The article provides critical analysis of the new Strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation up to 2030 with the forecast up to 2036 in view of evolution of federal relations and provisions of the institutional theory. Topicality of the research is envisaged by the necessity to comprehend the fact whether the present document in the absence of certain strategies of federative relations can perform the coordinating role in stimulating economic selfdevelopment in regions. The goal of the research is to identify systemic contradictions between declared targets of spatial development and real conditions and mechanisms of governing included in strategic documents. Principle conclusions of the research demonstrate a deep paradox of todayβs Russian regional policy: in spite of the declared rejection of the idea of equal development and transition to rhetoric of differentiated approach and resource concentration the effective Strategy does not put forward any withdrawal from the model of controlled asymmetry but reproduces centralized vertical logics of governing. The key institutional gap is successive denial of the important role of institutions of in-regional level, i.e. city agglomerations and strong centers of population, which are recognized as objective reality but are not provided with real power and finance authorities. Tools being introduced, such as common lists of strong centers of population and geo-strategic territories, as well as the digital platform of governing are analyzed as mechanisms of increasing administrative priority fixing from above and tools of vertical supervision but not as the basis of decentralization and providing regions with authorities. The author shows increasing non-coordination in the system of strategic planning. As priority lines in restructuring the article proposes adoption of the federal law about regional development securing the real status of institutions on in-regional level; drastic change in inter-budget relations to raise region independence and restore on the federal level the common center of responsibility for coordination of spatial policy. The research contributed to the discussion about the necessity to elaborate complex strategy of federative relations and showed that without such a document and re-distribution of real power and resources any spatial strategy will not be able to resolve key institutional paradoxes.
ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΎΡ Web2 ΠΊ Web3 ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ-Web3. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ»Π°Π±ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ½ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ (ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΠΠ ΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ) ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· Β«ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ Β» ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ±Π°Π»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π±Π°Π»Π°Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ-Web3 Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ·Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ-Web3 ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΄ΡΠΎ, ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ±-ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ. ΠΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ-Web3 ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² (ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ), Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. This paper is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of management models for digital platforms and organizations in the context of the transition from Web2 to Web3 and the formation of a future post-Web3 management paradigm. The main existing management models are considered in detail, their strengths and weaknesses are identified. A multi-criteria comparative analysis of three models (centralized, DAO, and hybrid) is carried out in terms of democracy, economic efficiency, and risk tolerance. The results of the analysis demonstrate that none of the pure management models is universally optimal. At the same time, the hybrid model demonstrates the most balanced results in all groups of criteria, which makes it possible to consider the creation of hybrid institutions that ensure a balance between decentralization, efficiency and resistance to manipulation as the basis for the formation of a post-Web3 management architecture. The principles of building a post-Web3 management system as an adaptive, multi-level system combining an operational core, expert subdomains and a broad community are outlined. The key characteristics of post-Web3 are the transition from quantitative token voting to reputation-based management and participant contributions (meritocracy), the introduction of algorithmic legitimacy, and the integration of AI to support decision-making.
Open access
Human Resources and Workforce
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
Subject. This article discusses the peculiarities of forming a holistic approach to assessing human capital as an economic resource of regions to improve the efficiency of its use in the context of decentralization. Objectives. The article aims to study human capital as a factor in the economic growth of regions in the context of decentralization, identify interregional disparities in its development, and substantiate strategic areas for intensifying the formation, funding, and effective use of human potential at the territorial level. Methods. For the study, I used analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, abstraction, comparison, generalization, and systems and dialectical methods. Results. The article proposes strategic areas for intensifying and financing the development of human capital, taking into account modern challenges, and it pays particular attention to the institutional capacities of regions. The article substantiates current approaches to financing human capital in the context of the transition to a decentralization model, as well as in the systematization of data on investments in human resources for 20232025, and it formulates proposals for improving the sustainability of regional development through the optimization of inter-budgetary transfers, taking into account the existing interregional imbalances in the Human Development Index. Relevance. The results obtained have a certain practical value, as they can help regions more effectively utilize their potential, attract investment, create new jobs, and develop their own unique strategies for human capital development based on territorial characteristics.
The sanctions restrictions imposed on the Russian economy have predetermined the risks of reduced control and blocking cross-border financial channels for international payments. Under these circumstances, an important element of the stateβs economic policy is the development of adaptation solutions that ensure the ability to minimize the risks associated with transformation of foreign economic activity. One of the mechanisms that forms the basis for solving this problem is the use of decentralized finance (DeFi) in the practice of international settlements. Meanwhile, it should be noted that in this area of financial and economic relations today there are a number of open issues β ranging from the conceptual framework to the impact of these fintech-innovations on the prospects for the stability of national financial systems and economic development in general. These issues acquire a special level of relevance at the regional level. The subject of the study is the prospects and mechanisms for using DeFi tools in the system of cross-border payments within the region. The object of the study is the foreign trade operations of the Republic of Tatarstan with the Peopleβs Republic of China. The purpose of the study is to develop and test methodological approaches for assessing the potential impact of fintech DeFi tools on the organization foreign economic activity in the region on the stability of gross GRP dynamics. The authors used methods of cointegration analysis, scenario modeling, substantiation of the studied patterns using regression analysis methods, etc. The information and statistical basis for the study were derived from data from the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation, the National Bureau of Statistics of China, as well as data from the territorial statistical authority of the Republic of Tatarstan. The study resulted in the systematization of the macroeconomic effects of using DeFi technologies for organizing international payments. A series of macroeconomic models have been developed that made it possible to identify and justify the potential for economic growth in the region through the practical application of DeFi tools in the system of organizing transnational settlements under sanction restrictions.
