Mustafa Disli, Fatima Abd Rabbo, Thibault Leneeuw, Ruslan Nagayev
Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange by traded value, relocated from Hong Kong (origin market) to Malta (destination market). This study exploits this relocation event by examining the comovement of Binance's native token with the native tokens of other cryptocurrency exchanges in the origin and destination markets. Using multivariate regression analysis, our results show that Binance experienced a significant decline in comovement with its origin market after moving to Malta. The results are less evident for the destination market; however, an increase in comovement immediately after the relocation of Binance is notable.
In this paper, we explored the price-volume cross-correlation asymmetric multifractal properties of some cryptocurrencies using multifractal asymmetric detrended cross-correlation analysis (MF-ADCCA). Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Binance Coin, Cardano, and Dogecoin are examples of cryptocurrencies. The empirical results reveal that the price-volume cross-correlations of all six cryptocurrencies display anti-persistent, multifractal, and asymmetric features, although the degree of these characteristics differs depending on the cryptocurrencies and market trends. Specifically, the anti-persistence multifractal of the price-volume cross-correlation is significantly stronger in the upward market than in the downward market for Bitcoin and Ethereum; for the remaining four cryptocurrencies, the opposite result is obtained. Furthermore, Dogecoin price-volume cross-correlation exhibits the most marked anti-persistence and the most significant asymmetric multifractality among the six cryptocurrencies analyzed.
Most financial signals show time dependency that, combined with noisy and extreme events, poses serious problems in the parameter estimations of statistical models. Moreover, when addressing asset pricing, portfolio selection, and investment strategies, accurate estimates of the relationship among assets are as necessary as are delicate in a time-dependent context. In this regard, fundamental tools that increasingly attract research interests are precision matrix and graphical models, which are able to obtain insights into the joint evolution of financial quantities. In this paper, we present a robust divergence estimator for a time-varying precision matrix that can manage both the extreme events and time-dependency that affect financial time series. Furthermore, we provide an algorithm to handle parameter estimations that uses the "maximization-minimization" approach. We apply the methodology to synthetic data to test its performances. Then, we consider the cryptocurrency market as a real data application, given its remarkable suitability for the proposed method because of its volatile and unregulated nature.
The Bitcoin mining process is energy intensive, which can hamper the much-desired ecological balance. Given that the persistence of high levels of energy consumption of Bitcoin could have permanent policy implications, we examine the presence of long memory in the daily data of the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index (BECI) (BECI upper bound, BECI lower bound, and BECI average) covering the period 25 February 2017 to 25 January 2022. Employing fractionally integrated GARCH (FIGARCH) and multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) models to estimate the order of fractional integrating parameter and compute the Hurst exponent, which measures long memory, this study shows that distant series observations are strongly autocorrelated and long memory exists in most cases, although mean-reversion is observed at the first difference of the data series. Such evidence for the profound presence of long memory suggests the suitability of applying permanent policies regarding the use of alternate energy for mining; otherwise, transitory policy would quickly become obsolete. We also suggest the replacement of 'proof-of-work' with 'proof-of-space' or 'proof-of-stake', although with a trade-off (possible security breach) to reduce the carbon footprint, the implementation of direct tax on mining volume, or the mandatory use of carbon credits to restrict the environmental damage.
Amadeo Christopher, Kevin Deniswara, Bambang Leo Handoko
This research aims to analyze the calculation of volatility stage from five cryptocurrency products, which are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin, Dashcoin, and Litecoin from 1st January 2018 to 1st April 2021 where it consists of calculation of each of the cryptocurrency products' volatility. The research method is a quantitative method by gaining data from Investing.com. Then, analyzing the data using Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models. This research aims to know whether ARCH and GARCH models apply to daily life situations in the field. The result shows that the data from ARCH and GARCH models are not suitable on daily basis. Further research should calculate cryptocurrency products to use differentiated GARCH models, such as GJR-GARCH or GARCH-MIDAS. It is also better to calculate the volatility of cryptocurrency products annually. According to some thesis, the volatility cryptocurrency products are more suitable to calculate annually than daily.
This paper examines the dynamic conditional correlations among 10 cryptocurrencies and the possibility of hedging investment strategies among multiple cryptocurrencies over the period affected by COVID-19 from 2017 to 2022. After studying the relationship between Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the other eight cryptocurrencies, four main results were obtained in this paper: first, from the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 period, almost all of the cryptocurrencies’ return growth rates increased, and COVID-19 had a positive effect on the returns of cryptocurrencies. Second, all of the cryptocurrencies’ return indices had features of volatility clustering and memory persistence in the long run; from pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19, these cryptocurrencies’ GARCH values decreased, but the correlations among the varying GARCH values increased. Third, the varying correlations between the return indices of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the other cryptocurrencies were very strong; from pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19, the average dynamic correlations between Bitcoin and the others increased. Fourth, Tether can be used as a hedge cryptocurrency against the other cryptocurrencies as COVID-19 enhanced its hedging feature.
