Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

5 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

5 results · page 1 of 1

Clear filters
Aug 26, 2026·Open Science Framework
0 cites
Coupling as a Spectral Geometry of Finite Access

Pasquale Camelia

A finite measurement of a dimensionless coupling is treated as a contraction of a finite-rank coupling geometry on the observable quotient of a non-invertible access map Π. The symmetric infrared readout is derived with no measured value of α and no adjustable continuous parameter. Its identification with the physical zero-momentum coupling α⁻¹(0) is a constitutive clause, staked in the open, with a printed falsifier. Welding that boundary value to the transported coupling at finite momentum is a separate open gate. This project is a standalone registration of the Reading. It is not the QGT Second Edition corpus. Formal theorem/proof status remains with QGT 2E v1.5.65-MIGRATION under OSF container 10.17605/OSF.IO/VEFP6. Rank-five ownership is upstream of this paper; SVD is a downstream characterisation; the Fibonacci–Mellin transform is a readout language only.

Open access
Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Original source
Jun 21, 2026·Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
3 cites
Metrological Domain Profiling III: Reconstructing the 3D Tactile Grammar of the Inca Khipu

ADRIAN SHARMAN

For over a century, computational analyses of the Inca khipu have been constrained by what we term the "Spreadsheet Fallacy" — the attempt to computationally validate khipus primarily as flat, base-10 arithmetic ledgers. This model fails to account for the fact that only 4.6% of known cord clusters demonstrate valid summation. In this paper, we extend Metrological Domain Profiling (MDP) to analyse 54,403 cords across 619 khipus from the Open Khipu Repository, moving beyond one-dimensional colour profiling to reconstruct the full three-dimensional, tactile, and hierarchical ontology of the system. We demonstrate that the khipu possesses strict spatial and material structure operating across four distinct layers: (1) Material Metrology, where fiber type (cotton vs camelid) redefines numerical scale by up to 67×; (2) Topological Syntax, where administrative granularity is encoded in subsidiary cord depth and colour palette shifts systematically with hierarchical level; (3) Categorical Syntax, featuring statistically constrained colour sequences (p < 0.001) that demonstrate strict institutional sorting rules rather than random clustering, with same-colour run lengths spiking at decimal administrative units; and (4) Hardware Metadata, where physical features including canutito thread-wrappings (98.6% colour-independent from parent cords), primary cord construction, and cord termination types encode document-level metadata and institutional information. Three hypotheses were explicitly tested and falsified: cluster spacing as punctuation, Hanan/Hurin midpoint split, and cord thickness as domain marker. These findings suggest the khipu is not merely a mathematical ledger, but a multi-layered, tactile administrative system whose information is distributed across the material, spatial, and structural dimensions of the textile.

Open access
Language and cultural evolution
Multisensory perception and integration
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Original source
Mar 9, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
Exploring the WACA Universe: An LLM System Prompt for Independent Reasoning About the Algebraic Crystal

