Abstrak Otonomi daerah dan desentralisasi fiskal mempunyai tujuan untuk menciptakan suatu kemandirian daerah. Tidak semua daerah mempunyai kesiapan yang sama dalam menciptakan kemandiriannya. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini, pemerintah pusat memberikan dana perimbangan/dana transfer kepada pemerintah daerah. Tetapi bukti empiris beberapa penelitian menunjukkan adanya fenomena terjadinya flypaper effect pemerintah daerah di Indonesia, dengan indikasi dominannya peran dana transfer terhadap pendapatan daerah dalam membiayai pengeluaran pemerintah daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel sebanyak 30 daerah di Jawa Tengah yang bersumber dari Laporan Realisasi Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) dari tahun 2009 hingga 2011. Metode pengambilan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling . Alat yang digunakan penelitian adalah regresi logistik. Hasil dari penelitian ini Belanja Pegawai mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap flypaper effect . Sedangkan Investasi Pemerintah Daerah dan Pembayaran Utang Pemerintah Daerah tidak berpengaruh terhadap flypaper effect . . Abstract Regional autonomy and fiscal decentralization has the objective to create a regional self-reliance. Not all regions have the same readiness in creating independence. To overcome this problem, the central government balance fund / fund transfers to local governments. But the empirical evidence, some studies suggest the existence of the flypaper phenomenon of local government in Indonesia, with an indication of the dominant role of the transfer of funds to finance revenue expenditure in the region. This study uses a sample of 30 regions in Central Java are sourced from the Report of Actual Revenue and Expenditure Budget (budget) from 2009 to 2011. Sampling method using Purposive Sampling method. Research tool used is logistic regression. The results of this study Shopping Employees has a significant effect on flypaper. While the Local Government Investments and Local Government Debt Payments had no effect on flypaper.
The enactment of The act Number 2211999, about The Local Government and The Act Number 2511999, about The Balancing Financial between Central and Local Government, they have changed the centralization system to the decentraiization in form of giving the regional autonomy, which it's real, broad and responsible. One of the impacts of that policy is The Local Government's fiscal decentralization (financing the regional autonomy), which it is authorities to coiiect the local tax and local retribution in order to financing public services in local region. Based on the argument, they important reviewed, such as: (a) how the basic concept of the local tax and retribution tax; (b j What is the legal basis of the local tax and retribution tax; and (c) how the implementation of local tax and local retribution. The basics concepts of local tax and local retribution, its essentially, should be able to provide local revenue in accordance with the degree of fiscal autonomy period and clearly had an impact on the fiscal responsibility of owned the relevant owned. The legal basics of tax collecting, such as The Article Number 23A ofUndang- UndangDasar1945; The Article Number 7, Paragraph 4 of The Act Number 1012004, about The Establishment, Regional Regulation; The implementation of the tax collecting have to based on the principles or system, which it is called "closed list". Kata kunci: Desentralisasi Fiskal, Pungutan Pajak Daerah, "Closed List"
This research tested the difference of financial performance between parent areas and new autonomy areas. The financial performances that meant in this research were degree of decentralization, level of independence, capital expenditure ratio, and level of financing capability. The aim of this research was to analyze the difference of financial performance between parent area and new autonomy area. The objects in this research were districts or cities that become parent areas and districts or cities that become new autonomy areas. The division period that used in this research was in the year of 1999—2004. Samples that used in this research were consists of 48 parent areas and 49 new autonomy areas. Data that used in this research is local government revenues and expenditures budget realization report in the period of 2005 —2007. Data analysis performed using independent sample t test from SPSS for window program. \nLevel of significance that used in this research was 5%. Result of this research showing that a) parent areas degree of decentralization significantly better than new autonomy areas, b) parent areas level of independence significantly better than new autonomy areas, c) no significantly difference of financing capability level both parent areas and new autonomy areas and d) new autonomy areas capital expenditure ratio significantly better than parent areas. \n \nKey words: \nparent areas, new autonomy areas, regional financial performance, degree of decentralization, level of independence, financing capability level, capital expenditure ratio.
