Abstract This article analyses the European Union’s regulatory evolution regarding Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) in financial markets, tracing the journey from the inception of Regulation (EU) 2022/858 to the transformative Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). It explores the foundational value proposition of tokenisation, namely atomic settlement and fractionalisation, while contrasting institutional successes like Project Guardian with systemic failures such as the ASX CHESS replacement. The study identifies the ‘ceiling on success’ inherent in the initial DLT Pilot Regime (DLTR), characterised by restrictive capitalisation thresholds and a lack of native cash leg integration. The analysis further evaluates the 2025 ESMA recommendations and the Commission’s subsequent MISP proposal, which seeks to establish a permanent, scalable architecture through unbundled CSD services introducing DLT Notaries and Account Keepers, and significantly elevated aggregate thresholds of €100 billion. The article concludes by arguing that the framework’s ultimate success depends on securing European technological sovereignty and maintaining an agile, national-level supervisory model rather than succumbing to premature centralisation.
Hasni Dyah Kurniawati, Saefudin Saefudin, fernando julio parera, Nurlyana Puspitasari · 7 authors
<ns3:p> Research background In recent decades, venture capital (VC) has increasingly incorporated sustainability principles, reflecting the global shift toward environmentally and socially responsible investment. The alignment of VC with sustainability goals responds to the climate crisis, technological transformation, and social expectations for ethical finance. However, research on the VC–sustainability nexus remains fragmented across disciplines, requiring systematic mapping to clarify key trends and research gaps. This study aims to map the global evolution of VC research within the context of sustainability. It identifies publication trends, collaboration patterns, main thematic clusters, and emerging research areas to provide an integrated understanding of this growing field. Methods A mixed-methods bibliometric analysis was conducted using data retrieved from the Scopus database for the period 2002–2025. Analytical tools including <ns3:italic>RStudio and VOSviewer</ns3:italic> were applied to examine publication dynamics, co-authorship networks, and conceptual structures. The SPAR-4-SLR protocol was adopted to ensure methodological transparency and rigor. Discussion Results show that international collaboration—particularly among China, the United States, and the United Kingdom—drives sustainable innovation in the VC ecosystem. Three main clusters were identified: the theoretical evolution of VC, long-term policy and economic frameworks, and VC’s role in green entrepreneurship and sustainable technology. Research on emerging themes such as decentralized finance (DeFi), machine learning, and risk modeling remains limited. This study adds value by offering a systematic overview of the intellectual landscape and highlighting future research directions to strengthen VC’s contribution to global sustainability. </ns3:p>
Shahinaz Hanem Abdellatif, Marwan Kobtan, Mostafa Zeinelabdein, Ramina Pashaee
The study examines the role of development finance theory, stakeholders’ theory, creating shared value (CSV), and the triple bottom line (TBL) framework to advance the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Most studies focus on sustainable Business Models (SBMs) from the perspective of developed countries and often overlook the interdisciplinary nature and peculiarities of emerging economies, in terms of technology opportunities, financing constraints, and governance challenges, in the Global South. This study proposes a multi-layered framework to advance economic sustainability in emerging economies by integrating blended green finance, public-private partnerships (PPP), and fintech-enabled SBMs. The multi-layered framework redefines traditional PPP as a collaborative delivery and governance mechanism involving public, private, and development multilateral organizations to implement Economic, Social, Governance (ESG), and climate-aligned infrastructure. It also reshapes the role of blended finance strategies and emphasizes the often-overlooked role of non-banking financial institutions (NBFIs); particularly leasing companies, small and microfinance institutions, alongside banks in enabling inclusive green finance, and incorporates financial technology (FinTech) innovations, including decentralized finance (DeFi), blockchain, and digital crowdfunding, to improve access to capital, and financial inclusion. Tailored to the context of MENA economies, like Egypt's Vision 2030, the framework offers policy insights and a smooth transition toward sustainable development. Keywords: Economic Sustainability, Green Finance, Blended Finance, Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), Fintech-Enabled Sustainable Business Models, Economic, Social, Governance (ESG), Egypt Vision 2030
Abstract The relationship between Fintech and Financial inclusion has emerged dramatically in the last five years as this study presents detailed bibliometric research on the interactions between Fintech and financial inclusion. The major goal of this study was to map the intellectual trends, influential work, and current research topics in this fast-developing field. Based on the data obtained from the Scopus database (2020–2025) and processed using VOSviewer, this study elaborates on descriptive, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling analyses. The most important findings are that there has been immense growth in Fintech-FI research since 2020, and the research is mainly concentrated in China, India, and the USA, where most research and articles have been published. This study identified nine thematic clusters such as decentralized finance and AI in banking and the significance of financial literacy. The fast increase in publication but a gap appears between the number of publications and the number of publications that are impacted, which means that there is still a necessity to make some significant, long-lasting contributions. It would be curious to explore the use of behavioral finance, regional comparisons of the regulatory environment, EFT application in empowering SMEs and embracing ESG, and the significance of ethics in the context of digital finance in improving fair and sound financial systems in the world in future.
