Local government institutions (LGIs) are widely recognized as the cornerstone of democratic governance and sustainable local development. In Bangladesh, Union Parishads, Municipalities (Pourashavas), Upazila Parishads, Zila Parishads, and City Corporations play a vital role in delivering public services, promoting participatory governance, and fostering socio-economic development. Despite significant progress in decentralization, the financial autonomy of local governments remains limited due to excessive dependence on central government transfers and grants. The inadequate mobilization of own-source revenue (OSR) restricts the capacity of LGIs to finance infrastructure, maintain essential public services, and respond effectively to local development needs. This conceptual paper examines the relationship between strengthening local government institutions and improving own-source revenue mobilization in Bangladesh. Drawing upon theories of fiscal decentralization, public financial management, and good governance, the paper argues that sustainable local development requires financially autonomous local governments capable of generating, managing, and utilizing local revenues efficiently and transparently. The study identifies key institutional, legal, administrative, technological, and political constraints affecting local revenue collection while proposing policy options to enhance fiscal capacity. The paper further emphasizes that digital transformation, improved tax administration, citizen participation, institutional accountability, and fiscal transparency can significantly strengthen local revenue systems. Effective utilization of locally generated revenue not only improves service delivery but also reinforces public trust and democratic accountability. The findings contribute to the growing literature on decentralization and local public finance by providing a conceptual framework for strengthening local government finance in Bangladesh.
Niko Silitonga, Harya Widiputra, Fangky Antoneus Sorongan
Fiscal decentralization has been widely implemented to improve regional fiscal efficiency and strengthen local fiscal capacity. However, empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness remains inconclusive, particularly in developing countries with diverse institutional capacities. This study examines the associations between regional fiscal policy instruments and provincial fiscal performance in Indonesia, proxied by the growth of Locally Generated Revenue (PAD), while investigating the moderating role of fiscal decentralization. Unlike previous studies that examine fiscal instruments separately or focus mainly on macroeconomic outcomes, this research develops an integrated framework that evaluates financing allocation, development expenditure, transfer funds, and other legitimate revenues within a moderated panel-data model. Using panel data from 33 provincial governments during 2017–2024, the study applies a fixed-effects regression model with interaction terms. The results show that development expenditure is positively and significantly associated with provincial fiscal performance, indicating that productive public spending strengthens regional fiscal capacity. In contrast, financing allocation and transfer funds show no significant direct associations with fiscal performance. Other legitimate revenues demonstrate a positive but limited association. Fiscal decentralization plays a dual moderating role by strengthening the association between transfer funds and fiscal performance while weakening the effects of development expenditure and other legitimate revenues. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of fiscal decentralization depends on fiscal instruments and local institutional capacity rather than producing uniform outcomes. This study contributes to the fiscal decentralization literature by providing an interaction-based empirical framework and practical evidence to support more effective decentralization policies and improve provincial fiscal performance in Indonesia.
Purpose This study aims to examine whether fiscal autonomy improves capital expenditure efficiency in decentralized systems by addressing the overlooked possibility that its effects are nonlinear and context-dependent. Focusing on Ghana’s 261 Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies (MMDAs), the study investigates whether fiscal autonomy enhances efficiency uniformly or only beyond certain institutional thresholds. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a balanced panel data set from 2018 to 2024 to detect continuous nonlinear and regime-specific effects using fixed-effects estimation with a quadratic specification and threshold-based robustness analysis. The data were obtained from Ghana Audit Service-certified financial reports and Ghana Statistical Service demographic indicators. Findings Fiscal autonomy is associated with a U-shaped relationship with capital expenditure efficiency, although the nonlinear effect is modest and only weakly statistically supported. At low levels of autonomy, increases in internally generated funds are associated with lower capital expenditure shares, while beyond an estimated threshold of approximately 37% of total revenue, the relationship becomes positive. Intergovernmental transfers complement local fiscal capacity, whereas population density and urban classification are not significant predictors in the regression models. Practical implications The findings indicate gradual capacity-sensitive decentralization strategies. Enhanced fiscal autonomy in the absence of institutional development may reduce expenditure efficiency. Policymakers should prioritize administrative capacity, revenue systems and accountability before increasing budgetary discretion. Originality/value This study provides panel-based evidence consistent with a U-shaped fiscal autonomy–efficiency relationship in African local governments. By highlighting threshold effects and institutional conditioning, it advances fiscal decentralization research and contributes to the application of nonlinear modeling in public finance.
