Automation is taking hold in different aspects of business across every industry and every sector. Consistent with this trend, the notion of embedding automation into legally binding contracts is also gaining momentum. COVID-19 is fuelling digital transformation and has highlighted frustrations with static contracts that sit disconnected from digital processes and systems. As automated ‘smart contracts’ become more common, lawyers have been grappling with how to preserve the legal integrity of the contract whilst harnessing the benefits of automation and digital connectivity. Automation of contract performance is a field lacking in standard definitions. This paper proposes a framework to assist discussion and development of legally enforceable automation of contract performance and explores high level features of contracts along the spectrum of contract automation by proposing an initial model for the levels of automation (and digitalisation). This model draws analogies with the SAE International J3016 “Levels of Automation” widely adopted for autonomous vehicles.
This paper discusses the implications of smart contracts in energy trading for the protection of consumer and individual rights. It examines the legal risks and regulatory solutions for a peer-to-peer energy trading platform (P2P-ETP) in creating a sustainable energy ecosystem. Part I discusses the conceptual framework of P2PETP, which enables consumers to become energy ‘producers' and traders. Smart technologies—smart contracts, smart meters, and distributed ledger technology (DLT) platforms, are the main components of this platform. The study examines the legal basis for these components. Part II analyzes the legal uncertainty of the smart contract, such as its enforceability, and the inadequate protection for consumers and their individual rights through price manipulation, violation of rights to privacy, and data breaches. Part III discusses the potential policy implementations and the principles behind a legal and regulatory framework for establishing a trusted peer-to peer energy trading platform.
The object of the present work is to provide a legal analysis of the formation of legally binding agreements through blockchain-based smart contracts. Smart contracts are computer codes that are capable of running automatically upon the occurrence of specific conditions and according to pre-specified functions. These codes can be stored and processed on a blockchain and any change is recorded in the blockchain. The expression “smart legal contract” refers to the use of smart contracts in the contractual domain to perform already existing contracts or to express legally binding agreements in the form of lines of computer code. Regarding the latter, researchers question whether blockchain-based smart contracts can be considered legally binding contracts. The study aims at putting in correlation contract requirements with blockchain- \nbased smart contracts. The scope of the analysis is to verify how to interpret the rules on contract formation to make blockchain-based smart contracts fit into contract law.
Spanish Abstract: el contrato inteligente (smart contract) es una tecnología que permite la ejecución automatizada de un comando que sigue la lógica “si X entonces Y”, ante la verificación de una condición preestablecida. En combinación con la tecnología blockchain el contrato inteligente adquiere las características de descentralización, inalterabilidad y, sobre todo, de irreversibilidad. En este escrito se analiza el impacto del contrato inteligente en el derecho contractual, a partir de la distinción fundamental entre contrato inteligente y ‘contrato legal inteligente’. A partir de esa distinción se revisan algunas cuestiones que plantea esa tecnología al confrontarla con ciertos aspectos del contrato: su formación, su ejecución, su interpretación y la protección contractual del consumidor. El análisis lleva a concluir que el contrato inteligente, cuando cumple una función dentro de un contrato en sentido jurídico, no puede escapar a la influencia de los principios y reglas del derecho contractual. English Abstract: Smart contracts are a technology which enables the automated execution of a “if this-then that” function, upon the meeting of a predetermined condition. Combined with blockchain technology, Smart contracts become descentralized, tamper-proof and above all irreversible. This paper focuses on how Smart contracts impact on Contract law. On the basis of the distinction between Smart contract and ‘Smart legal contract’, I examine some issues arising from the interacción of Smart contract technology with some aspects of contract’s life cycle: formation, performance, interpretation, and contractual consumer protection. The outcome of the análisis Will show that Smart contracts, whenever they are imbedded in the context of a contract in a legal sense, cannot avoid the principles and rules of Contract law.
The article addresses the prospects of using distributed ledger technologies – blockchain and artificial intelligence – for the purpose of systematizing the rights to the results of intellectual activity for their subsequent commercialization. The authors describe the key characteristics of the distributed ledger technology and review various legal problems pertaining to the use of blockchain technologies. The authors draw conclusions regarding the prospects of using blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies as measures for rapid prevention and elimination of intellectual rights violations. They also express their views on the process of commercializing intellectual property and reducing the number of conflicts related to the inclusion of intellectual property objects into distributed ledger systems. The article was prepared with the financial support of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the framework of the research “Scientific and methodological support for the development of theoretical and applied legal structures (models) of accounting and disposal of rights to the results of intellectual activity (technology transfer)
Vladimir P. Kamyshansky, Garmshev, M. A., Anna S. Shekhovtsova, Екатерина Анатольевна Новикова · 5 authors
The authors examined the concept and signs of a smart contract through a comparative legal analysis of the legislation of Russia, Belarus, the EU and the USA. The key characteristics of a smart contract as a contract, its types, ways of development and improvement are highlighted and substantiated, the examples of smart contracts from the practice of these countries are given, problematic aspects of legal regulation in this sphere are identified
Die Blockchain Technologie hat das Potential die Wirtschaft im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung zu revolutionieren. In zentralisierten Organisationen werden die Entscheidungen von einem Verantwortlichen oder einer Gruppe getroffen. In der Blockchain gibt es keinen bestimmten Entscheidungsträger. Um eine Entscheidung zu treffen, muss ein Konsens erreicht werden. Um diesen Konsens zu erreichen, wird von jeder Blockchain Plattform ein so genannter Konsens-Mechanismus eingesetzt. Damit Blockchains ihr volles ökonomisches Potential ausschöpfen können, muss eine gute Skalierbarkeit gegeben sein. Doch dazu müssen Kompromisse in anderen Bereichen eingegangen werden. Das Blockchain-Trilemma besagt, dass man die drei Haupteigenschaften Skalierbarkeit, Sicherheit und Dezentralität immer zulasten der anderen erreicht, bzw. dass alle drei Eigenschaften nicht gleichzeitig maximiert werden können. Die implementierten Konsens-Mechanismen versuchen dieses Dilemma mit unterschiedlichen Ansätzen zu lösen. Daher sind sie einer der wichtigsten Aspekte sowie Unterscheidungsmerkmale der Blockchain Plattformen. Diese Arbeit bietet einen Überblick sowie eine technische Analyse über die zur Zeit existierenden Konsens-Mechanismen. Darüber hinaus werden Smart Contract Plattformen analysiert und die dort eingesetzten Konsens-Mechanismen detailliert beleuchtet. Außerdem wird die Umstellung des Konsens-Mechanismus von Proof of Work zu Proof of Stake in der Ethereum-Plattform anhand Ihres Einflusses auf zukünftige Smart Contracts analysiert. Die Analyse liefert einen Überblick über 62 Konsens-Mechanismen und 21 Smart Contract-Plattformen die im Moment eingesetzt werden. Weiter werden Kriterienkataloge vorgestellt, welche für den Vergleich von Smart Contract-Plattformen sowie deren Konsens-Mechanismen eingesetzt werden können.