This study examines the role of impact investing and climate finance in generating measurable social value through renewable energy projects by applying the Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework. Growing global investment in renewable energy has emphasized financial performance and emission reduction outcomes, while systematic measurement of social impacts remains limited. The purpose of this research is to assess how SROI can be used to quantify the social and environmental value created by renewable energy investments and to demonstrate its relevance for impact-oriented decision-making. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining secondary project data analysis, stakeholder engagement, outcome mapping, and monetization of social and environmental benefits to calculate SROI ratios. The findings reveal that renewable energy projects consistently produce social returns exceeding the initial investment, with SROI ratios varying according to project type, scale, stakeholder involvement, and socio-economic context. Community-based and decentralized projects tend to generate higher relative social returns, driven by employment creation, improved energy access, health improvements, and environmental benefits. The study concludes that integrating SROI into climate finance evaluation enhances transparency, accountability, and alignment between financial objectives and sustainable development goals.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) offers open and permissionless financial services, but its core infrastructure remains exposed to serious security failures. Representative infrastructure classes such as decentralized exchanges (DEXs), protocols for loanable funds (PLFs), and cross-chain bridges matter because failures can propagate widely. This work presents a layered and empirically grounded framework for DeFi vulnerability prioritization. We analyze 558 exploit incidents from 2021–2025 and trace their mechanisms, vulnerabilities, and threat vectors across representative DeFi infrastructure classes. We introduce three complementary components: (1) a Risk Priority Number (RPN) used as an interpretable FMEA-style baseline for attack ranking, (2) an Adversarial Feasibility Score (AFS) that captures exploit feasibility from mapped adversarial-trait prevalence and accessibility, and (3) a Vulnerability-Centric Risk Score (VRS) defined as a structured priority ranking combining empirical likelihood, absolute economic severity, and attacker feasibility. The main validated model uses median per-incident USD loss as a consistent severity signal across the full incident dataset. Temporal validation shows that the structured vulnerability-priority model outperforms the multiplicative baseline and improves on the empirical base rank across both temporal holdouts and both future targets. The resulting framework provides an auditable remediation ordering for protocol developers, auditors, and risk managers.
Open access
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
This paper analyzes the reconfiguration of business models in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) ecosystem under the aegis of informational capitalism 4.0.It investigates the paradigmatic transition from restricted innovation to models of open innovation and algorithm-mediated co-creation, based on a new regime of mathematical trust.From a socio-technological perspective, it discusses the tensions between protocol autonomy and state regulation, identifying the challenges that algorithmic governance and social datafication pose to monetary sovereignty and ethics in the technology sector.It is concluded that the success of DeFi depends on the balance between radical decentralization and governance mechanisms that prevent the concentration of power, especially in the context of Latin American development.
Energy Communities (ECs) have emerged as central legal instruments for decentralized renewable energy deployment across Europe; however, their long-term viability depends critically on financial sustainability mechanisms that remain inadequately understood. This study examines the economic foundations of ECs through a narrative literature review of revenue generation, cost allocation, and the capital mobilization pathways in three representative European markets (Germany, Spain, and Italy). A structured Scopus database search identified 280 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025. Following systematic screening, 89 articles were selected for analysis through bibliometric mapping in R (Biblioshiny) and qualitative synthesis in NVivo. The analysis reveals that stable feed-in tariffs, tax incentives, and self-consumption remuneration schemes form the primary revenue mechanisms, while cost management effectiveness varies substantially across countries due to differing grid-charge structures and administrative frameworks. Capital access remains constrained for smaller communities despite hybrid financing innovations combining public grants, cooperative equity, and emerging crowdfunding mechanisms. Regulatory heterogeneity, high upfront investment requirements, and limited institutional credit availability continue to impede scalability. The findings emphasize that achieving widespread EC adoption requires harmonized policy frameworks, transparent cost-sharing arrangements, and diversified investment instruments that align local participation with national decarbonization objectives while ensuring equitable access across diverse socio-economic contexts.
