The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) represents one of the most consequential U.S. legislative efforts to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. As the bill advances through the legislative process, uncertainty surrounding its ultimate enactment remains significant. Rather than focusing on a binary prediction of passage or failure, this paper examines the market-structure implications of three plausible regulatory outcomes. Using a scenario-planning framework, the analysis explores how stablecoins, tokenized commercial bank deposits, decentralized finance (DeFi), and base-layer crypto commodities may evolve under alternative legislative and regulatory paths. The scenarios recognize that federal agencies, courts, financial institutions, and digital asset firms are already adapting their strategies in anticipation of divergent policy environments. Drawing on legislative records, regulatory filings, industry announcements, and legal scholarship, the paper identifies the principal opportunities, risks, and structural shifts associated with each scenario and assesses their implications for the future development of U.S. digital asset markets.
On April 1, 2025 Circle Internet Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Circle," "the Company," or "issuer", filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contemplating the "offering [of]… shares of Class A common stock." After the additional filing of prospectus amendments, the final offering prospectus is dated August 12, 2025. The offering of 34,000,000 shares was priced before market opening on June 4, 2025 at $31 per share. Circle's disclosure documents provide an excellent description of the many new blockchain-enabled Decentralized Finance [DeFi] technological and operational challenges facing participants and investors. These valuable disclosures benefit all who seek to understand these important developments impacting the future stability of global financial and currency markets. It is the actual disclosure language of Circle Internet Group, Inc. in their prospectus that is the focus of the article.
Canada has emerged as one of the more proactive jurisdictions in regulating crypto asset trading platforms (CTPs), operating a dual-layer framework that requires compliance with both federal antimoney laundering obligations under the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) and provincial securities laws administered by bodies such as the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA). This paper conducts a literature review of the existing academic and regulatory scholarship on Canada's crypto registration requirements, examining the development of this framework from 2014 to 2025. Drawing on peerreviewed scholarship in Canadian securities law, international comparative regulation, and decentralized finance governance theory, it explores the effectiveness of the pre-registration undertaking (PRU) system introduced in 2022-2023, the enforcement actions taken against noncompliant platforms, and the outstanding gaps in investor protection, particularly concerning decentralized finance (DeFi) and value-referenced crypto assets (VRCAs). The paper argues that while Canada's approach represents a meaningful advancement in crypto compliance infrastructure, significant regulatory fragmentation across provinces and the rapid pace of technological innovation continue to challenge the framework's adequacy. Implications for retail investor protection and the integration of crypto into the mainstream financial system are discussed.
This article is devoted to the contribution of cryptocurrencies and blockchain to the transformation of the world economy. It describes the basic principles of blockchain functioning, the evolution of major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as their practical application in the areas of decentralized finance, cross-border payments, and supply chain management. The study also analyzes the advantages of these technologies and their current limitations.
Open access
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
The article is devoted to the philosophical, legal and comparative legal analysis of the transformation of the autonomy of the will in the context of algorithmization of private law. The subject of the study is the transformation of the autonomy of the will as a system-forming principle of private law in the context of algorithmization of contractual relations. The focus is on the relationship between automaticity of fulfillment of obligations (smart contracts) and dispositivity, as well as the functional change in the role of the subject of civil law in the digital environment. In this paper, attention is paid to the problem of the relationship between automaticity of fulfillment of obligations and dispositivity as a system-forming principle of contract law. The author proceeds from the historiographical understanding of the autonomy of the will, which has developed in European and Russian civil law, and considers the smart contract as a technological form of realization of the previously expressed will of the parties. Additionally, the limits of judicial control and the preservation of traditional principles of good faith and proportionality in algorithmic mandatory structures are analyzed. The research methodology is based on a combination of philosophical-legal and comparative-legal approaches. The author applies a formal dogmatic method to analyze the category of autonomy of will and the legal nature of a smart contract in Russian civil law. The scientific novelty of the article lies in substantiating the thesis that the algorithmization of private law, contrary to the doctrinally widespread ideas about the "death of the subject" and the replacement of the autonomy of the will by program code, leads not to the denial of the classical model of the contract, but to the functional transformation of the role of the subject. Based on a comprehensive comparative legal analysis (Russia, the countries of continental Europe, the USA, China), the predominance of an integration regulatory model has been revealed, in which a smart contract adapts to existing legal structures without revising the conceptual core of the law of obligations. A comparative legal analysis of the regulation of smart contracts in Russia, the countries of continental Europe, the USA and China demonstrates the predominance of an integration model in which digital technologies adapt to existing legal structures without revising the conceptual core of the contract. The conclusion is drawn that the subject of private law in the era of algorithms does not lose its autonomy, but becomes the architect of its own digital normativity, while maintaining the status of a bearer of will and legal responsibility.
