Abstract The Norwegian health care system is built on individual rights and the principles of universal access, decentralization, and free choice of provider. Norway has universal health coverage, funded primarily by general taxes and by payroll contributions shared by employers and employees. Local authorities at the municipal level organize and finance primary health care services according to local demand and within national frameworks. Habilitation services are offered both in the primary health care and as a part of the specialist health services. They offer both inpatient and outpatient services for people with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD). National guidelines, known as Good health and care services for people with IDD , have recently (2021) been launched after various reports over the years of serious breaches and challenges in the health and care services provided to people with IDD.
Open access
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Abstract Introduction Chronic diseases form the largest burden of disease in European countries. Redesign of health systems towards chronic integrated care is needed, with more collaboration between first and second line, between medical and social services and support to prevention and self-management. What are the levers for change in such health systems? This study addresses this knowledge gap, through a policy analysis of barriers and facilitators for change towards chronic integrated care. Methods 26 central level stakeholders were selected, based upon their influence in regulation and policy, financing, health care provision and community representation. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were held covering assessment of past and current policies and implementation, barriers and opportunities for change. Results Reforms have taken place, such as the stimulation of local initiatives for chronic integrated care projects and the set-up of local care councils. Most stakeholders assessed the current Belgium's implementation of integrated care as low, despite a growing awareness for the need for change. A context factor often mentioned to constrain implementation was a state reform which led to a partial decentralization, fragmentation of decision power and a division of healthcare competences between federal and federated levels. Other barriers were the current financing system, the lack of investments in new models of care and the vested interests of providers. Discussion This analysis shows that chronic care reform in Belgium is constrained by partial decentralization of primary health care, and by the financing system and vested interests. It points to the need for coordination of health policy making and implementation. Disentangling the levels of decision-making and the financial leverage at these levels gives insights for change and change management, for the Belgium health system and other countries with a strong decentralized system. Key messages The current Belgium’s implementation of integrated care was assessed as low, due to different contexts factors such as division of health care competencies between different governmental levels. In a country as Belgium with a strong decentralized health care system coordination of health policy making and implementation is key in order to scale up integrated care for chronic diseases.
Maria Gabriella Melchiorre, Roberta Papa, Sabrina Quattrini, Giovanni Lamura · 5 authors
INTRODUCTION: eHealth applications have the potential to provide new integrated care services to patients with multimorbidity (MM), also supporting multidisciplinary care. The aim of this paper is to explore how widely eHealth tools have been currently adopted in integrated care programs for (older) people with MM in European countries, including benefits and barriers concerning their adoption, according to some basic health system characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2014, in the framework of the ICARE4EU project, expert organizations in 24 European countries identified 101 integrated care programs. Managers of the selected programs completed an online questionnaire on several dimensions, including the use of eHealth. We analyzed data from this questionnaire, in addition to qualitative information from six innovative programs which were studied in depth through case study methodology, according to characteristics of national health systems: a national health model (financing system), overall strength of primary care (PC) (structure/service delivery process), and level of (de)centralization of health system (executive powers in a country). RESULTS: 85 programs (out of 101) adopted at least one eHealth tool, and 42 of these targeted explicitly older people. In most cases, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were used and some benefits emerged like improved care management and integration, although inadequate funding mechanisms represented a major barrier. The analysis by health system characteristics showed a greater adoption of eHealth applications in decentralized countries, in countries with a National Health Service (NHS) model, and in countries with a strong/medium level of PC development. CONCLUSIONS: Although in the light of some limitations, findings indicate a relation between implementation of care programs using eHealth tools and basic characteristics of health systems, with decentralization of a health system, NHS model, and strong/medium PC having a key role. However adaptations of European health systems seem necessary, in order to provide a more innovative and integrated care.
Claudio Ronco, G. Mason, A. Nayak Karopadi, Ashlea Bennett Milburn · 5 authors
Today, health policy seems to be on the top of governments' agendas around the world. Healthcare systems are challenged by a number of phenomena happening on a global scale; these trends include demographic change in terms of an ageing population, an increase in chronic disease, patients having higher expectations on healthcare delivery and above all a major pressure on public finances to slow increasing healthcare expenditures. Such developments are forcing policy-makers to reform healthcare systems. First, there is a tendency towards decentralization of responsibilities. Second, governments are moving towards reimbursement schemes rewarding good outcomes and performance. Third, great importance is being attributed to transparency and accountability, and to introduce competition in healthcare. Fourth, attention is being shifted from simple treatment of a disease towards preventive initiatives, in a more holistic approach to health. Finally, healthcare policy-makers are recognizing the importance of empowering patients to give them control over decisions regarding their own health. These dynamics can be observed in chronic kidney disease, the management of which is a huge economic burden to healthcare systems globally, and which represents a good example of a field where important changes can be witnessed in therapy, technology, delivery and financing.
Open access
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
CONTEXT: In the 1990s, the Republic of Georgia instituted health care reforms to convert the centralized, state-operated health care system inherited from the Soviet Union to a decentralized, market-driven system of health care delivery. Under the new system, 87% of health care expenditures are financed through out-of-pocket payments at the point of service. OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of health care reforms on access to care and health care financing among ill residents of Tbilisi, Georgia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A probability-proportionate-to-size cluster survey conducted in 1999 of 248 households containing 306 household members who had been ill in the past 6 months in Tbilisi, Georgia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported health care utilization, out-of-pocket expenditures, and financing practices. RESULTS: Of sick household members, 51% used official health care services at hospitals and clinics; 49% did not use official services and sought advice from relatives or friends, used traditional medicines, or did nothing. Those with serious illness were more likely to seek care through official services (82%) than those with nonserious illness (27%). Ninety-three percent of respondents said costs were the major deterrent to obtaining health care. Ten percent of ill household members reported that they were unable to obtain health care because of high costs; 16% reported being unable to afford all the medications necessary to treat their illness. Sixty-one percent of ill household members used savings to pay for health care expenditures and 19% of those able to obtain care had to use strategies such as borrowing money or selling personal items to pay for health care. Total out-of-pocket health care expenditures (53%) were paid for by borrowing money or selling personal items. A significant portion of households with ill members (87%) reported an interest in purchasing health care insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Economic disruption and health care reforms have led to access problems and out-of-pocket financing strategies that include reliance on personal savings, selling personal items, and borrowing money. Future reforms should consider an appropriate system for health care insurance risk pooling for the population of Tbilisi, Georgia.
Stephen T. Miller, Roger Vander Zwagg, Melanie Joyner, John W. Runyan
Observations of a publicly-financed system for the medical care of a large number of persons with chronic diseases have been made over seven years. The system combines decentralized, nurse-staffed neighborhood clinics, operated by a public health department, with a central referral clinic for consultations and the management of complicated problems. After seven years in the chronic disease program 55% of 1,004 patients with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiac diseases were still receiving care, 19% had died, and 26% had been lost to the program. In the seventh year, the mean diastolic blood pressure in hypertensives was 84 mm Hg and the mean serum glucose in diabetics was 203 mg/dl. For the group under care, hospital days/1000/year were 74% of the rate during the year before referral to the program and out-patient visits/1000/year were approximately the same as before referral. However, two-thirds of the visits, formerly made to a public hospital, were now being made to neighborhood clinics. The system appears to be an effective method of providing medical services for persons who formerly used the public hospital as their source of outpatient care.
Open access
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life