This poster aims to increase public awareness and understanding of Minister of Finance Regulation Number 50 of 2025. It presents key information regarding the taxation of cryptocurrency transactions in Indonesia, including Value Added Tax (VAT), Final Income Tax Article 22, applicable tax rates, and tax obligations for crypto transactions. The poster is designed to communicate taxation information accessible for global audience. This work was developed as part of a collaborative educational program between the Diploma III of Taxation, University of Lampung and Scientia Hall.
Emerging economies collect substantially less tax revenue relative to national income than advanced economies, and a large share of this shortfall reflects weak enforcement capacity rather than statutory rates. Digital audio technologies and integrated financial information systems are increasingly promoted as instruments for narrowing this gap, yet the evidence on whether, when, and how they raise compliance and transparency remains scattered across public economics, accounting, and information systems scholarship. This review synthesises empirical and conceptual work published between 2006 and 2026 to assess what is known about four interlocking mechanisms: third party information reporting and electronic invoicing, electronic filing and payment platforms, continuous auditing and analytics, and distributed ledger and regulatory technology approaches to data governance. Three consistent patterns emerge. First, technologies that create verifiable third-party information trails produce the most durable compliance gains, with value added tax self-enforcement, electronic sales registers, and consumer incentive schemes generating measurable revenue increases, while technologies that merely digitise existing processes without new information yield smaller and more fragile effects. Second, the revenue and transparency return to digital systems are conditional on administrative capacity, data quality, and political commitment rather than automatic, which explains why similar tools succeed in some jurisdictions and fail in others. Third, the accounting profession is moving from periodic sampling toward continuous assurance and population level analytics, but adoption in emerging economies lags because of skills, infrastructure, and governance constraints. These findings suggest that the design and sequencing of digital reforms matter more than the sophistication of the technology itself. The review offers tax administrators and policymakers evidence graded account of which interventions rest on strong causal evidence and which rest on weaker conceptual or cross sectional foundations, and it identifies the conditions under which digital instruments translate into sustained fiscal gains rather than symbolic modernization.
Italy introduced a dedicated crypto-asset tax regime in 2023 that is broadly modelled on its longstanding financial income tax system. The regime primarily governs the taxation of capital gains and other income from crypto-assets for individuals, thereby offering initial legal certainty for users and service providers. However, it establishes a single set of rules for all crypto-assets regardless of their functions or underlying rights and leaves several stages of the crypto-asset lifecycle and many asset-specific tax issues insufficiently addressed. This article analyses the regimeâs core design features through the lenses of efficiency and equity and assesses the frameworkâs âfuture-proofâ capacity in light of rapid technological change with specific attention focused on decentralized finance (DeFi), asset-tokenization, stablecoins, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Finally, it examines enforcement challenges and shows how reliance on the traditional âthird party tax agentâ model struggles to accommodate the anonymity (or pseudo-anonymity), decentralization, transaction-composability, and a-territoriality of crypto-assets. Against this background, the article identifies potential policy adjustments and alternative compliance mechanisms to enhance the effectiveness and resilience of the Italian framework.
Anas Azenzoul, Nacer MAHOUAT, Ouissale El Gharbaoui, Jihane Tayazime ¡ 6 authors
Tax systems worldwide face a compliance gap that OECD data places at USD 100â240 billion annually in corporate avoidance alone, before accounting for the shadow economy and crypto-asset transactions. FinTech mandatory e-invoicing, real-time transaction matching, and machine-learning audit selection is narrowing the informational conditions that enable evasion, while simultaneously introducing governance risks: opaque algorithmic audit targeting, contested blockchain forensic evidence, and the surveillance potential of programmable money. This article presents a PRISMA 2020 systematic literature review of 59 peer-reviewed articles (Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect), complemented by IRAMUTEQ lexicometric analysis and an extension of the Allingham Sandmo compliance model to incorporate algorithmic detection probabilities, bomb-crater belief dynamics, and Zero-Knowledge Proof verification. Four thematic clusters emerge: tax compliance behaviour and FinTech adoption (19.92%), digital transformation and corporate performance (35.34%), bibliometric and emerging-technology research (16.54%), and cryptocurrency markets and regulatory challenges (28.20%). Across them, FinTech reduces evasion where institutional and technical conditions allow but generates distributional, evidentiary, and constitutional risks that existing legal frameworks have yet to resolve. In response, we propose the Techno-Legal Due Process Framework (TLDPF) three pillars (Techno-Proportionality, Cryptographic Burden of Proof, and Algorithmic Constitutionalism) grounded in EU/OECD constitutional doctrine as a normative design proposal awaiting empirical validation.
Putri Anggia, Aisyah Ajeng Putri Riyanto, Muhammad Fathi
The rapid growth of cryptocurrencies is reshaping the global financial landscape, challenging traditional systems of taxation and regulation. This article examines the complex interplay between cryptocurrency anonymity, legal frameworks, and the pursuit of international tax justice. Using normative legal research with a descriptive approach, this article examined the challenges posed by cryptocurrency adoption in taxation policies. The findings revealed that while blockchain technology enhances transparency and decentralisation, the anonymity features of digital assets create risks of tax evasion and illicit financial flows. Addressing these issues requires integrated efforts among international regulatory frameworks, such as the OECD's CARF and FATF's Travel Rule alongside domestic reforms like Indonesia's HPP Law and the EU's DAC8. Inclusive governance that empowers developing countries and the constitutional grounding of tax justice principles are essential to strike a balance between individual privacy and collective fiscal responsibility. This multi-layered approach is critical to ensuring cryptocurrencies serve as instruments of innovation rather than tools for inequality. Future research should focus on empirical assessments of compliance costs, enforcement effectiveness across borders, and the development of privacy-preserving technologies, such as zero-knowledge proofs, to enable proportional and fair regulation globally.
The growth of digital assets such as cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), stablecoins, and decentralized finance (DeFi) has changed the global financial system. These assets operate on blockchain technology and allow users to transfer value without traditional intermediaries such as banks. While this innovation has created new economic opportunities, it has also created challenges for existing tax laws. Traditional tax systems were designed for physical assets and transactions that occur within clear geographical boundaries. However, digital assets are decentralized, borderless, and often pseudonymous, which makes it difficult for governments to classify, track, and tax them effectively. This paper studies how different countries tax digital assets through a comparative legal analysis of six jurisdictions: the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, India, Japan, and Singapore. It examines how each jurisdiction classifies digital assets and how taxes such as income tax, capital gains tax, and indirect taxes are applied to digital asset transactions. The analysis shows that countries follow different approaches. Some countries treat cryptocurrencies as property and apply capital gains tax, while others focus on the economic use of the asset. India has introduced a strict tax regime with a flat tax rate and transaction-level withholding requirements. The study identifies key issues in the current global system, including inconsistent classification of digital assets, difficulties in valuation and record-keeping, regulatory arbitrage, and enforcement challenges. To address these issues, the paper suggests the need for international cooperation, clearer legal definitions, and technology-neutral tax policies. A coordinated global framework can improve compliance while supporting innovation in the digital economy. Keywords: 1. Digital Assets 2. Crypto-Currency Taxation 3. Blockchain Regulation 4.Comparative-Tax Law 5. Global Tax Policy
This article examines the utilization of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) as a mechanism to address import customs tax evasion. The research employs a game-theoretic framework to examine the dynamics of tax evasion and assess the impact of blockchain on improving transparency, accountability, and compliance in customs administration. A systematic literature review process, adhering to PRISMA criteria, was utilized to gather and examine pertinent academic articles. The literature study examines critical subjects, such as the mechanisms of import tax evasion, the digital taxation framework, and the use of blockchain technology into tax systems. The study also examines the relevance of game theory in comprehending and addressing non-compliant behaviors among taxpayers. In the practical phase, we conducted a systematic review of a corpus exceeding 100 publications, obtained from three international research databases: Scopus, Taylor & Francis, and IEEE Xplore. Following the application of rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria to guarantee relevance, a concentrated selection of research constituted the foundation for our study. This research underscores the capacity of DLT to transform conventional evasion tactics, reduce corruption, and improve institutional efficacy in customs operations. Insights are contextualized through a worldwide comparison and an examination of the Moroccan customs scene, offering concrete recommendations for utilizing blockchain to modernize customs operations.
This article examines how accounting standards shape the taxation of cryptoassets, focusing on key differences under the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), and selected offshore jurisdictions. Fragmented accounting and tax frameworks create substantial obstacles to cross-border compliance despite their growing economic significance. The article draws on a comparative regulatory analysis and corporate case studies (MicroStrategy, Coinbase, and Tesla) and identifies three persistent frictions at the book-tax interface. First, classification friction arises because jurisdictions treat the same asset as intangible property, a financial instrument, or a commodity thereby creating uncertainty for fiat-backed stablecoins and security-like tokens. Second, timing friction stems from mismatches between accrual-based financial reporting and realization-based tax rules especially for staking rewards, crypto lending, decentralized finance (DeFi), and derivatives. Third, valuation friction reflects tension between historical cost and fair value compounded by volatility and fragmented liquidity which disproportionately affects complex instruments and international structures. The article proposes the tax-accounting alignment framework (TAAF) as a conceptual roadmap to address these challenges. It prioritizes economic substance over legal form using functional classification, blockchain finality as an objective recognition trigger and adaptive valuation thresholds. The framework illustrates how these principles can simplify compliance and enhance tax transparency in cross-border and arbitrage-sensitive settings.
Bitcoinâs sixteenth anniversary in 2025 provides an important juncture to reflect on how tax law has responded to the emergence of crypto assets. Initially hailed as âthe monetary experiment of our timeâ, Bitcoin and its successors have challenged fundamental tax concepts and exposed divergences in domestic and international tax systems. This article first revisits the debate on whether crypto assets should be characterized as âmoneyâ, demonstrating that classification matters only to the extent that tax consequences diverge across regimes. It then examines four unresolved issues that continue to occupy scholars and policymakers: the characterization of mining rewards as entrepreneurial income or windfall gains; the treatment of staking rewards as active or passive income; the tax consequences of blockchain hard forks; and the classification of collateral use of crypto assets in decentralized finance. Each issue reveals tensions between traditional tax analogies and the novel features of blockchain-based activities, highlighting trade-offs between theoretical purity and administrability. While global convergence is unlikely due to foundational differences in tax systems, the analysis underscores the importance of clarity, consistency, and functional approaches to ensure that taxation keeps pace with technological innovation.
The paper investigates tax risks arising in the taxation of cryptocurrency transactions in Ukraine and in the broader international context. It substantiates that the absence of a unified legal qualification of cryptocurrencies significantly complicates the identification of the taxable object, the determination of the tax base, and the establishment of the moment at which tax liabilities arise. The paper highlights key challenges associated with the high volatility of digital assets, the insufficient transparency of transaction recording mechanisms, the complexity of verifying the origin of crypto assets, and the increased risks of tax evasion. Particular attention is devoted to the transnational nature of cryptocurrency circulation, which creates favorable conditions for tax arbitrage, regulatory fragmentation, and manipulation of tax residency. These phenomena weaken the effectiveness of national tax systems and generate additional threats to fiscal stability. It is argued that existing regulatory approaches in many jurisdictions remain fragmented and inadequately adapted to the specific features of decentralized digital technologies. The paper identifies priority directions for mitigating tax risks, including the harmonization of national legislation with international standards, the development of a coherent and unified model for the taxation of digital assets, the improvement of financial monitoring mechanisms, and the enhancement of transparency in cryptocurrency-related transactions. The paper concludes that only a systematic, balanced, and coordinated approach to the legal regulation of the cryptocurrency market is capable of ensuring tax certainty, strengthening compliance, and reducing risks both for the state and for market participants.
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, DAC8, and the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework together form an emerging normative ecosystem meant to bring crypto-asset activity within the reach of tax authorities. This study asks whether that ecosystem affords a coherent and complete framework for the international taxation of crypto-assets, or whether the heterogeneity of classifications between financial-market law and tax law perpetuates the conditions for an incomplete taxation that procedural transparency cannot, on its own, remedy. The study proceeds in two parts. Part I analyses the transparency framework. Its definitions are settled, but its reach is not: DAC8 and CARF render transactions visible only where a reporting intermediary exists, which places decentralised finance and self-custody outside the system altogether. Part II asks what becomes of the information once it has been reported. Comparing the substantive tax treatment of staking, mining, airdrops, non-fungible tokens, stablecoins and decentralised-finance income across the principal jurisdictions, it finds that visibility does not in itself produce taxation, because states do not qualify what they see in the same way. Beneath the divergence, the study identifies an uncoordinated drift toward functional treatment. It argues that hard substantive harmonisation is foreclosed in practice, globally for want of any authority empowered to impose it and within the European Union for want of the unanimity that direct taxation requires. What remains available is coordination rather than harmonisation: the neutralisation of cross-border mismatches on the model of the linking rules developed against hybrid mismatches, a technique that leaves each state in possession of its own classification. The central finding of the study is structural. The absence of an identifiable counterparty constrains transparency, substantive qualification, and any coordinated remedy alike, so that the framework is coherent across the intermediated crypto economy and structurally incomplete beyond it. The same limit that arises from the architecture of the technology arises, for reasons of its own, from the consent-based architecture of the international legal order, and together they mark the boundary within which the international taxation of crypto-assets can be made to work.
Andreas KOLYDAS, Stamatis Kontsas, Stavros Kalogiannidis
The research aims to find out how cryptocurrency aids tax evasion in Greece, the socio-economic factors contributing to the practice, and the efficiency of the Greek taxation legislation in deterring such conduct. A total of 359 questionnaires were completed by respondents who engage in cryptocurrencies in Greece. Cross correlational statistical analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to test the relationship of cryptocurrency usage, anonymity, tax policies and socio-economic factors and their impact on tax evasion. Also, sociodemographic factors such as income levels and education levels greatly affected the ability to engage in tax evasion. The study provides a validation that the frequency of cryptocurrency usage, anonymity, ineffectual tax laws, socio-economic factors have a positive correlation with tax evasion rates and influence tax dodging in Greece. Based on the issues highlighted in this study, the following steps are advised for the improvement of the Greek anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism regime: i) improve the regulation and enforcement measures concerning cryptocurrencies, ii) enhance the transparency of the cryptocurrency transactions, and iii) address the socio-economic circumstances that enable tax evasion.
Rosario Violeta Grijalva Salazar, Jose Antonio Caicedo-Mendoza, Arturo Jaime Zuùiga Castillo, Erikson Olivas-Valencia ¡ 5 authors
Taxation on cryptocurrency is becoming critical in global fiscal governance as digital assets adapt to the modern reality of existing outside of traditional regulatory constructs. Theoretical and practical understanding of cryptocurrency taxation is quite new, and so a systematic review was designed to present the most recent empirical research evidence on the legal, fiscal and behavioral aspects of cryptocurrency taxation from across the globe. Using the PRISMA-2020 guidelines, a structured search was applied to the Scopus database on 21 May 2025, with the search terms âcrypto-currencyâ, âcryptoassetâ and âtaxation.â The inclusion criteria consisted of original research articles published between the years of 2020 and 2025 in English or Spanish, that could be accessed via institutional library support, and that were related to taxation, legal regulation and/or compliance. Out of the original identified 224 records, 36 met the eligibility criteria after screening and verification through seven different stages of review. Socially, five themes were produced by the findings: legal ambiguity surrounding fiscal treatment, limited tax literacy and compliance issues, macroeconomic and monetary issues, application of digital technologies for fiscal tracking, and environmental repercussions from crypto mining. Many countries do not have any coherent tax frameworks to govern the risk that emerges from cryptocurrency taxation, creating uncertainty for both regulators and investors. The findings outlined in this systematic review point to the urgent need for creating a coherent approach to cryptocurrency taxation based on definitions, digital approaches to traceability, and tax literacy compliance strategies. In order to create effective cryptocurrency taxation, there must be a base balance between ensuring innovation, fiscal responsibility, transparency, equity and sustainability in the developing digital economy.