Smart contracts represent a specific synthesis of technology and law. They are agreements that are automatically executed and, owing to blockchain technology, relatively immutable. Due to their automation and immutability, smart contracts constitute a useful instrument of contemporary digital transactions. At the level of the European Union, smart contracts are comprehensively regulated by Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 on fair access to and use of data. In the first part of the paper, the author analyzes the concept of smart contracts, along with a brief explanation of blockchain technology as their underlying basis. In the second part, the author examines the legislation of the Member States of the European Union concerning smart contracts prior to the adoption of the aforementioned Regulation. The central part of the paper is devoted to an analysis of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 relating to smart contracts, with particular emphasis on the essential requirements for smart contracts used in the performance of data sharing agreements, as well as on the procedure for assessing the compliance of smart contracts with those essential requirements. In the conclusion, the author elaborates the thesis that the new European Union legislation, including that relating to smart contracts, represents a qualitative leap compared to previous solutions, as it provides a detailed regulation of some of the most significant issues concerning the functioning of smart contracts and offers appropriate legal and technical guarantees for their successful application.
This study investigates the impact of cryptocurrency implied volatility and the CBOE VIX term structure on Bitcoin returns from March 2021 to May 2025. Using PCA and an orthogonalization framework, we identify the VIX term structure’s slope factor as a primary determinant of contemporaneous Bitcoin returns. While Bitcoin shows strong negative responses to VIX and crypto-implied volatility across all maturities, the VIX slope factor exhibits superior explanatory power. Notably, following the January 2024 U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF approval, Bitcoin's sensitivity to its own implied volatility significantly attenuated, while its responsiveness to the VIX remained unchanged. A placebo test confirms this structural shift, suggesting that ETF institutionalization has altered Bitcoin’s internal risk dynamics without decoupling it from broader equity market volatility.
Traditional property law was built on the physics of tangibility-land, bricks, and physical goods. The defining characteristic of a property right has long been exclusivity: if I possess an object, you cannot. However, the rise of digital assets, from cloud-hosted data and software licenses to non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and virtual real estate, has fundamentally challenged this paradigm. This paper examines the friction between classical property doctrines and digital assets, arguing that modern legal frameworks must shift from an absolute ownership model to a nuanced "bundle of rights" approach to prevent corporate overreach while protecting consumer interests.
DIGITAL ASSETS AND THE LAW: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE WITH COMPARATIVE LESSONS FROM THE US AND UAE Tassaduq Hussain, Fourth-Year, B.A.LL. B (Hons.) Student, School of Law, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.225 Digital assets have rapidly emerged as a defining feature of the global financial ecosystem. Cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and Digital assets have rapidly emerged as a defining feature of the global financial ecosystem. Cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), all rooted in blockchain technology, are reshaping our understanding of value, ownership, and financial systems. In India, while adoption has surged, the regulatory and legal framework remains fragmented, reactive, and ambiguous.
Open access
Innovations and Analysis in Business and Education
The growth of the crypto markets has changed the investment environment in a profound manner by elevating cryptocurrencies from purely speculative assets to institutional-grade investments. The current paper evaluates the investment characteristics of Bitcoin and Ethereum, the most popular cryptocurrencies, based on the modern portfolio theory framework. According to the analysis carried out for 2020-2025, the Bitcoin asset demonstrates an impressive Sharpe ratio of 1.7, substantially exceeding that of the S&P 500 (0.54) and gold (0.48-0.54). In favorable market conditions, Ethereum outperforms Bitcoin in terms of risk-adjusted returns, exhibiting even better characteristics. The study highlights a change in the mechanism of price fluctuations in the market from the \\\"four-year cycle\\\" to the flow of institutional capital. At the same time, correlation analysis shows that despite the absence of high correlation of these assets with other asset classes over the long term, the correlation between the two increases under market pressure. As a result, 1-4% of portfolio weight can be safely allocated to each asset, depending on the investment strategy.