There are many problems in the implementation of decentralization and local autonomy in Indonesia, in terms of: (1) Authority and responsibility between central, provincial, regencial/municipal, village government; (2) Local leadership; (3) Representative/ Legislative and political party; (4) Local finance; (5) Democracy and village autonomy. Besides, there are many flaws, uncertainties, and anxieties in the concept of local autonomy, the function of central government and its organs, authority, organization structure and working order, local arrogance, leadership by the local- people, Peoples Assembly, financial management, local financial management, and policy inconsistency. These problems have to be solved by among other shifting paradigm, from constructional paradigm to empowerment, to create self-reliance through social learning. The right implementation of decentralization and local autonomy will be beneficial for the central government, empower the society/government, guarantee heterogeneity and local plurality, create democracy, and enhance the peoples self-reliance and participation in development activities, besides enhancing the governments responsiveness.
By autonomy, most of resources that managed by central government becomes managed by local government. By decentralization, services to the society will be more efficient and effectively. This paper will analyze how far the response of local income because of change in Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP,) and also the ability of regional finance in regional autonomy era. The result of this paper shows that the coefficient of elasticity of regional income more than one, it means that if Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) increase one percent, it will increases local income more than one percent. The role of domestic income to local income decrease, it means that the local government has to look for a forward alternative how lo increases the role of domestic income to local income.
Decentralization theory states that the higher degree of centralization will increase local economic growth, because local government will create public sector efficiently, so it will increase more local economic growth than central government. The implementation of Decentralization Law No. 23 & 33, 2004, and the balance of finance between the central and local government as the manifestation of the theory is expected to increase affectivity and efficiency of local government performance through the delegation process from the central government to the local government. This research was conducted to evaluate 5 years of fiscal decentralization of 29 districts and 9 cities in East Java with fixed effect model (fern) analysis. The result of this research are: (a) decentralization of expenditure has significant positive impact on economic growth, (b) decentralization of expenditure has significant positive impact on inefficiency of public expenditure, and (c) inefficiency of public expenditure has significant negative impact on economic growth. Keywords: decentralization of expenditure, inefficiency of public expenditure, economic growth
Intergovernmental fiscal transfers are critical elements of public finance in decentralized countries. In the context of Indonesia’s decentralization reforms, their design and implementation have significant impacts on the potential revenue and fiscal capacity of basic public service provision. The case of Indonesia’s 2001 Big Bang decentralization illustrates the challenges associated with implementing significant reforms in the intergovernmental fiscal system. The practice of decentralization policy in Indonesia since the time has not generally improved local development performance yet. This study evaluates fiscal decentralization, focusing on fiscal capacity as the impacts of the intergovernmental fiscal equalization transfers, in the case of Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta. The study shows a low percentage of its own revenue compared to its total budget. It indicates the failure of fiscal decentralization policy in improving local government fiscal capacity.
This study examined the current decentralized system in Indonesia for increased disparities in educational expenditures across districts. It also examined the impact of these on the quality of education at public junior secondary education. The study used the most recently available data from the Ministry of National Education (MONE) and Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) covering 1999/00 and 2002/03. These data measured district level school expenditures, demographic and socio-economic variables.The study found that the current decentralized system in Indonesia increased fiscal capacities for education at districts. Unfortunately, increases in the fiscal capacities for education led to increased disparities in education expenditures per student, creating growing gaps in fiscal capacities for education across districts. Districts which received larger general allocation funds (DAU) per capita were also more likely to allocate more funding for education, whether or not they were poor or wealthy districts. This fact was reflected by the finding that district GRDP per capita in sub-national regions of Java-Bali and Sumatera had no impact on districts' education expenditures per student. In addition, the sub-provincial districts of the Kota (more urban) and Kabupaten (less urban) also differed in the way that they allocated funding for education. The Kota in the Sumatera region tended to allocate significantly more for education than did the Kabupaten. At the same time, the Kota in Java-Bali did not allocate significantly more for education than the Kabupaten. Teacher compensation was national, so funding variance was measured by locally controlled variables. The most significant impact on student achievement were teaching and learning process expenditures (textbooks, libraries, labs, field trips, etc.). The study concluded that increased funding, combined with more efficient budget allocations, were keys to quality improvement. Policy recommendations include: a) targeting DAU transfers to reduce the gaps in fiscal capacity for education across districts; b) rewarding districts with effective budget allocations that support improved student achievement; and c) placing education closer to the center of development and security policy. Better government monitoring and district transparency is needed for this major investment. Improved policy research and reporting capacities are needed, including annual reports on decentralization policy implementation.
