Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

2 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

2 results · page 1 of 1

Clear filters
Aug 25, 2026·Preprints.org
0 cites
Structure-Aware Learning and Smart-Contract Enforcement for Cognitive IoT Admission Control

Yali Ren, Ning Wang

Admission control governs Quality of Service (QoS) in cognitive IoT networks (CIoTNs) in which secondary nodes opportunistically share spectrum with preemptive primary users. The optimal policy is of threshold type, but the threshold table is indexed by the 2N fully occupied channel configurations, so both model-free learning and on-chain enforcement scale poorly in N. We show that this table has low intrinsic complexity: across 55 randomised continuous-time Markov decision process (CTMDP) instances, a monotone step function of the aggregate secondary-user drain rate σ(n) carrying only 1.6–2.3 distinct levels reproduces 81–87% of the 2N table entries exactly, the remainder erring by a single queue slot. We give a quasi-static argument for why σ(n) is the right scalar summary. Using this regularity as an inductive bias, an index-pooled Q-learning read-out reduces discounted policy-value loss by up to 4.4× (1.55% to 0.36% at N=4, six seeds) at the largest sample budget, but adds variance and was worse than the per-configuration baseline in one of eight cells; we therefore also specify a deployment gate and report it as untested. We further report a negative result: projecting learned value differences onto the concave cone guaranteed by the structural theorem is inert at N=4 and yields at most a 0.22 percentage-point gain at N=3, because recovery is limited by configuration coverage rather than by shape violation. Finally, we implement Service Level Agreement (SLA) enforcement as a Solidity contract and measure it on a local Ethereum Virtual Machine. Index compression cuts policy-installation gas by 241.8× at N=16 (48.79M to 0.20M gas) and keeps installation in one transaction, but raises the per-decision cost by 14.4–18.4k gas; it is therefore a feasibility mechanism for large N and for frequently re-committed policies, not a uniform improvement.

Open access
Age of Information Optimization
Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Original source
Aug 21, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Commitment Lifetime Analysis in Decentralized Finance

Jincheng Zhang

This paper investigates the concept of "commitment lifetime" within the context of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, specifically focusing on the variability in the duration a user's commitment to a collateralized asset remains valid. The commitment lifetime, denoted as *LC(P)*, is defined as the difference between the release time and the birth time of the commitment, where *trelease* and *tbirth* represent the respective timestamps. The core objective is to analyze the probability distribution of commitment lifetimes, denoted as *P(LC > t)*, for different algorithmic approaches used in managing collateralized positions. We demonstrate that despite potentially differing underlying mechanisms, various DeFi protocols can arrive at identical conclusions regarding commitment lifetimes. This highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical representation of commitment lifetime distributions, which we term the "commitment lifetime distribution." This analysis provides a foundational understanding for risk management and parameter optimization within DeFi systems.

Open access
2 source records
Software System Performance and Reliability
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Age of Information Optimization
Original source