Open access
2 source records
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally
Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
Roman Rusyn-Hrynyk, Π. Π. Π€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΊ, Pavlo Kotsaba
The article presents conceptual approaches to the formation of an adaptive and predictive paradigm of enterprise financial management, which is gaining particular relevance under conditions of growing economic turbulence, digital transformation, and geopolitical instability. Traditional financial management models based on fixed budgets, retrospective analysis, and standardized procedures are no longer capable of ensuring flexible responses to dynamic changes in the external environment. In this context, the study aims to justify and structure a new management paradigm that integrates predictive analytics, digital technologies, adaptive strategies, and a systemic approach to enterprise finance. The research outlines five key components of the adaptive-predictive financial system: analytical (collection and processing of big data), predictive (scenario modeling, probabilistic forecasting), adaptive (flexible budgeting, KPI monitoring), integrative-technological (implementation of ERP, BI, cloud platforms), and organizational (coordination, decentralization, information flow management). The tools enabling each component are detailed, including GARCH, ARIMA, machine learning models, neural networks, decision support systems (DSS), and real-time analytics. Special attention is paid to the role of digital technologies in transforming financial functions, particularly the possibilities for automation, complex risk profiling, unstructured data analysis, and the creation of integrated analytical platforms. The article emphasizes the need to develop a new managerial culture focused on rapid response, cross-functional collaboration, development of digital competencies, and data-driven decision-making. A number of unresolved issues are identified, including the lack of unified approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of adaptive-predictive systems, underdeveloped risk management models using AI, and barriers to implementation in organizations with traditional hierarchical structures. The findings of the study may serve as a foundation for developing industry-specific models of adaptive financial management and enterprise digital transformation.
Most modern digital technologies, which are part of the fourth industrial revolution, can be used to improve the efficiency of production processes in the oil and gas industry, in particular, in exploration, planning and optimisation of well construction and maintenance operations, secondary oil and gas recovery methods and enhanced oil and gas recovery. Information flow management can significantly reduce operating costs associated with oil and gas field logistics. Production processes in the oil and gas industry are accompanied by the collection, transmission, processing and storage of significant amounts of information aimed at making and implementing the necessary decisions. In these conditions, big data management technologies are becoming increasingly important. The proliferation of digital technologies, given the peculiarities of oil and gas technologies, requires improvement of measures and means of protection against unauthorised interference with information flow management processes. The use of distributed ledger technology makes data leakage impossible and provides a high level of protection of the information field. The conducted research has identified areas of rational use of simulation software and special applications in the form of automated calculation algorithms in modelling the work processes of oil and gas equipment. Simulation programs do not require a mathematical description of the oil and gas machine's workflow, but are ineffective in the case of a significant number of calculation operations. The use of an automated calculation algorithm is advisable if it is necessary to involve numerous arrays of source data, the analysis of which involves the implementation of numerous calculation procedures. Increasing the share of digital technologies in the educational process involves the widespread introduction of electronic document management, the legalisation of electronic signatures and distance learning methods.
Open access
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally
Anna Khvorostyanaya, I. V. Rozhdestvensky, A. V. Π€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²
Abstract. One of the strategic priorities for the development of large companies is the growth of innovation, as they provide companies with long-term competitive advantages. Working with third-party developers allows corporations to get the development they need at a relatively mature stage, when the main technical risks have already been removed. At the same time, corporations are not ready to finance early-stage developments, while venture investors in Russia mainly finance projects already at the revenue stage. In this regard, the main purpose of this article is to consider a possible mechanism for solving this problem using digital platforms based on distributed ledger technology in the part that relates to smart contracts, as well as a platform for semi-automatic examination of projects using the technology readiness assessment methodology. The creation of digital platforms is due not only to the growth of corporate interests, but also to the increased development of the global and regional trend β digitalization. The article presents and summarizes various digital platforms that can be used by companies to develop a funnel of innovative proposals, that is, industrial acceleration. For this purpose, the methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction are used in the article. The key result of this article is the identified tools of digital platforms, which can reduce the systemic and non-systemic risks of strategic investment. The platform for accelerating projects based on distributed ledger technology makes it possible to achieve transparency of transactional operations by fixing the client path, and the platform for assessing the level of readiness and auditing projects based on the methodology for assessing technological readiness solves the problem of balancing the interests of different market actors and optimizes the process of building tactical tasks. These models of digital platforms can be practically implemented in the activities of various market actors and make it easier for them to determine strategic goals and select quantitative and qualitative tasks for their implementation. Further research may be devoted to the analysis of the best practices for the creation and development of such digital platforms, strategic typology, and the study of industry effects of the use of digital platforms.
Open access
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Regional Economic Development and Innovation
Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture