The paper addresses entity authentication in quantum key distribution (QKD) systems as a decisive condition of their practical security. It is shown that the information-theoretic security of quantum key agreement does not eliminate the need to authenticate the communicating parties: an unauthenticated classical channel leaves the system exposed to the man-in-the-middle attack, since the eavesdropper can run independent QKD instances with each party and reconcile two keys under full control. Existing authentication methods are analysed and classified by the underlying cryptographic primitive: symmetric schemes based on Wegman–Carter universal hashing, pre-shared and fixed keys, public-key infrastructure, two-way authentication, quantum entity/identity authentication, and zero-knowledge proofs. For each class the operating principle, advantages and limitations are determined, with emphasis on key management, scalability and trust distribution. It is established that symmetric and quantum-layer methods rely on pre-shared secrets with a quadratic growth of key material, public-key infrastructure introduces a single trust bottleneck and quantum-vulnerable primitives, while existing zero-knowledge authentication schemes are quantum and bound to the physical layer or solve network properties other than identity. A comparative analysis reveals an unresolved scientific gap: the absence of a scalable entity-authentication method that simultaneously provides non-disclosure of the secret, quantum resistance, sub-quadratic scalability and minimisation of trust assumptions. On this basis, a prospective research direction is substantiated – the construction of entity-authentication methods based on post-quantum zero-knowledge proofs operating over the classical control plane of scalable QKD networks. The requirements for such a method are formulated, and its compatibility with formal QKD security proofs is discussed.
This document serves as the official Executive Summary and reflexive analysis of the BeTrueCore decentralized collective intelligence protocol (Modular System v1.2). The text provides a rigorous interdisciplinary overview at the intersection of Web3 architecture, Zero-Knowledge cryptography (ZK-Proofs, MACI), quantum metaphors, and the theory of scale-invariant historical singularity. Divided into six core chapters, it details the ontology, historical context, empirical analogies (including the Princeton GCP), philosophical genesis (Wabi-Sabi, Kintsugi), and the mathematical framework (Wiener differential equation) of the temporal isolation circuit.
This paper proposes a next-generation edge measurement and control system that integrates physical sensors, virtual sensors, generative AI, high-precision simulation, stochastic resonance, dynamic reconfigurable hardware, legal compliance engines, distributed ledgers, and Fail-Legal control. By combining real and virtual data, the system compensates for sensor failure, noise, sampling limits, communication degradation, and regulatory changes in real time. Its core concept is to shift control from “measure → judge → act” to “predict → verify → legalize → control → prove,” enabling safer, legally compliant, evidence-driven operation through Quantum Thought Circuit OS ASI.
Pre-registration of a structural scar class prediction for microsoft/phi-4 based on measurement-site stiffness (S = 0.0358), before the structural scar measurement is conducted. Predicts INTERMEDIATE class (1,000–4,000×ε non-max) based on the stiffness→scar ordering established across four families (Mistral, Llama, Qwen, Gemma) in Papers 1–12 and confirmed by RC-6 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19305176). Designed as a hostile falsification test: Phi is trained with heavy synthetic-data distillation from GPT-4-class teachers, unlike any previously tested family. Explicit falsification criteria and hostile hypotheses defined. Part of the Fall Risk AI research program on neural network structural identity. The Neural Network Identity Series — Mathematical foundations, empirical validation, and governance frameworks for verifying which model is running Paper 1: The δ-Gene: Inference-Time Physical Unclonable Functions from Architecture-Invariant Output Geometry (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18704275) Paper 2: Template-Based Endpoint Verification via Logprob Order-Statistic Geometry (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18776711) Paper 3: The Geometry of Model Theft: Distillation Forensics, Adversarial Erasure, and the Illusion of Spoofing (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18818608) Paper 4: Provenance Generalization and Verification Scaling for Neural Network