The rapid evolution of cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and Web3 ecosystems has significantly transformed global financial systems and digital economies. India has emerged as one of the largest cryptocurrency adoption markets due to increasing internet penetration, fintech innovation, digital payment infrastructure, and a young technology-oriented population. Simultaneously, the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi), tokenized assets, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and artificial intelligence integration with blockchain has redefined the scope of digital assets beyond speculative investment instruments. This research paper examines the emerging trends, regulatory developments, opportunities, and challenges associated with cryptocurrency and blockchain adoption in India in 2026. The paper also analyses government policies, taxation frameworks, investor behavior, cybersecurity risks, and institutional participation. The findings suggest that India possesses strong potential to become a global blockchain innovation hub if supported by balanced regulation, improved investor awareness, and sustainable technological development.
This study aims to clarify the concept and types of digital assets within a comparative analytical framework, enriched by an examination of a number of English judicial precedents specifically addressing the precautionary attachment of digital assets. The study begins by defining digital assets, their types, and their legal nature in this context. It then addresses the concept of precautionary attachment, its conditions, and its scope. Furthermore, the study examines the extent to which digital assets may be subject to precautionary attachment through an analysis of judicial precedents under English common law, while also highlighting key features of the Singaporean approach in this regard. This is intended to contribute to the Saudi legal framework in light of the absence of explicit legislative regulation of digital assets within the Saudi Enforcement Law. The study also seeks to clarify the extent of judicial authority in issuing precautionary judicial orders relating to digital assets, while highlighting the practical and legal challenges associated with their intangible nature and cross-border character. The study reaches several findings, most notably that the Saudi regulator has not yet provided an explicit statutory definition of digital assets in any of the applicable laws or regulations, nor has it permitted dealing in or trading such assets within the Kingdom, as confirmed by official statements issued by regulatory authorities. Nevertheless, in contrast, digital assets have occupied a significant place in comparative legal scholarship, particularly within comparative legal systems. Digital assets are defined as data recorded on the blockchain that confer specific rights such as ownership, access, representation, voting, or practical use. The scope of digital assets extends to include a wide range of digitally stored content and rights, including cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and Bitcoin. The study also proposes several recommendations, most importantly that the Saudi regulator should introduce an explicit statutory provision defining digital assets within one of the applicable laws or regulations, whether within the framework of the Capital Market Law, commercial transaction laws, or monetary regulations. This would ensure clarity regarding the legal nature of such assets, define their scope, and enhance the ability to regulate and deal with them in accordance with statutory rules and specific controls. The study further recommends amending Article (24/3) of the Implementing Regulations of the Enforcement Law to expressly include digital assets among the assets subject to precautionary attachment. Following such amendment, the provision would read as follows: All assets of the debtor shall be subject to precautionary attachment, whether movable, immovable, or digital assets in all their forms.
The article discusses the issue of confiscation of property in relation to criminally discovered digital assets (cryptocurrencies, tokens, NFT (Non-fungible token) and other electronic digital rights). Digital assets are a symbol of economic development, security and transparency, investment, and financial democracy. The article analyzes the role of digital assets in the legalization of proceeds from crime. The international The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards, of which the Republic of Kazakhstan is a member, are analyzed. One of the urgent legal problems today is the creation of a mechanism for the confiscation of digital assets. The article highlights the importance of creating this mechanism. Examples and cases from practice are analyzed, as well as samples from foreign countries, and the effectiveness of their application in the Republic of Kazakhstan is analyzed. The legal differentiation of the process of preservation and further effective use of digital assets after the mechanism of confiscation is carried out. The effectiveness and legality of storing confiscated digital assets on the Binance Kazakhstan digital asset exchange and the use of cryptocurrencies by law enforcement agencies in crypto exchanges are analyzed. The article explains the importance of secure storage of confiscated digital assets, transparency of information about stored digital assets, and the creation of mechanisms to regulate the emergence of full control over confiscated digital assets in the state. The article defines the significance for the Republic of Kazakhstan of the use of the institution of confiscation (non-conviction based confession) without a court verdict. A legal assessment is given of the conformity of the institution of confiscation of property without conviction with the presumption of innocence and inviolability of property rights.
the paper examines the phenomenon of decentralized finance (DeFi) as one of the most promising and at the same time controversial areas of the digital economy. DeFi is defined as an ecosystem of protocols and applications based on blockchain and smart contracts that allows financial transactions to be carried out without the intermediation of traditional institutions. It is noted that the key advantages of the technology are transparency, automation, reduction of transaction costs, and expansion of the accessibility of financial services. Simultaneously, risks associated with the lack of unified regulatory approaches, high vulnerability of smart contracts, the use of DeFi for unlawful purposes, and the uncertainty of legal liability are emphasized. Particular attention is paid to AML/KYC problems, as well as the use of DeFi platforms for money laundering of criminal proceeds.
