中杰君 王
本文在作者已发表的“消费黑洞”理论基础上,完成从批判到建构的理论跨越。文章指出,传统政治经济学的根本局限在于将“价值”视为一种可被生产、占有与分配的实体性存在。本文提出一个截然不同的起点:分配的本质并非物质财富的权属分割,而是主体贡献的本体论承认。 基于对笛卡尔“我思故我在”、黑格尔—马克思“我劳动故我在”的存在论谱系溯源,本文拓展劳动实践范畴,建构“贡献存在论”(Contribution Ontology)*3(WD-2026-B003),提出“我贡献故我在”的本体论命题。本文确证:人的社会性存在通过劳动、消费、关系、文明四维贡献结构得以显现。这是马克思实践存在论在数字时代的延伸与深化。 依托贡献存在论,本文揭示资本主义的本质矛盾是制度化的“存在论暴力”(Ontological Violence)*4(WD-2026-B004)——资本通过三重褫夺否定消费、关系、文明维度的人类贡献。在此基础上,本文界定“消费无产阶级”(Consumption Proletariat)*5(WD-2026-B005)范畴:同一批劳动者在生产中是劳动无产阶级(被剥夺剩余价值),在消费中是消费无产阶级(被褫夺消费贡献价值)。这是劳动无产阶级的第二重属性,揭示当代资本主义“生产端剥削+消费端褫夺”的双重剥夺结构。 本文论证按消费贡献分配的历史必然性,建构“贡献流动理论”(Contribution Flow Theory)*6(WD-2026-B006)与“消费贡献值六重质变”(Sixfold Qualitative Transformation)*7(WD-2026-B007)核心架构。六重质变遵循“贡献值只升维不归零”的根本原则,实现消费贡献从隐匿到全球流通再到文明守护的全维度价值升维。第四重质变升华生成“公信值”(Public Trust Equity Value,PTV)——包含“社保值”(Personal Social Security Value,SSV)和“社权值”(Personal Governance Rights Value,GRV),标志着贡献从经济领域升华为公共治理领域。第五重质变升华生成“共信币”(Global Trust Coin,GTC)——归国家所有,全球流通,反制资本霸权。第六重质变升华生成“圣火币”(Eternal Fire Coin,EFC)——国家消耗共信币于全人类最高事业时燃烧升华,锚定国际治理话语权。 战略层面,本文提出“利益虹吸效应”(Interest Siphon Effect)*8(WD-2026-B008)理论,论证通过市场化理性选择实现消费者觉醒、资源集聚、主权转移的四阶段和平升维路径。本文确立的按消费贡献分配制度框架,是实现从资本主权到消费者主权(进而指向贡献者主权)文明和平升维的战略方案。 本文的最高文明论断是:共信主义(WD-2026-999)不是与暴力文明、资本文明、劳动文明并列的第四种特殊文明,而是人类文明的完成形态——一个终于承认一切贡献的普遍文明。它是共产主义在数字时代的制度化展开,是人类分配制度演进中从局部到全域的必然升维。共信主义不是资本的敌人,而是资本的归宿——它将资本从压迫和异化的根源,转化为服务人类共同福祉的贡献形态。按贡献分配是对“按资分配”和“按劳分配”进行历史扬弃后的完成形态。 关键词:按贡献分配(WD-2026-000);按消费贡献分配(WD-2026-B001);消费者主权(WD-2026-B002);贡献存在论(WD-2026-B003);存在论暴力(WD-2026-B004);消费无产阶级(WD-2026-B005);贡献流动理论(WD-2026-B006);六重质变(WD-2026-B007);贡献者主权(WD-2026-B009);共信主义(WD-2026-999) This paper,building upon the author‘s previously published theory of the Consumption Black Hole,completes the transition from critique to construction in political economy.It argues that the fundamental limitation of traditional political economy lies in treating“value”as a substantive entity that can be produced,possessed,and distributed.The paper proposes a radically different starting point:the essence of distribution is not the division of material wealth,but the ontological recognition of subjective contribution. Based on a critical examination of the ontological genealogy from Descartes’“I think,therefore I am”to Hegel-Marx‘s“I labor,therefore I am,”this paper extends the category of labor practice to the broader domain of contributive existence.It demonstrates that human social existence manifests through multiple dimensions——labor,consumption,relationality,and civilization——which together constitute the four-dimensional ontological structure of human contribution. Drawing upon this framework,the paper deconstructs the deep operational logic of capitalism:the essential contradiction of capitalism is not superficial distributional inequality,but institutionalized Ontological Violence——the systematic deprivation of contributions in the dimensions of consumption,relationality,and civilization.On this basis,the paper defines the category of the Consumption Proletariat as the second attribute of the proletariat,revealing the complete structural mechanism of dual deprivation in contemporary capitalism. Integrating the materialist premises of digital productive forces——big data,blockchain,and artificial intelligence——this paper demonstrates the historical inevitability of Distribution According to Consumption Contribution.It constructs a Sixfold Qualitative Transformation framework:welfare-based→savings-based→investment-based→public governance(Public Trust Equity Value,embracing Social Security Value and Governance Rights Value)→international(Global Trust Coin)→civilizational(Eternal Fire Coin)——achieving full-dimensional value return from contribution visibility to global circulation to civilizational guardianship.At the strategic level,this paper proposes the Interest Siphon Effect theory,demonstrating that consumer resources constitute the structural core node of capital circulation.It outlines a four-stage peaceful evolutionary path of human civilizational upgrading and capital reclamation from consumer awakening to sovereignty transformation,ultimately pointing toward Contribution Sovereignty. The supreme civilizational thesis of this paper is:Convivialism is not the fourth special civilization alongside the civilizations of violence,capital,and labor,but the completed form of human civilization——a universal civilization that finally recognizes all contributions.It is the institutional unfolding of communism in the digital age and the inevitable upgrading from partial to universal recognition in the evolution of distribution systems.Convivialism is not the enemy of capital,but its ultimate destination——transforming capital from a source of oppression and alienation into a contribution form that serves human common well-being. Keywords:Distribution According to Contribution(DAC,WD-2026-000);Distribution According to Consumption Contribution(DACC,WD-2026-B001);Consumer Sovereignty(WD-2026-B002);Contribution Ontology(WD-2026-B003);Ontological Violence(OV,WD-2026-B004);Consumption Proletariat(CP,WD-2026-B005);Contribution Flow Theory(CFT,WD-2026-B006);Sixfold Qualitative Transformation(SQT,WD-2026-B007);Contribution Sovereignty(WD-2026-B009);Convivialism(WD-2026-999)