Climate resilience activities in vulnerable regions often confront problems relating to the financial opacity, corruption, and the unreliable verification of outcomes. The paper proposes a blockchain system to strengthen transparency and traceability in climate adaptation funding, particularly for green infrastructure. Using smart contracts and Internet of Things (IoT)- verified geospatial data, the system assures the real-time monitoring of performance metrics and releases funds securely upon assessed performance. A hybrid PoW/PoS consensus mechanism is suggested to enable scalability while remaining energy friendly toward resource-constrained geographies. Pilot implementation among small countries is scheduled to assess the adoption and governance. The goal is for this model to restore public faith and speed climate resilience activities in places where the traditional setup fails.
The current model of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) finance is fundamentally jeopardized by institutional short-termism, fragmented regulatory oversight, and a pervasive lack of verifiable impact measurement (Measurement, Reporting, and Verification, or MRV). This failure, central to the contemporary 'WEF Crisis,' necessitates a new, autonomous financial architecture. This report proposes a Dual-Stream Sustainable Tokenomics Model designed to bypass these systemic flaws by simultaneously accelerating regenerative capital flow toward all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and programmatically defunding low-ESG, high-polluting enterprises. The core mechanism involves the deployment of Negative Externality Tokens (NETs), which act as a programmatic Pigouvian liability, enforced by resilient Divestment DAOs (D-DAOs). This creates an autonomous, persistent financial penalty that forces polluting entities to internalize environmental costs, effectively 'starving' unsustainable capital streams . Concurrently, the issuance of Real-World Asset (RWA) tokens and Impact Credits (ICs), underpinned by Decentralized Ledger Technology (DLT) and real-time Digital MRV (dMRV) 1 , provides verifiable transparency and necessary liquidity 3 for sustainable projects across all SDGs—from poverty alleviation (SDG 1) to climate action (SDG 13). The shift to adaptive DAO 3.0 governance 4 ensures policy persistence and resilience against institutional inertia, establishing a self-sustaining financial stream decoupled from fluctuating political and financial cycles.
This report presents an updated assessment of the environmental footprint of Ethereum several years after the network transitioned from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake. Produced by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) at Cambridge Judge Business School, the research advances earlier analyses by executing a bottom-up infrastructural audit. Rather than relying on theoretical assumptions, it maps the physical infrastructure of the network: where the nodes sit, the exact hardware configurations they run on, and the specific carbon intensity of the grids that power them. The result is a highly granular, empirical estimate of the electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of Ethereum. By establishing this definitive baseline, the report provides a transparent foundation for understanding the contemporary environmental profile of the network and how it may evolve.
Crowdfunding for social goods has become a transformative force in India's development ecosystem, emerging as a crucial citizen-driven financing model for healthcare assistance, educational support, social welfare, environmental conservation, and community development projects.As India progresses toward achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the importance of innovative, decentralized, and participatory funding mechanisms has grown significantly.Traditional sources of funding-government schemes, philanthropic donations, CSR initiatives, and institutional grants-are often insufficient to meet the enormous financial needs of low-income and marginalized communities.In this context, digital crowdfunding platforms such as Ketto, Milaap, ImpactGuru, Donatekart, and GiveIndia offer flexible, inclusive, and accessible channels for mobilizing public contributions.Unlike commercial crowdfunding, donation-based crowdfunding provides no financial returns to donors.Therefore, donors' decisions are fundamentally shaped by behavioural finance factors rather than economic incentives.This research adopts a behavioural finance perspective to examine the psychological, emotional, cognitive, and social determinants that influence campaign success for SDG-aligned social crowdfunding projects in India.The study investigates how donor motivations-including altruism, empathy, moral obligation, warm-glow effect, identity-driven giving, and social influence-interact with campaign design elements, platform architecture, and trust signals to determine fundraising outcomes.Findings from prior research and platform-level data indicate that trust remains the strongest driver of donation intention.Indian donors tend to be risk-averse due to concerns about fraud, misrepresentation, and misuse of funds.As a result, trust-building mechanisms-such as verified fundraisers, authentic documentation, medical proof, transparent financial breakdowns, institutional endorsements, and frequent campaign updates-significantly increase credibility and donor confidence.Emotional storytelling is another powerful determinant; campaigns featuring identifiable beneficiaries, vivid visuals, personal narratives, and urgent medical needs evoke stronger empathy and are more likely to attract support.Social proof and herding behaviour also play a critical role.Donors frequently look to the actions of others to validate campaign legitimacy, especially when information is limited.High engagement metrics-number of donors, comments, shares, early contributions-signal popularity and urgency, triggering positive herding effects that accelerate the fundraising process.Campaigns that achieve early momentum typically experience higher visibility, stronger network effects, and higher conversion rates.In India, where community networks, family ties, religious identity, and regional affiliations are strong, such social cues significantly enhance campaign reach:
