Blockchain Papers

Brittany Hagedorn, Jeremy Cooper, Oluwole Odutolu, Ojukwu Mark Ojukwu · 5 authors

Abstract Background The availability of essential medicines and supplies remains a serious impediment to effective primary health care (PHC) in many lower and lower middle-income countries. Most of these countries rely on centralized procurement, centralized stores, and a “push” distribution system. We describe here the impacts of a large-scale randomized trial in Nigeria, which provided modest funding directly to facilities to spend, on supply availability. Methods Districts in three states were randomly allocated to either direct facility financing (DFF) or performance-based financing (PBF) and matched to a control group. Both DFF and PBF transferred funds to facility bank accounts and allowed the facility management committee to spend on operational costs, including essential drugs. Facilities could procure medicines on the government’s essential drug list from pre-approved suppliers if they were certified by the national drug regulator. We conducted a difference-in-difference (DiD) analysis using facility survey data to assess the impact on availability of essential drugs and supplies. Results Drug availability was initially similar for the three arms of the trial (9 of 29 essential medicines). After three years, DFF and PBF facilities had significantly higher product availability than control (p<0.05). This amounted to an increase of 28/ 34 percentage points in DFF/PBF facilities (an additional 8/10 products, respectively), and only 10% in control (3 additional products). We did note that there was little difference between control and intervention arms in the availability of medicines for donor-supported vertical programs like immunization, family planning, and malaria. However, there were very large improvements for products like antibiotics, obstetrical drugs, diagnostics, and TB medications. Conclusion Providing funds directly to health facilities improved drug availability. It was superior to the typical centralized procurement and “push” distribution system that is widespread in lower-income settings. This approach is already spreading and should be adopted more widely.