The article presents an in-depth analysis of international approaches to the taxation of virtual assets, covering cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance instruments, non-fungible tokens, airdrops, and hard forks. The research is based on a comparative study of tax regimes in the United States, Germany, Switzerland, Estonia, Singapore, Portugal, and Australia. The analysis addresses differences in legal definitions, rules of income and capital gains taxation, valuation methods, and the application of value-added or goods and services tax. Attention is paid to compliance mechanisms and administrative practices that influence taxpayer behavior and shape levels of adoption. To complement the legal comparison, the study incorporates empirical data from the Global Crypto Adoption Index, allowing for an evaluation of the link between regulatory clarity, tax burden, and the spread of digital assets in different countries. A special focus is placed on Ukraine, which has legally recognized virtual assets through the Law âOn Virtual Assetsâ while awaiting the implementation of Draft Law No. 10225-Đ´ to introduce taxation rules. These reforms are assessed in the context of international standards developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the Financial Action Task Force, and the European Union. The article emphasizes the risks associated with gaps between formal legislative alignment and actual enforcement capacity in transition economies. Excessive or unclear taxation is shown to contribute to capital outflow, informal practices, and regulatory arbitrage. The article further explores underregulated areas such as staking, token swaps, and the creation and trade of non-fungible tokens. It argues that updated tax guidance and coordinated cross-border measures are necessary to provide legal certainty and prevent systemic risks. The role of blockchain analytics, identity verification, and international information-exchange regimes is highlighted as a foundation for more effective oversight. The novelty of the study lies in combining doctrinal legal analysis with fiscal assessment and comparative empirical indicators, which makes it possible to identify both universal patterns and national specificities. The conclusions stress that sustainable taxation of virtual assets requires transparent, balanced, and enforceable rules supported by international coordination. Such an approach not only ensures stable public revenues but also fosters responsible financial innovation and strengthens the integration of Ukraine into the global digital economy.
We investigate how transparencyâcrypto exchanges' verification of trader identities through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and their transmission of trader and transaction data to tax authoritiesâshapes the effectiveness of tax policies in cryptocurrency markets. Using regulatory events and cross-exchange price variation, we provide initial global evidence that transparency amplifies the capitalization of statutory crypto-tax liabilities into prices. In the United States, Bitcoin prices on exchanges subject to new tax reporting obligations fall by an average of 0.34 % following announcements that raise expectations of information transmission, even without changes in statutory tax liabilities. Across jurisdictions, price declines are significantly larger where reporting systems are more transparent, and in cross-sectional analysis, exchanges that both enforce KYC and transmit information show the strongest price sensitivity to local tax liabilities, particularly where capital controls constrain arbitrage. These findings reveal a transparencyâprivacy trade-off unique to crypto markets and demonstrate how digital assets provide rare opportunities to test classic tax-capitalization theories under conditions of anonymity and regulatory heterogeneity, with implications for the design of effective tax policies.
Zusammenfassung Mit der Entscheidung des FG Niedersachsen liegt erstmals eine deutsche Finanzgerichtsentscheidung zur umsatzsteuerrechtlichen Behandlung von NFTs (Non-Fungible-Token) in Form von digitalen Bilddateien vor. Dies ist insofern zu begrĂźĂen, weil die umsatzsteuerrechtliche Behandlung von NFTs vielfältige Rechtsfragen aufwirft. Zwar nimmt das Sekretariat des Mehrwertsteuerausschusses in einem Arbeitspaper vom 21.2.2023 zu vielfältigen Rechtsfragen unverbindlich Stellung (Working Paper No. 1060, taxud.c.1(2023)1930643 - EN). Allerdings hat der Mehrwertsteuerausschuss auf Basis dieses Arbeitspapieres keine Leitlinien aufgestellt. Auch im BMF-Schreiben v. 6.3.2025 zur ertragsteuerrechtlichen Behandlung bestimmter Kryptowerte ist sowohl die ertragsteuerrechtliche als auch die umsatzsteuerrechtliche Behandlung von NFTs in Rz.5 explizit ausgenommen (BStBl. I 2025, 658). Im Folgenden wird die Entscheidung des FG Niedersachsen kurz zusammengefasst, um sich anschlieĂend mit der Rechtsfrage auseinanderzusetzen, ob der Handel von NFTs in Form von digitalen Bilddateien Ăźber NFT-Plattformen zu einer fingierten Leistungskette gem. § 3 Abs. 11a UStG zwischen NFT-Verkäufer, NFT-Plattform und NFT-Käufer fĂźhrt. Die Rechtsfrage ist insofern von Relevanz, weil NFT-Verkäufer in der Praxis regelmäĂig ein Informationsdefizit haben, den Ort der Leistung zu bestimmen - wie die Entscheidung des FG Niedersachsen einleuchtend veranschaulicht.