Although local public finance regulation has received substantial attention within fiscal decentralization and public financial management research, comparative analyses of its institutional configuration as an integrated regulatory regime remain limited. This study aims to examine the institutional design of local public finance regulation across European countries, analyze how regulatory standards, supervisory institutions, monitoring mechanisms, and enforcement instruments interact to strengthen regional governance, and formulate policy implications for Indonesia’s fiscal decentralization reforms. A qualitative comparative government design was employed through a systematic literature review. The study analyzed documentary evidence from 21 European countries purposively selected from Local Public Finance: An International Comparative Regulatory Perspective (2021), supplemented by Eurostat Government Finance Statistics, the European Commission Fiscal Rules Database, and the OECD Tax Autonomy Database. Data were examined using qualitative content analysis involving coding, categorization, cross-country comparison, and thematic interpretation. The findings indicate that effective local public finance regulation depends not merely on the presence of numerical fiscal rules but on the institutional integration of regulatory standards, supervisory bodies, monitoring mechanisms, and enforcement arrangements within coherent governance systems. Regulatory configurations also vary according to constitutional structures, administrative traditions, and fiscal decentralization models, resulting in diverse approaches to maintaining fiscal sustainability and regional accountability. The study concludes that effective regional financial governance requires balanced institutional arrangements that combine local fiscal autonomy with robust oversight, transparency, accountability, and regulatory coordination. These findings contribute to the literature on regulatory governance, comparative government, and fiscal federalism by conceptualizing local public finance regulation as an integrated governance regime rather than a collection of isolated fiscal controls. They also provide practical implications for Indonesia by emphasizing the need to strengthen supervisory capacity, fiscal transparency, enforcement consistency, and intergovernmental regulatory coordination in local financial governance.
Open access
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Sustainability, Governance, and Employment Studies
Aleksandar Stojkov, A. Maksimovska Stojkova, Elena Neshovska Kjoseva, Jovan Zafiroski
This study investigates how a territorially uneven distribution of informal economic activity affects subnational fiscal capacity and potentially distorts fiscal equalization systems. Using a Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model, we estimate the size of the informal economy across the eight statistical regions of North Macedonia over the 2008–2023 period. The estimated shares of regional informality are subsequently linked to indicators of fiscal dependence and local revenue performance. The findings suggest that regions characterized by larger informal economies tend to exhibit greater dependence on intergovernmental transfers and weaker effective fiscal autonomy. The analysis further indicates that intergovernmental transfer systems relying primarily on regional gross domestic product and realized tax collections may systematically underestimate the true economic potential of highly informal jurisdictions. The paper contributes to the literature by conceptualizing informality not merely as an informal economic activity, but as a structural distortion affecting the measurement of fiscal capacity and the functioning of decentralized public finance systems.
Mark Gerald Ruiz, Ramona Maria Miral, John Paolo Rivera
This paper examines the fiscal impacts of climate-related events in the Philippines and proposes policy measures to build a climate-resilient economy. Through cross-sectional analysis, it finds that the fiscal resilience of local government units (LGUs) is influenced by their dependence on external revenues, the availability of preallocated funds, and the severity of disasters. The results underscore the need for region-specific fiscal strategies that diverge from conventional frameworks, given the country’s decentralized disaster management system and the pivotal role of local institutions. The study recommends establishing a dedicated climate resilience fund, adopting climate-responsive budgeting, strengthening risk transfer mechanisms, incentivizing green investments, and enhancing LGU capacity to manage adaptation financing. Additionally, investments in climate research, data-driven governance, and public awareness are essential. Aligning climate finance with long-term development goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development would integrate resilience into national planning, enabling the Philippines to better withstand climate risk while promoting sustainable growth and fiscal stability.
Setyo Tri Wahyudi, Al Muizzuddin Fazaalloh, Kartika Sari, Amalia Rahmawati
Fiscal decentralization has expanded the responsibilities of local governments, yet substantial disparities in fiscal performance persist across jurisdictions. This study examines how governance capacity influences fiscal performance and revenue sustainability within Indonesia’s decentralized metropolitan governance framework. Using panel data from seven local governments in the Gerbangkertosusilo metropolitan area during 2015–2024, the analysis develops a Composite Fiscal Performance Index (CFPI) that integrates revenue effectiveness, expenditure efficiency, fiscal autonomy, and revenue sustainability. The results reveal significant and persistent variation in fiscal outcomes. Jurisdictions with stronger governance capacity, particularly Surabaya City and Sidoarjo Regency, consistently achieve higher CFPI scores, reflecting more effective revenue mobilization, greater fiscal autonomy, and stronger expenditure management. In contrast, lower-capacity jurisdictions exhibit weaker fiscal performance, slower growth in own-source revenues, and greater dependence on intergovernmental transfers. Revenue forecasting further indicates that high-performing jurisdictions are more likely to sustain favorable fiscal trajectories over the medium term. By combining multidimensional fiscal performance measurement with forward-looking revenue sustainability assessment, this study contributes to the subnational public finance literature. The findings identify governance capacity as a critical institutional determinant of fiscal resilience and highlight the need for capacity-sensitive policies to improve the effectiveness of decentralized governance systems.
ABSTRACT A long‐standing topic of concern in the literature on governmental auditing is whether the aims of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) or other central audit institutions should include detecting fraudulent use of public money. The balance of opinion has been against this proposition, largely for reasons of infeasibility. This article takes up the same topic, but in policy contexts appropriate to this special issue, namely, where federally financed health, education, and infrastructure programs are implemented through program spending and delivery by local governments. Such policy contexts heighten the need for a capability to prevent and prosecute cases involving the fraudulent use of public money. This need, recognized within Brazil's federal executive since the early 2000s, has been addressed by its Office of the Comptroller General (Controladoria‐Geral da União—CGU) through systematic field audits of municipal implementation coupled with strategic collaboration with the Federal Police. This article examines CGU's integrated audit‐investigation approach and its policy and institutional contexts. By explaining how these strategies have functioned in attaining operational capacity and support, the article provides evidence on possibilities of how audit institution strategies aiming to detect fraudulent use of public money can be feasible within decentralized governance systems that call for innovative vertical coordination mechanisms.
The article examines the distribution and use of budgetary resources across different levels of governments in post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Ukraine. The relevance of the study derives from the need to assess fiscal decentralization models in the context of institutional transformation and current challenges, including those related to wartime conditions. The analysis focuses on the relationship between the institutional structure of subnational governance, the degree of fragmentation of local communities, and the patterns of budgetary resource allocation. Particular attention is given to the comparative assessment of revenue and expenditure structures, with an emphasis on ensuring cross-country comparability by excluding social security funds from the general government sector. The results indicate that most post-socialist countries have a centralized pattern of revenue formation combined with a relatively decentralized execution of public expenditures. This configuration gives rise to an asymmetry between the sources of financial resources and the responsibilities for their use. It is argued that this asymmetry represents a structural feature of intergovernmental relations and constrains the financial autonomy of local governments. The analysis also shows that more fragmented municipal systems are associated with higher levels of revenue centralization and stronger dependence on intergovernmental transfers, whereas larger territorial communities tend to provide a more stable basis for local fiscal capacity. In the case of Ukraine, a dual trend is observed. On the one hand, decentralization reforms have strengthened the financial capacity of local communities; on the other hand, wartime conditions have led to a temporary re-centralization of financial resources and an expanded role of the central government in financing priority expenditures. The findings may be used to improve the allocation of budgetary resources and to achieve a better alignment between revenue assignment and expenditure responsibilities, particularly in the context of post-war recovery.