Syed Masudur Rahman Dewan

Reading the letter “Transforming Health Insurance in Bangladesh: A Future-Ready Approach” that was submitted in response to “The Urgent Need for Developing a Common Health Insurance Policy in Bangladesh: A Perspective” [1] inspired me to write this response, and I am grateful to the author(s) for their work. The author(s) makes a valid and necessary point about the need for a paradigm shift away from traditional state-led models and towards decentralized, technology-driven, behaviorally informed strategies. But while we're looking at the present situation, we must also recognize the government's current efforts and see how they could support or even lay the groundwork for a universal health insurance program that would benefit all citizens. The Health Ministry of Bangladesh has announced that the government has initiated a program to offer free medical treatment and medications to the population. The ministry has announced plans to implement 24-h health services at 500 centers and to distribute a healthcare card to each household under the “Shyastha Surokkha Karmasuchi” (SSK) package. This card enhances patient identification at hospital admission and optimizes the payment process by monitoring diagnostic information and service usage; however, it has not been fully implemented yet [2]. The government's efforts to improve healthcare access and quality are commendable, but they also bring attention to a basic problem. People with lower and medium incomes, as well as those working in the informal economy, are disproportionately impacted by the unequal distribution of resources caused by the tax-based approach that forms the basis of many of these programs. Several economic studies have pointed out that, in Bangladesh, many families continue to struggle financially since out-of-pocket costs make up around 68.5% of overall healthcare spending [3]. Despite the importance of programs like SSK that offer free services, this circumstance shows that these efforts do not solve the underlying problems with the healthcare funding system, which include structural disparities and financial instability. A shift toward a universal, all-encompassing health insurance system seems essential and advantageous in this light. A strong health insurance system might have two benefits: first, it would help those who can't pay for medical treatment get coverage, and second, it would provide a system for reliable, long-term financing. Germany, France, and Japan are only a few examples of the nations that have demonstrated that social-insurance models may achieve both universal coverage and fair allocation of resources through income-based premiums and required participation [4]. The difficulty for Bangladesh comes from trying to apply these models to our own social and economic situation. The large informal sector of the Bangladeshi economy, which has long been exempt from traditional tax and insurance systems, is a major obstacle to the widespread adoption of health insurance. We propose a multi-pronged strategy to address this. To begin, one way to guarantee affordability is through progressive premium systems, in which contributions change according to income levels. Premium payments from informal workers might be made easier with the use of innovative collecting techniques, such as community-based networks and mobile payment systems like “bKash” and “Nagad,” which would reduce administrative responsibilities [5]. Second, providing low-income groups with government subsidies is essential. The state may make sure that no one is left out because they don't have enough money by paying part of the premiums for those who are vulnerable. It is really essential for everyone to take part; to eliminate coverage gaps and deal with fluctuating participation rates, it is recommended to use a default opt-in method. This means that all citizens would be automatically registered in the health insurance program, and opting out would only be permitted under certain circumstances. Behavioral economics principles have been used successfully in other contexts to significantly boost enrollment using this method. The insurance system's risk pool and financial foundation may be further expanded if measures were to be considered that would promote the formalization of workers in the informal sector [5]. Integrating technology stands alongside these funding improvements as another pillar of a health insurance system prepared for the future. Claims processing using blockchain technology, for instance, has the potential to streamline administrative operations, make them more transparent, and cut down on fraud and settlement delays [6]. Furthermore, predictive underwriting algorithms have allowed for more precise and inexpensive premium changes in East African pilot programs using AI-driven adaptive pricing techniques [7]. Bangladesh can create a system that can handle large-scale operations while catering to people of varying income levels by adopting this state-of-the-art technology. Without the larger healthcare system, no health insurance system can possibly operate. While it is great that SSK and other government programs are working to make services more accessible, such as free prescription programs and 24/7 care centers, these efforts should be supplemented by steps to make sure healthcare resources are distributed fairly. When contrasted with metropolitan regions, rural communities still lack enough infrastructure and medical specialists. We can encourage fair allocation of resources with a single health insurance system that is built with targeted incentives and a tiered reimbursement mechanism. For instance, healthcare providers may be more motivated to offer high-quality services to rural communities if they were to get higher payment rates for institutions in underserved locations and participate in public-private partnerships. In conclusion, free healthcare programs are a huge step forward, but they also show how flawed a system that relies just on taxes to pay for healthcare may be. The solution to long-term, fair healthcare in Bangladesh lies in a universal health insurance system that is prepared for the future and can flexibly integrate public programs with creative private sector solutions. The healthcare system in Bangladesh may be revolutionized by adopting a hybrid model that incorporates digital technology, progressive premium collections, behavioral defaults, and mandated insurance. A more equitable and effective distribution of resources would be fostered by such a system, which would shield its inhabitants from ruinous medical bills. It is anticipated that these reflections will contribute to the ongoing conversation regarding the enhancement of healthcare financing in Bangladesh. An approach that is collaborative and integrates the benefits of state-driven initiatives with decentralized, technology-enabled, and socially equitable models is likely to facilitate long-term reform. S.M.R.D. conceptualized, supervised, and wrote the draft. The author has nothing to report. The author declares no conflicts of interest. The lead author SMRD affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained. Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Leith Greenslade, Samy Ahmar, Ekpedeme Inyang, Sylvia Warren · 5 authors

