Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

19 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

19 results · page 1 of 1

Clear filters
Aug 1, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Code Promo 1xBet Sans DĂ©pĂŽt 2027 : 1XWAP – Bonus

code promo gratuit 1xbet

code promo gratuit 1xbet: 1XWAP offre un bonus de 100 %. Retrouvez la liste des codes promo 1xBet disponibles lors de votre inscription sur le site officiel de 1xBet. Une sĂ©lection de paris gratuits et de codes promo est Ă©galement disponible. La procĂ©dure pour trouver et saisir les codes promo est expliquĂ©e sur cette page. De nombreux utilisateurs ont laissĂ© des avis positifs sur le code promo 1xBet du jour. 1xBet offre Ă©galement des cadeaux d'anniversaire, vous permet d'augmenter vos gains grĂące aux paris combinĂ©s, propose des coupons pour les paris eSports et bien plus encore. 1XBET offre une variĂ©tĂ© de bonus, notamment des paris gratuits, des tours gratuits et des cadeaux tels que des iPhones, des ordinateurs portables et des consoles de jeux. Les promotions des bookmakers sont activĂ©es en saisissant le code promo dans le champ prĂ©vu Ă  cet effet. Le code promo d'inscription est Ă  saisir lors du remplissage du formulaire qui s'ouvre aprĂšs avoir cliquĂ© sur le bouton « Inscription ». Code promo 1xbet Ă  l'inscription : Copiez le code promo 1XBET : 1XWAP. Ouvrez le site web ou l'application 1xBet. Cliquez sur « S'inscrire ». Choisissez la mĂ©thode qui vous convient : en un clic, par tĂ©lĂ©phone ou par e-mail. Trouvez le champ « Code promo » et saisissez 1XWAP. Finalisez la crĂ©ation de votre compte. ComplĂ©tez toutes les informations de votre compte personnel. Acceptez de recevoir le bonus. Approvisionnez votre compte avec au moins 1 € / 1 $. 1xbet doublera automatiquement votre dĂ©pĂŽt, dans la limite de 800 $. Important : Si les informations de votre compte personnel sont incomplĂštes, le bonus ne sera pas crĂ©ditĂ©. Le bonus de dĂ©pĂŽt obtenu grĂące au code promo 1xbet doit ĂȘtre activĂ© dans les 30 jours suivant la crĂ©ation du compte. Comme indiquĂ©, le casino propose Ă©galement diverses promotions, notamment Drops & Wins, offrant de gros gains en argent rĂ©el ! Code promo 1xBet 2027 - Bonus Casino jusqu'Ă  1950 $ Obtenez le meilleur code promo 1xBet : 1XWAP, qui vous permettra de recevoir un bonus jusqu’à 130 $. Offre valable jusqu’au 31 dĂ©cembre 2027. Le bonus sport est dĂ©bloquĂ© en deux Ă©tapes : la moitiĂ© sur des paris combinĂ©s Ă  une cote de 1,40, et l’autre moitiĂ© dans la section 1xGames. Le bonus casino, quant Ă  lui, est rĂ©parti sur quatre dĂ©pĂŽts. Une seule offre est activĂ©e Ă  la fois : le choix se fait lors de la crĂ©ation du compte, avant le premier dĂ©pĂŽt. Ce coupon est rĂ©servĂ© aux nouveaux inscrits. Outre le bonus de bienvenue, 1xBet propose plusieurs promotions, dont cinq actives auxquelles nous participons rĂ©guliĂšrement en 2027. Les joueurs les plus actifs accĂšdent au programme VIP avec un gestionnaire de compte dĂ©diĂ©. Les avantages incluent des limites de retrait plus Ă©levĂ©es, des paris gratuits personnalisĂ©s et un cashback hebdomadaire dont le pourcentage dĂ©pend de votre niveau. Hyper Bonus : Bonus sur vos gains AprĂšs votre inscription avec le code promo 1xBet : 1XWAP, un bonus est ajoutĂ© Ă  vos gains, pouvant atteindre 100 % selon le nombre d’évĂ©nements sĂ©lectionnĂ©s. Les conditions sont simples : tous les paris combinĂ©s d’au moins quatre sĂ©lections (cote minimale de 1,2 par sĂ©lection, jusqu’à 50 sĂ©lections) sont Ă©ligibles Ă  l’offre. Bonus pour sĂ©rie de paris perdants : jusqu'Ă  500 € Si vous effectuez 20 paris perdants sur diffĂ©rents Ă©vĂ©nements en 30 jours, 1xBet vous crĂ©ditera automatiquement d'un bonus. Le montant dĂ©pend de vos mises : À partir de 2 € par pari, le bonus est de 100 € À partir de 5 €, 250 € À partir de 10 €, 500 € Seuls les paris simples et combinĂ©s sont Ă©ligibles, avec une cote maximale de 3,00. Pour activer le bonus, contactez le service client de 1xBet par e-mail. Le casino en direct de 1xBet est impressionnant et propose une grande variĂ©tĂ© de catĂ©gories, dont 1xLIVE, oĂč vous pouvez gagner du cashback. Vous pouvez Ă©galement profiter de jeux en direct, de jeux Crash, de poker et bien plus encore. Si vous prĂ©voyez de dĂ©poser en cryptomonnaie, vĂ©rifiez d'abord les mĂ©thodes de paiement Ă©ligibles dans votre compte joueur. Celles-ci dĂ©pendent de votre localisation. Bitcoin et USDT sont acceptĂ©s sur 1xBet, mais certaines offres de casino ne sont pas accessibles avec ces mĂ©thodes. Comment retirer ses gains avec un code promo 1xBet ? Les retraits sont possibles une fois les conditions de mise remplies, pour les bonus paris sportifs et 1xGames. Tant qu'un bonus est actif, le solde, y compris les fonds dĂ©posĂ©s, reste bloquĂ©. Une fois les conditions remplies, les gains sont transfĂ©rĂ©s sur le compte principal et peuvent ĂȘtre retirĂ©s. La procĂ©dure ne prend que quelques secondes depuis la section « Retrait » : choisissez la mĂ©thode, saisissez le montant et confirmez. Le premier retrait dĂ©clenche une vĂ©rification d'identitĂ© (KYC), nĂ©cessitant une piĂšce