We examine whether China’s 2014 local government debt-swap program, intended to centralize fiscal control and eliminate off-budget borrowing, paradoxically reinforced subnational fiscal autonomy through implicit fiscal decentralization. Exploiting cross-sectional variation in debt levels identified by the 2013 national audit and employing a difference-in-differences design, we examine how the programme affected infrastructure-related land supply and local financing behaviour. We find that the debt-swap programme significantly increased the supply area of infrastructure land while exerting little effect on land prices, consistent with a supply-side expansion rather than demand shocks. Mechanism analyses show that the programme alleviated repayment pressure and facilitated renewed borrowing through local government financing vehicles, thereby expanding local indebtedness despite the central government’s objective of curbing it. In contrast, we find only limited improvements in expenditure efficiency, fiscal revenue, and GDP. Overall, these findings suggest that the debt-swap programme primarily reshaped intertemporal fiscal constraints rather than imposing durable fiscal discipline. More broadly, the results highlight an institutional paradox of recentralization: policies aimed at constraining subnational borrowing may unintentionally expand local fiscal capacity through alternative channels, thereby reinforcing implicit fiscal decentralization.
This study aims to analyze and synthesize prior research on navigating human resource capacity and accountability challenges in decentralized public finance through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The review focuses on how human resource capacity, fiscal autonomy, digital governance, and accountability mechanisms interact in shaping the effectiveness of decentralized public financial management. The SLR method was employed because it allows a structured and transparent synthesis of previous findings, identifies recurring patterns, and clarifies inconsistencies across studies. Literature was searched through the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), covering publications from 2022 to 2026, using combinations of keywords related to fiscal decentralization, human resource capacity, accountability, transparency, local government finance, and public financial management. The initial search identified 63 records, which were then screened based on title relevance, abstract suitability, research focus, publication year, full-text availability, and substantive alignment with the topic. After the selection process, 11 articles were retained for final review and analyzed through descriptive-qualitative synthesis. The findings indicate that decentralized public finance becomes more effective when supported by competent human resources, merit-based administration, strong internal control, adequate digital systems, and meaningful citizen participation. In contrast, weak technical capacity, fiscal dependence, fragmented institutions, and limited managerial autonomy repeatedly hinder accountability outcomes. This review contributes to the literature by reinforcing the capacity–accountability linkage as a central explanatory framework and by offering practical insight for policymakers and public administrators seeking to strengthen local fiscal governance in decentralized settings.
Citra Fadhilah Utami, Arum Ira Nadhira, Clarisa Rofiati, Della Affesia Putri
Urban infrastructure financing in Indonesia faces a structural funding gap alongside rising subnational fiscal risk under decentralization. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis framework to allocate loans across 50 priority cities in the 2025–2029 National Development Plan. The framework integrated fiscal capacity, debt sustainability, institutional readiness, public investment productivity, and spatial role into three composite indices, namely Soft Gate, Impact, and Priority. Using a weighted additive framework with percentile-based screening, cities were classified into Loan Priority, Blended, Grant, and Selective categories. The results showed that 28 percent qualified as Loan Priority, while 24 percent require blended mechanisms due to fiscal-impact mismatch. In conclusion, the framework enhances fiscal discipline and transparency in subnational borrowing decisions.
Abstract How does existing research explain India’s public service delivery challenges? This chapter provides an overview of how political economists and state capacity scholars have made sense of India’s governance problems, including a politicized bureaucracy, an overburdened administration, corruption, underwhelming monitoring and accountability structures, and poor decentralization. We argue that both the political economy and state capacity literature do not recognize the role of public financial management in fuelling many common problems. At the same time, literature on public finance is limiting because it fails to link fund flows to effective public service delivery. We bridge these varying streams of literature by explaining how the government’s expenditure capacity is critical for policy implementation.