Elena Voskresenskaya, Lybov Vorona-Slivinskaya, Lybov Achba
The study on issues of digital economy proved the current existence of the new “digital” economic reality. The traditional legal apparatus used for the statutory regulation of this new economic reality showed itself not only inefficient, but also significantly restraining the actively developing economic processes. In this regard, a plenty of practical and legal collisions occur related to the problems of identification of persons involved in civil-law transactions, property relations regarding digital economic turnover (for instance, relations concerning property rights in the field of distributed ledgers), registration of property rights and deals, regulation of banking line processes, formation of special protection models for relationships based on the use of digital technologies including issues of cybernetic and data security. The development of digital economy will inevitably influence legal principles and demand reconsidering some of doctrinal approaches to traditional legal models of regulating different types of economic activities. In this case, socially just changes in the legal regulation of economic activities should be primarily aimed at removing legal barriers that impede the development of digital economy, as well as at synchronizing legal rules with the technological features of economy’s functioning.
Smart contracts are increasingly popular in business and law. Smart contracts are also becoming increasingly complex. Advances in technology allow smart contracts to handle far more intricate transactions than the traditional—and simple— vending machine example. With increased complexity comes increased responsibility. When parties rely on an attorney to review or draft a smart contract, that attorney must understand what he or she is reading or writing. Smart contracts, however, are not written in a language most attorneys can understand, let alone write. While a general description of the contract may be translated into plain English, the contract itself is written in code. If an attorney cannot read the contract itself—and can only read a general description of the contract—can the attorney claim in good faith that he or she possesses the competence necessary to understand the terms of the contract? If the attorney cannot understand the contract, he or she can be held liable for malpractice if the contract leads to results contrary to what the attorney claimed could or would occur. The implementation of smart contracts is likely to give rise to specialized requirements for attorneys drafting and advising on smart contracts. Special requirements are not unheard of in the legal community. For example, to become a patent attorney, one must take and pass the Patent Bar Examination and fulfill other requirements, such as obtaining a bachelor’s degree in specified fields of science or engineering. Similar requirements—either in the form of a smart contract certification or exam—should be developed not only as a measure of attorney competence, but also as a protection against malpractice suits brought forth by clients.
Recently smart contracts become more and more popular in such areas as initial coins offering (ICO), financial sector, international trade and public services. At the same time there is almost no legal regulation of smart contracts. There are unsuccessfull tries to regulate smart contracts bu security legislation. There are continuing discussions over whether a smart contract can be considered a civil contract and whether violated rights of the parties of smart contract could be protected in trail. The purpose of this article is to assess the practice of legal regulation of smart contracts worldwide and in Ukraine and to develop proposals for improvement of legal regulation of smart contracts. An analysis of law regulation of smart contracts in different countries of the world shows the initial state of the law in this area, significant differences between national systems of law and almost complete absence of judicial precedents. Most countries are trying to regulate smart contracts by securities and financial instruments legislation, which neither takes into account the economic nor legal nature of the smart contract. The greatest progress in legal regulation has reached Belarus, which has recognized the smart contract as a type of civil contract and cryptocurrency as the official means of payment. In Ukraine, despite the active implementation of blockchain technology in state registers, there is no legal regulation of smart contracts and cryptocurrency. The Government Concept of the development of digital economy and society for 2018 – 2020 and conclusions of financial regulators on the legal status of cryptocurrencies determine the need to develop legal regulation of the digital economy. In my oppinion, Ukraine should recognize the most widespread cryptocurrencies as official means of payment and issue its own state cryptocurrency. The legal regulation of tokens used in initial coins offering should be similar to the legal regulation of of debt securities. It is necessary to amend the civil legislation in order to recognize a smart contract as a type of civil contract expressed in the form of programming code and automatically executed in a distributed network. To minimize risks of smart contracts it is necessary to state requirements of mandatory identification of parties and to implement mandatory electronic application containing the essential terms of the contract which will have legal force in case of a programming code error and to resolve litigation between the parties.
СМАРТ-КОНТРАКТ В УСЛОВИЯХ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ НОРМАТИВНОЙ ПЛАТФОРМЫ ЭКОСИСТЕМЫ ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКИ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке