Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.
3,636 results · page 110 of 152
Tobias Burggraf, Aditya Vyas
No abstract is available for this record.
Lai T. Hoang, Dirk G. Baur
Abstract This paper studies a large number of bitcoin (BTC) options traded on the options exchange Deribit. We use the trades to calculate implied volatility (IV) and analyze if volatility forecasts can be improved using such information. IV is less accurate than AutoRegressive–Moving‐Average or Heterogeneous Auto‐Regressive model forecasts in predicting short‐term BTC volatility (1 day ahead), but superior in predicting long‐term volatility (7, 10, 15 days ahead). Furthermore, a combination of IV and model‐based forecasts provides the highest accuracy for all forecasting horizons revealing that the BTC options market contains unique information.
María Belén Arouxét, Aurelio F. Bariviera, Verónica Pastor, Victoria Vampa
Cryptocurrency history begins in 2008 as a means of payment proposal. However, cryptocurrencies evolved into a complex ecosystem of high yield speculative assets. Contrary to traditional financial instruments, they are not (mostly) traded in organized, law-abiding venues, but on online platforms, where anonymity reigns. This paper examines the long term memory in return and volatility, using high frequency time series of seven important coins. Our study covers the pre-Covid-19 and the subsequent pandemic period. We use a recently developed method, based on the wavelet transform, which provides more robust estimators of the Hurst exponent. We detect that, during the peak of Covid-19 pandemic (around March 2020), the long memory of returns was only mildly affected. However, volatility suffered a temporary impact in its long range correlation structure. Our results could be of interest for both academics and practitioners.
Shiyun Li, Yiping Huang
Abstract The advance of cryptocurrencies has sparked wide concern over their interplay with the existing global financial market. This paper analyzes the risk spillover relation between cryptocurrencies and major financial assets, and unravels how cryptocurrencies could influence global financial systemic risk. We find that cryptocurrencies function as a separate risk source from traditional assets. Major legislative, financial and technological events in the cryptocurrency market may affect risk spillover dynamics. Although the overall penetration of cryptocurrencies is not yet deep, introducing cryptocurrency can significantly increase the systemic risk to traditional markets during low risk level episodes.
Lennart Ante
The underlying transparency of the Bitcoin blockchain allows transactions in the network to be tracked in near real-time. When someone transfers a large number of Bitcoins, the market receives this information and traders can adjust their expectations based on the new information. This paper investigates trading volume and its relation to asymmetric information around transfers on the Bitcoin blockchain. We collect data on 2132 large transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain between September 2018 and November 2019, where 500 or more Bitcoins were transferred. Using event study methodology, we identify significant positive abnormal trading volume for the 15-minute window before a large Bitcoin transaction as well as during and after the event. Using public information about Bitcoin addresses of cryptocurrency exchanges as proxies for information asymmetry, we find that transactions with high levels of information asymmetry negatively affect abnormal trading volume once the event becomes public knowledge, while some effects are even opposite for transactions with lower information asymmetry. The results show that blockchain transaction activity is a relevant aspect of Bitcoinns microstructure, as informed traders make use of the information in general and adjust their expectations based on the degree of information asymmetry.
Tarun Chitra, Alex Evans
As smart contract platforms autonomously manage billions of dollars of capital, quantifying the portfolio risk that investors engender in these systems is increasingly important. Recent work illustrates that Proof of Stake (PoS) is vulnerable to financial attacks arising from on-chain lending and has worse capital efficiency than Proof of Work (PoW) \cite{fanti_pos_econ}. Numerous methods for improving capital efficiency have been proposed that allow stakers to create fungible derivative claims on their staked assets. In this paper, we construct a unifying model for studying the security risks of these proposals. This model combines birth-death Pólya processes and risk models adapted from the credit derivatives literature to assess token inequality and return profiles. We find that there is a sharp transition between 'safe' and 'unsafe' derivative usage. Surprisingly, we find that contrary to \cite{fanti2019compounding} there exist conditions where derivatives can \emph{reduce} concentration of wealth in these networks. This model also applies to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols where staked assets are used as insurance. Our theoretical results are validated using agent-based simulation.
Pierangelo De Pace, Jayant Rao
No abstract is available for this record.
Tobias Burggraf, Markus Rudolf
No abstract is available for this record.