Abstract Given the complexity of an on-demand architecture for public financial management (PFM), how can governments effectively implement these changes? This chapter outlines four approaches that can enable changes in a decentralized manner, without forcing them from the top down. One, any changes to PFM must align with the incentives of individuals in the system. Two, the system should be modified with agile development in mind, using adaptive planning, fast delivery, constant learning and improvement, and rapid response to change. Three, asynchronous onboarding, or the idea that stakeholders can adopt and integrate with the overall PFM system in their own time, can make sure these changes work within India’s complex federal structure. Four and relatedly, we discuss how changes in PFM can be undertaken within the existing institutional structure. By following these approaches, governments can navigate the complexities of changes in architecture of PFM while fostering sustainable and scalable improvements in public service delivery.
Chapter 5 focuses on Ghana, one of Africa’s most institutionalized democracies, and contrasts its relatively balanced allocation of development finance with the regional favoritism observed in Zambia. Ghana’s stable two-party system – dominated by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) – is characterized by cross-ethnic coalitions. While the NDC has traditionally drawn support from the Volta region and the Muslim North, and the NPP from the Akan-dominated Ashanti region, ethnic fragmentation has encouraged both parties to target swing regions through strategic resource allocation. Ghana’s political landscape is shaped by a commitment to ethno-regional balance in leadership and efforts to institutionalize regional equity, which curtail ethnic favoritism. Decentralization and broad-based representation further incentivize parties to compete in swing constituencies. Despite ongoing challenges such as rent-seeking and rising debt, Ghana’s independent institutions and vibrant civil society help constrain ethnic favoritism – offering a stark contrast to Zambia’s declining accountability during its democratic transition.
By 2026, India's urban transition is no longer a gradual demographic shift it has become the central axis of national economic stability. Cities are now the primary engines of growth, employment, and productivity. Yet the financial architecture that supports them remains structurally weak. The 16th Finance Commission (2026–2031), chaired by Arvind Panagariya, faces a defining challenge: redesigning fiscal federalism at a moment when urban India is expanding faster than its capacity to finance itself. Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) stand at the heart of this tension. Although cities contribute a growing share to India's GDP, their financial autonomy remains constrained. The combined budget of India's 4,500+ ULBs amounts to roughly 1.3% of GDP, while their own-source revenue (OSR) generation is only about 0.6%. This gap reflects a deeper structural imbalance between expenditure responsibilities and revenue-raising powers. The weakness is most evident in property taxation the cornerstone of municipal finance worldwide. In India, property tax collections hover around 0.2% of GDP. In comparison, the OECD average stands at 1.08%, while countries like the United Kingdom (3.11%) and Canada (3.05%) demonstrate the fiscal potential of robust property tax systems. India's "property paradox" is rooted in valuation gaps, outdated rent control regimes, and extensive exemptions. Despite rising real estate values, tax realization remains minimal. At the same time, climate change has moved from a distant threat to a measurable economic variable. Heatwaves, floods, and water stress now erode an estimated 4–6% of GDP annually through productivity losses and infrastructure damage. In this context, fiscal reform must evolve into what can be called "Green Federalism" a framework that embeds climate performance within intergovernmental transfers. With the operationalization of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency-led Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, alongside the sovereign AI initiative BharatGen, Ind...
