Russell W. F. Lai, Giulio Malavolta, Viktoria Ronge
In their celebrated work, Groth and Sahai [EUROCRYPT'08, SICOMP' 12] constructed non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs for general bilinear group arithmetic relations, which spawned the entire subfield of structure-preserving cryptography. This branch of the theory of cryptography focuses on modular design of advanced cryptographic primitives. Although the proof systems of Groth and Sahai are a powerful toolkit, their efficiency hits a barrier when the size of the witness is large, as the proof size is linear in that of the witness. In this work, we revisit the problem of proving knowledge of general bilinear group arithmetic relations in zero-knowledge. Specifically, we construct a succinct zero-knowledge argument for such relations, where the communication complexity is logarithmic in the integer and source group components of the witness. Our argument has public-coin setup and verifier and can therefore be turned non-interactive using the Fiat-Shamir transformation in the random oracle model. For the special case of non-bilinear group arithmetic relations with only integer unknowns, our system can be instantiated in non-bilinear groups. In many applications, our argument system can serve as a drop-in replacement of Groth-Sahai proofs, turning existing advanced primitives in the vast literature of structure-preserving cryptography into practically efficient systems with short proofs.
Inspired by the work of Ghadafi and Groth (ASIACRYPT 2017) on a certain type of computational hardness assumptions in cyclic groups (which they call ``target assumptions''), we initiate an analogous work on another type of hardness assumptions, namely the ``knowledge-of-exponent'' assumptions (KEAs). Originally introduced by Damgard to construct practical encryption schemes secure against chosen ciphertext attacks, KEAs have subsequently been used primarily to construct succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs), and proved to be inherent to such constructions. Since SNARKs (and their zero-knowledge variant, zk-SNARKs) are already used in practice in such systems as the Zcash digital currency, it can be expected that the use of KEAs will increase in the future, which makes it important to have a good understanding of those assumptions. Using a proof technique first introduced by Bellare and Palacio (but acknowledged by them as being due to Halevi), we first investigate the internal structure of the q-power knowledge-of-exponent (q-PKE) family of assumptions introduced by Groth, which is thus far the most general variant of KEAs. We then introduce a generalisation of the q-PKE family, and show that it can be simplified.
Rafaël del Pino, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregor Seiler
We present a group signature scheme, based on the hardness of lattice problems, whose outputs are more than an order of magnitude smaller than the currently most efficient schemes in the literature. Since lattice-based schemes are also usually non-trivial to efficiently implement, we additionally provide the first experimental implementation of lattice-based group signatures demonstrating that our construction is indeed practical -- all operations take less than half a second on a standard laptop. A key component of our construction is a new zero-knowledge proof system for proving that a committed value belongs to a particular set of small size. The sets for which our proofs are applicable are exactly those that contain elements that remain stable under Galois automorphisms of the underlying cyclotomic number field of our lattice-based protocol. We believe that these proofs will find applications in other settings as well. The motivation of the new zero-knowledge proof in our construction is to allow the efficient use of the selectively-secure signature scheme (i.e. a signature scheme in which the adversary declares the forgery message before seeing the public key) of Agrawal et al. (Eurocrypt 2010) in constructions of lattice-based group signatures and other privacy protocols. For selectively-secure schemes to be meaningfully converted to standard signature schemes, it is crucial that the size of the message space is not too large. Using our zero-knowledge proofs, we can strategically pick small sets for which we can provide efficient zero-knowledge proofs of membership.
Areej M. Abduldaim, Jumana Waleed, Arbah S. Abdul-Kareem, Maiada N. Mohmmedali
A zero knowledge proof is a type of authentication scheme, which gives no knowledge beyond the authenticity for identifying an entity. Ring theory plays an important role in designing of a novel algorithm for zero knowledge proof through using of a particular class of non-commutative rings. In this article, we employ the notion of nil 3-Armendariz rings to plan a new algorithm for zero knowledge proof. Our main approach is to build the algebraic structure of the zero knowledge proof depends on the stipulation in the definition of the nil 3-Armendariz rings. The proposed protocol is clarified via numerical simulation example, and its soundness and completeness are evidenced. Finally, we found that the proposed protocol satisfies the completeness, the soundness in the sense that, there is 50% chance of catching a cheating prove, and the proposed protocol has the property of zero knowledge.