The constant evolution of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) calls for the continuous monitoring of its developments and implications through a critical review of the academic literature. While DeFi holds promise for enhancing economic activity by expanding market access for enterprises and promoting financial inclusion, concerns remain that digital assets are primarily used for speculative purposes rather than for financing the real economy. This study employs bibliometric methods to investigate whether and how the current academic literature addresses the potential influence of DeFi on real economic dynamics. Employing bibliometric methods—including co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and keyword co-occurrence analyses—focused on DeFi-related publications in the Economics and Business subject areas within the Scopus database, the study maps the knowledge base, author networks, and thematic trends and their temporal evolution, supporting regulators, researchers, and practitioners. The findings reveal that the integration of DeFi with the real economy has received limited attention in scholarly research. This highlights the need for further investigation into DeFi’s implications for financial stability, productive investment, and long-term economic growth.
Sustainable finance is becoming an essential tool in addressing critical global environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion with the youth generation emerging as a central driver for green investment models.The research identifies new participatory financial systems led by youth, which promote sustainable development, particularly in areas such as renewable energy, climate change, and the circular economy.We achieve this by examining the shift in investment patterns in general, as well as the specific trends among rich young entrepreneurs, activists, and technologists.This is carried out through an indepth analysis of grassroots actions, case studies, and decentralized finance (DeFi) models.The article explores new ways of engaging youth in crowdfunding platforms, green bonds, tokenized carbon credits, and venture funds that focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, bringing sustainability finance within the reach of all and reducing the entry barrier to green innovation.Furthermore, the study sheds light on the interaction between the benefits of technology and finance, as well as the use of blockchain, AI, and other fintech solutions provided by youth-led platforms to maintain accountability, traceability, and scalability in green investment projects.The paper also examines policy gaps and institutional issues contributing to the inability of young people to access sustainable finance and provides recommendations to facilitate an environment that can foster innovation as well as inclusion in it.The study also identifies young changemakers as key drivers in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), by placing them in perspective not just as recipients of sustainable finance, but as creators of its ecosystems.This piece of work is part of the debate around inclusive green growth and a roadmap in terms of empowering the future generation to live within the context of the sustainable economic model.
The global financial ecosystem is undergoing a profound transformation driven by the convergence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) imperatives, Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities, and Financial Technology (FinTech) innovations. This paper explores the synergistic nexus among these three forces and articulates how their intersection is reframing the trajectory of sustainable finance. By integrating ESG objectives with AI-powered intelligence and FinTech-driven efficiency, the study demonstrates how financial systems can evolve from traditional, compliance-based models to adaptive, data-driven, and ethically informed architectures that promote long-term sustainability and inclusiveness. Using a multidisciplinary research framework, the paper examines the mutual reinforcement between sustainability principles, technological innovation, and digital finance mechanisms. It assesses how AI enhances ESG data management through advanced analytics, natural language processing, and machine learning algorithms that can measure, predict, and optimize sustainability outcomes. These technologies improve data transparency, reliability, and comparability, addressing one of the core challenges of ESG evaluation and reporting. In parallel, FinTech platforms like spanning blockchain, decentralized finance (DeFi), green digital bonds, and peer-to-peer investment systems-enable traceable and democratized financial flows that embed sustainability values at the transaction level.The study proposes a novel conceptual model, the “Sustainable Intelligence Framework (SIF)”, which delineates how ESG indicators, AI insights, and FinTech mechanisms interact within a dynamic feedback system. The SIF illustrates that when these domains operate synergistically, they not only enhance decision-making efficiency but also generate compounded social, environmental, and economic value. Through case studies of emerging economies and advanced markets, the research uncovers practical applications, regulatory considerations, and ethical implications of the ESG‑AI‑FinTech triad. The analysis further highlights how AI-driven FinTech can facilitate green credit scoring, impact investment assessment, and automated sustainability auditing, while blockchain ensures trust, traceability, and reduced information asymmetry across value chains. The findings affirm that the integration of ESG, AI, and FinTech is not merely convergent but transformative in creating a synergistic ecosystem that can accelerate the transition toward a sustainable, transparent, and equitable financial future. This synergy also redefines risk management and governance paradigms, positioning sustainability as a strategic driver rather than a regulatory constraint. The paper concludes by emphasizing that the ESG‑AI‑FinTech nexus represents the next frontier in sustainable finance, offering a blueprint for policymakers, institutions, and innovators to harmonize profitability with planetary and social well-being.