We study the prediction of Value at Risk (VaR) for cryptocurrencies. In contrast to classic assets, returns of cryptocurrencies are often highly volatile and characterized by large fluctuations around single events. Analyzing a comprehensive set of 105 major cryptocurrencies, we show that Generalized Random Forests (GRF) (Athey, Tibshirani & Wager, 2019) adapted to quantile prediction have superior performance over other established methods such as quantile regression, GARCH-type and CAViaR models. This advantage is especially pronounced in unstable times and for classes of highly-volatile cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, we identify important predictors during such times and show their influence on forecasting over time. Moreover, a comprehensive simulation study also indicates that the GRF methodology is at least on par with existing methods in VaR predictions for standard types of financial returns and clearly superior in the cryptocurrency setup.
Abstract This study investigates whether gold, USD, and Bitcoin are hedge and safe haven assets against stock and if they are useful in diversifying downside risk for international stock markets. We propose a combined GO‐GARCH‐EVT‐copula approach to examine the hedge and safe haven properties of gold, USD, and Bitcoin. We then examine the attractiveness of these assets in reducing stock portfolio risk by using downside risk measures estimated by the proposed approach and other competing models. We also evaluate the relative performance of the proposed model in reducing downside risk with the competing models. The findings of the study indicate that the USD is the most valuable hedge and safe haven asset closely followed by gold, while Bitcoin is the least valuable. It is also observed that the proposed combined approach performs best in reducing the portfolio downside risk. The findings of this study are of significance for portfolio managers and individual investors who wish to protect the portfolio value during market turmoil.
Value at risk and expected shortfall are increasingly popular tail risk measures in the financial risk management field. Both academia and financial institutions are working to improve tail risk forecasts in order to meet the requirements of the Basel Capital Accord; it states that one purpose of risk management and measuring risk accuracy is, since extreme movements cannot always be avoided, financial institutions can prepare for these extreme returns by capital allocation, and putting aside the appropriate amount of capital so as to avoid default in times of extreme price or index movements. Forecast combination has drawn much attention, as a combined forecast can outperform the individual forecasts under certain conditions. We propose two methodology, one is a semiparametric combination framework that can jointly produce combined value at risk and expected shortfall forecasts, another one is a parametric regression framework named as Quantile-ES regression that can produce combined expected shortfall forecasts. The favourability of the semiparametric combination framework has been presented via an empirical study - application in cryptocurrency markets with high-frequency data where the necessity of risk management application increases as the cryptocurrency market becomes more popular and mature. Additionally, the general framework of the parametric Quantile-ES regression has been presented via a simulation study, whereas it still need to be improved in the future. The contributions of this work include but are not limited to the enabling of the combination of expected shortfall forecasts and the application of risk management procedures in the cryptocurrency market with high-frequency data.
Werner Kristjanpoller, Leonardo H.S. Fernandes, Benjamin Miranda Tabak
Cryptocurrencies play a pivotal role in the financial market. Given this, we perform the asymmetric multifractal cross-correlation analysis to examine the weak form of the Efficient Market Hypotheses (EMH) considering two temporal scales. In the daily scale, we find that the pair Bitcoin–Litecoin displays the largest multifractal spectrum. While, in the hourly scale, the pair Bitcoin–Ethereum presents the largest multifractal spectrum. Our empirical evidence has rejected the weak form of the EMH and clearly suggests that the dynamics of the analyzed cryptocurrency pairs are in line with the Fractal Market Hypothesis (FMH). Cross-correlation asymmetries are more persistent for small fluctuations than for large fluctuations. The results are essential for investors, portfolio and risk managers, and policymakers.
