Victoria L. Lemieux, Rosa Gil, Faith Molosiwa, Qizheng Zhou · 8 authors
As archives turn to artificial intelligence to manage growing volumes of digital records, privacy risks inherent in current AI data practices raise critical concerns about data sovereignty and ethical accountability. This paper explores how privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) and Web3 architectures can support archives to preserve control over sensitive content while still being able to make it available for access by researchers. We present Clio-X, a decentralized, privacy-first Web3 digital solution designed to embed PETs into archival workflows and support AI-enabled reference and access. Drawing on a user evaluation of a medium-fidelity prototype, the study reveals both interest in the potential of the solution and significant barriers to adoption related to trust, system opacity, economic concerns, and governance. Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation theory, we analyze the sociotechnical dimensions of these barriers and propose a path forward centered on participatory design and decentralized governance through a Clio-X Decentralized Autonomous Organization. By integrating technical safeguards with community-based oversight, Clio-X offers a novel model to ethically deploy AI in cultural heritage contexts.
This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential.
Lingfeng Bao, Jiameng Yang, Xiaohu Yang, Chunming Rong
Since the introduction of Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain technology has garnered widespread attention. Scholars from various research fields, countries, and institutions have published a significant number of papers on this subject. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive analysis specifically focusing on the scientific publications in the field of blockchain. To conduct a comprehensive analysis, we compiled a corpus of 41,497 publications in blockchain research from 2008 to 2023 using the Clarivate databases. Through bibliometric and citation analyses, we gained valuable insights into the field. Our study offers an overview of the blockchain research landscape, including country, institution, authorship, and subject categories. Additionally, we identified Emerging Research Areas (ERA) using the co-citation clustering approach, examining factors such as recency, growth, and contributions from different countries/regions. Furthermore, we identified influential publications based on citation velocity and analyzed five representative Research Fronts in detail. This analysis provides a fine-grained examination of specific areas within blockchain research. Our findings contribute to understanding evolving trends, emerging applications, and potential directions for future research in the multidisciplinary field of blockchain.
Johannes Gruendler, Darya Melnyk, Arash Pourdamghani, Stefan Schmid
Peer review, as a widely used practice to ensure the quality and integrity of publications, lacks a well-defined and common mechanism to self-incentivize virtuous behavior across all the conferences and journals. This is because information about reviewer efforts and author feedback typically remains local to a single venue, while the same group of authors and reviewers participate in the publication process across many venues. Previous attempts to incentivize the reviewing process assume that the quality of reviews and papers authored correlate for the same person, or they assume that the reviewers can receive physical rewards for their work. In this paper, we aim to keep track of reviewing and authoring efforts by users (who review and author) across different venues while ensuring self-incentivization. We show that our system, DecentPeeR, incentivizes reviewers to behave according to the rules, i.e., it has a unique Nash equilibrium in which virtuous behavior is rewarded.
While recent reviews of blockchain technology have focused on the latest developments in cryptocurrency and their derivative impacts, less attention has been given to analysing their knowledge paths and boundaries based on past research to guide their development. To address this gap, we conducted both a bibliometric study of 2525 articles and a lexicometric study of 123 articles. The bibliometric study provided holistic insights into the evolution and distribution of blockchain research, including influential researchers and countries, discipline composition, knowledge development trends, and emerging frontiers. The lexicometric study identified the boundary concept structure with a quantitative textual approach, extracting the strongest signifying epistemic communities. Our findings indicate that blockchain research draws from four major disciplines, making it a multidisciplinary field. With the increasing maturity and development of technological infrastructure, the application and management of blockchain become increasingly relevant issues. Our analysis suggests that blockchain can be considered more of a boundary object than a disruptive change from knowledge perspectives. Therefore, this paper proposes a comprehensive understanding of the development path and epistemic concepts of blockchain research.
The Synchronic Web is a highly scalable notary infrastructure that provides tamper-evident data provenance for historical web data. In this document, we describe the applicability of this infrastructure for web archiving across three envisioned stages of adoption. We codify the core mechanism enabling the value proposition: a procedure for splitting and merging cryptographic information fluidly across blockchain-backed ledgers. Finally, we present preliminary performance results that indicate the feasibility of our approach for modern web archiving scales.