Peterson Owusu, Anokye M. Adam, George Tweneboah
This paper explores the symmetric and asymmetric dependency structure of decomposed return series of Gold and eight cryptocurrencies to establish the hedging and diversification potentials of these asset classes. Daily data spanning 30 April 2013 to 18 April 2019 are employed within the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Quantile-in-Quantile regression techniques. Our empirical results provide evidence that cryptocurrencies and Gold can both hedge and diversify for each other at different conditional distributions of their returns. We also find that cryptocurrencies are not purely speculative but can be driven by medium- and long-term fundamentals. In addition, both Gold and cryptocurrencies can be hedge and diversifiers for other traditional asset classes such as crude oil, fiat currencies, and other commodities.
Amina Amirat, Wafa Alwafi
This paper investigates the existence of herding behavior in cryptocurrencies market. Using data of the 20 large cryptocurrencies and MV Index Solution Crypto Compare Digital Assets for large cap index, we found no evidence of herding behavior using cross-sectional absolute standard deviation estimation. However, by applying a rolling window analysis, the results show significant herding behavior, which varies over time. Finally, we find an inverse relationship between herding behavior and the Bloomberg consumer comfort index which means that when traders are less comfortable they prefer to ignore their expectations and follow the market performance.
Amin Shams
This paper documents a persistent structure in cryptocurrency returns and analyzes a broad set of characteristics that explain this structure. The results show that similarities in size, trading volume, age, consensus mechanism, and token industries drive the structure of cryptocurrency returns. But the highest variation is explained by a "connectivity" measure that proxies for similarity in cryptocurrencies' investor bases using their trading location. Currencies connected to other currencies that perform well generate sizably higher returns than the cross-section both contemporaneously and in the future. I examine three potential channels for these results. First, evidence from new exchange listings and a quasi-natural experiment shows that unobservable characteristics cannot explain the effect of connectivity. Second, decomposition of the order flows suggests that connectivity captures strong exchange-specific commonalities in crypto investors' demand that also spills over to other exchanges. Finally, analysis of social media data suggests that these demand shocks are a first order driver of cryptocurrency returns, largely because they can be perceived as a sign of user adoption.
Asena Deniz, Dilek Teker
One of the most important innovations brought by digitalization is crypto money known as virtual money. Cryptocurrencies, which have been discussed in recent years and especially a new portfolio for investors, are very popular. Bitcoin is the most well-known of these cryptographic systems, which do not depend on a central authority and have maximum reliability. The effects of various financial indicators on cryptoparas were examined in this study. The model includes a daily database in between April 3, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Initially stationarity is tested with unit root tests. Then cointegration and causality tests are employed. Impulse response is also implemented and analysed.
Kwok Ping Tsang, Zichao Yang
No abstract is available for this record.
Fabian Woebbeking
Abstract By computing a volatility index (CVX) from cryptocurrency option prices, we analyze this market’s expectation of future volatility. Our method addresses the challenging liquidity environment of this young asset class and allows us to extract stable market implied volatilities. Two alternative methods are considered to compute volatilities from granular intra-day cryptocurrency options data, which spans over the COVID-19 pandemic period. CVX data therefore capture ‘normal’ market dynamics as well as distress and recovery periods. The methods yield two cointegrated index series, where the corresponding error correction model can be used as an indicator for market implied tail-risk. Comparing our CVX to existing volatility benchmarks for traditional asset classes, such as VIX (equity) or GVX (gold), confirms that cryptocurrency volatility dynamics are often disconnected from traditional markets, yet, share common shocks.
Tommy Crépellière, Matthias Pelster, Stefan Zeisberger
Arbitrage opportunities in markets for cryptocurrencies are well-documented. In this paper, we confirm that they existed; however, their magnitude decreased greatly from April 2018 onward. Analyzing various trading strategies, we show that it is hardly possible to exploit existing price differences since then. We discuss and test several mechanisms that may be responsible for the increased market efficiency and find that, particularly, informed trading is correlated with a reduction in arbitrage opportunities.
Damian S. Damianov, Ahmed H. Elsayed
No abstract is available for this record.