Abstract This study investigates the dynamic mechanism of financial markets on volatility spillovers across eight major cryptocurrency returns, namely Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar, Ripple, Tether, Cardano, Litecoin, and Eos from November 17, 2019, to January 25, 2021. The study captures the financial behavior of investors during the COVID-19 pandemic as a result of national lockdowns and slowdown of production. Three different methods, namely, EGARCH, DCC-GARCH, and wavelet, are used to understand whether cryptocurrency markets have been exposed to extreme volatility. While GARCH family models provide information about asset returns at given time scales, wavelets capture that information across different frequencies without losing inputs from the time horizon. The overall results show that three cryptocurrency markets (i.e., Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin) are highly volatile and mutually dependent over the sample period. This result means that any kind of shock in one market leads investors to act in the same direction in the other market and thus indirectly causes volatility spillovers in those markets. The results also imply that the volatility spillover across cryptocurrency markets was more influential in the second lockdown that started at the beginning of November 2020. Finally, to calculate the financial risk, two methods—namely, value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR)—are used, along with two additional stock indices (the Shanghai Composite Index and S&P 500). Regardless of the confidence level investigated, the selected crypto assets, with the exception of the USDT were found to have substantially greater downside risk than SSE and S&P 500.
Purpose The main aim of the study is to explore the volatility spillover effect of cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin) on inflation volatility in India. Design/methodology/approach A popular tool, the Bivariate GARCH model (BEKK-GARCH), to study the volatility spillover effect, is applied in the study. Monthly data of cryptocurrencies and inflation (WPI and CPI indices) are gathered from 2015 to 2021. Findings Significant short-term responsiveness of volatility of cryptocurrencies on the inflation volatility is found. In addition to this, the significant volatility spillover effect from the cryptocurrencies to the inflation volatility is found. Practical implications The findings of the current paper can be of use for inflation management, target inflation policies and policies to contain the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The significance of the current paper is relevant as governments worldwide are officially recognizing cryptocurrencies and starting the process of launching their official virtual currency. Originality/value No other study is observed on the topic. Hence, the contribution and novelty of the findings of the current paper are very high and add value to the nonexistent literature on the topic. Lack of the number of inflation observations (data of CPI and WPI are available only in monthly frequency) crimps the model estimation. As the cryptocurrencies become old, more data points will be available by design, and such problems can be resolved, and better model estimation may be possible.
The aim of the study investigates the return and volatility spillovers and conditional correlations between Borsa Istanbul Stock Exchange 100 Index (BIST100) and Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), and Litecoin (LTH) using daily data for the period between August 07, 2015 and May 20, 2021 with VAR-DCC-GARCH model. We find no bidirectional return spillovers between BIST100 and cryptocurrencies. In line with the volatility spillover results of the study, it has been determined that there is a unidirectional shock transmission from BIST100 to BTC, XRP and LTH, and a unidirectional volatility spillover from BIST100 to BTC and ETH. Also, in the study, it has been determined that the dynamic conditional correlations between BIST100 and four cryptocurrencies have a highly variable over time and their average is very close to zero. However, in possible panic periods, the situation is reversed
In equity trading, internalization is the predominant execution method for uninformed order flow, allowing retail brokers to realize cost savings and thereby offer price improvements to customers. In cryptocurrency trading, there are doubts as to whether informed and uninformed traders can be distinguished in the same way, leading brokers to seek cost savings through internal order matching instead. Using the historical order flow of the German cryptocurrency broker BISON, we present a prediction-based approach to internal order matching: Upon receiving a customer order, our model forecasts whether future order flow will be sufficient to neutralize the order before the settlement date. With a prediction accuracy of 85%, it enables brokers to match three-quarters of order volume internally, which is three times as much as a traditional static approach, and realize meaningful cost savings, even after accounting for common minimum price improvements.
Cryptocurrencies show some properties that differ from typical financial instruments. For example, dynamic volatility, larger price jumps, and other market participants and their associated characteristics can be observed (Pardalos, Kotsireas, Guo, & Knottenbelt, 2020). Especially high tail risk (Sun, Dedahanov, Shin, & Li, 2021; Corbet, Meegan, Larkin, Lucey, & Yarovaya, 2018; Borri, 2019) leads to the question of whether the methods and procedures established in risk management are suitable for measuring the resulting market risks of cryptos appropriately. Therefore, we examine the risk measurement of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. In addition to the classic methods of market risk measurement, historical simulation, and the variance-covariance approach, we also use the extreme value theory to measure risk. Only the extreme value theory with the peaks-over-threshold method delivers satisfactory backtesting results at a confidence level of 99.9%. In the context of our analysis, the highly volatile market phase from January 2021 was crucial. In this, extreme deflections that have never been observed before in the time series have significantly influenced backtesting. Our paper underlines that critical market phases could not be sufficiently observed from the short time series, leading to adequate backtesting results under the standard market risk measurement. At the same time, the strength of the extreme value theory comes into play here and generates a preferable risk measurement.