The Buru Regency Government, as the party tasked with administering government, development, and public services, is required to report on regional financial accountability as the basis for assessing its financial performance. The purpose of this study is to assess regional financial performance using ratios from 2020 to 2024, consisting of: Regional Fiscal Independence; Effectiveness of PAD Management; Effectiveness of Regional Taxes; Degree of Fiscal Decentralization; Fiscal Dependency; and Growth of Regional Government Finance in Buru Regency. Using secondary data sourced from the Ministry of Finance website, this study concludes that the financial performance of the Buru Regency Government consists of: 1) the regional fiscal autonomy ratio is still very low with an instructive relationship pattern, indicating that the local government is not yet capable of financing its own government activities, development, and services to the community, and the local government still needs intervention from the central government; 2) the fiscal decentralization ratio indicates that the local government's ability to increase its own revenue (PAD) to finance its own development is still very limited; 3) the local tax effectiveness ratio and local revenue (PAD) indicate that the local government is less effective in realizing tax revenue and local revenue (PAD) from the set targets and real potential; 4) The fiscal dependency ratio shows that the Buru Regency local government is still highly dependent on assistance from the central and provincial governments compared to its own regional revenue; 5) The PAD growth ratio shows that the local government is poor/negative in maintaining and increasing PAD.
Abstract The global financial markets are being changed by DeFi's ability to remove central actors to facilitate peer-to-peer transactions. DeFi promotes efficiency, globalization, and economic inclusion, and at the same time, it has raised tax compliance. This study attempts to bridge the gaps by analyzing available scholarly and policy-oriented research, along with recent regulatory initiatives. The study concludes that the tax compliance challenges posed by DeFi's Decentralization, Shrouded Identity, and Composability Features are serious and can overcome the traditional tax reporting mechanisms. The study also suggests the broad directions of gaps in the literature to be addressed in policy-driven and empirical studies in the future. Keywords: DeFi, Blockchain, Tax Compliance, Fintech
This chapter examines the tax treatment applicable to non-fungible tokens (NFTs). NFTs are unique digital assets stored on a blockchain, primarily used to certify the authenticity and ownership of digital or physical items. With the rapid rise in the popularity of NFTs, discussions about their taxation have become increasingly prominent. From a tax law perspective, NFTs represent both an innovative financial product and a legal challenge, as they raise critical questions about their classification and treatment under existing tax frameworks. NFTs may represent digital or non-digital assets, and an important tax consideration is whether the NFT carries value independent of the asset it represents. In todayâs digital age, characterized by technological advancements, evolving artistic values, and the ease of replication, determining the locus of value has become increasingly challenging, necessitating a nuanced, case-by-case analysis. This chapter evaluates the taxation of NFTs by examining their common use cases and exploring the implications for tax systems. It seeks to provide insights into the legal and practical challenges posed by the taxation of NFTs.
Essossinam Pali, Coffi Cyprien Aholou, François Paul Yatta
After several hesitant attempts, Togo has made renewed progress in implementing sustainable decentralization. Municipal and regional elections held in 2019 and 2024 marked a significant institutional step forward. However, this implementation phase remains marked by both achievements and structural challenges. This article explores how local elected officials perceive the decentralization policy and its financing in their municipalities. It formulates the general hypothesis that decentralization fosters the implementation of local public policies when supported by appropriate institutional mechanisms. Based on a quantitative survey conducted in early 2024 among 487 local actors including 477 municipal councilors and 10 prefects the results highlight a range of perceptions. While some elected officials acknowledge improvements in service delivery and institutional support (through tools such as FACT and ANFCT), others stress the persistence of constraints related to financial autonomy, administrative capacities, and citizen participation. The findings suggest that decentralization in Togo is progressing, albeit unevenly, and requires further efforts to consolidate its institutional and operational foundations.