Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

2 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

2 results · page 1 of 1

Clear filters
Aug 12, 2026·Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
0 cites
Pricing Nature, Managing Risk: The Intellectual Structure of Biodiversity in Finance

Insaf Arfa, Wided Khiari, Houssein Ballouk

ABSTRACT Faced with the accelerating erosion of biodiversity and its growing recognition as a source of financial risks and opportunities, the academic literature linking biodiversity and finance is expanding rapidly. This article offers a systematic and bibliometric review of this literature in order to analyze its evolution, intellectual structure, main conceptual dynamics and gap identification. Aligning with the PRISMA‐2020 protocol, this study examines 1088 scientific articles published in the period 1993–2025. The data were extracted from Scopus and Web of Science databases. The analysis uses descriptive bibliometric methods available in R software and the bibliometrix package via the Biblioshiny interface. The results highlighted a strong acceleration of scientific production since 2015, which is linked with the development of sustainable finance and international regulatory frameworks. While the thematic mapping identifies a broader landscape, three key areas are prioritized for in‐depth analysis: Sustainability as a macroeconomic framework, Biodiversity conservation via innovation in financial instruments, and the emergence of biodiversity risk as a systemic financial risk. Beyond descriptive mapping, this study proposes the Biodiversity‐Finance Inhibition Framework (BFIF) as an integrative conceptual framework to synthesize the persistent disconnect between academic evidence and market implementation. It identifies a systemic “Inhibition Loop” where data gaps at the micro‐level and a lack of ecological accountability at the meso‐level paralyze macro‐regulatory ambitions. The article also highlights a significant geographical disparity, with research heavily concentrated in developed economies. Finally, it outlines a strategic research agenda aimed at breaking this “Inhibition Loop” by exploring a “methodological frontier” involving bio‐econometrics, blockchain, and artificial intelligence to reinforce the measurement, governance, and effectiveness of biodiversity‐finance.

Environmental Conservation and Management
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Original source
Aug 2, 2026·Annals of Management 管理学年鉴
0 cites
Digital Technologies and Collaborative Governance Capability in Forestry Supply Chains

ALAMUSI

Digital technologies are transforming supply chain management by enabling greater connectivity, transparency, and coordination among supply chain partners. In forestry supply chains, characterized by dispersed resources, multiple stakeholders, and complex operational processes, collaborative governance has become increasingly important for improving coordination and sustainable resource management. However, existing studies mainly focus on operational optimization and digital applications, while the governance implications of digital technologies remain insufficiently explored. This conceptual article explores how digital technologies may enable collaborative governance capability in forestry supply chains through four governance mechanisms: information sharing, resource integration, collaborative decision-making, and adaptive governance. Based on collaborative governance and digital transformation literature, a conceptual framework is proposed to illustrate how digital technologies may support governance processes through the Internet of Things, big data analytics, cloud computing, blockchain, and artificial intelligence. The article provides theoretical insights into digital-enabled collaborative governance and practical implications for sustainable forestry supply chains.

Open access
Forest Management and Policy
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Original source