The work is devoted to an overview of modern investment methods, the cryptocurrency market, ways of their development and strategies in this direction. The article analyzes the investment opportunities of cryptocurrencies; presents conclusions about the main advantages and disadvantages of each investment method, the level of risk, determining factors and investment attractiveness. The article considers one of the main methods of investing in cryptocurrency - speculation on the rates of various coins. In particular, two strategies for generating income through speculation are considered: the first is Buy&Hold, it is designed for long-term investment, involves buying cryptocurrency on the exchange and storing it in an account for a certain period of time; the second - the Buy&Sell strategy differs from the previous one in that it is designed for short-term investment. The presented work briefly describes a widely known method of investing in cryptocurrency - mining; in this case, all activities are based on blockchain technology, and the efficiency of the blockchain directly depends on the computing power of the computer. As a result, the profitability of mining is relatively low, special, very expensive equipment is required; In this paper, we have studied and tried to convey to the reader a widespread method of investing in cryptocurrency — initial coin offering (ICO), which means a form of attracting investment funds for the implementation of a project by issuing cryptocurrency. It is argued that the above tactics are also borrowed from the traditional financial market — initial public offering (IPO). In conclusion, the article summarizes the pros and cons of cryptocurrency investment methods; several simple recommendations are presented that will help increase your existing capital and diversify your investment portfolio.
Objective : to critically analyze the possibility of extending the existing spatial criminal law principles to acts committed in the decentralized virtual worlds of the metaverse, and to develop proposals that include updating the approach to establishing jurisdiction over such virtual crimes. Methods : the methodological basis of the research is a set of general scientific methods and approaches of scientific cognition – dialectical, formal logical (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), systematic, as well as private scientific methods – formal legal, legal modeling, interpretation. The study relies on an analysis of judicial practice, foreign legislation, technical features of blockchain technologies and decentralized autonomous organizations, which makes it possible to identify gaps in legal regulation and propose conceptually new solutions for determining the crime scene in a virtual environment. Results : the study revealed a limited implementation of the current generally accepted principles of determining jurisdiction in relation to virtual crimes that do not have physical coordinates. The proposed multifactorial jurisdiction model redefines the “crime scene” taking into account factors such as the offender’s digital identity, the nature and location of digital assets, platform management protocols, and the actual damage caused. Assumingly, the immutable and verifiable nature of blockchain transactions can serve as a legal equivalent of a physical presence to establish personal jurisdiction, allowing criminal prosecution to be initiated even in cases where the actual location of the offender remains unknown. Scientific novelty : the paper presents an approach that implies the fundamental transformation of reactive, adaptive legal regulation principles into a proactive, comprehensive framework designed specifically for the unique challenges of the metaverse. A paradigm-changing hypothesis was put forward: that a permanent (stable) digital footprint of the offender in virtual spaces can serve to exercise jurisdiction. The model systematically presents the idea of harm as the most important link between virtual offenses and their consequences in the real world. Practical significance : it is currently impossible to apply legal norms and rules to relations in the metaverse, taking into account their specifics. The main provisions and conclusions of the study can be used to improve the mechanisms of legal regulation of the metaverse and to form international protocols on data exchange and mutual legal assistance for searching and collecting evidence based on blockchain technology. They may help to develop legislative initiatives aimed at creating integrated legal mechanisms that are scalable and resistant to rapid technological changes, characteristic for the digital environment.
ABSTRACT This paper examines the impact of regulatory controls on Bitcoin's excess returns and volatility. The paper innovates by proxying changes in the regulatory environment using global Google search volume intensity data. The generated regulatory indices accurately identify episodes of regulatory tightening within cryptocurrency markets. A three‐factor model—incorporating market, momentum, and size factors—is employed to evaluate the effects of regulation on Bitcoin returns. The study also assesses the influence of changes in the regulatory environment on volatility using additional controls. Findings reveal that increased regulation significantly reduces monthly Bitcoin returns and increases return volatility. These effects are both statistically and economically significant, robust across multiple proxies for regulatory activity, and persist even when accounting for the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The results highlight the real regulatory risks associated with Bitcoin investments, particularly for risk‐averse investors, and underscore the importance of policy developments in shaping cryptocurrency market dynamics.
