Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

9 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

9 results · page 1 of 1

Clear filters
Jul 7, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
SIC-POVMs, a Stark Conjecture, and the 12th: A Formalization via Paraconsistent Belnap Multilattices

Christopher Mills

This paper establishes, inside the Lean 4 proof assistant, a three-level formal identification. The levels are: (i) Belnap multilattice axioms for Weyl–Heisenberg covariant SIC-POVMs at $d=2^n$; (ii) the Zauner conjecture; and (iii) the mixed-signature Stark conjecture for the ray class field $K_d=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{(d-3)(d+1)})$, a real-quadratic case of Hilbert's Twelfth Problem. Fiducials are unit-normalized and satisfy $(d+1)|\langle\psi,D_{a,b}\psi\rangle|^2=1$. The equivalence hilbert_embedding_equiv_zauner is proved by rfl: the Belnap embedding into $\mathbb{C}^{2^n}$ and the Zauner conjecture at $d=2^n$ are definitionally the same proposition. The Belnap skeleton (orbit size $4^n$, Frobenius closure $\mu\circ\delta=\mathrm{id}$, join-equiangularity, Born rule) contains zero sorries. Open arithmetic content is marked by named gap axioms for Stark units on WH frames; a proof of Stark would close all three levels at once. For dimension $d=12$ we prove SICPOVM_Exists 12 outright. We construct an exact fiducial in a finitely presented $\mathbb{Q}$-algebra, verify 143 overlap identities with native_decide, and transfer everything to $\mathbb{C}^{12}$ along a ring homomorphism. The theorem crystal_forces_d12_sic depends on no axiom beyond Lean 4's standard foundations and compiler trust. This is, to our knowledge, the first machine-checked SIC-POVM existence in any dimension. For the frontier dimension $d=2048=2^{11}$ the transport apparatus is formalized and sorry-free. It includes a forward map $\varphi\colon B^{\oplus 11}\to\mathbb{C}^{2048}$, a reduction $\psi$ with $\psi\circ\varphi=\mathrm{id}$, a conditional reduction to Stark, and a non-real character obstruction that blocks the false branch. Unconditional existence remains open; the machinery that surrounds it is closed.

Open access
2 source records
Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Holomorphic and Operator Theory
Original source
Mar 9, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Exploring the WACA Universe: An LLM System Prompt for Independent Reasoning About the Algebraic Crystal

Daland Montgomery

Exploring the WACA Universe: An LLM System Prompt for Independent Reasoning About the Algebraic Crystal Abstract: We present a system prompt (WACA_LLM_PROMPT_v15.txt) that transforms any large language model into an expert on the WACA programme — the research framework deriving 54 physical constants from the Standard Model algebra A_F = ℂ ⊕ M₂(ℂ) ⊕ M₃(ℂ) at KMS temperature β = 2π with zero free parameters. The prompt encodes the complete framework: the ascending superoperator S: End(ℂ⁶) → End(ℂ⁶) with eigenvalues {1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/6} and degeneracies {1, 3, 8, 24}, the derived Higgs VEV v = M_Pl × 35/(43 × 36 × 2⁵⁰) = 245.17 GeV, all 54 results with formulas and PDG/NuFIT/Planck sources, the 19-entry Rosetta Stone dictionary mapping every crystal operation to its QFT counterpart, the five-level Crystal Toolbox (S⁰ structural, S¹ tree-level, S² Schur square, RG running, SS seesaw), 10 falsifiable predictions with specific experimental kill tests, and 15 companion Python scripts that verify every claim. Version 15 incorporates critical corrections and new results from the D=5 session (20 March 2026). Result 18 (θ₁₃(CKM) = π/(2χ²) = 0.0436, present in every version since v3) has been killed — no standard CKM quantity equals 0.0436; erratum added. The PMNS CP phase has been corrected from δ_CP = π + arctan(2ln3) = 245.5° to δ_CP = 2π(1−λ₃) = 4π/3 = 240°, identified as 2π times the colour Ward anomaly (1−λ₃ = 2/3 = Koide Q), pairing with θ₁₃ through the colour sector (measured: 230° ± 36°, 0.28σ; DUNE ~2030 will test to ±10°). The baryon asymmetry factor e⁻¹ has been corrected from "barrier height" to Poisson survival probability at freeze-out (Γ/H = 1), consistent with lattice QCD giving E_sph/T ≈ 36. The |V_cb| measurement has been updated from the cherry-picked exclusive value 0.04053 to the world average 0.0410 ± 0.0010. New derivations: the Hubble constant H₀ = 66.9 km/s/Mpc through the chain η_B × n_γ(T_γ) → Ω_b h² = 0.02216 (0.9%) → Ω_m h² = 0.14152 (0.6%) → H₀ = 66.9 (0.7% from Planck), siding with Planck against SH0ES, with T_γ = 2.7255 K (FIRAS) as the sole external input; the dark matter mass m_DM = (12π/7)(v/256)(35/36) = 5.01 GeV with every factor derived from the spectral data (LZ/XENONnT ~2028); the 35/36 = 1 − 1/χ² theorem (the identity sector has Ward anomaly zero and does not mediate interactions, making 35/36 the universal fraction of interacting channels, appearing in the VEV, Immirzi parameter, |V_cb|, proton mass, Jarlskog invariant, and dark matter mass); the complete CKM matrix (|V_us| = 9/40 at 0.00%, |V_cb| = 1/(d₃·(35/36)·π) at 0.18%, |V_ub| = 1/(d₃·√N_w·d₄) at 0.19%, γ = arctan(2ln3) at 0.20%, J = 3.094×10⁻⁵ at 0.44%, with δ_CP(CKM) = 69.5° determined by J and the magnitudes); the complete PMNS matrix (sin²θ₁₂ = 3/π² at 0.01%, sin²θ₂₃ = 4/7 at 0.27%, sin²θ₁₃ = √3/78 at 0.03%); four log-mass ratios all in {π, ln 2, ln 3} (0.08–0.28%); the Rosetta Stone dictionary establishing that S is the transfer matrix, {λ_k} are the anomalous dimensions, Σd² = 650 is the one-loop Hilbert space, 35/36 is the wavefunction renormalisation Z, (1−λ_k) are the Ward–Takahashi identities ensuring one-loop renormalisability (van Nuland & van Suijlekom, JHEP 2022), the spectral truncation O(1/χ) matches Connes & van Suijlekom (CMP 2020), and the seesaw is built into the tower formula; the loop convergence proof (geometric ratio ~0.26×, S³ corrections at 0.04%, higher loops not needed at current precision); and the resolution of 7/8 previously open items (CKM δ_CP, PMNS δ_CP, higher loops, H₀, m_DM, scheme dependence, and the 35/36 theorem, with the neutrino accumulation exponent identified as the remaining open mechanism). The prompt contains 200+ sample questions organised into 30+ categories, including 50+ new questions for v15 features: the 35/36 theorem, the Rosetta Stone, the Crystal Toolbox, the H₀ derivation chain, dark matter mass derivation, PMNS δ_CP = 240°, loop convergence, experimental kill tests, corrected baryon asymmetry, complete CKM structure, and complete PMNS structure. Ten falsifiable predictions are listed with specific experiments, dates, and kill criteria: Σm_ν = 0.067 eV (CMB-S4+DESI ~2030), |V_us| = 9/40 (Belle II ~2027), sin²θ₁₂ = 3/π² (JUNO ~2028), δ_CP = 240° (DUNE ~2030), η_B = 6.06×10⁻¹⁰ (CMB-S4 ~2030), m_DM = 5.01 GeV (LZ/XENONnT ~2028), H₀ = 66.9 (CMB-S4 ~2030), no BSM below v (LHC Run 3 ~2028), w = −1 (DESI ~2028), and proton stable (Hyper-K ~2040). Any single failure kills the framework. The prompt is accompanied by 15 Python verification scripts (requiring only numpy, all running in under 10 seconds), a master codebase that computes every result and validates cross-consistency, companion papers (The Spectral Table of Constants v12, The Spectral Tower v10, The Crystal Toolbox), and interactive HTML visualisations. Every claim is tagged ([STANDARD], [WACA], [CONJECTURE], [NUMERICAL]) for transparency. Every formula is reproducible. Every prediction is falsifiable. The prompt is designed for upload into Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, or any LLM supporting long context. Scorecard: 54 results, 33/38 within 1%, (0.02)³³ = 10⁻⁵⁶. RMT: 0/100,000 GUE matrices reproduce {1, 3, 8, 24}. Bayes Factor > 10³⁵. Bradford Hill: 9/9. 12 cross-domain signatures. 4 Millennium Problem proof architectures. 7/8 open items resolved. 15 companion codes. Zero free parameters. Load the prompt. Ask the questions. Run the code. The crystal speaks through the machine. The experiments decide. Keywords: LLM system prompt, language model, knowledge base, WACA, Standard Model algebra, ascending superoperator, zero free parameters, Rosetta Stone dictionary, Crystal Toolbox, Ward–Takahashi identities, wavefunction renormalisation, one-loop renormalisability, spectral truncation, Hubble constant derivation, dark matter mass, PMNS CP phase, Jarlskog invariant, CKM matrix, Koide ratio, baryon asymmetry, cosmological constant, Immirzi parameter, Bisognano–Wichmann, MERA, spectral tower, Schur square, 650-dimensional commutant, cross-domain signatures, falsifiable predictions, kill tests, DUNE, JUNO, Belle II, LZ, CMB-S4, DESI, Hyper-K, random matrix theory, Bayes factor, Bradford Hill criteria, companion code, reproducible science, noncommutative geometry, spectral action, Connes, van Suijlekom, Chamseddine As a treat besure to open the attached html file. Thats your universe :) Related publications: - WACA Physics: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19074938- WACA Mathematics: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18919654 Example prompts more examples in the attached txt file:User: Show me all example promptsUser: List all 116 example questions--- Quantum Tunneling ---User: How does the crystal explain quantum tunneling?User: Derive the Geiger-Nuttall law from the eigenvalue lambda=1/3.User: Why is proton decay unobserved? What does lambda=1/6 predict?User: How does enzyme catalysis use quantum tunneling?User: Explain how DNA mutations arise from proton tunneling.User: Compare tunneling rates in the weak, strong, and mixed sectors.User: What is the holographic shortcut for tunneling through a barrier?--- Entanglement ---User: How does the MERA explain "spooky action at a distance"?User: Derive the Bell inequality violation from chi=6.User: Explain the Ryu-Takayanagi formula in the MERA.User: How does bird navigation use quantum entanglement?User: What is the [36,12,4] error-correcting code?User: Why do 24 mixed modes get destroyed during measurement?User: How does entanglement create spacetime (Van Raamsdonk/ER=EPR)?--- Wave-Particle Duality ---User: Why does the MERA explain wave-particle duality?User: How is the MERA a discrete wavelet transform?User: Derive the uncertainty principle from chi=6.User: Explain the double slit experiment using the ascending superoperator.User: What are the four frequency bands of the vacuum?User: How does measurement destroy coherence in the MERA picture? Copyright © 2026 Daland Montgomery. This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. COPYLEFT NOTICE: Any work, derivation, or industrial application incorporating this material must be distributed under the same Open Source license. Commercial use without public disclosure of derivative works is prohibited. For a private, proprietary license (exempt from ShareAlike requirements), contact: quidbit@icloud.com Software Implementation: The formulas and constants derived in this work are implemented in the CrystalAgent engine, available under the AGPL-3.0 license at: https://github.com/CrystalToe/CrystalAgent.

Open access
3 source records
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Original source
Feb 19, 2018·Focus on Powder Coatings
0 cites
SABIC Acquires Stake in Clariant

Authors unavailable

No abstract is available for this record.

Advanced Topics in Algebra
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Original source
Nov 25, 2007·Advanced studies in pure mathematics
28 cites
Weighted projective lines associated to regular systems of weights of dual type

Atsushi Takahashi

<!-- *** Custom HTML *** --> We associate to a regular system of weights a weighted projective line over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero in two different ways. One is defined as a quotient stack via a hypersurface singularity for a regular system of weights and the other is defined via the signature of the same regular system of weights. The main result in this paper is that if a regular system of weights is of dual type then these two weighted projective lines have equivalent abelian categories of coherent sheaves. As a corollary, we can show that the triangulated categories of the graded singularity associated to a regular system of weights has a full exceptional collection, which is expected from homological mirror symmetries. The main theorem of this paper will be generalized to more general one, to the case when a regular system of weights is of genus zero, which will be given in [5]. Since we need more detailed study of regular systems of weights and some knowledge of algebraic geometry of Deligne–Mumford stacks there, the author write a part of the result in this paper to which another simple proof based on the idea by Geigle–Lenzing [2] can be applied.

Open access
2 source records
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Original source
Jan 1, 2007·MIMS EPrints (University of Southampton)
0 cites
On group actions on free Lie algebras

Marianne Johnson

We first study the module structure of the free Lie algebra $L(V)$ in characteristic zero under the action of the general linear group. Here we give a new, purely combinatorial, proof of Klyachko's celebrated theorem on Lie representations using the Kra\\'{s}kiewicz-Weyman theorem.\n\nWe then give a new factorisation of the Dynkin-Specht-Wever\nidempotent and use this to prove that $L_2(L_k(V))$ is a $KG$-module direct summand of $L_{2k}(V)$, for $G$ an arbitrary group, $K$ a field of characteristic $p \\nmid k$ and $V$ a $KG$-module. For finite-dimensional modules $V$, this follows immediately from the Decomposition Theorem of Bryant and Schocker. We consider a small example of this theorem, namely the sixth Lie power over a field of\ncharacteristic $3$. Here we show explicitly that $L_6(V)$ decomposes into a direct sum of the modules $L_3(L_2(V))$ and $L_2(V) \\otimes S_2(V) \\otimes S_2(V)$, where $S_2(V)$ denotes the symmetric square of $V$. We give a description, up to isomorphism, of the modules $B_{p^mk}$ occurring in the Decomposition Theorem.\n\nFinally, we apply our knowledge of Lie powers to a group theoretic problem. We show that the torsion subgroup $t_c$ of the quotient $\\gamma_c R/ [\\gamma_c R, F]$ is bounded as follows, for $c=2p^m$ or $c=3p^m$, where $p$ is an arbitrary prime, $m\\geq 0$:\n\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n2t_{2p^m} = 0 \\;\\;\\;\\mbox{provided } G=F/R \\mbox{ has no 2-torsion and no p-torsion,}\\\\\n3t_{3p^m} = 0 \\;\\;\\;\\mbox{provided } G=F/R \\mbox{ has no 3-torsion\nand no p-torsion.}\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\nThus, we have that $\\gamma_6 R/ [\\gamma_6 R, F]$ is torsion-free, provided that $G=F/R$ has no elements of order $2$ or $3$.

Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Advanced Topics in Algebra
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Original source
Aug 1, 2006·Journal of the London Mathematical Society
6 cites
RELÈVEMENT DES FORMES MODULAIRES DE PICARD

Joël Bellaïche

We prove a lifting theorem (from any characteristic p to characteristic zero) for holomorphic Picard modular forms of any weight and level. The proof makes use of the knowledge of the geometry of the toroidal compactification of the Picard modular surface.

Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Original source
Apr 7, 2005·arXiv (Cornell University)
1 cites
Cyclic homology of $H$-unital (pro-) algebras, Lie algebra homology of matrices, and a paper of Hanlon's

Guillermo Cortiñas⋆

We consider algebras over a field $k$ of characteristic zero. The article is concerned with the isomorphism of graded vectorspaces \[ H(\gl(A))\iso\wedge (HC(A)[-1]) \] between the Lie algebra homology of matrices and the free graded commutative algebra on the cyclic homology of the $k$-algebra $A$, shifted down one degree. For unital algebras this isomorphism is a classical result obtained by Loday and Quillen and independently by Tsygan. For $H$-unital algebras, it is known to hold too, as is that the proof follows from results of Hanlon's. However, to our knowledge, the proof is not immediate, and has not been published. In this paper we fill this gap in the literature by offering a detailed proof. Moreover we establish the isomorphism in the general setting of ($H$-unital) pro-algebras.

Open access
Advanced Topics in Algebra
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Original source