Blockchain is a shared, immutable ledger that has attracted the attention of researchers and practitioners across innumerable sectors, with its implications for modernizing payment systems having the possibility of inciting a digital revolution. In the scope of this study, 1,511 publications were obtained from Scopus to conduct a systematic review of the research space through bibliometric and network analyses. The main aim of this study was to determine key authors, significant studies, and collaboration patterns, to reveal the distributions and impacts of publications in the blockchain-based payments area between 2019 and 2022. The results indicate that the Khalifa University of Science and Technology is the most influential journal, while the most cited author is Salah, K. Additionally, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has sponsored most academic documents, with the US emerging as the most impactful country. This study has also found that blockchain-based payments literature congregated in 5 disciplines. These areas are computer science, engineering, decision science, mathematics, and business. A co-authorship analysis also networks relations between nations, authors, and organizations globally, creating unique clusters that maximize research productivity. In summary, this study designs an analytical map of the research landscape, which can guide future research.
Prashasti Singh, Vivek Kumar Singh, Hiran H. Lathabai
Future Generation Computer Systems (FGCS), published by Elsevier, is a prestigious peer reviewed journal that started in 1984. As on date of writing this article, the journal is in its 137th volume. Owing to its publication quality and continued academic standards, it has been indexed by major academic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, DOAJ etc. It is now ranked among the top journals in the area of Computer Science (General). Motivated by the long history, academic reputation and prestige of the journal, the present study attempts to do a bibliometric and text-based analysis of publications in the journal during the period of 1984-2020 (37 years). Bibliometric analysis helped to identify publishing and citation patterns, authorship and collaboration structure, funding patterns of the published research, open access and altmetric impact, gender distribution and SDG connections etc. The text-integrated path analysis helped in identifying the thematic structure and major concept evolution trajectories. The results of the analysis indicate that the FGCS journal is a high-quality research journal that has grown over time in terms of publications, citations and rankings. It publishes articles in specified thematic areas, with cloud, grid, IoT, Blockchain etc. found as the major themes addressed. Knowledge extension from cloud computing to multi-domain networks is witnessed and a divergence towards service function chains, distributed machine learning and edge computing systems is visible. The article thus presents very informative and useful insight about research publication trends in FGCS.
Blockchain as an emerging technology has transformed many traditional and conventional ecosystems and business models. Publication review system is one of the interesting subjects for transformation. The conventional models of publication review besides the urgent criticisms necessitates a transformation. This paper has investigated the most dominant shortcomings of literature review of publication review systems. Investigating the capabilities of Blockchain technology in the literature and its transformative capabilities, a network based Blockchain ecosystem is proposed. The ecosystem is providing a decentralized, transparent, and effective collaboration mechanisms for authors, reviewers, and other stakeholders in publication review processes. The main advantage of the ecosystem is committing the of all stakeholders and recognizing their contributions in a publication. Moreover, the ecosystem profits the stakeholders from the resulted reputation of the publication in future citations with its token model. The architecture of the proposed ecosystem supports the management of publication contents and sharing it for stakeholders. Moreover, it enables the configuration of smart contracts for governance of processes among stakeholders. It uses a token transaction Blockchain model to fulfill the token transactions. The capabilities and details of layers in the ecosystem has been discussed addressing the new paradigm of publication review ecosystem.
Significant attention in the financial industry has paved the way for blockchain technology to spread across other industries, resulting in a plethora of literature on the subject. This study approaches the subject through bibliometrics and network analysis of 6790 records extracted from the Web of Science from 2014-2020 based on blockchain. This study asserts (i) the impact of open access publication on the growth and visibility of literature, (ii) the collaboration patterns and impact of team size on collaboration, (iii) the ranking of countries based on their national and international collaboration, and (iv) the major themes in the literature through thematic analysis. Based on the significant momentum gained by the blockchain, the trend of open access publications has increased 1.5 times than no open access in 2020. This analysis articulates the numerous potentials of blockchain literature and its adoption by various countries and their authors. China and the USA are the top leaders in the field and applied blockchain more with smart contracts, supply chain, and internet of things. Also, results show that blockchain has attracted the attention of less than 1% of authors who have contributed to multiple works on the blockchain and authors also preferred to work in teams smaller in size.
Hira Ahmad, Muhammad Ahtazaz Ahsan, Adnan Noor Mian
A large number of survey papers are being published in blockchain since the first survey appeared in 2017. A person entering into the field of blockchain is faced with the issue of which blockchain surveys to read and why? Who is publishing these surveys and what is the nature of these surveys? Which of the publishers are publishing more such surveys and what are the lengths of the published surveys? Which kind of survey is getting more citations? Which of the authors is collaborating on such surveys? etc. All these questions motivated us to analyze the trends in publishing blockchain surveys. In this paper, we have performed a bibliometric analysis on $801$ surveys or review papers published in the field of blockchain in the last approximately five years. We have analyzed the papers with respect to the publication type, publishers and venue, references, citations, paper length, different categories, year, countries, authors, and their collaborations and found interesting insights. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind and hope to provide better understanding of the field.
Phase transition from the human-limited, "analogue" way of research enquiry to the silicon-based, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered digital science is forthcoming. To facilitate this transition, I propose three project ideas: 1) CryptoScience platform, aimed to provide tools for endemic digitalization & open access of the research data, with attribution of the work credit of all involved individuals and parties using blockchain technology; 2) Computational Publication Standard, designed for publishing research findings in an AI-friendly format of knowledge graphs; 3) data modelling from publications, meant to extract key pieces of knowledge (entities and their relationships) contained in manuscript publications using natural language processing and image recognition, to enable their incorporation into the digital knowledge databases. These three ideas could be implemented separately by different research groups and institutions, however, they will strongly benefit from each other's synergistic effect.
Numerous indexing databases keep track of the number of publications, citations, etc. in order to maintain the progress of science and individual. However, the choice of journals and articles varies among these indexing databases, hence the number of citations and h-index varies. There is no common platform exists that can provide a single count for the number of publications, citations, h-index, etc. To overcome this limitation, we have proposed a weighted unified informetrics, named "conflate". The proposed system takes into account the input from multiple indexing databases and generates a single output. Here, we have used the data from Scopus and WoS to generate a conflate dataset. Further, a comparative analysis of conflate has been performed with Scopus and WoS at three levels: author, organization, and journal. Finally, a mapping is proposed between research publications and distributed ledger technology in order to provide a transparent and distributed view to its stakeholders.
Peer-review is a necessary and essential quality control step for scientific publications but lacks proper incentives. Indeed, the process, which is very costly in terms of time and intellectual investment, not only is not remunerated by the journals but is also not openly recognized by the academic community as a relevant scientific output for a researcher. Therefore, scientific dissemination is affected in timeliness, quality, and fairness. Here, to solve this issue, we propose a blockchain-based incentive system that rewards scientists for peer-reviewing other scientists' work and that builds up trust and reputation. We designed a privacy-oriented protocol of smart contracts called Ants-Review that allows authors to issue a bounty for open anonymous peer-reviews on Ethereum. If requirements are met, peer-reviews will be accepted and paid by the approver proportionally to their assessed quality. To promote ethical behavior and inclusiveness the system implements a gamified mechanism that allows the whole community to evaluate the peer-reviews and vote for the best ones.
Academic publication of latest research results are crucial to advance the development of all disciplines. However, the current academic publication procedure lacks transparency in the review process, and reviewers do not have strong incentives to provide quality reviews for their peers. This may lead to misconducts in the review process, e.g. an anonymous reviewer may give biased comments to a paper without being noticed since the comments are seldom published for evaluation. In addition, it is ironic that the research community has to pay a lot to access papers reviewed by the community for free, though free sharing of research results is important for research advances.To address the above problems, we propose Open-Pub, a decentralized, transparent yet privacy-preserving academic publication scheme based on the blockchain technology. The blockchain promises transparency in the review process and provides an incentive mechanism based on cryptocurrency, but the privacy requirement in the double-blind review process still needs to be fulfilled. To this end, we first design a threshold identity-based group signature (TIBGS) using verifiable secret sharing to protect identity confidentiality. Then we develop a strong double-blind procedure to protect the identities of authors and reviewers. With this strong double-blind procedure, authors can choose to submit papers anonymously, and validators distribute papers anonymously to reviewers on the blockchain according to their research interests. This process is publicly recorded and traceable on the blockchain so as to realize transparent peer preview. To evaluate its efficiency, we implement Open-Pub based on Ethereum and conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate its performance, including computation costs and processing delay. The experiment results show that Open-Pub is highly efficient in computation and processing anonymous transactions.
Hossein Mohammadi Rouzbahani, Hadis Karimipour, Ali Dehghantanha, Reza M. Parizi
Power systems are growing rapidly, due to the ever-increasing demand for electrical power. These systems require novel methodologies and modern tools and technologies, to better perform, particularly for communication among different parts. Therefore, power systems are facing new challenges such as energy trading and marketing and cyber threats. Using blockchain in power systems, as a solution, is one of the newest methods. Most studies aim to investigate innovative approach-es of blockchain application in power systems. Even though, many articles published to support the research activities, there has not been any bibliometric analysis which specifies the research trends. This paper aims to present a bibliographic analysis of the blockchain application in power systems related literature, in the Web of Science (WoS) database between January 2009 and July 2019. This paper discusses the research activities and performed a detailed analysis by looking at the number of articles published, citations, institutions, research areas, and authors. From the analysis, it was concluded that there are several significant impacts of research activities in China and the USA, in comparison to other countries.
Blockchain technology, and more specifically Bitcoin (one of its foremost applications), have been receiving increasing attention in the scientific community. The first publications with Bitcoin as a topic, can be traced back to 2012. In spite of this short time span, the production magnitude (1162 papers) makes it necessary to make a bibliometric study in order to observe research clusters, emerging topics, and leading scholars. Our paper is aimed at studying the scientific production only around bitcoin, excluding other blockchain applications. Thus, we restricted our search to papers indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection, whose topic is "bitcoin". This database is suitable for such diverse disciplines such as economics, engineering, mathematics, and computer science. This bibliometric study draws the landscape of the current state and trends of Bitcoin-related research in different scientific disciplines.
Emilija Stojmenova Duh, Andrej Duh, Uroš Droftina, Tim Kos · 7 authors
Scholarly communication is today immersed in publish or perish culture that propels noncooperative behaviour in the sense of strategic games played by researchers. Here we introduce and describe a blockchain based platform for decentralized scholarly communication. The design of the platform rests on community driven publishing reviewing processes and implements incentives that promote cooperative user behaviour. Key to achieve cooperation in blockchain based scholarly communication is to transform a static research paper into a modifiable research paper under continuous peer review process. We describe and discuss the implementation of a modifiable research paper as a smart contract on the blockchain.
John Collomosse, Tu Bui, Alan Brown, John Sheridan · 9 authors
We present ARCHANGEL; a de-centralised platform for ensuring the long-term integrity of digital documents stored within public archives. Document integrity is fundamental to public trust in archives. Yet currently that trust is built upon institutional reputation --- trust at face value in a centralised authority, like a national government archive or University. ARCHANGEL proposes a shift to a technological underscoring of that trust, using distributed ledger technology (DLT) to cryptographically guarantee the provenance, immutability and so the integrity of archived documents. We describe the ARCHANGEL architecture, and report on a prototype of that architecture build over the Ethereum infrastructure. We report early evaluation and feedback of ARCHANGEL from stakeholders in the research data archives space.
Nowadays, the Internet is indispensable when it comes to information dissemination. People rely on the Internet to inform themselves on current news events, as well as to verify facts. We, as a community, are quickly approaching an 'electronic information age' where the majority of information will be distributed electronically and tools to preserve this information will become essential. While archiving online digital information is a good way to preserve online information for future generations, it has many disadvantages including the easy manipulation of archived information, e.g. by the archiving authority. Online information is also prone to getting hacked or being taken offline. Therefore, it is necessary that archived online news information is securely time-stamped with the date and time when it was first archived in a way that cannot be manipulated. The process of 'trusted timestamping' is an established approach for claiming that particular digital information existed at a particular 'point in time' in the past. However, traditional approaches for trusted timestamping depend on the time-stamping authority's fidelity. Directly embedding the hash of a digital file into the blockchain of a cryptocurrency is a more recent method that allows for secure time-stamping, since digital information is stored as part of the transaction information in, e.g. Bitcoin's, blockchain, and not stored at a centralized time-stamping authority. However, there is no system yet available, which uses this approach for archiving and time-stamping online news articles. Therefore, the aim of this thesis is to develop a system that 1) enables decentralized trusted time-stamping of web and news articles as a means of making future manipulation of online information identifiable, and 2) allows users to determine the authenticity of articles by checking different versions of the same article online.
Mohamed Aturban, Michael L. Nelson, Michele C. Weigle
We show that state-of-the-art services for creating trusted timestamps in blockchain-based networks do not adequately allow for timestamping of web pages. They accept data by value (e.g., images and text), but not by reference (e.g., URIs of web pages). Also, we discuss difficulties in repeatedly generating the same cryptographic hash value of an archived web page. We then introduce several requirements to be fulfilled in order to produce repeatable hash values for archived web pages.