Pneumonia, the leading infectious killer of children under five, has been called a “forgotten killer,” “a neglected tragedy,” and a “global cause without champions.”1, 2 Despite causing 800 000 child deaths, more than HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined, pneumonia has never attracted the levels of support commensurate with its burden.3 Less than 5% of international Development Assistance for Health and just 3% of all infectious disease research spending, are allocated to pneumonia.4 While the Global Action Plan for Diarrhoea and Pneumonia (GAPPD)5 launched by World Health Organization and UNICEF in 2013 did set a global target of three child pneumonia deaths per 1000 live births by 2025, no government had developed a national strategy to achieve this target by 2019.a The lack of funding and planning have contributed to slow progress meeting the target and just two countries—Bangladesh and Indonesia—of the 20 with more than 10 000 annual child pneumonia deaths are on track to achieve the GAPPD pneumonia target.6 At current rates of progress, an estimated 6.3 million children will die from pneumonia by 2030 and many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will fail to achieve the sustainable development goal for child survival. The solution is not another vertical program channeling billions of dollars to tackle a single disease. There would be little appetite from national governments or the global health and development community for such a mechanism, which might undermine efforts to expand the reach of integrated community case management (iCCM) and integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) and strengthen primary health care services to deliver Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Experience suggests that further reductions in child mortality in LMICs will require approaches that are sensitive to the complex patterns of comorbidity between pneumonia, diarrhea, malaria and malnutrition, and cognizant of the rising challenges of rapid urbanization, vaccine hesitancy, air pollution, and the double burden of under and overnutrition. The case for harnessing existing mechanisms such as Gavi, the Global Fund, Unitaid, and the Global Financing Facility to better integrate vaccine delivery, nutrition, and community case management is increasingly compelling, and much more work is needed to align the efforts of international agencies engaged in child survival in the high-burden countries.7 The Every Breath Counts Coalition (EBCC; https://stoppneumonia.org/) was officially launched in November 2017 to provide a platform for governments and international health agencies to work together to achieve the GAPPD target. In an acknowledgment of the progress achieved by the Global Fund and Gavi, the 40 member EBCC is a public-private partnership with representation from UN agencies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private foundations, pharmaceutical and medical technology companies, and universities. Each member has made a written commitment to support government efforts to accelerate reductions in child pneumonia deaths according to their capabilities along with the prevention, protection, diagnosis, and treatment continuum. EBCC works with governments to develop data-based pneumonia control strategies, delivered as part of national primary health care strengthening and UHC efforts. The EBCC has prioritized support to four large “transnational” clusters with large populations of children at heightened risk of death from pneumonia including, (a) Chad, Nigeria, Niger, and Mali, (b) Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola, (c) Ethiopia and Somalia, and (d) Pakistan and Afghanistan, the ambition of which is to support the development of bespoke pneumonia control strategies in each country. At the global level, three EBCC teams drive progress towards specific childhood pneumonia “global public goods” including: The development of routine indicators to measure access to pneumonia diagnosis and treatment; a set of agreed research priorities; and robust advocacy and communications activities. As Nigeria has the largest population of children at greatest risk of death from pneumonia, the EBCC supported the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) to develop a pneumonia control strategy between January 2019 and 2020. Coalition members including USAID, the Nigerian offices of Dalberg, Save the Children, UNICEF, and the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) joined forces to support the process. To better understand the barriers preventing faster progress on reducing child pneumonia deaths in Nigeria, the Family Health Department within the FMoH invited 75 participants to a strategy workshop in Abuja in January 2019. Following this workshop, approximately 40 interviews with national and global stakeholders, supplemented by desk research and analysis of state-level policies and data on the burden of pneumonia deaths, were conducted by the strategy firm Dalberg on behalf of the FMoH. By early March 2019, the FMoH and the EBCC had developed a draft pneumonia control strategy, and the FMoH invited 30 partners to meet in Abuja in April 2019 to review the strategy and align the contents with the RMNCAH+N Strategy. EBCC and the FMoH then worked together to develop a more detailed implementation plan and an estimation of the financial resources needed to implement the strategy. Less than 7 months after the process began, a final workshop to validate the strategy took place in Abuja in July 2019. In October 2019, the Minister of Health officially approved the strategy and the strategy was officially launched in Nigeria on January 2020. This strategy development process generated several key lessons. The pneumonia control strategy development process elevated the status of childhood pneumonia as a key public health challenge in Nigeria. Bringing together a range of public (eg, Federal and State Ministries of Health and donor government missions), private (eg, manufacturers of vaccines, medical devices, and antibiotics), faith-based organizations, and civil society actors demonstrated an appetite for a greater focus on pneumonia and drew attention to the gaps and barriers in pneumonia control that were impeding progress to Nigeria's child survival target. Despite many competing priorities in health, stakeholders involved in the process became champions for pneumonia control. Two NGOs, Save the Children and CHAI even decided to integrate parts of the pneumonia control strategy into their own newborn and child health programming. The pneumonia control strategy development process also showed that it is possible to focus on a specific cause of child death, while promoting integrated case management of childhood illnesses at community and facility levels (ie, iCCM and IMCI). By emphasizing that pneumonia should be accorded a level of attention commensurate with its disease burden, the FMoH and EBCC were able to reposition and prioritize pneumonia as a major killer, deserving of at least the same levels of investment as other leading but much better resourced killers (eg, malaria). The process to develop the pneumonia control strategy enhanced cross-sectoral and interministerial collaboration across all levels of government in Nigeria. Effective pneumonia control depends on the coordinated actions of different federal, state, and local government agencies to prevent, diagnose, and treat pneumonia at all levels of the health care system. The Nigerian FMoH had to work closely with the Agriculture, Energy, and Environment Ministries to prevent pneumonia by improving vaccination, nutrition, and clean air. In addition, the FMoH must find ways to influence State and Local Government health actors to improve the diagnosis and treatment of childhood pneumonia in primary health care and hospital services, as these are decentralized responsibilities. The FMoH and EBCC were able to bring these various government actors together for the first time to talk about pneumonia control and offer the support of private and nonprofit sector partners. Lastly, and critically, the experience in Nigeria highlights the importance of taking a data-driven approach that puts the most vulnerable populations of children first. While it is still challenging to map child pneumonia deaths at national and subnational levels, data are improving rapidly and governments have new tools to identify childhood pneumonia “hotspots” where deaths concentrate.8 In Nigeria, the subnational child pneumonia maps released by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation in 2019 revealed “hotspots” in several northern states. Targeting pneumonia control efforts to these children represents the most cost-effective path to reduce pneumonia deaths and achieve the GAPPD target. The EBCC is committed to sharing these new tools with governments so that they can help direct scarce resources in ways that maximize the number of child pneumonia deaths prevented. These maps not only enable governments to prioritize the most vulnerable children but also to require their international health and development partners to do the same. Nigeria is pioneering a new approach to achieving the GAPPD target. Its pneumonia control strategy will need to be monitored and evaluated over the next 5 years to assess results, to ensure that partners are held accountable for delivering on their commitments and to capture learnings that can inform other governments. If successful, the Nigerian pneumonia control strategy could become a blueprint for other countries struggling with heavy burdens of child pneumonia deaths to achieve the GAPPD target and strengthen integrated newborn and child health policies and programs.