Daland Montgomery

Exploring the WACA Universe: An LLM System Prompt for Independent Reasoning About the Algebraic Crystal Abstract: We present a system prompt (WACA_LLM_PROMPT_v15.txt) that transforms any large language model into an expert on the WACA programme — the research framework deriving 54 physical constants from the Standard Model algebra A_F = ℂ ⊕ M₂(ℂ) ⊕ M₃(ℂ) at KMS temperature β = 2π with zero free parameters. The prompt encodes the complete framework: the ascending superoperator S: End(ℂ⁶) → End(ℂ⁶) with eigenvalues {1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/6} and degeneracies {1, 3, 8, 24}, the derived Higgs VEV v = M_Pl × 35/(43 × 36 × 2⁵⁰) = 245.17 GeV, all 54 results with formulas and PDG/NuFIT/Planck sources, the 19-entry Rosetta Stone dictionary mapping every crystal operation to its QFT counterpart, the five-level Crystal Toolbox (S⁰ structural, S¹ tree-level, S² Schur square, RG running, SS seesaw), 10 falsifiable predictions with specific experimental kill tests, and 15 companion Python scripts that verify every claim. Version 15 incorporates critical corrections and new results from the D=5 session (20 March 2026). Result 18 (θ₁₃(CKM) = π/(2χ²) = 0.0436, present in every version since v3) has been killed — no standard CKM quantity equals 0.0436; erratum added. The PMNS CP phase has been corrected from δ_CP = π + arctan(2ln3) = 245.5° to δ_CP = 2π(1−λ₃) = 4π/3 = 240°, identified as 2π times the colour Ward anomaly (1−λ₃ = 2/3 = Koide Q), pairing with θ₁₃ through the colour sector (measured: 230° ± 36°, 0.28σ; DUNE ~2030 will test to ±10°). The baryon asymmetry factor e⁻¹ has been corrected from "barrier height" to Poisson survival probability at freeze-out (Γ/H = 1), consistent with lattice QCD giving E_sph/T ≈ 36. The |V_cb| measurement has been updated from the cherry-picked exclusive value 0.04053 to the world average 0.0410 ± 0.0010. New derivations: the Hubble constant H₀ = 66.9 km/s/Mpc through the chain η_B × n_γ(T_γ) → Ω_b h² = 0.02216 (0.9%) → Ω_m h² = 0.14152 (0.6%) → H₀ = 66.9 (0.7% from Planck), siding with Planck against SH0ES, with T_γ = 2.7255 K (FIRAS) as the sole external input; the dark matter mass m_DM = (12π/7)(v/256)(35/36) = 5.01 GeV with every factor derived from the spectral data (LZ/XENONnT ~2028); the 35/36 = 1 − 1/χ² theorem (the identity sector has Ward anomaly zero and does not mediate interactions, making 35/36 the universal fraction of interacting channels, appearing in the VEV, Immirzi parameter, |V_cb|, proton mass, Jarlskog invariant, and dark matter mass); the complete CKM matrix (|V_us| = 9/40 at 0.00%, |V_cb| = 1/(d₃·(35/36)·π) at 0.18%, |V_ub| = 1/(d₃·√N_w·d₄) at 0.19%, γ = arctan(2ln3) at 0.20%, J = 3.094×10⁻⁵ at 0.44%, with δ_CP(CKM) = 69.5° determined by J and the magnitudes); the complete PMNS matrix (sin²θ₁₂ = 3/π² at 0.01%, sin²θ₂₃ = 4/7 at 0.27%, sin²θ₁₃ = √3/78 at 0.03%); four log-mass ratios all in {π, ln 2, ln 3} (0.08–0.28%); the Rosetta Stone dictionary establishing that S is the transfer matrix, {λ_k} are the anomalous dimensions, Σd² = 650 is the one-loop Hilbert space, 35/36 is the wavefunction renormalisation Z, (1−λ_k) are the Ward–Takahashi identities ensuring one-loop renormalisability (van Nuland & van Suijlekom, JHEP 2022), the spectral truncation O(1/χ) matches Connes & van Suijlekom (CMP 2020), and the seesaw is built into the tower formula; the loop convergence proof (geometric ratio ~0.26×, S³ corrections at 0.04%, higher loops not needed at current precision); and the resolution of 7/8 previously open items (CKM δ_CP, PMNS δ_CP, higher loops, H₀, m_DM, scheme dependence, and the 35/36 theorem, with the neutrino accumulation exponent identified as the remaining open mechanism). The prompt contains 200+ sample questions organised into 30+ categories, including 50+ new questions for v15 features: the 35/36 theorem, the Rosetta Stone, the Crystal Toolbox, the H₀ derivation chain, dark matter mass derivation, PMNS δ_CP = 240°, loop convergence, experimental kill tests, corrected baryon asymmetry, complete CKM structure, and complete PMNS structure. Ten falsifiable predictions are listed with specific experiments, dates, and kill criteria: Σm_ν = 0.067 eV (CMB-S4+DESI ~2030), |V_us| = 9/40 (Belle II ~2027), sin²θ₁₂ = 3/π² (JUNO ~2028), δ_CP = 240° (DUNE ~2030), η_B = 6.06×10⁻¹⁰ (CMB-S4 ~2030), m_DM = 5.01 GeV (LZ/XENONnT ~2028), H₀ = 66.9 (CMB-S4 ~2030), no BSM below v (LHC Run 3 ~2028), w = −1 (DESI ~2028), and proton stable (Hyper-K ~2040). Any single failure kills the framework. The prompt is accompanied by 15 Python verification scripts (requiring only numpy, all running in under 10 seconds), a master codebase that computes every result and validates cross-consistency, companion papers (The Spectral Table of Constants v12, The Spectral Tower v10, The Crystal Toolbox), and interactive HTML visualisations. Every claim is tagged ([STANDARD], [WACA], [CONJECTURE], [NUMERICAL]) for transparency. Every formula is reproducible. Every prediction is falsifiable. The prompt is designed for upload into Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, or any LLM supporting long context. Scorecard: 54 results, 33/38 within 1%, (0.02)³³ = 10⁻⁵⁶. RMT: 0/100,000 GUE matrices reproduce {1, 3, 8, 24}. Bayes Factor > 10³⁵. Bradford Hill: 9/9. 12 cross-domain signatures. 4 Millennium Problem proof architectures. 7/8 open items resolved. 15 companion codes. Zero free parameters. Load the prompt. Ask the questions. Run the code. The crystal speaks through the machine. The experiments decide. Keywords: LLM system prompt, language model, knowledge base, WACA, Standard Model algebra, ascending superoperator, zero free parameters, Rosetta Stone dictionary, Crystal Toolbox, Ward–Takahashi identities, wavefunction renormalisation, one-loop renormalisability, spectral truncation, Hubble constant derivation, dark matter mass, PMNS CP phase, Jarlskog invariant, CKM matrix, Koide ratio, baryon asymmetry, cosmological constant, Immirzi parameter, Bisognano–Wichmann, MERA, spectral tower, Schur square, 650-dimensional commutant, cross-domain signatures, falsifiable predictions, kill tests, DUNE, JUNO, Belle II, LZ, CMB-S4, DESI, Hyper-K, random matrix theory, Bayes factor, Bradford Hill criteria, companion code, reproducible science, noncommutative geometry, spectral action, Connes, van Suijlekom, Chamseddine As a treat besure to open the attached html file. Thats your universe :) Related publications: - WACA Physics: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19074938- WACA Mathematics: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18919654 Example prompts more examples in the attached txt file:User: Show me all example promptsUser: List all 116 example questions--- Quantum Tunneling ---User: How does the crystal explain quantum tunneling?User: Derive the Geiger-Nuttall law from the eigenvalue lambda=1/3.User: Why is proton decay unobserved? What does lambda=1/6 predict?User: How does enzyme catalysis use quantum tunneling?User: Explain how DNA mutations arise from proton tunneling.User: Compare tunneling rates in the weak, strong, and mixed sectors.User: What is the holographic shortcut for tunneling through a barrier?--- Entanglement ---User: How does the MERA explain "spooky action at a distance"?User: Derive the Bell inequality violation from chi=6.User: Explain the Ryu-Takayanagi formula in the MERA.User: How does bird navigation use quantum entanglement?User: What is the [36,12,4] error-correcting code?User: Why do 24 mixed modes get destroyed during measurement?User: How does entanglement create spacetime (Van Raamsdonk/ER=EPR)?--- Wave-Particle Duality ---User: Why does the MERA explain wave-particle duality?User: How is the MERA a discrete wavelet transform?User: Derive the uncertainty principle from chi=6.User: Explain the double slit experiment using the ascending superoperator.User: What are the four frequency bands of the vacuum?User: How does measurement destroy coherence in the MERA picture? Copyright © 2026 Daland Montgomery. This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. COPYLEFT NOTICE: Any work, derivation, or industrial application incorporating this material must be distributed under the same Open Source license. Commercial use without public disclosure of derivative works is prohibited. For a private, proprietary license (exempt from ShareAlike requirements), contact: quidbit@icloud.com Software Implementation: The formulas and constants derived in this work are implemented in the CrystalAgent engine, available under the AGPL-3.0 license at: https://github.com/CrystalToe/CrystalAgent.