d'identitĂ© valide et parfois un justificatif de domicile. Lors de notre test depuis le Cameroun, la validation a pris un peu moins de 24 heures ; prĂ©voyez plus de temps pendant le week-end. Code promo 1xBet Ă  l'inscription | Bonus jusqu'Ă  130 € Le code promo 1xBet Ă  l'inscription : 1XWAP est valable sans limite de temps et vous garantit un bonus de 100 % sur votre dĂ©pĂŽt. Saisissez le code promo lors de votre inscription et recevez un bonus sur votre premier dĂ©pĂŽt jusqu'Ă  130 €. Vous recevrez Ă©galement un pack de bienvenue au Casino 1xBet d'une valeur maximale de 1 950 € + 150 tours gratuits pour jouer aux machines Ă  sous et Ă  d'autres jeux. Activez le code promo pour recevoir le bonus dĂšs aujourd'hui. Code promo 1xBet gratuit ✓ Code bonus ✓ Bonus d'inscription sans dĂ©pĂŽt ✓ Tours gratuits ✓ Programme de fidĂ©litĂ©. Le bonus de bienvenue 1xBet (pari gratuit) est accessible Ă  tous les joueurs n'ayant jamais Ă©tĂ© inscrits sur le site officiel. Le code promo 1xBet pour le pari gratuit s'utilise de la mĂȘme maniĂšre. AprĂšs avoir saisi le code bonus, vous devrez accepter les conditions gĂ©nĂ©rales de la sociĂ©tĂ© et activer votre compte. Les coupons bonus ne nĂ©cessitent aucune activation particuliĂšre. AprĂšs leur inscription, les parieurs reçoivent un bonus sur leur premier dĂ©pĂŽt 1xBet de 100 % du montant dĂ©posĂ©, jusqu'Ă  100 €. Les fonds promotionnels sont crĂ©ditĂ©s sur le compte bonus, tandis que le solde est conservĂ© sur le compte principal et disponible pour jouer selon les conditions habituelles. Il est actuellement impossible d'obtenir un pari gratuit 1xBet simplement en s'inscrivant. Comment et oĂč saisir un code promo 1xBet et recevoir un bonus ? Utilisez le code promo 1xBet : 1XWAP lors de votre inscription pour obtenir un bonus de 100 % jusqu'Ă  400 $ sur votre premier dĂ©pĂŽt. Profitez des meilleurs bonus du Casino 1XBET : ☆ Bonus sans dĂ©pĂŽt 2027 ✓ Pack de bienvenue ✓ Codes promo ✓ Cashback. DĂ©couvrez comment activer les bonus et commencez Ă  gagner ! 1xBet Casino 2027 - Bonus nouveau joueur 1xBet Casino propose plus de 3 000 jeux provenant de plus de 60 opĂ©rateurs de renom. Vous trouverez des milliers de machines Ă  sous, ainsi que des jeux de table, des jeux avec croupiers en direct et bien plus encore. La majoritĂ© des jeux sont des machines Ă  sous, avec plus de 2 000 titres phares disponibles. Si vous ĂȘtes amateur de jeux de table, vous pouvez jouer au blackjack, au baccarat, Ă  la roulette et Ă  bien d'autres. Des catĂ©gories spĂ©ciales sont disponibles pour trouver rapidement vos jeux prĂ©fĂ©rĂ©s. Code promo 1xBet pour les tours gratuits : 1XWAP. Utilisez ce code bonus lors de votre inscription. Bonus Casino 1xBet : Jusqu’à 1 950 $ + 150 tours gratuits. Utilisez votre bonus sur l’ensemble du site du casino. Profitez d’une variĂ©tĂ© de machines Ă  sous. Attention : Veuillez noter que les paris en ligne peuvent ĂȘtre illĂ©gaux dans certaines rĂ©gions. Avant de jouer, veuillez vĂ©rifier la lĂ©galitĂ© de ces activitĂ©s dans votre pays. 1xBet dĂ©cline toute responsabilitĂ© quant aux consĂ©quences de vos dĂ©cisions. Les jeux d’argent peuvent engendrer une dĂ©pendance. Jouez de maniĂšre responsable et gĂ©rez votre budget. Code promo 1xBet 2027 : 1XWAP – Bonus de 200 % jusqu’à 200 € Le code promo 1xBet valable en 2027 est 1XWAP. Utilisez-le lors de votre inscription pour obtenir un bonus sport de 200 % jusqu’à 200 € sur votre premier dĂ©pĂŽt ou un pack casino de 1 500 € et 150 tours gratuits. Ce code d’inscription 1xBet vous donne accĂšs Ă  un bonus attractif, mais certaines erreurs peuvent empĂȘcher sa validation. L’erreur la plus frĂ©quente consiste Ă  placer un pari simple au lieu d’un pari combinĂ©. Dans ce cas, le pari peut ĂȘtre gagnant, mais il ne sera pas pris en compte pour le dĂ©blocage du bonus. Les deux offres ne sont pas cumulables ; vous devez faire votre choix lors de la crĂ©ation de votre compte. Pour les amateurs de basketball, que ce soit pour la saison NBA de cet Ă©tĂ© ou celle qui dĂ©butera cet automne, le bonus sport reste le plus avantageux. Les passionnĂ©s de machines Ă  sous prĂ©fĂ©reront sans doute le pack casino, qui offre un bonus maximum nettement plus Ă©levĂ©, mais avec des conditions de mise diffĂ©rentes. Pour parier sur le basketball, nous recommandons le bonus de premier dĂ©pĂŽt sur les sports. Son bonus est calculĂ© en deux Ă©tapes : x5 sur les paris combinĂ©s sportifs avec une cote minimale de 1,40, puis x30 sur la section 1xGames. En Inde, la totalitĂ© du bonus est mise sur les sports, sans utiliser 1xGames. Lors d'une sĂ©rie de matchs NBA, trois paris combinĂ©s autour de 1,40 nous ont suffi pour remplir les conditions de mise sur les sports en cinq jours. N'ouvrez pas de compte en Bitcoin, USDT, Litecoin ou autres cryptomonnaies si vous souhaitez recevoir un bonus. Ces cryptomonnaies ne sont pas incluses dans le programme de bonus de 1xbet. Code promo 1xBet Casino : Bonus jusqu'Ă  1 500 € + 150 tours gratuits Avec le code promo 1xBet : 1XWAP, obtenez un bonus casino sur vos 4 premiers dĂ©pĂŽts, jusqu'Ă  1 500 € + 150 tours gratuits sur Aviator. Chaque tranche de bonus nĂ©cessite un d