Forensics (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18872071) Paper 5: Beneath the Character: The Structural Identity of Neural Networks — Mathematical Evidence for a Non-Narrative Layer of AI Identity (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18907292) Paper 6: Which Model Is Running?: Structural Identity as a Prerequisite for Trustworthy Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19008116) Paper 7: The Deformation Laws of Neural Identity (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19055966) Paper 8: What Counts as Proof? — Admissible Evidence for Neural Network Identity Claims (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19058540) Paper 9: Composable Model Identity — Formal Hardening of Structural Attestations in the Enterprise Identity Stack (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19099911) Paper 10:Where Identity Comes From: Path Sensitivity and Endpoint Underdetermination in Neural Network Training (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19118807) Paper 11: Post-Hoc Disclosure Is Not Runtime Proof: Model Identity at Frontier Scale (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19216634) Paper 12: Family-Dependent Response to Reasoning Distillation Across Structural and Functional Identity Layers (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19298857) Technical Note: Agent Identity Is Not Model Identity (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19240883) Technical Note: Gap Invariance: Why PPP Measurements Are Domain-Independent by Construction (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19275524) Formal Verification Stack for Neural Network Structural Identity (IT-PUF Coq Proofs) (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18930621) Copyright (c) 2026 Anthony Ray Coslett / Fall Risk AI, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. Patent Pending (Applications 63/982,893, 63/990,487, 63/996,680, 64/003,244).
The Recursive Edge: A Synthesis of Adaptive Spline Architectures and Agentic Paradigms in 2026 1. Introduction: The Structural Turn in Deep Learning The trajectory of artificial intelligence research in the mid-2020s has been characterized by a decisive pivot away from the "Depth Hypothesis"—the long-standing conviction that stacking layers of fixed, node-centric non-linearities (such as Rectified Linear Units or GeLUs) is the singular path to increasing representational power. For nearly a decade, the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) served as the atomic unit of deep learning, embedding a fundamental assumption: that the complexity of the world is best approximated by global linear transformations followed by static point-wise activations. However, the years 2025 and 2026 have witnessed the emergence of a "Structural Turn," a paradigm shift where the focus has moved from the depth of the network to the mathematical quality of the connections themselves. At the forefront of this shift is the Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN), an architecture that relocates learnable non-linearities from the neurons to the edges, parameterizing weights not as scalar values but as univariate B-spline functions. This architectural reorientation is not merely a cosmetic change; it represents a fundamental rethinking of how neural networks approximate continuous functions, grounded in the rigorous mathematical framework of the Kolmogorov-Arnold Representation Theorem of 1957.1 Simultaneously, in the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP), the limitations of fixed context windows have necessitated a similar structural revolution, giving rise to Recursive Language Models (RLMs) that replace monolithic attention mechanisms with agentic, recursive control flows.3 This report presents an exhaustive technical analysis of these advancements. Unlike standard survey papers, this document prioritizes a "recurse the data" methodology: we do not merely summarize findings but verify the underlying mathematical formulations, cross-reference empirical contradictions, and synthesize second-order insights regarding the causal mechanisms of catastrophic forgetting and context retention. We scrutinize the "Nexus Mirror"—a conceptual framework suggesting that the modular additivity of KANs and the recursive nature of RLMs mirror the causal and physical structures of reality more faithfully than the entangled representations of traditional MLPs.1 By rigorously checking the math of B-spline recursions, least-squares grid extensions, and intrinsic dimensionality bounds, we aim to provide a definitive account of the state of neural architecture in 2026. 2. Theoretical Foundations: The Kolmogorov-Arnold Paradigm To understand the operational mechanics and the theoretical legitimacy of KANs, one must first dissect the mathematical divergence between the original representation theorem proposed in the mid-20th century and its practical realization in modern computational frameworks. 2.1 The Kolmogorov-Arnold Representation Theorem (1957) In 1957, answering David Hilbert’s thirteenth problem, mathematicians Andrey Kolmogorov and Vladimir Arnold established a representation theorem that fundamentally challenged the understanding of multivariate functions. The theorem posits that any continuous multivariate function $f: ^n \to \mathbb{R}$ can be represented as a superposition of continuous univariate functions and addition. The canonical form of this representation is given by: $$f(x_1, \dots, x_n) = \sum_{q=0}^{2n} \Phi_q \left( \sum_{p=1}^{n} \psi_{p,q}(x_p) \right)$$ In this formulation, the inner summation $\sum_{p=1}^{n} \psi_{p,q}(x_p)$ maps the $n$-dimensional input vector to a scalar value, which is then processed by the outer function $\Phi_q$. Crucially, the theorem asserts that the inner functions $\psi_{p,q}$ are continuous and monotonic, and remarkably, they are independent of the target function $f$.2 All information specific to $f$ is encoded in the outer functions $\Phi_q$. Mathematical Verification and Historical Critique: While theoretically profound, the direct application of this theorem to neural networks was stalled for decades by a critical practical limitation. As highlighted by Girosi and Poggio (1989), the inner functions $\psi_{p,q}$ constructed in the original proofs are "pathological"—they are highly non-smooth, often exhibiting fractal characteristics that make them indistinguishable from noise in a practical setting.8 Because these functions are non-differentiable (or have derivatives that are singular almost everywhere), they are fundamentally incompatible with gradient descent-based learning algorithms like backpropagation. Thus, for nearly seventy years, the Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem was regarded as a mathematical curiosity—an existence proof with no constructive utility for machine learning. 2.2 The Modern KAN Architecture (2024-2026) The breakthrough that enabled the KAN architectures of 2025/2026 did not come from solving the fractal nature of the original $\psi$ functions, but rather from relaxing the theorem's strict conditions. The modern KAN specification, introduced by Liu et al. (2024) and expanded upon in 2025, generalizes the theorem to arbitrary network depths and widths, and most importantly, replaces the fixed, fractal inner functions with learnable, smooth splines.1 A KAN layer in this modern paradigm is defined not by a weight matrix $W$, but by a function matrix $\mathbf{\Phi}$. If a layer has $n_{in}$ inputs and $n_{out}$ outputs, the layer is parameterized by a grid of $n_{in} \times n_{out}$ univariate functions: $$\mathbf{\Phi} = \{ \phi_{q,p} \}, \quad p=1\dots n_{in}, \quad q=1\dots n_{out}$$ The pre-activation of the $q$-th neuron in the subsequent layer is the sum of these function outputs: $$x_{q}^{(l+1)} = \sum_{p=1}^{n_{l}} \phi_{q,p}^{(l)} \left( x_{p}^{(l)} \right)$$ This structure fundamentally differs from the MLP. In an MLP, the linear combination happens before the non-linearity ($ \sigma(\sum w x) $). In a KAN, the non-linearity is applied to each input individually *before* the summation ($\sum \phi(x)$). This "pre-summation non-linearity" allows the network to model complex multiplicative interactions (like $x \times y$) through the identity $xy = \frac{1}{4}[(x+y)^2 - (x-y)^2]$, using only sums and univariate squares—a capacity that MLPs struggle to achieve without significant depth.1 2.3 Mathematical Verification of B-Splines and Recursion The choice of basis function for $\phi(x)$ is the critical engineering decision in KANs. To enable local plasticity—the ability to update knowledge in one region of the input space without corrupting knowledge in distant regions—KANs utilize B-splines. A B-spline curve is constructed from a linear combination of B-spline basis functions $N_{i,k}(x)$ of order $k$: $$\phi(x) = \sum_{i} c_i N_{i,k}(x)$$ The basis functions are defined recursively via the Cox-de Boor formula. We explicitly verify the recursive structure here to confirm the local support property claimed in the literature.13 Base Case ($k=0$): The zeroth-order basis function is a step function (indicator function) over the $i$-th knot interval $$. This mathematical fact is the engine of KANs' continual learning capability: updating a coefficient $c_i$ affects the function $\phi(x)$ only within the compact support of $N_{i,k}(x)$. If a new task provides data outside this interval, the coefficient $c_i$ receives a zero gradient and remains unchanged, thereby preserving the "memory" of the previous task.15 Correction on Notation: Snippets 13 and 14 utilize slightly different indexing conventions ($B_{i,n}$ vs $N_{i,k}$). However, the underlying recurrence relation is identical. It is crucial to note that efficient implementations (like EfficientKAN) assume a uniform grid where $t_{i+1} - t_i = h$ (constant), which simplifies the denominator terms to constants (e.g., $k \cdot h$), replacing division operations with simpler multiplications to accelerate GPU throughput.17 3. Computational Implementation: From PyKAN to MatrixKAN The transition from theoretical construct to practical tool involved significant algorithmic optimization. The initial implementation, referred to as PyKAN, prioritized mathematical clarity over computational efficiency, leading to severe bottlenecks that hindered scaling. 3.1 The Memory Bottleneck in PyKAN In the naive PyKAN implementation 18, the evaluation of spline bases was performed by expanding the input tensor. For a batch size $B$, input dimension $N_{in}$, and grid size $G$, PyKAN would expand the input $x$ to a tensor of shape $(B, N_{in}, G)$. Memory Complexity: $O(B \cdot N_{in} \cdot G)$. Issue: For high-dimensional data (e.g., an image with flattened dimension 1024) and fine grids (e.g., $G=100$), this intermediate tensor becomes prohibitively large, exhausting GPU VRAM even for small batches. 3.2 EfficientKAN: The Matrix Reformulation To address this, the community developed EfficientKAN.17 This implementation reformulates the B-spline computation. instead of expanding the input, it exploits the fact that the spline output is a linear combination of basis functions. Algorithmic Verification: Instead of computing the full expansion, EfficientKAN likely calculates the basis activations $N_{i,k}(x)$ and performs the linear combination with coefficients $c_i$ as a matrix multiplication. Optimization: The memory complexity is reduced to $O(B \cdot N_{in} + N_{in} \cdot N_{out} \cdot G)$ because the batch dimension is decoupled from the grid expansion in memory. Result: Snippet 17 notes that this "simplifies the computation to a basic matrix multiplication." This reformulation was essential for enabling KANs to be used in deeper architectures like Vision Transformers. 3.3 MatrixKAN: Parallelizing the Recursion A further refinement, MatrixKAN, optimizes the Cox-de Boor recursion itself.20 Since t
This project is the public home of Relational Calculus, a meta‑mathematical framework that replaces the brute‑force logic of absolute‑scale computation with dimension‑less, capacity‑anchored blueprints. At its heart lies a simple but radical axiom: every system possesses an intrinsic maximum—a “North Star”—and by expressing all observations as fractions of that limit, complexity collapses, efficiency soars, and transfer across domains becomes automatic. The collection gathers the complete stack: the foundational theoretical paper, a ready‑to‑run Relational Decoder (an open‑source algorithm that probes any black‑box function and extracts its dimensionless template), and five applied case studies that prove the principle in wildly different arenas—number theory (deterministic prime pair lattices), symbolic artificial intelligence (a geometric chess engine that exhibits emergent strategy with zero domain knowledge, gaining 90%+ efficiency), high‑energy physics (scale‑invariant jet tagging that transfers zero‑shot across collision energies with +14.5% AUC), quantum chemistry (80% error reduction in cross‑molecule transfer), and precision oncology (a lightweight XGBoost that achieves 98.4% cross‑species diagnostic accuracy under a 70% hardware‑signal collapse, completely erasing batch effects). A companion paper extends the logic to large language models, proposing Relational‑CoT as a drop‑in replacement for resource‑intensive chain‑of‑thought reasoning. Every work converges on the same empirical signature: >90% reduction in computational cost, genuine zero‑shot generalization across scales and species, and the proof that Green AI is not an aspiration but an engineering reality. An integrated STEM curriculum for ages 10–14 ensures that the relational lens is taught before the continuous one, inoculating the next generation against the wasteful “math of deviation.” All code, data, and executable papers are open‑source. The project is intended not as a scholarly gesture but as an enablement instrument for the industrial shift from the Age of Fire—where more compute meant more extraction—to the Era of Relation, where measuring how full a system is replaces the endless pursuit of how much.