Ernest Mensah, Moses Aikins, Margaret Gyapong, Francis Anto · 6 authors

BACKGROUND: The global health system has a large arsenal of interventions, medical products and technologies to address current global health challenges. However, identifying the most effective and efficient strategies to deliver these resources to where they are most needed has been a challenge. Targeted and integrated interventions have been the main delivery strategies. However, the health system discourse increasingly favours integrated strategies in the context of functionally merging targeted interventions with multifunctional health care delivery systems with a focus on strengthening country health systems to deliver needed interventions. Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) have been identified to promote and perpetuate poverty hence there has been global effort to combat these diseases. The Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme (NTDP) in Ghana has a national programme team and office, however, it depends on the multifunctional health delivery system at the regional and district level to implement interventions. The NTDP seeks further health system integration to accelerate achievement of coverage targets. The study estimated the extent of integration of the NTDP at the national, regional and district levels to provide evidence to guide further integration. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The research design was a descriptive case study that interviewed key persons involved in the programme at the three levels of the health system as well as extensive document review. Integration was assessed on two planes-across health system functions-stewardship and governance, financing, planning, service delivery, monitoring and evaluation and demand generation; and across three administrative levels of the health system-national, regional and district. A composite measure of integration designated Cumulative Integration Index (CII) with a range of 0.00-1.00 was used to estimate extent of integration at the three levels of the health system. Service delivery was most integrated while financing and planning were least integrated. Extent of integration was partial at all levels of the health system with a CII of 0.48-0.68; however it was higher at the district compared to the national and regional levels. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: To ensure further integration of the NTDP, planning and finance management activities must be decentralized to involve regional and district levels of the health system. The study provides an empirical measure of extent of integration and indicators to guide further integration.