This study explores the current landscape of fiscal decentralization in India, with particular attention tothe financial structure and functioning of rural and urban local government bodies. It investigates thecomposition and trends of own-source revenues versus intergovernmental transfers, the extent of fiscalautonomy enjoyed by local institutions, and the institutional and policy challenges that hinder effectivedevolution of financial powers. Drawing upon secondary data, government reports, and existing scholarlyresearch, the paper analyses persistent vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances, variations across states, andthe implications of limited fiscal capacity on local governance and service delivery. Furthermore, the studyidentifies critical policy gaps, administrative bottlenecks, and capacity constraints that undermine the objectivesof decentralized governance. It concludes by proposing strategic reforms to strengthen fiscal empowerment,improve transparency and accountability, and enhance the overall effectiveness of India’s multi-tiered fiscalframework
C J Noorjahan, Ms. Saranya Durga K, Mrs. Ruth Rebecca R
This paper discusses the Union-to-State tax devolution in India during the years 2015 to 2024, which is constructed based on the proposals of the 14th Finance Commission and the 15th Finance Commission. It provides the vertical fiscal imbalance that persists in India, with the Union dominating the significant sources of revenue and the horizontal imbalance between the States with varying capabilities and needs. Based on secondary data in budget documents, Finance Commission reports, and Reserve Bank publications, the study runs both descriptive analysis and chi-square tests in determining the stability and equity of tax transfers. The research results indicate that tax devolution has been inequitable and fluctuating. Big States like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh got the maximum shares, with little going to the smaller States like Goa, Sikkim, and Mizoram. Arunachal Pradesh was a small state because of its strategic and geographical location. This was proven right by statistical tests, which means that State size had a significant effect on levels of allocation. The general trend also showed instability, whereby devolution reached its highest point in 2015-16 and was very low in other years, and this makes it hard for the States to plan their finances. Though the share of taxes to the States was raised by the 14th Finance Commission, subsequent changes in the 15th Finance Commission led to average transfers to many States, strengthening inequalities. The research concludes that the existing devolution system still favours the bigger States and proposes a more transparent, equitable and need-based system to reinforce fiscal decentralisation and create a balanced regional development.
Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractThe Russian invasion of Ukraine has reshaped the functioning of local budgets, creating fiscal challenges for municipalities while simultaneously testing the resilience of the decentralization reform launched in the pre-war period. This study examines the dynamics of local public finance in Ukraine during wartime (2022–2024), focusing on revenue fluctuations, expenditure restructuring, and the emerging role of participatory budgeting as an adaptive tool for community engagement. Using official data from the Ministry of Finance, the State Statistics Service, and the Open Budget Portal, the analysis compares fiscal indicators before and during the full-scale war. Case studies of selected municipalities highlight divergent strategies between frontline and rear communities in balancing defense-related needs, social support for internally displaced persons, and development priorities. Despite reduced revenues and rising security expenditures, local budgets remained stable, largely due to the decentralization framework. In addition to domestic revenues, local budgets increasingly relied on external inflows: international grants, loans, and non-repayable donor assistance. These instruments served as a critical buffer that compensated for the wartime decline in municipal revenues and stabilized key public services. We further examined how these external resources shaped the fiscal resilience of Ukrainian municipalities under wartime conditions. Moreover, participatory budgeting, though often suspended, proved to be a potential mechanism for maintaining public trust and civic involvement under crisis conditions. The study argues that “wartime participatory budgeting” represents a novel phenomenon with implications for both crisis governance and post-war reconstruction.
Dobrotă Gabriela, DAN NICOLETA, BUTĂNESCU-VOLANIN REMUS-CONSTANTIN
Public finance sustainability represents a fundamental pillar of macroeconomic stability and a key determinant of the ability of states and local communities to cope with major economic shocks. Against the backdrop of successive crises over the past two decades—financial, health-related, and geopolitical—the relationship between fiscal sustainability and community resilience has gained increasing attention in both economic scholarship and European institutional debates. The aim of this article is to examine the linkage between fiscal sustainability and the resilience of local communities through an integrated approach that combines cross-country analysis at the European Union level with an in-depth assessment of Romania’s experience. The study relies on Eurostat data covering the period 2015 2023 and focuses on fiscal indicators, the degree of fiscal decentralization, and the capacity of local communities to translate public resources into economic and institutional resilience. The methodological framework includes descriptive and comparative analysis, alongside the construction of a composite Community Resilience Index. The empirical findings reveal substantial disparities across EU Member States and indicate that fiscal sustainability, when accompanied by functional fiscal decentralization and strategically oriented public investment, is associated with higher levels of community resilience. In the case of Romania, the gap between a relatively moderate level of public debt and comparatively low community resilience is largely explained by limited local fiscal autonomy and persistent institutional constraints.