The background of this research is the fall of the New Order Regime which occurred in 1998, followed closely behind by the creation of local autonomy policy. This policy was issued based on Law Numer 22/1999 (Local Government) and Law Numer 25/1999 (Intergovernmental Finance). Both laws have changed the local public administration from a centralized into a decentralized system and also caused reform in some components such as planning, organization, personnel, and finance. Even though Law Number 22/1999 had been implemented for four years, the reform seemed very tardy. In fact, several regions showed a progress tendency that was the reverse of the expectation. For this reason, the question that will be formulated in this research is 'Why was there a different level of performance of local public administration reform after the local autonomy implementation in Indonesia?' The conceptual framework of this research is outlined as follows: it is presumed that the performance of Local Public Administration Reform is determinedby two major independent variables that are interrelated. These are the Central Government Role Variable and the Response of Local Government and its Environment toward the Reform. The Central Government Role consists of two variables Decentralization as an Architecture Reform Variable and the Policy Reform Variable. Both major variables interrelate with some varibles at the local level such as the Mayor/Regent's Role, the Response of Bureaucrats and Politicians to Local Public Administration Reform, and the Response of Civil Society to the Reform.
This paper attempts to trace and find evidence for the linkages between the quality of governance, and development at the local level since the adoption of the fiscal decentralization policy in the Philippines in 1991. The concern since then over the links has been prompted by the observed persistent imbalances in local development - across and within regions - which many believe is due to the less than prudent exercise of the devolved powers and responsibilities - hence, low quality of local governance. To be sure, the decentralization has led to not a few innovations in local service delivery and financing, and in increased people's participation in local civic activities. However, the spread of innovation has been slow and there has been less than genuine participation in the mandated local special bodies. The uneven quality of local governance thus may have contributed to imbalanced regional growth. Evidence also indicate that the initial level of economic conditions determine the acceptable quality of local governance, which explains why certain poor areas remain in the vicious circle of penury and misgovernance. To help improve the quality of local governance, some policy inputs are suggested.
Significant changes in the Indonesian political system have affected most aspects of its government and community. First, there is an effort to implement democracy in terms of ideology as well as political practices. Second, the government system is transforming from centralization to decentralization, as the development process is delegated to regional governments (cities and kabupatens). Third, there is an effort to build community consciousness through community participation in national and regional development.Participating in the development process, citizens should be supported with relevant public information. It is the government's task to provide information regarding governmental issues and public interests. As communication and information have been delegated to regional governments, they should execute this task based on good governance principles.However, providing fair and balanced information is not simple. Large populations and regions separated by water and mountains make the task harder. Therefore, regional governments must adopt advanced information technology systems, which functioned to transfer information to the public as well as to receive public feedback medium in an efficient and effective way. To meet those qualifications, regional governments endeavor to implement e-government as a tool for democratizing communication and information.After almost 3 years, there are indications that e-government has not been properly implemented by regional governments. They have faced many problems, including lack of financing, poor technical skill, lack of human resources and infrastructure, and the political will of the government elite itself.Nevertheless, there are many ways to overcome these problems. Standardizing the application of e-government, establishing the regulation of e-government, involving other stakeholders, and developing human resources may aid in the implementation of e-government. In addition, lessons learned from other regions, for example, Kutai Timur or Gorontalo, are also recommended.
The decentralisation of educational administration in Indonesia has recently been the focus of much interest throughout the Asia-Pacific region. With its massive population and multi-ethnic social background, Indonesia serves as an interesting example when considering the real impact of decentralized systems on the financing of Junior Secondary Education in developing countries. In this paper, first, the decentralisation scheme and the current financial budgeting system at the school level of junior secondary education in Indonesia are outlined. Second, a quantitative analysis of the unit cost among provinces, districts and schools is detailed. Finally, policy tasks for the further development of decentralised administration will be identified. Even under the former centralised regime, each school or district was operating in a varied way, while it is also true that the process of this diversified financial budgeting was not always a strategic one.