The study focuses on examining the implications of cryptocurrencies to the Bank Secrecy/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML framework.Accordingly, it applies a comparative legal research approach to understand trade-offs between cryptocurrencies and BSA/AML through comparing information from different primary sources obtained from LexisNexis, Bloomberg Law, and Westlaw.The motivation behind the study was the rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies among investors and retail consumers, which poses risks to the stability of the financial system.The study noted lack of a devoted prime regulator with paramount powers to oversee all cryptocurrency activities as a gap that blockchain applies, in respect to the regulatory arbitrage theory, to circumvent harsh regulations in some jurisdictions, for favorable ones in other jurisdictions.Some of the features noted to challenge effective regulation of these currencies include anonymity, lack of physical equivalent to bank notes and coins, decentralized, and the agile technology used in blockchain.However, efforts to embrace effective adoption and incorporation of crypto assets into the financial system are being demonstrated through the enactment of House Bills, legislative histories, State and Federal Acts such as the CANSEE) Act (S.2355) to mitigate against the risks of illicit activities perpetrated in the decentralized finance (DeFi).The study established if the current efforts being made might be combined with amendment of the BSA/AML regulation to apply in decentralized finance, identification of a primary regulator for cryptocurrencies, and collaboration between regulators and blockchain developers, they would enhance secure and effective adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Almost everyone has come across the concept of crypto-assets, or other synonyms for this phenomenon. It can be said that they have already become an integral part of everyday life in an era that is often referred to as the industrial (digital) revolution 4.0. A relatively long period has passed since the first crypto-assets were issued, and they are increasingly becoming more accessible to the general public, who do not even need to have investment experience to buy or sell them. This is also due to many other technological innovations, which are used in the competitive struggle for clients and make it possible to buy crypto-assets practically anywhere.
The article explores the institutional paradigm of the transformation of the global financial architecture under the conditions of digitalization of the global economy. It is substantiated that the proliferation of digital financial technologies, including fintech innovations, crypto-assets, decentralized finance (DeFi), and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), generates profound structural shifts in the functioning of the global financial system and necessitates a reconsideration of the role of key institutions of international financial governance. The study analyzes the evolution of the roles of central banks, international financial institutions, national regulators, and private financial technology companies in shaping the new global financial landscape. It is determined that central banks are gradually transforming from traditional monetary regulators into key architects of digital financial infrastructure, while private fintech and BigTech companies are becoming systemically important actors capable of influencing payment systems, financial inclusion, and cross-border financial flows. Particular attention is devoted to the analysis of contemporary global trends in the implementation of CBDCs, the development of crypto-asset markets, and decentralized financial platforms. It is demonstrated that these processes are forming a hybrid model of financial globalization that combines elements of centralized regulation with decentralized financial mechanisms. The article highlights key initiatives of international coordination and regulatory harmonization implemented within the frameworks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Financial Stability Board (FSB), and the G20, aimed at ensuring financial stability, cybersecurity, and preventing regulatory arbitrage. Based on the conducted analysis, an institutional model for the transformation of the global financial architecture is proposed, grounded in the integration of international standardization, public–private partnership, and multi-stakeholder interaction. It is proven that the effectiveness of the digital transformation of the global financial system depends on the capacity of international institutions to adapt regulatory approaches to dynamic technological changes and to ensure a balance between innovation, financial stability, and economic security.
In an age where the lines between finance and technology blur into an opus of digital evolution, The VDA & Crypto Convergence: Charting the Operational Pulse of the Global Crypto Exchange Ecosystem in 2025 dissects the metamorphosis of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) and crypto exchanges from experimental ventures to regulated pillars of modern finance. The study unveils 2025 as a watershed year- a "regulated renaissance"- where legislation such as the U.S. GENIUS Act, EU's MiCA, and Hong Kong's Stablecoin Ordinance transformed ambiguity into architecture. It examines how hybrid exchanges-the ingenious offspring of centralized speed and decentralized autonomy- symbolize the era?s financial duality, while AI-driven intelligence and tokenization redefine market participation and asset fluidity. Through the interplay of law, technology, and trust, this paper illuminates a future where the crypto economy ceases to be an outlier and becomes the central nervous system of global finance, balancing regulation and innovation like twin sails steering the same vessel through uncharted digital waters.