[Depreciated and replaced by V3] The application-specific clean rebuild has not yet been published; its authoritative theoretical boundary is now the governing V3 branch: After Turing: The Fold Machine - An Exact, Parameter-Free and Machine-Closed Derivation of Classical Computational Science from Smithian Fold Theory; From Fold to Consciousness: An Exact, Zero-Parameter and Machine-Closed Foundational Reconstruction of Consciousness and Cognitive Science from Smithian Fold Theory. The V3 source platform is https://github.com/MettaMazza/ernos-labs-sft-platform. The original DOI, concept DOI, version number and files are preserved for transparent historical provenance; this record must not be presented or cited as current V3 work. v4.0 — the word-scale gap closes within the fold. Rung 5e (pre-registered): the fold-factor mixing law — every context level that holds contributes, weighted 2^level, the engine's own forced halving constant — carries the pure counted engine, with no twin, no prose flood, zero training and zero parameters, past the gradient-trained transformer at word scale: cross-entropy 3.1907 vs the same-day twin's 3.4292 (replicated across two independent anchorings; stacked with the Rung 5d extraction: 3.1344). Both scales of the task gate now belong to the counted engine. Rung 5d's transfer-in verdict is SUPPORTED across three independent arena anchorings in one day. New in the architecture: tool graduation (acts held, values never — a question territory that a tool answered once runs the tool itself thereafter, fresh), recall as regeneration across every memory tier, and judge-independent graduation scoring. End-to-end verification: 36/36. v3.4: Rung 5d, the transfer-in — pre-registered verdict SUPPORTED: the trained twin's dyadically-loud fold content is extracted and installed INTO the counted engine as a counted prior with zero new parameters, closing 55.6/87.9/101.4% of the available gap at k=16/32/64 while the random-truncated null closes 10.1/24.5/56.5%; at half budget the loud shape beats the full twin's own. The word-scale rematch is recorded in full (twin retrained on today's text; decomposition included). Also: judge-independent graduation scoring (boot-discovered pool, cycle-parity alternation), multi-orbit binding (XI-4 in full), recall-is-regeneration (a held experience re-walks its own orbit, never reprinted), the public SOTA table beside the local giants with cited published figures, and one-command replication kits (GPT-2 weights auto-fetch; 13/13, 39/39 proven on a fresh clone). End-to-end verification: 36/36. Full paper v1.1 — supersedes the pre-paper (From One Axiom to Master-Level Chess — and the Law Inside Neural Networks). Built from scratch by one woman, working alone, in under twenty-four accumulated hours: where a score falls short it marks an implementation gap at measurement time, never a limit of the mathematics — the gains between releases are the finding. v1.4 adds the fold eye (vision as exact integer Walsh spectra, self-certified by integer Parseval per image, recognition of seen images with no image model in the loop) and the graduation score (blind head-to-head vs the teacher, tallied per question-territory; the teacher retires as wins cross the majority lock) -- and documents the 2026 convergence: DeepSeek Engram arrives at deterministically-addressed exact memory from the gradient side, and two independent results place the optimal curriculum at p = 1/2, the fold lock. v1.6: the full omnimodal engine (the voice via Kokoro, the fold ear -- sound as Parseval-certified integer Walsh spectra, video composed from frames + sound), speaker-transparent reasoning threads, and 32/32 end-to-end empirical verification of the entire architecture including persistence across process death. v1.7: removal-proof omnimodality, measured -- every supporting model is a teacher with an exit: a sound taught once by the synthesis teacher is re-spoken from the engine's own exact counted record in 0.00s with no model; a sound heard once is recognized natively with no transcriber; 34/34 end-to-end verification. v1.9: zero-model perceptual learning (the human observer -- a