Papers1 provider · 1 record
May 8, 2025· arXiv
preprint
Open access

Loss-Versus-Rebalancing under Deterministic and Generalized block-times

Authors:Alex NezlobinMartin Tassy

Abstract

Although modern blockchains almost universally produce blocks at fixed intervals, existing models still lack an analytical formula for the loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) incurred by Automated Market Makers (AMMs) liquidity providers in this setting. Leveraging tools from random walk theory, we derive the following closed-form approximation for the per block per unit of liquidity expected LVR under constant block time: \[ \overline{\mathrm{ARB}}= \frac{\,σ_b^{2}} {\,2+\sqrt{2π}\,γ/(|ζ(1/2)|\,σ_b)\,}+O\!\bigl(e^{-\mathrm{const}\tfracγ{σ_b}}\bigr)\;\approx\; \frac{σ_b^{2}}{\,2 + 1.7164\,γ/σ_b}, \] where $σ_b$ is the intra-block asset volatility, $γ$ the AMM spread and $ζ$ the Riemann Zeta function. Our large Monte Carlo simulations show that this formula is in fact quasi-exact across practical parameter ranges. Extending our analysis to arbitrary block-time distributions as well, we demonstrate both that--under every admissible inter-block law--the probability that a block carries an arbitrage trade converges to a universal limit, and that only constant block spacing attains the asymptotically minimal LVR. This shows that constant block intervals provide the best possible protection against arbitrage for liquidity providers.

Community

0 comments
Use Connect Wallet in the navigation

No discussion yet

Be the first to share a question or observation.