NFTree creates incentives to protect ecosystems of high ecological value and strengthens territorial resilience by integrating companies, communities, and key stakeholders under an innovative financing model. Through decentralized community management structures and natural asset tokenization (a process that digitally converts ecological value into verifiable assets), it turns ecosystem stewards into direct protagonists, ensuring transparency, traceability, and placing both people and ecosystems at the core of sustainable development. This publication provides a clear replication guide to consolidate a sustainable financing system that ensures long-term conservation. Based on Fundación Futuro's experience in the Andean Chocó and other successful conservation models, it offers a strategic framework to integrate stakeholders, implement digital tools, and develop governance and financing mechanisms that make ecological and social regeneration viable. The goal is to share experience and inspire replication in other contexts and regions. The publication shares key lessons and insights from Fundación Futuro and Grupo Futuro's journey, aiming to inspire adaptation and replication in diverse contexts and regions.
The creative environment has transformed because of the digital economy's explosive growth, particularly for digital artists who now produce, distribute, and monetize their work primarily through online channels. To preserve the financial sustainability of digital art actors, this study aims to investigate how digital financial literacy serves as a supporting element in crowdfunding and microfinance. Two hundred respondents working in various digital art domains, including graphics, music, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), were surveyed using a quantitative methodology. The study's findings, obtained using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) and SmartPLS software, demonstrated that microfinance has a statistically negligible and detrimental impact on the long-term financial viability of actors involved in digital art. Crowdfunding, on the other hand, significantly improves their financial viability. Furthermore, financial sustainability is positively and significantly impacted by digital financial literacy. The impact of microfinance on the long-term financial viability of digital creative players is mitigated by digital financial literacy. To enhance the resilience of creative professionals in an increasingly digital economy, this study emphasizes the importance of integrating financial education with training in digital skills. The study's practical implications include suggestions for legislators, professionals in the creative sector, and academic institutions to develop targeted initiatives that may enhance the financial viability of digital arts practitioners. To further understand the connection between digital financial literacy and the sustainability of the creative economy, further study is advised that it uses a longitudinal approach and cross-national comparisons.
Regenerative Finance emerged in response to the Great Recession of 2007-2008 and the subsequent financial crisis, which exposed the erosion of the financial system. Its foundation is on Regenerative Economics, proposing a new economic system and framework for a regenerative civilisation that will reshape the future of Finance. It contrasts with various other propositions, such as ESG, DEI, and Green Finance. This thesis aims to define Regenerative Finance and how it differs from traditional extractive Finance and investment business models. How “ReFi” challenges the habitual mindset behind the Financial industry, which prioritises maximising profits at the expense of communities, living ecosystems, and the environment, generating “a triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss”. How it plans to transform the financial system, addressing inequality, and setting forth regeneration. The study employed secondary data collection gathered from official sources, including the UNFCCC. The presentation is descriptive and employs thematic analysis, identifying core themes typical of social science projects. This research examines the technology substructure, which serves as an intersection between Web3, characterised by DAOs, blockchain, Decentralised Finance (DeFi), Crypto, NFTs, and tokenisation as its tools for regeneration. It explores all their technical specifications, the principles behind these innovations, implementation, and challenges. Additionally, there are Natural Capital-Backed Assets (VCM, Biochar, etc.), which function as a novel solution to preserve natural resources, employing technologies such as Tokenization. It encompasses socio-economic and political aspects, examples of ongoing ReFi projects, criticism, challenges, and/or fraud that ReFi may encounter in practice, beyond the theoretical.