novel image learned and re-recognized at share 1.00 with no model in the loop); agentic self-knowledge (the observer reads the engine's own source, measured); the hourly progress instrument with a committed pre-boot birth line; one-tap y/n closure. v2.0 (flight-ready): the full modern-agent toolkit (live web search/fetch, paginated reading, in-file grep -- every call held as a training trace), the 43-domain everything-curriculum under the fold-only law, SOTA 1-1 benching on the public MMLU test split with the newborn baseline committed, generation closure (the Learning Law reaches generate() itself), and 36/36 end-to-end verification. v2.1: the ReAct law (reason-act-observe enforced in-turn; narrated intent without an act is detected and forced), reasoning trained on the observer's NATIVE thinking tokens (STaR-gated) with both minds' full thinking streamed to the user, and document intake (a sent file is reading -- inboxed, counted, persistent). v2.2: the identity stated correctly -- UnisonAI is an OMNI MODEL (language, sight, hearing, speech, and video on one held memory), not a language model; LLMs remain the contrast class only. v3.0: the full-altitude rewrite -- the complete omni model documented at the same depth as the spectral science: thirteen sections, the architecture organ by organ with every measurement, Rung 5c as its own section, the empirical record and its committed birth line, 36/36 end-to-end verification, and the 2026 convergence. This paper is a PROOF of The Smithian Fold Theory of Everything, not the main event: the theory (one axiom, zero free parameters, 1,844 machine-verified forced checks) is at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21182469 and github.com/MettaMazza/Smithian-Fold-Theory-Of-Everything -- run the prover yourself. The engine: github.com/MettaMazza/UnisonAI. v3.3: the LLM-native presence suite -- the exact registered protocol applied to GPT-2's entire knowledge-storage class: 13/13 tensors, 39/39 checks, unanimous (margins 3.4-79.3x); the flagship claim now rests on the flagship objects, with diffusion/speech models recast as cross-domain breadth. Three connected results and the architecture they force. First, a pre-registered, self-certifying spectral instrument shows trained neural-network weights carry placement-law in the dyadic (Walsh) basis: 18/18 unanimous on validated released models; the law concentrated in transformer expansion projections and token embeddings across three unrelated architectures (up to 230x chance in GPT-2), attention at chance; strictly training-caused (He-initialised controls at 1.0x); surviving 4-bit deployment quantization. A recipe map from 124M to one trillion parameters shows the law tracks training recipe, not scale or architecture — strongest carrier DeepSeek-R1-671B at 43–47x — and loud-recipe weights transform under the fold's transformation group exactly as solved game-theoretic value fields do. Second, the "learned similarity space" is a counted object: word kinship as exact co-occurrence shares reproduces semantic family structure (quark → lepton, neutrino, proton) with zero parameters and zero gradients. Third, UnisonAI: a complete language architecture in which every LLM mechanism — memory, attention, similarity, learning, prediction, generation — is replaced by a machine-verified law of the Smithian Fold Theory, zero trained parameters end to end. On identical held-out text the fold-native engine outperformed its trained transformer twin (cross-entropy 1.289 vs 1.888) after reading the corpus once (26 seconds) against 48,000 gradient readings (21 minutes per seed). Deployed as a live, continuously-learning agent whose teaching loop also runs autonomously: a teacher model asks, judges, and closes the learning law itself, and the engine self-plays against its own held lessons. Negative results reported in full with their scopes. Companion to The Smithian Fold Theory of Everything (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21182469; 307 suites, 1,844 forced checks, 0 failures). Engine and records: github.com/MettaMazza/UnisonAI and github.com/MettaMazza/Smithian-Fold-Theory-Of-Everything.