Nicola Uras, Lodovica Marchesi, Michele Marchesi, Roberto Tonelli
In this article we forecast daily closing price series of Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum cryptocurrencies, using data on prices and volumes of prior days. Cryptocurrencies price behaviour is still largely unexplored, presenting new opportunities for researchers and economists to highlight similarities and differences with standard financial prices. We compared our results with various benchmarks: one recent work on Bitcoin prices forecasting that follows different approaches, a well-known paper that uses Intel, National Bank shares and Microsoft daily NASDAQ closing prices spanning a 3-year interval and another, more recent paper which gives quantitative results on stock market index predictions. We followed different approaches in parallel, implementing both statistical techniques and machine learning algorithms: the Simple Linear Regression (SLR) model for uni-variate series forecast using only closing prices, and the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model for multivariate series using both price and volume data. We used two artificial neural networks as well: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Long short-term memory (LSTM). While the entire time series resulted to be indistinguishable from a random walk, the partitioning of datasets into shorter sequences, representing different price "regimes", allows to obtain precise forecast as evaluated in terms of Mean Absolute Percentage Error(MAPE) and relative Root Mean Square Error (relativeRMSE). In this case the best results are obtained using more than one previous price, thus confirming the existence of time regimes different from random walks. Our models perform well also in terms of time complexity, and provide overall results better than those obtained in the benchmark studies, improving the state-of-the-art.
Elie Bouri, Κωνσταντίνος Γκίλλας, Rangan Gupta, Christian Pierdzioch
We analyze the role of the US-China trade war in predicting, both in- and out-of-sample, daily realized volatility of Bitcoin returns. We study intraday data spanning from 1st July 2017 to 30th June 2019. We use the heterogeneous autoregressive realized volatility model (HAR-RV) as the benchmark model to capture stylized facts such as heterogeneity and long-memory. We then extend the HAR-RV model to include a metric of US-China trade tensions. This is our primary predictor of interest, and it is based on Google Trends. We also control for jumps, realized skewness, and realized kurtosis. For our empirical analysis, we use a machine-learning technique which is known as random forests. Our findings reveal that US-China trade uncertainty does improve forecast accuracy for various configurations of random forests and forecast horizons.
Vijay Mohan
No abstract is available for this record.
Yongge Wang
This paper compares mathematical models for automated market makers including logarithmic market scoring rule (LMSR), liquidity sensitive LMSR (LS-LMSR), constant product/mean/sum, and others. It is shown that though LMSR may not be a good model for Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications, LS-LMSR has several advantages over constant product/mean based automated market makers. However, LS-LMSR requires complicated computation (i.e., logarithm and exponentiation) and the cost function curve is concave. In certain DeFi applications, it is preferred to have computationally efficient cost functions with convex curves to conform with the principle of supply and demand. This paper proposes and analyzes constant circle/ellipse based cost functions for automated market makers. The proposed cost functions are computationally efficient (only requires multiplication and square root calculation) and have several advantages over widely deployed constant product cost functions. For example, the proposed market makers are more robust against front-runner (slippage) attacks.
Emmanuel Pintelas, Ioannis E. Livieris, Stavros Stavroyiannis, Theodore Kotsilieris · 5 authors
No abstract is available for this record.
Anirudh Dhawan, Tālis J. Putniņš
We investigate the puzzle of widespread participation in cryptocurrency pump-and-dump manipulation schemes. Unlike stock market manipulators, cryptocurrency manipulators openly declare their intentions to pump specific coins, rather than trying to deceive investors. Puzzlingly, people join in despite negative expected returns. In a simple framework, we demonstrate how overconfidence and gambling preferences can explain participation in these schemes. Analyzing a sample of 355 cases in 6 months, we find strong empirical support for both mechanisms. Pumps generate extreme price distortions of 65% on average, abnormal trading volumes in the millions of dollars, and large wealth transfers between participants.
Miroslav Fil, Ladislav Krištoufek
Pairs trading is a strategy based on exploiting mean reversion in prices of securities. Even though these strategies have been shown to perform well for equities, their performance is unknown for the field of cryptocurrencies, usually perceived as inefficient and predictable. We apply the distance and cointegration methods to a basket of 26 liquid cryptocurrencies traded on the Binance exchange, specifically at 5-minute, 1-hour and daily frequencies. In our backtests, the strategies underperform classical benchmarks. However, the results are quite sensitive to parameter settings and external factors such as transaction costs or execution windows. Higher-frequency trading delivers significantly better performance, and while the most common daily distance method returns -0.07% monthly, this increases to 11.61% monthly for 5-minute frequency. Additionally, we find evidence of simple mean-reverting behavior in intraday prices that is missing in daily data, and which provides further support for the inefficiency of cryptocurrency markets.
Yi Li, Andrew Urquhart, Pengfei Wang, Wei Zhang
No abstract is available for this record.