Preuves à divulgation nulle de connaissance pour le calcul sécurisé Dans cette thèse, nous étudions les preuves à divulgation nulle de connaissance, une primitive cryptographique permettant de prouver une assertion en ne révélant rien de plus que sa véracité, et leurs applications au calcul sécurisé. Nous introduisons tout d’abord un nouveau type de preuves à divulgation nulle, appelées arguments implicites à divulgation nulle, intermédiaire entre deux notions existantes, les preuves interactives et les preuves non interactives à divulgation nulle. Cette nouvelle notion permet d’obtenir les mêmes bénéfices en terme d’efficacité que les preuves non-interactives dans le contexte de la construction de protocoles de calcul sécurisé faiblement interactifs, mais peut être instanciée à partir des mêmes hypothèses cryptographiques que les preuves interactives, permettant d’obtenir de meilleures garanties d’efficacité et de sécurité. Dans un second temps, nous revisitons un système de preuves à divulgation nulle de connaissance qui est particulièrement utile dans le cadre de protocoles de calcul sécurisé manipulant des nombres entiers, et nous démontrons que son analyse de sécurité classique peut être améliorée pour faire reposer ce système de preuve sur une hypothèse plus standard et mieux connue. Enfin, nous introduisons une nouvelle méthode de construction de systèmes de preuves à divulgation nulle sur les entiers, qui représente une amélioration par rapport aux méthodes existantes, tout particulièrement dans un modèle de type client-serveur, où un client à faible puissance de calcul participe à un protocole de calcul sécurisé avec un serveur à forte puissance de calcul.
Gottfried Herold, Max Hoffmann, Michael Klooß, Carla Ràfols · 5 authors
Bilinear groups form the algebraic setting for a multitude of important cryptographic protocols including anonymous credentials, e-cash, e-voting, e-coupon, and loyalty systems. It is typical of such crypto protocols that participating parties need to repeatedly verify that certain equations over bilinear groups are satisfied, e.g., to check that computed signatures are valid, commitments can be opened, or non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs verify correctly. Depending on the form and number of equations this part can quickly become a performance bottleneck due to the costly evaluation of the bilinear map.
Group signatures are a class of digital signatures with enhanced privacy. By using this type of signature, a user can sign a message on behalf of a specific group without revealing his identity, but in the case of a dispute, an authority can expose the identity of the signer. However, it is not always the case that we need to know the specific identity of a signature. In this paper, we propose the notion of deniable group signatures, where the authority can issue a proof showing that the specified user is NOT the signer of a signature, without revealing the actual signer. We point out that existing efficient non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems cannot be straightforwardly applied to prove such a statement. We circumvent this problem by giving a fairly practical construction through extending the Groth group signature scheme (ASIACRYPT 2007). In particular, a denial proof in our scheme consists of 96 group elements, which is about twice the size of a signature in the Groth scheme. The proposed scheme is provably secure under the same assumptions as those of the Groth scheme.
M. Albrecht, Pooya Farshim, Shuai Han, Dennis Hofheinz · 6 authors
Abstract We provide constructions of multilinear groups equipped with natural hard problems from indistinguishability obfuscation, homomorphic encryption, and NIZKs. This complements known results on the constructions of indistinguishability obfuscators from multilinear maps in the reverse direction. We provide two distinct, but closely related constructions and show that multilinear analogues of the $${\text {DDH}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtext>DDH</mml:mtext></mml:math> assumption hold for them. Our first construction is symmetric and comes with a $$\kappa $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:math> -linear map $$\mathbf{e }: {{\mathbb {G}}}^\kappa \longrightarrow {\mathbb {G}}_T$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> for prime-order groups $${\mathbb {G}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math> and $${\mathbb {G}}_T$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> . To establish the hardness of the $$\kappa $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:math> -linear $${\text {DDH}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtext>DDH</mml:mtext></mml:math> problem, we rely on the existence of a base group for which the $$\kappa $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:math> -strong $${\text {DDH}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtext>DDH</mml:mtext></mml:math> assumption holds. Our second construction is for the asymmetric setting, where $$\mathbf{e }: {\mathbb {G}}_1 \times \cdots \times {\mathbb {G}}_{\kappa } \longrightarrow {\mathbb {G}}_T$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> for a collection of $$\kappa +1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> prime-order groups $${\mathbb {G}}_i$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> and $${\mathbb {G}}_T$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> , and relies only on the 1-strong $${\text {DDH}} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtext>DDH</mml:mtext></mml:math> assumption in its base group. In both constructions, the linearity $$\kappa $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>κ</mml:mi></mml:math> can be set to any arbitrary but a priori fixed polynomial value in the security parameter. We rely on a number of powerful tools in our constructions: probabilistic indistinguishability obfuscation, dual-mode NIZK proof systems (with perfect soundness, witness-indistinguishability, and zero knowledge), and additively homomorphic encryption for the group $$\mathbb {Z}_N^{+}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math> . At a high level, we enable “bootstrapping” multilinear assumptions from their simpler counterparts in standard cryptographic groups and show the equivalence of PIO and multilinear maps under the existence of the aforementioned primitives.
This habilitation thesis deals with cryptographic primitives that preserve the algebraic structure of underlying objects (messages, keys, etc) and their applications to the design of non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs and privacy-enhancing cryptographic primitives.In 2008, Groth and Sahai showed how to make these proof systems relatively efficient in abelian groups endowed with a bilinear map. These techniques, however, require to work with lower-level primitives where handled objects all live in a cyclic abelian group. Among other things, we need to sign messages without destroying their algebraic structure (in particular, without hashing them first) so as to be able to efficiently prove properties about hidden signed messages. The first part of this thesis describes a structure-preserving signature scheme which was the first efficient realization under previously studied algorithmic assumptions. These tools are also utilized in the design of a novel revocation mechanism for group signatures, which allow users to anonymously sign messages on behalf of a population they belong to. The second part of this thesis considers structure-preserving signatures endowed with homomorphic properties. We show how to use them in the design of non-malleable cryptographic primitives. Using linearly homomorphic structurepreserving signatures, we notably obtain non-malleable commitments to group elements and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs, as well as public-key encryption schemes that resist chosen-ciphertext attacks.
Technology is linking the slightest of our actions to the virtual world. In such connected environments, cryptography aims at building schemes with provable security in order to mathematically protect the users' security in electronic exchanges. Relying on the existence of pairings in bilinear groups wherein the discrete logarithm problem is hard, this thesis puts forth mechanisms to efficiently enhance the privacy in three of the most fundamental cryptographic primitives, namely, digital signatures, encryption schemes and zero-knowledge proofs. Furthermore, these mechanisms support public verifiability so as to force the honesty of all participants in the standard model. We first focus on group signatures, a primitive proposed some 20 years ago, for which we propose the first efficient revocation mechanisms, overcoming the main obstacle to the deployment of this primitive in practical applications. We then focus on P-homomorphic signatures that make it possible to modify a signed message in a controlled way. In particular, we propose new mechanisms providing structure-preserving linearly homomorphic signatures, from which we build the first constant-size non-malleable commitments compatible with standard proof systems, as well as a generalization of this construction into a generic transformation. Finally we further investigate the unexpected applications of this kind of malleable signatures to non-malleable cryptography. This leads us to new proof systems for linear languages which in turn provide the most efficient publicly verifiable CCA-secure threshold encryption to date, and other new extensions.
Georg Fuchsbauer, Christian Hanser, Daniel Slamanig
Structure-preserving signatures (SPS) are a powerful building block for cryptographic protocols. We introduce SPS on equivalence classes (SPS-EQ), which allow joint randomization of messages and signatures. Messages are projective equivalence classes defined on group-element vectors, so multiplying a vector by a scalar yields a different representative of the same class. Our scheme lets one adapt a signature for one representative to a signature for another representative without knowledge of any secret. Moreover, given a signature, an adapted signature for a different representative is indistinguishable from a fresh signature on a random message. We propose a definitional framework for SPS-EQ and an efficient construction in Type-3 bilinear groups, which we prove secure against generic forgers. We also introduce set-commitment schemes that let one open subsets of the committed set. From this and SPS-EQ, we then build an efficient multi-show attribute-based anonymous credential system for an arbitrary number of attributes. Our ABC system avoids costly zero-knowledge proofs and only requires a short interactive proof to thwart replay attacks. It is the first credential system whose bandwidth required for credential showing is independent of the number of its attributes, i.e., constant-size. We propose strengthened game-based security definitions for ABC and prove our scheme anonymous against malicious organizations in the standard model; finally, we discuss a concurrently secure variant in the CRS model.
In this thesis, we investigate the notion of privacy for signatures belonging tothe second type, i.e., those which provide privacy with respect to the signed message.
The first part of our work consists of one chapter in which one of the applications of blind signatures in on-line services and games is considered. In this way, we seek an ecient solution for a simple scenario in which a recipient can take a token from an issuer to be paid to an on-line service provider, without revealing anything about the service he intends to use.
The second part of the work considers the problem of formalizing the notion of convertible non-transferable signatures, which is addressed in two chapters. Here the notion of transferability refers to transferring the validity of a signature with respect to a given message by the recipient of the signature to a third party. The basic idea for constructing concrete schemes for such signatures is to build a scheme in which a signature can be valid with regard to any random message unless some piece of information is revealed. Non-transferable (sometimes also called private) signatures enable the signer or the recipient to decide who can verify the issued signature. It is possible to construct such signatures by computing a non-transferable signature using a non-transferable proof (in an interactive or non-interactive way) to prove its validity to the designated veri er. The concept of non-transferable signatures was introduced into cryptography by proposing undeniable signatures, in which after is- suing the signature nobody can verify it with regard to the signed message without the cooperation of the signer. This restriction of veri cation is the point of dierence between traditional signatures that are universally veri able and non-transferable signatures. The best-known examples of non-transferable signatures are undeniable signatures, designated con rmer signatures, directed signatures, universally desig- nated veri er signatures, nominative signatures, etc. In the rst three signatures, it is the signer who is interested in making the signature recognizable only to himself or some pre-chosen party, while in the last two it is the recipient who makes the signature private to himself or some known party chosen by himself. Each of these signatures has its own natural application scenarios. Although these signatures are dierent in both nature and application, almost all of them are built from the same basic primitives: zero-knowledge proofs and commitments.