Open access
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Data Analysis with R
Original source
Jul 12, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Lingenic-Text: A Formally Verified Unicode 17.0 Text Processing Library in SPARK/Ada with Complete C API

Danslav Slavenskoj, Lingenic LLC

Introduction The processing of Unicode text is among the most foundational operations in modern computing, yet the algorithms that govern it—segmentation, normalization, bidirectional layout, collation—are specified across more than a dozen Unicode Technical Annexes and Reports, each encoding rules of considerable complexity. Implementations of these algorithms in widely used libraries have historically been written in memory-unsafe languages without formal guarantees, relying on testing alone to establish correctness. The question of whether a Unicode text processing library can be not merely tested but proved correct—with machine-checked guarantees of both the absence of runtime errors and functional conformance to the Unicode Standard—has not, to the authors' knowledge, been addressed prior to this work. Lingenic-Text is a complete implementation of the Unicode 17.0 text processing stack, written in SPARK/Ada (Ada 2022) and formally verified with GNATprove. The library comprises approximately 32,200 lines of Ada source across 57 files, implementing fourteen distinct modules: UTF-8 encoding and decoding (RFC 3629), grapheme cluster segmentation, word segmentation, and sentence segmentation (UAX #29), line breaking (UAX #14), normalization to all four forms (UAX #15), case mapping including full multi-character mappings and context-sensitive rules (Unicode §3.13), collation with DUCET support (UTS #10), the full Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm including bracket pair resolution (UAX #9), East Asian width determination (UAX #11), emoji classification and property lookup (UTS #51), identifier detection (UAX #31), and internationalized domain name processing with Punycode (UTS #46, RFC 3492). Every verification condition—9,640 in total, spanning runtime checks, functional contracts, assertions, termination, initialization, and data dependencies—is discharged by the prover at Level 4. No pragma Assume appears anywhere in the codebase. Conformance testing against Unicode Consortium test suites and reference data passes all 504,634 test cases. Architecture and Verification Approach The verification architecture factors into two links of different strength. The first link is a formal proof: for every subprogram in the library, a ghost specification encodes the intended behavior as pure expression functions or recursive ghost functions, and GNATprove proves that the implementation satisfies this specification for all possible inputs. This link is machine-checked and universal. Ghost code in SPARK is erased entirely at compile time, imposing zero runtime cost. The second link is conformance testing against the Unicode Consortium test suites—GraphemeBreakTest.txt, NormalizationTest.txt, BidiCharacterTest.txt, and others—which validates that the ghost specifications themselves faithfully encode the rules of the Unicode Standard. This link is empirical: it is validation by examples, and its strength is bounded by the coverage of the test suites. The end-to-end guarantee is therefore proved(implementation ⊹ specification) ∧ tested(specification ≈ standard). Along the implementation-correctness axis, the guarantee is a proof; along the standard-conformance axis, it is only as strong as the test suite. Since the Unicode Standard is a natural-language document, the conformance boundary cannot be eliminated by formal methods alone, but the test suites are the Consortium's own conformance instruments, and the library passes all 504,634 cases. Two principal proof patterns emerge across the library's modules. In the first, used by the segmentation algorithms, the Unicode rules are encoded as a recursive ghost function with a Subprogram_Variant annotation proving termination. The implementation is a forward state machine realized as a loop, whose invariant asserts equivalence with the recursive specification at every iteration. The postcondition of the public subprogram then states that its output equals the value of the recursive ghost function applied to the input. In the second pattern, used by normalization and case mapping, a generic text transformation framework carries a ghost predicate (Partial_Valid) as its loop invariant. Each callback's postcondition preserves this invariant, and a finishing postcondition bridges from the partial invariant to the full output specification. This generic is instantiated by each module with its own callback and specification, yielding proved correctness without duplicating the proof scaffolding. All property lookups—script, general category, grapheme break property, word break, sentence break, line break, East Asian width, Bidi class, joining type, and others—are implemented as flat arrays indexed directly by codepoint, giving O(1) access with no dynamic allocation, no hash tables, and no trees. The Unicode Character Database files are read from disk at initialization by a proved UCD parser, whose postcondition guarantees that every codepoint's property value in the populated table matches the value specified by a recursive ghost function encoding a model of the UAX #44 property file format. The fidelity of that model to the actual UAX #44 text is, like the algorithm specifications, established by test rather than by proof. This design permits updating to a new Unicode version by replacing the data files in the ucd/ directory, without modifying any source code. Scope and Capabilities The library provides a complete C API as a static library with 53 exported functions, enabling integration with C, C++, and any language supporting C foreign function interfaces. The C binding is a thin validation layer: every entry point checks its arguments against the precondition of the proved SPARK subprogram it wraps, returning an error code on violation, so that the machine-checked postconditions of the core apply to every successful call through the C interface. Among the more complex modules, the Bidirectional Algorithm implementation handles the full rule set of UAX #9, including explicit embeddings, overrides, and isolates, isolating run sequence resolution, and bracket pair matching under rule N0 with the BD16 algorithm. The reordering procedure produces a proved permutation of the input. The collation module implements UTS #10 with both Non-Ignorable and Shifted variable weighting, contraction handling, and implicit weight computation for CJK Unified Ideographs, Tangut, Nushu, and Khitan Small Script. The IDNA module implements the full UTS #46 processing pipeline with Punycode encoding (RFC 3492), ContextJ validation (RFC 5892), Bidi domain name rules (RFC 5893), and DNS length checks. The library enforces several invariants by construction. No heap allocation occurs; all buffers are bounded arrays with every index proved in range, eliminating buffer overflows as a class of defect. No runtime exceptions are raised; all error conditions are communicated through status codes. Runtime checks are suppressed in the compiled binary (-gnatp) because GNATprove has already proved their absence. The sole code outside SPARK verification is the file I/O routine that reads UCD data from disk; every other subprogram is machine-checked. Availability Lingenic-Text version 1.2.0 implements Unicode Standard 17.0. The source code, comprising all SPARK/Ada sources, the C binding, and conformance test programs, is available under the Lingenic Source-Available License v2.3. Production use requires a separate license from Lingenic LLC. The Unicode Character Database files included in the distribution are © Unicode, Inc. and are distributed under the Unicode License V3.