Open access
3 source records
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Original source
Feb 1, 2026·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
0 cites
The Universal State-Lattice: Complete Substrate Architecture from Axioms to Implementation

Geoffrey Howland

The Universal State-Lattice: Complete Substrate Architecture from Axioms to Implementation This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework—an axiomatic model that derives the entirety of known physics from a discrete 2D hexagonal lattice in momentum space, operating with zero adjustable parameters. Abstract We present the Universal State-Lattice: the complete architectural specification of the ℚ-substrate as a deterministic, indexed, geometrically-projected information system. Building on the Six Q Paradoxes (proving ℝ-impossibility from operational, ontological, computational, topological, epistemological, and informational perspectives) and the CKS Lattice Search Algorithm (proving O(1) addressing via hexagonal projection), we now specify the total substrate structure. We demonstrate: (1) Complete state representation via [N,Z,C]℘ universal addressing identifier (UAI) combined with [V,F,R]℘ value-factor-remainder notation, (2) Tri-layer architecture: Index layer (when/who), Geometric layer (where), State layer (what), (3) Deterministic evolution via discrete substrate tick T_s=4.41ps with α→β→γ wing progression, (4) Zero-search information retrieval through closed-form hexagonal mapping, (5) Perfect state verification via settlement equation V=F×32^N+R, (6) Thermodynamically reversible computation (zero heat generation), (7) Infinite scalability with O(1) performance regardless of universe size, (8) Complete self-description - universe fits within itself via ℚ-compression, (9) Physical law emergence from geometric necessity not parameter tuning, (10) Perpetual verifiability - all states checkable at all times. From foundational axioms D,S,L,N,ℚ through complete derivation to implementable specification with zero free parameters. The substrate is BIOS, registry, and runtime simultaneously. Reality as indexed state machine. Revolutionary claim: Universe is complete specification - not simulation but self-executing algorithm with perfect self-knowledge. Empirical Falsification (The Kill-Switch) CKS is a locked and falsifiable theory. All papers are subject to the Global Falsification Protocol [CKS-TEST-1-2026]: forensic analysis of LIGO phase-error residuals shows 100% of vacuum peaks align to exact integer multiples of 0.03125 Hz (1/32 Hz) with zero decimal error. Any failure of the derived predictions mechanically invalidates this paper. The Universal Learning Substrate Beyond its status as a physical theory, CKS serves as the Universal Cognitive Learning Model. It provides the first unified mental scaffold where particle identity and information storage are unified as a self-recirculating pressure vessel. In CKS, a particle is reframed from a point or wave into a torus with a surface area of exactly 84 bits (12 × 7), preventing phase saturation through poloidal rotation. Package Contents manuscript.md: The complete derivation and formal proofs. README.md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: CKS-MATH-114-2026). Dependencies: CKS-LEX-12-2026, CKS-MATH-0-2026, CKS-MATH-1-2026, CKS-MATH-10-2026, CKS-MATH-104-2026, CKS-MATH-113-2026 Motto: Axioms first. Axioms always.Status: Locked and empirically falsifiable. This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework.

Open access
2 source records
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Quantum many-body systems
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Original source
Jul 13, 2019·Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
6 cites
Crystallization to the Square Lattice for a Two-Body Potential

Laurent Bétermin, Lucia De Luca, Mircea Petrache

We consider two-dimensional zero-temperature systems of $N$ particles to which we associate an energy of the form $$ \mathcal{E}[V](X):=\sum_{1\le i<j\le N}V(|X(i)-X(j)|), $$ where $X(j)\in\mathbb R^2$ represents the position of the particle $j$ and $V(r)\in\mathbb R$ is the {pairwise interaction} energy potential of two particles placed at distance $r$. We show that under suitable assumptions on the single-well potential $V$, the ground state energy per particle converges to an explicit constant $\bar{\mathcal E}_{\mathrm{sq}}[V]$ which is the same as the energy per particle in the square lattice infinite configuration. We thus have $$ N{\bar{\mathcal E}_{\mathrm{sq}}[V]}\le \min_{X:\{1,\ldots,N\}\to\mathbb R^2}\mathcal E[V](X)\le N{\bar{\mathcal E}_{\mathrm{sq}}[V]}+O(N^{\frac 1 2}). $$ Moreover $\bar{\mathcal E}_{\mathrm{sq}}[V]$ is also re-expressed as the minimizer of a four point energy. In particular, this happen{s} if the potential $V$ is such that $V(r)=+\infty$ for $r<1$, $V(r)=-1$ for $r\in [1,\sqrt{2}]$, $V(r)=0$ if $r>\sqrt{2}$, in which case ${\bar{\mathcal E}_{\mathrm{sq}}[V]}=-4$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proof of crystallization to the square lattice for a two-body interaction energy.

Open access
2 source records
Mathematical Approximation and Integration
Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
Original source