Utang Rosidin, Dewi Mayaningsih, Muhammad Yahya Wahyudin
The authenticity of state legal documents in the digital system constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for legal certainty and governmental accountability. This study aims to analyze the regulatory vacuum in chain of custody standards within Indonesia's digital archival administrative law, examine the urgency and conceptual foundations of chain of custody as an instrument for guaranteeing the authenticity of state legal documents, and formulate a reconstruction model based on chain of custody through the integration of cryptographic and blockchain technologies. This research employs a normative legal method utilizing statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal: first, a structurally embedded rechtvacuum exists in Indonesia's digital archival administrative law, wherein none of the six primary legal instruments analyzed explicitly regulates digital chain of custody standards as a mandatory mechanism, reflecting regulatory misalignment that undermines the legal certainty of state documents; second, the chain of custody doctrine requiring five core parameters of documentation continuity, evidence integrity, authentication, expert verification, and corroborative reliability constitutes a conditio sine qua non for authenticity assurance of state legal documents in the digital age; third, this study formulates a Five-Layer Reconstruction Model integrating permissioned blockchain, SHA-256 cryptography, and smart contracts as the techno-normative infrastructure for a national chain of custody system, accompanied by recommendations for amending the Archival Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and the issuance of a new Supreme Court Regulation on blockchain-based digital document authentication
Kemajuan pesat teknologi digital telah mendorong perkembangan ekosistem investasi mata uang kripto di Indonesia, sekaligus memicu maraknya penipuan investasi kripto yang belum ditangani secara memadai melalui instrumen hukum pidana positif. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis kekosongan norma dalam penanganan tindak pidana penipuan investasi kripto dari perspektif hukum pidana positif Indonesia dan hukum pidana Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP, Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE), serta Undang-Undang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UU P2SK) masih memiliki kesenjangan normatif karena belum dirancang untuk mengakomodasi karakteristik khusus kejahatan kripto, seperti desentralisasi, anonimitas pelaku, sifat lintas batas, volatilitas tinggi, dan ketidakjelasan status hukum aset kripto. Dalam perspektif fiqh jinayah, penipuan investasi kripto dikualifikasikan sebagai at-tadlis yang termasuk dalam kategori jarimah ta’zir, dengan prinsip sadd ad-dzari’ah sebagai dasar pencegahan. Analisis maqashid syariah menunjukkan bahwa penipuan investasi kripto mengancam hifzh al-mal (perlindungan harta), sehingga nilai-nilai Islam dapat ditempatkan sebagai rechtsidee dalam mengisi kekosongan hukum. Sebagai ius constituendum, penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembentukan undang-undang khusus mengenai kejahatan aset digital yang mengatur penipuan kripto, sanksi ta’zir yang berorientasi pada restitusi bagi korban, mekanisme pembuktian berbasis forensik blockchain, serta penguatan kerja sama internasional.
The rapid development of blockchain technology has introduced new forms of digital assets, including Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and metaverse virtual land, creating legal uncertainty regarding their status as inheritable property under Indonesian Islamic Family Law. This study examines the legal status of these digital assets as inheritance objects, analyzes their distribution based on fiqh al-mawārīth and Indonesian positive law, and proposes a legal framework to strengthen legal certainty in digital inheritance. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic jurisprudential approaches. Legal materials were analyzed through descriptive and deductive legal reasoning. The findings demonstrate that NFTs and metaverse virtual land satisfy the Islamic legal characteristics of māl because they possess lawful ownership, measurable economic value, legal control, and transferability, thereby qualifying as al-tirkah (inheritance estate). Their distribution should follow the principles of fiqh al-mawārīth while accommodating the technical characteristics of blockchain-based assets, particularly digital wallets and private-key access. The study also identifies a regulatory gap in Indonesian positive law concerning digital asset inheritance. Unlike previous studies that primarily discuss digital assets from commercial or general legal perspectives, this research develops an integrated framework combining Islamic inheritance law, Indonesian positive law, and digital estate planning to strengthen legal certainty, protect heirs' rights, and contribute to the development of Islamic Family Law in the digital era.