Open access
3 source records
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Original source
Jul 4, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Ismail's Glossary: A Complete Navigation Index for Mathlib4

Muhammed Ismail

In this project, I provide a complete, human-readable description for every one of Mathlib4's 9,150 modules — the mathematics library of the Lean 4 proof assistant — stating what each module contains, who uses it, and, wherever the names alone would leave it ambiguous, how it differs from its similarly named neighbors. Coverage is total rather than representative: every directory and every file, described against one fixed, fully specified reference snapshot, released as an independent, open-source resource for the Lean and Mathlib community — not an official product of either. Every entry in this glossary, without exception, is checked against the actual Mathlib4 source at the reference snapshot (Lean 4.29.1, Mathlib4 commit 1ad783f9bf, 2026-05-09): of 9,150 entries, 9,107 carry Complete status and 43 carry Benchmark Theorem status; zero are Pending, and zero are Needs Review. Ismail's Glossary covers the full Mathlib4 hierarchy — 1,129 directories and 8,021 files across six depth levels, spanning all 32 of Mathlib's top-level mathematical domains, from algebra and analysis to category theory and measure theory. Each entry carries six structured fields (path, name, type, parent path, depth, description), so the same data serves a human reader and a retrieval pipeline equally well.The Glossary JSON. The complete dataset, all 9,150 entries, in machine-readable form for any AI platform or retrieval pipeline.The RAG JSON. A flat, embedding-ready export with each entry pre-merged into a single field, for retrieval-augmented-generation systems that want a drop-in data source.The Claude Skill. A self-contained bundle that installs the glossary as an active, queryable reference inside Claude, so Mathlib navigation answers are grounded in current data rather than a language model's frozen training-time memory.The Master Spreadsheet. The live, community-editable source of truth, with a static snapshot published alongside it for anyone who needs a fixed, citable copy.The Interactive Website. A searchable glossary tree plus a dedicated visual Atlas of all 32 top-level domains, built for orientation rather than lookup, alongside a Lean 4 syntax reference and a getting-started guide. To this project's knowledge, no existing Mathlib tool — declaration search engine, in-editor tactic, or auto-generated documentation — provides complete, structural, plain-language coverage of the library at this depth; each presupposes that the user already knows, at least approximately, what they are looking for. All data is provided in full transparency and community contribution is actively encouraged: the complete glossary, every deliverable described above, and the moderated contribution workflow are at github.com/M-Ismail-ZA/IsmailsGlossary. For any feedback, corrections, or collaboration, please contact me via the email address listed on the paper.

Open access
2 source records
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Polynomial and algebraic computation
Mathematics Education and Programs
Original source
Jun 20, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Research - Zero Knowledge Proofs

Lois-Kleinner Alpasan

This research document is part of the **MF+SO** project within The Anticloud research corpus. Published by Alpasan, Lois-Kleinner.

Open access
2 source records
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Original source
May 21, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Rei as a Formal-Verification Compilation Pass for AI-Generated Mathematics — Rei-AIOS Paper 154 v0.0 (OUTLINE)

Nobuki Fujimoto, Rei, (Anthropic, claude-opus-4-7), Claude

⚠ v0.0 OUTLINE intentional publication — Pattern 4 mitigation embedded. This is an OUTLINE, not a v0.1 publishable manuscript. The central operational claim — that Rei provides a formal-verification compilation pass composing with AI hypothesis generators (AlphaEvolve, LLM Wiki, OpenEvolve) — requires at least one end-to-end demonstration before v0.1 promotion. As of 2026-05-22 the demonstration is at scaffold-level smoke-run stage only (OpenEvolve scaffold structurally validated, but full 100-iteration evolutionary loop with real evolved Lean 4 proof NOT YET executed). Publication-as-v0.0 is intentional honest framing per OUKC feedback_no_rush_publication.md: rather than wait silently for v0.1 evidence, the OUTLINE is published with explicit gate state so reviewers can see exactly what is and is not claimed. Framing concept: AlphaEvolve / LLM Wiki / OpenEvolve = hypothesis generators (loosely-grounded, fast, large-search). Rei = proof completer (mechanically verified, slow, decisive). Together they compose: hypothesis generator emits candidates → Rei evaluates via D-FUMT₈ 8-axis projection (Îł-evaluator) + Lean 4 zero-sorry validation (ÎČ-evaluator) → return verified candidates to the evolutionary loop. Rei is positioned as a formal-verification compilation pass in the AI-mathematics generation pipeline. Scaffold evidence (2026-05-22): external/openevolve-rei/ — YAML config (Ollama 3-prover ensemble), Python evaluators (ÎČ = Lean 4 zero-sorry, Îł = D-FUMT₈ projection), example skeleton (26-circle packing 2.635 benchmark). 4 smoke-tests PASS: yaml parse + 3 Python AST parse + circle_packing standalone execution (n=26 r=0.4167 density=14.18) + Îł-evaluator returns OpenEvolve-compatible dict with metrics (axis_dominant=ZERO 9 hits, score=0.0154) + artifacts (token_count=13). Per SCOPE.md non-claims: this is NOT a fork of OpenEvolve, NOT a claim of 26-circle 2.635 reproduction, NOT a claim that Rei has built an evolutionary code generator, NOT a paper-publishable result by itself. v0.1 acceptance criteria (10 items): see §9. Core gates: OpenEvolve installed + first 100-iteration loop completes + real evolved Lean 4 proof generated + scaffold extended with at least one zero-sorry proof for one open conjecture from META-DB Tier 1. v0.1 will publish as Zenodo new-version preserving DOI lineage from this v0.0 record. Honest scope (read first): (1) This is OUTLINE only — framing + prior-art audit + acceptance criteria, no end-to-end evidence. (2) Rei is NOT a hypothesis generator — its role in this composition is specifically as the verifier/completer. (3) Per feedback_world_uniqueness_claim_controllable.md: we use "to our knowledge no equivalent Lean 4 zero-sorry + D-FUMT₈ 8-axis evaluator exists in the OpenEvolve plugin ecosystem as of 2026-05-22" phrasing, NOT "world-first." (4) Three-party co-authorship (Fujimoto / Rei / Claude) per OUKC charter v1.0. (5) Per OUKC No-Patent Pledge — no patent will be filed.

Open access
2 source records
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Original source
May 1, 2026·arXiv (Cornell University)
0 cites
Evaluating the Architectural Reasoning Capabilities of LLM Provers via the Obfuscated Natural Number Game

Lixing Li

While Large Language Models have achieved notable success on formal mathematics benchmarks such as MiniF2F, it remains unclear whether these results stem from genuine logical reasoning or semantic pattern matching against pre-training data. This paper identifies Architectural Reasoning: the ability to synthesize formal proofs using exclusively local axioms and definitions within an alien math domain, as the necessary ability for future automated theorem discovery AI. We use the Obfuscated Natural Number Game, a benchmark to evaluate Architectural Reasoning. By renaming identifiers in the Natural Number Game in Lean 4, we created a zero-knowledge, closed environment. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, finding a universal latency tax where obfuscation increases inference time. The results also reveal a divergence in robustness: while general models (Claude-Sonnet-4.5, GPT-4o) suffer performance degradation, reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, GPT-5, DeepSeek-Prover-V2) maintain the same accuracy despite the absence of semantic cues. These findings provide a quantitative metric for assessing the true capacity for mathematical reasoning.

Open access
3 source records
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Topic Modeling
Original source
Jan 1, 2026·IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
0 cites
ACTS: Attestations of Contents in TLS Sessions

Pierpaolo Della Monica, Ivan Visconti, Andrea Vitaletti, Marco Zecchini

An essential requirement for the large-scale adoption of Web3 is enabling users to benefit from their data even within already deployed systems. This raises an important open question: how can existing, widely adopted software verify that a user has retrieved specific data from a TLS server? Impressive scientific results (e.g., DECO [CCS20] and the work of Xie et al. [USENIX24]) and industrial products (TLSNotary) have recently made progress in the above challenging direction. However, while they nicely leave TLS servers untouched, the retrieved data is then used in computations with verifiers that are required to run some advanced non-standardized cryptographic schemes (e.g., ZK-SNARKs), which clearly limits the large-scale adoption of the proposed technologies. In this paper, building on top of previous approaches and relying on the recent concept of Predicate Blind Signatures of Fuchsbauer and Wolf [Eurocrypt24], we bypass the limits of prior work by presenting ACTS a distributed architecture that, while still leaving TLS servers untouched, it allows a user to show possession of data retrieved from TLS servers simply requiring that the software of the verifier can check a standard signature. Our contributions include a round-optimal predicate blind signature protocol that produces standard RSA-PSS signatures. We show how this primitive can be integrated into the DECO architecture (and its successors) to certify data retrieved from TLS servers. Furthermore, we have optimized our construction to make it practical on commodity hardware for a large and significant class of policies implemented by the notary (i.e., the actor that is in charge of obliviously certifying TLS data, therefore preserving data confidentiality). We provide an experimental evaluation on the simple but powerful enough use case of a PDF document downloaded from a TLS server and encoded into an AES-GCM ciphertext. The user will then get a certified PDF through a standard PADES signature added obliviously to the PDF along with some metadata by a notary service. The resulting standard signed PDF document can be transparently verified using off-the-shelf PDF readers. Our experimental validation demonstrates that our architecture is suitable for real-world deployment in concrete scenarios.

Open access
2 source records
Cryptography and Data Security
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Original source
Sep 15, 2025·arXiv (Cornell University)
0 cites
From Evaluation to Enhancement: Large Language Models for Zero-Knowledge Proof Code Generation

Xue, Zhantong, Pingchuan Ma, Zhaoyu Wang, Zhou, Yuguang · 7 authors

Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are increasingly deployed in domains such as privacy-preserving authentication, verifiable computation, and secure finance. However, authoring ZK programs remains challenging: unlike conventional software development, ZK programming manifests a fundamental paradigm shift from \textit{imperative computation} to \textit{declarative verification}. This process requires rigorous reasoning about finite field arithmetic and complex constraint systems (which is rare in common imperative languages), making it knowledge-intensive and error-prone. While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong code generation capabilities in general-purpose languages, their effectiveness for ZK programming, where correctness hinges on both language mastery and constraint-level reasoning, remains unexplored. To address this gap, we propose \textsc{ZK-Eval}, a domain-specific evaluation pipeline that probes LLM capabilities on ZK programming at three levels: language knowledge, algebraic primitive competence, and end-to-end program generation. Our evaluation of four state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that while models demonstrate strong proficiency in language syntax, they struggle when implementing and composing algebraic primitives to specify correct constraint systems, frequently producing incorrect programs. Based on these insights, we introduce \textsc{ZK-Coder}, an agentic framework that augments LLMs with constraint sketching, guided retrieval, and interactive repair. Experiments with GPT-o3 on Circom and Noir show substantial gains, with success rates improving from 20.29\% to 87.85\% and from 28.38\% to 97.79\%, respectively. With \textsc{ZK-Eval} and \textsc{ZK-Coder}, we establish a new basis for systematically measuring and augmenting LLMs in ZK code generation to lower barriers for practitioners and advance privacy computing.

Open access
2 source records
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
cs.SE
Original source
Jan 1, 2025·OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
0 cites
SHA-256 Preimage Finder Spanish (For Bitcoin)

Katayama, Kaoru Aguilera

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Original source
Dec 18, 2024·IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
5 cites
Exploring the Six Worlds of Gröbner Basis Cryptanalysis: Application to Anemoi

Katharina Koschatko, Reinhard LĂŒftenegger, Christian Rechberger

Gröbner basis cryptanalysis of hash functions and ciphers, and their underlying permutations, has seen renewed interest recently. Anemoi (Crypto’23) is a permutation-based hash function that is efficient for a variety of arithmetizations used in zero-knowledge proofs. In this paper, exploring both theoretical bounds as well as experimental validation, we present new complexity estimates for Gröbner basis attacks on the Anemoi permutation over prime fields.We cast our findings in what we call the six worlds of Gröbner basis cryptanalysis. As an example, keeping the same security arguments of the design, we conclude that at least 41 instead of 37 rounds would need to be used for 256-bit security, whereby our suggestion does not yet include a security margin.

Open access
Polynomial and algebraic computation
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Original source
Oct 17, 2024·2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Distributed Systems Security (ICBDS)
4 cites
EduDocs: Document Verification using Blockchain

Sanchit Kadwe, Shilpa Laddha, Yash Patil, Yukrant Patle · 5 authors

In today’s digital age, the verification of documents is a critical aspect of numerous transactions and processes across various industries. However, traditional methods of document verification are often susceptible to fraud, tampering, and inefficiencies. In response to these challenges, this project proposes a novel solution leveraging blockchain technology to enhance the security and integrity of document verification processes. The objective of this project is to develop a decentralized system for document verification using blockchain, aiming to provide a secure, transparent, and tamper-proof platform for verifying the authenticity of digital documents. By harnessing the immutable and transparent nature of blockchain, the proposed system seeks to address the shortcomings of traditional verification methods and establish a trusted environment for document verification. Key features of the proposed system include the use of cryptographic hashing techniques to create unique digital fingerprints for each document, which are then stored on a blockchain network. Smart contracts are utilized to automate the verification process, enabling seamless and transparent verification without the need for intermediaries.The methodology involves the design and implementation of the blockchain-based document verification platform, incorporating essential components such as user authentication, document uploading, verification, and retrieval functionalities. The system is developed using Ethereum, a popular blockchain platform, and is deployed on a test network for evaluation and testing. Results from experimental testing demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed system in providing tamper-proof document verification services. Furthermore, comparative analysis with existing centralized solutions highlights the advantages of blockchain-based verification in terms of security, transparency, and efficiency.

2 source records
Web Data Mining and Analysis
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Original source
Aug 28, 2024·Journal of Symbolic Computation
1 cites
Invariant neural architecture for learning term synthesis in instantiation proving

Jelle Piepenbrock, Josef Urban, Konstantin Korovin, Miroslav Olƥåk · 6 authors

The development of strong CDCL-based propositional (SAT) solvers has greatly advanced several areas of automated reasoning (AR). One of the directions in AR is therefore to make use of SAT solvers in expressive formalisms such as first-order logic, for which large corpora of general mathematical problems exist today. This is possible due to Herbrand's theorem, which allows reduction of first-order problems to propositional problems by instantiation. The core challenge is synthesizing the appropriate instances from the typically infinite Herbrand universe. In this work, we develop a machine learning system targeting this task, addressing its combinatorial and invariance properties. In particular, we develop a GNN2RNN architecture based on a graph neural network (GNN) that learns from problems and their solutions independently of many symmetries and symbol names (addressing the abundance of Skolems), combined with a recurrent neural network (RNN) that proposes for each clause its instantiations. The architecture is then combined with an efficient ground solver and, starting with zero knowledge, iteratively trained on a large corpus of mathematical problems. We show that the system is capable of solving many problems by such educated guessing, finding proofs for 32.12% of the training set. The final trained system solves 19.74% of the unseen test data on its own. We also observe that the trained system finds solutions that the iProver and CVC5 systems did not find.

Open access
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Original source
Feb 19, 2024·arXiv (Cornell University)
0 cites
SACRÉ BLEU: Self-Assessed Creator Royalties Énforced by Balancing Liquidity Estimation & Utility (A formal definition and analysis of Ethereum Request for Comment ERC-7526)

David Miles Huber, Arran Schlosberg

The secondary market for Ethereum non-fungible tokens (NFTs) has resulted in over $1.8bn being paid to creators in the form of a sales tax commonly called creator royalties. This was despite royalty payments being enforced by no more than social contract alone. Predictably, such an incentive structure led to zero-royalty alternatives becoming abundant and payments dwindled. A purely programmatic solution to royalty enforcement is hampered by the prevailing NFT standard, ERC-721, which is ignorant of sale values and royalty enforcement therefore relies on (potentially dishonest) third parties. We thus introduce an incentive-compatible mechanism for which there is a single rationalisable solution, in which royalties are paid in full, while maintaining full ERC-721 compatibility. The mechanism constitutes the core of ERC-7526.

Open access
2 source records
cs.GT
econ.TH
Diverse Specialized Academic Research
Original source
Jan 1, 2024·SSRN Electronic Journal
0 cites
Code Review DAO

Wulf A. Kaal

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Software Engineering and Design Patterns
Original source
Sep 1, 2021·Journal of digital banking.
3 cites
Securing DLT-based KYC via randomised audits

Matus Drgon, Lamprini Georgiou, Aggelos Kiayias

Know Your Customer (KYC) is a costly and heavily regulated process that financial institutions are legally required to undertake to conduct business with their customers. Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) can be used as a coordination mechanism for financial institutions to share KYC costs in a common jurisdiction. Previous techniques that use DLT to support the KYC process, perhaps unexpectedly, introduce a single point of failure in the system. Indeed, financial institutions are vulnerable to repercussions if a single institution makes an operational mistake during the onboarding stage. We tackle this problem by introducing a probabilistic mechanism, where some of the financial institutions involved need to independently repeat the KYC process in the form of a randomised audit. This novel approach mitigates the single point of failure of the previous DLT-based KYC designs and introduces a natural trade-off between the security of the KYC process and its cost efficiency. In our approach the audit probability can be either set as a global DLT parameter or be dependent on attributes associated with the particular client.

Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Original source
Mar 7, 2014·Journal of Medical Devices
0 cites
Detection of Looping During Colonoscopy Using Embedded Sensors1

Mike Bruce, David Drozek, JungHun Choi

Looping of the colonoscope shaft is the most common problem associated with a colonoscopy procedure. One study has shown that looping occurred in 91 out of 100 cases [1]. Looping can have a variety of effects ranging from extended procedure times, incomplete examinations, or even perforation of the colon wall [2]. Another study shows that 37 perforations occurred in 116,000 patients [3]. Looping increases discomfort for the patient, requiring larger amounts of anesthesia, and increasing operation time. Looping forces the doctor to reposition the colonoscope by twisting and retracting the shaft with varying degrees of success. This additional maneuvering of the colonoscope shaft during the procedure places extra stress on the inner lining of the colon wall.The problem of looping can be lessened with the help of manipulation by the doctor. By applying pressure to the abdomen and rotating the patient on his/her left or right side, looping can be reduced [4]. Some examples of existing equipment that is currently used to help combat this problem include: a double balloon sheath around the distal tip, a shape locking overtube guide, a general overtube, or a variable stiffness colonoscope. These are devices that passively prevent looping from forming. A better way to try and solve this problem is to constantly monitor the shape of the colonoscope shaft to determine if and when a loop will form and prevent it from happening. Some of the devices that employ a similar method to this include: the computer assisted NeoGuide system, fluoroscopy, and magnetic endoscopic imaging. The first of these devices uses a computer controlled, articulated colonoscope such that each segment follows the exact same path as the segment preceding it. The latter two give the doctor a 3D image of the shaft. If these devices were less expensive, then they might be more widely used, but as it is they are very expensive.With this in mind, a proof of concept method for detecting the shape of the colonoscope shaft during the procedure is introduced. If the shape of the colonoscope shaft is known then looping can be detected and avoided more easily. It would be more beneficial to avoid a loop all together than to backtrack once it is already formed.A model was developed that consists of multiple sets of connected links to be placed along the middle of the colonoscope shaft. These links are free to rotate in two different directions to show the motion of the shaft in full. Each rotation joint is equipped with a 6 mm rotational potentiometer, an angular displacement sensor. The potentiometer is a variable resistor that increases its resistance linearly from zero to a peak value over a range of 240 deg. Every rotation joint has a potentiometer attached to it through a modified pin. Figure 1 shows a single link with potentiometer attached.This only shows a single link but the entire model has 20 links connected together to give an image of a much larger stretch of the colonoscope. The link system is designed to conform to the inside of the colonoscope shaft only increasing the stiffness marginally. The system setup is shown in Fig. 2.Figure 2 above shows the complete system diagram with all components and order of attachment. Once the model was finished it each sensor was wired together in series on the power and ground pins with a power supply. The sensor output pins were wired separately and returned to the end of the system to a data acquisition device to process the signals. The signals acquired are voltage readings from each potentiometer. Signal express was used to acquire the signal and save it as a file. The file was then inserted into a computer program in matlab, which graphed an image of the model.The linkage was formed into a straight line to show the baseline reading for the system. The second configuration was a small alpha loop with 3 cm radius. This was formed because the alpha loop is one of the most common types of loops found in the colonoscopy procedure. Both configurations are shown in Fig. 3.Once this was done, the voltage readings from the sensors were recorded into a file. This file was then inserted into a program that manipulates these values into corresponding angles based upon calibration charts. From the corresponding angles a graphical image was produced that closely resembles the original model. The matlab graphs are set to the same scale as the original model. The graphical images can be seen in Fig. 4. The straight line and alpha loop configuration both very accurately resemble the physical model with little error (Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)). This shows that the model can accurately predict complex shapes and configurations, with little error, that are commonly found inside the colon during a procedure.From the results presented above, it can be seen that the linkage model method with attached potentiometers can easily manage loops commonly found in the everyday procedure. This ability combined with the graphical imaging software can help a doctor to potentially see a loop as it is about to be formed. As has been previously said, the key to stopping loop formation is the prediction of loops before they form. With this model and software, loops can be accurately predicted and viewed during a procedure. With little to no training at all a doctor can look at the computer screen and be able to tell if the shaft of the colonoscope is approaching the tipping point between loop formation and following the colon wall around a curve such as in the sigmoid colon. This would be greatly helpful with decreasing the numbers of incomplete colonoscopies due to loop formation. Along with this, knowing the curvature of the shaft of the colonoscope and the basic knowledge of the shape of the colon, the doctor can give a more accurate description of locations of polyps discovered in the colon.Overall, this method of loop detection that has been discussed could serve as an additional tool to helping a doctor complete a colonoscopy procedure. This method could reduce procedure time due to loop formation as well as decrease pain to the patient. The doctor could also decrease the number of incomplete colonoscopies that result from looping of the colonoscope shaft.

Soft Robotics and Applications
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Original source
Jan 1, 2012·IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
0 cites
On the (Im)Plausibility of Constant-Round Public-Coin Straight-Line-Simulatable Zero-Knowledge Proofs.

Yi Deng, Juan A. Garay, San Ling, Huaxiong Wang · 5 authors

Abstract. In 2001, a breakthrough result by Barak [FOCS 2001] showed how to achieve public-coin zero-knowledge (ZK) arguments in constant rounds, a feature known to be impossible using black-box simulation. In this approach, the simulator makes use of the code of the malicious verifier in computing the prover messages (albeit without understanding it), and does not rewind the malicious verifier—and it is hence called a straight-line simulator. Since then, however, we have witnessed little progress on the basic question whether Barak’s technique can be extended to ZK proof systems. In this paper we make progress on this front, by providing strong evidence that such an extension is far from likely. Specifically, we show that for a natural class of constant-round public-coin ZK proofs (which we call “canonical, ” as all known non-black-box ZK protocols fall in this category), a straight-line simulator based on the known non-black-box technique for such a proof system can actually be used to solve a seemingly unrelated problem, namely, to figure out some non-trivial property of a verifier’s program, and without executing the target code, a problem commonly viewed as notoriously hard. A key tool in our reduction is an improved structure-preserving version of the well-known Babai-Moran Speedup (derandomization) Theorem, which essentially says that, for a constant-round public-coin interactive proof system in which the verifier sends m messages and each of the prover messages is of length p, if the cheating probability for an unbounded prover is Ï”, then there exist (p/O(log 1

Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Polynomial and algebraic computation
Original source
Aug 3, 2010·Balisage Series on Markup Technologies
4 cites
Extension of the type/token distinction to document structure

Claus Huitfeldt, Yves Marcoux, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

The type/token distinction introduced by C. S. Peirce and taken up by many others is familiar when applied to individual symbols or characters in a writing system, and also when applied at a higher level to words (and word-like objects). Some writers apply the distinction not only at some basic or foundational level but also as a description of higher levels of organization. This paper follows their example by outlining a concrete extension of the type/token distinction to all levels of document organization, specifying that higher-level types may contain sequences of lower-level types, and similarly for higher- and lower-level tokens. We further extend the usual model of types and tokens by allowing higher-level types to contain not just sequences of (lower-level) types but also sets, bags, conjunctions and disjunctions of types. This allows the system to deal gracefully both with indeterminate documents (e.g., a manuscript in which it is not clear whether a given mark on the page represents a 'c' or a 't') and with intentionally polyvalent documents, in which some marks are to be read as tokens of more than one type, as in the “ambigram”, a sort of combination puzzle and calligraphic artwork in which the shapes on the page may be read in different ways, or the same way, in different directions. This account of document structure in terms of types and tokens is similar in many ways to that offered by SGML, XML, and other systems of descriptive markup. On this view, SGML and XML elements are, strictly speaking, types (and tokens) in Peirce's sense of those words. Some techniques developed in other areas to which the type/token distinction is relevant may be useful in work on markup languages (and vice versa).

Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Original source
Jan 1, 2004·Digital Commons @ Butler University (Butler University)
0 cites
AZBY-Shiftwords: Edify, Story

Richard Sabey

The cipher (or athbash, under which name Web3 defines it) is a Hebrew substitution cipher which replaces the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet (aleph, 1\) by the last (tav, ) the second (beth, J) by the last but one (shin, IJI), and so on, unti I we get to the last (ta , n), which i replaced by the first (aleph, 1\). Jan Anderson described it in Fledge Ledge Edge (WW 8. 1997229). Naturally, the idea can be applied to our alphabet; following the precedent set by atbash I name it the azby cipher.

Open access
2 source records
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Algorithms and Data Compression
Original source