Abstract. We present a generic transformation that allows us to use a large class of pairing-based signatures to construct schemes for signing group elements in a structure preserving way. As a result of our transformation we obtain a new efficient signature scheme for signing a vector of group elements that is based only on the well established decisional linear assumption (DLIN). Moreover, the public keys and signatures of our scheme consist of group elements only, and a signature is verified by evaluating a set of pairing-product equations. In combination with the Groth-Sahai proof system, such a signature scheme is an ideal building block for many privacy-enhancing protocols. To do this, we start by proposing a new stateful signature scheme for signing vectors of exponents that is F-unforgeable under weak chosen message attacks. This signature scheme is of independent interest as it is compatible with Groth-Sahai proofs and secure under a computational assumption implied by DLIN. Then we give a general transformation for signing group elements based on signatures (for signing exponents) with efficient non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs. This transform also removes any dependence on state in the signature used to sign exponents. Finally, we obtain our result by instantiating this transformation with the above signature scheme and Groth-Sahai proofs. 1
Shafi Goldwasser, Yael Tauman Kalai, Guy N. Rothblum
In this work we study interactive proofs for tractable languages. The (honest) prover should be efficient and run in polynomial time, or in other words a "muggle". The verifier should be super-efficient and run in nearly-linear time. These proof systems can be used for delegating computation: a server can run a computation for a client and interactively prove the correctness of the result. The client can verify the result's correctness in nearly-linear time (instead of running the entire computation itself). Previously, related questions were considered in the Holographic Proof setting by Babai, Fortnow, Levin and Szegedy, in the argument setting under computational assumptions by Kilian, and in the random oracle model by Micali. Our focus, however, is on the original interactive proof model where no assumptions are made on the computational power or adaptiveness of dishonest provers. Our main technical theorem gives a public coin interactive proof for any language computable by a log-space uniform boolean circuit with depth d and input length n. The verifier runs in time (n+d) • polylog(n) and space O(log(n)), the communication complexity is d • polylog(n), and the prover runs in time poly(n). In particular, for languages computable by log-space uniform NC (circuits of polylog(n) depth), the prover is efficient, the verifier runs in time n • polylog(n) and space O(log(n)), and the communication complexity is polylog(n). Using this theorem we make progress on several questions: We show how to construct short (polylog size) computationally sound non-interactive certificates of correctness for any log-space uniform NC computation, in the public-key model. The certificates can be verified in quasi-linear time and are for a designated verifier: each certificate is tailored to the verifier's public key. This result uses a recent transformation of Kalai and Raz from public-coin interactive proofs to one-round arguments. The soundness of the certificates is based on the existence of a PIR scheme with polylog communication. Interactive proofs with public-coin, log-space, poly-time verifiers for all of P. This settles an open question regarding the expressive power of proof systems with such verifiers. Zero-knowledge interactive proofs with communication complexity that is quasi-linear in the witness, length for any NP language verifiable in NC, based on the existence of one-way functions. Probabilistically checkable arguments (a model due to Kalai and Raz) of size polynomial in the witness length (rather than the instance length) for any NP language verifiable in NC, under computational assumptions.
Non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs and non-interactive witness-indistinguishable proofs have played a significant role in the theory of cryptography. However, lack of efficiency has prevented them from being used in practice. One of the roots of this inefficiency is that non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs have been constructed for general NP-complete languages such as Circuit Satisfiability, causing an expensive blowup in the size of the statement when reducing it to a circuit. The contribution of this paper is a general methodology for constructing very simple and efficient non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs and non-interactive witness-indistinguishable proofs that work directly for groups with a bilinear map, without needing a reduction to Circuit Satisfiability. Groups with bilinear maps have enjoyed tremendous success in the field of cryptography in recent years and have been used to construct a plethora of protocols. This paper provides non-interactive witness-indistinguishable proofs and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that can be used in connection with these protocols. Our goal is to spread the use of non-interactive cryptographic proofs from mainly theoretical purposes to the large class of practical cryptographic protocols based on bilinear groups.
In this paper, we give an efficient short constant-size group signature scheme that is secure in standard model based on strong Diffie-Hellman assumption. We achieve this result by combining a variant signature scheme of the one presented by Okamoto and non-interactive zero knowledge proof used by Boyen and Waters. Compared with the most efficient group signature scheme without random oracle, our scheme has a much shorter public key length and signature length, and needs less computation.
A small size group signature scheme based on RSA cryptosystem is described in this paper. Due to the special algebraic structure of RSA, one public key and two corresponding private keys are available. The two private keys are used as signature keys for group members. The signature operation includes an ordinary RSA signature and a zero knowledge proof about signature key. Compared with most group schemes, it has low computational cost as to signature and verification.
This paper is an extended version of math.OA/0601528 where we point out and remedy a gap in the proof by P. Julg and G. Kasparov of the Baum-Connes conjecture for discrete subgroups of SU(n,1). In particular, here we explain in details why the non-microlocality of the Heisenberg calculus prevents us from implementing into this framework the classical approach of Seeley to pseudodifferential complex powers, which was the main issue at stake in math.OA/0601528.