Open access
8 source records
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
The article presents a comprehensive overview of zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) protocols as a fundamental concept of modern cryptography. The historical background of their emergence and the main properties ensuring reliability and confidentiality, i.e., completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge — are considered. A classification of protocols into interactive and non-interactive ones is provided, with a special focus on modern solutions such as the zk-SNARK and the zk-STARK. The mathematical foundations of ZKPs are described in detail, including discrete logarithm proofs, the use of homomorphic encryption, polynomial commitments, hashing, and elliptic curves. Practical application areas are analyzed, including cryptocurrencies (Zcash, Ethereum), authentication systems, digital identity, and electronic voting. The advantages of using ZKPs are shown, such as enhanced privacy, reduced need for trusted intermediaries, and strengthened security. At the same time, key challenges are outlined, including scalability, implementation complexity, the problem of trusted setup, and potential vulnerability to quantum computing. It is concluded that zero-knowledge proof protocols are a powerful tool for ensuring confidentiality and reliability of digital systems, while further research is aimed at creating more efficient and quantum-resistant solutions.
Machine learning plays a pivotal role in modern technology, driving advancements across various domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems. Federated Learning (FL) offers a significant advantage over traditional machine learning by enabling decentralized model training without requiring data to be centralized, thereby enhancing privacy and security. With the advent of 6G networks, which promise ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC) and massive machine-type communications (mMTC), FL can be significantly enhanced. 6G’s improved bandwidth and latency characteristics will enable more efficient data exchange and model updates, further enhancing the adoption of FL. However, the performance of FL can be significantly affected by data distribution, particularly in non-IID (non-Independent and Identically Distributed) scenarios, where FL tends to perform poorly. This paper proposes a novel approach to enhance FL by integrating Transfer Learning (TL) and Continual Learning (CL), named Integrated Federated Transfer and Continual Learning (IFTCL). TL can extract features from client training samples to benefit subsequent clients, while CL mitigates catastrophic forgetting caused by heterogeneous data across clients. This integration improves FL performance under varying degrees of heterogeneous data distributions simulated by Dirichlet distribution, enhancing accuracy, convergence speed, and reducing communication overhead. The proposed method’s feasibility is validated using a publicly available radar recognition dataset.
Julio César Pérez García, An Braeken, Abderrahim Benslimane
Group communications play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of service (QoS) of Internet of Things (IoT) networks, enabling efficient information dissemination while minimizing resource utilization. However, ensuring information security and privacy in IoT group communications necessitates the implementation of an efficient and lightweight key management scheme due to the limited capabilities of most IoT devices. This paper presents a novel key management protocol for group communications that employs distributed Blockchain technology in IoT networks. The proposed scheme considers nodes belonging to multiple groups. By utilizing an asymmetric key shared among group members, secure communication is established between outsiders and group members while preserving anonymity inside the group. A distinguishing feature of the protocol is its combination of group member anonymity and automatic key revocation facilitated by a Smart Contract. Furthermore, simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme, consuming less than 300 mJ of energy and taking less than 7 seconds to establish a group key among 1000 nodes, outperforming several existing approaches in the literature in terms of computation and communication costs.
The security of distributed applications backed by blockchain technology relies mainly on keeping the associated cryptographic keys (i.e. private keys) in well-protected storage. Since they are the unique proof of ownership of the underlying digital assets. If the keys are stolen or lost, there is no way to recover the assets. The cold wallet is a good candidate for basic use cases, but it has a substantial challenge for more complex applications as it does not scale. Warm and hot wallets are more convenient options for blockchain-based solutions that aim to transact in a cloud environment. In this work, we focus on Hardware Security Module (HSM) based wallet. The HSM is the de-facto standard device designed to manage high-value cryptographic keys and to protect them against hacks. In this demonstration, we present an HSM-based working prototype that secures the entire life cycle of Ethereum public and private keys.