Dorcas Mugure Mwangi

The rationale for considering decentralization in anti-poverty programs is that it might have positive effects on the economic development. Decentralization brings the government closer to the people. Local officials are better informed on the local needs, and are thus more capable of providing the optimal mix of local policies. While the SMEs subsector constitute close to 80% of employment, it only contributes to about twenty percent (20%) of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2011 in Kenya. This implies dismal subsector performance despite its potential contribution to employment, income and equity as was asserted in the ILO report in 1972. The performance of the SMEs in Kenya is linked to several constraints among which the regulatory and institutional framework is alleged to be one of the factors. SMEs in Kenya are threatened for survival as a competitive enterprise. The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of devolution on small and medium enterprises performance in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. The target population of this study composed of representatives of the various industries including the matatu, dairy, supermarkets, jua kali and small manufacturing companies in Nairobi and its environs. The target population of this study was therefore 1015. The study used stratified random sampling method to select 10% of the respondents who formed a sampling frame of 102 respondents. Data was collected using questionnaires. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics done with the help of software program SPSS version 21 and presented using frequency tables. In addition, multivariate regression model was applied to determine the relative importance of each of the two variables with respect to SME performance. The study revealed that that fees and levies, affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya to a moderate extent. The study concluded that fees and levies, cess and rates by the county government affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya. The study also concluded that SME financing mechanism, fair trading practices, capacity development, mechanism for value addition and increase in supply, distribution and access to goods and services affect the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises affect the performance of SMEs in Kenya. The recommends that the county government should use the finances collected from fees and levies, cess and rates in proper and controlled manner with a goal of improving the working environment for the SMEs in Kenya. The study also recommends that the county government should put in strict measures to ensure that there is no corruption in the fees and levies, cess and rates collection process to ensure that the amount collected do not go to the hands of few individuals and that a substantial amount can be received to support the plans and policies of the county government. The study suggested that a similar study should be carried out in other counties to find out whether it will yield the same results. The study focused on SMEs, another study should be carried out to find out the effect of devolution on large companies.

Ellen Einterz, Myra E. Bates

INTRODUCTION: In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) sound planning is required as interest increases in the decentralization of healthcare financing and the implementation of a sector-wide approach to health care. For this, improved knowledge of national morbidity and mortality is essential. Data from remote areas of SSA are needed to ensure that public health priority-setting and actions reflect the situation in all regions, not just those easily accessed and readily researched. In order to understand the causes, circumstances and changes over time of death in a remote and underserved region, this study sought information on all deaths in a district hospital over a 17 year period. METHODS: The study design was a retrospective review of the hospital records (in registers) of all patients hospitalized in Kolofata District Hospital, a rural public hospital in the Far North Region of Cameroon, 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2009. A line listing was extracted of all 1281 inpatient deaths, and this included dates of admission and death; patient name, address, sex and ethnic group; presenting complaint; duration of symptoms; summary of physical examination; and the diagnosis presumed to be the cause of death. RESULTS: Children under the age of 15 years and males comprised the majority of deaths (63.9% and 56.0%, respectively). Causes of death were related to the seasons. Infectious diseases including acute lower respiratory tract infection, malaria and diarrhoeal diseases were the leading causes of death; AIDS caused most adult deaths. A total of 67% of patients presented within 1 week of symptom onset, and 56.8% of deaths occurred on or before the day after admission. Deaths due to AIDS, malaria and complications of pregnancy increased over time. Among Kolofata District residents, death from vaccine-preventable measles and neonatal tetanus were rare, particularly in the later study years. The proportion of deaths attributed to non-communicable diseases did not increase in the 17 year period. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce mortality in this world region, priority should be given to the prevention and management of lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, diarrhoeal diseases, AIDS, and the complications of pregnancy. The planning of health resources and activities should take into account seasonal variations in the causes of death. Improvements to emergency services and community education that emphasises the need for earlier presentation when ill should reduce deaths that occur soon after hospital admission. Death due to measles and neonatal tetanus has become rare, a reflection of the effectiveness in this area of the national vaccination program.

John Grundy, Valentine Healy, L Gorgolon, E Sandig

INTRODUCTION: In 1991 the Philippines Government introduced a major devolution of national government services, which included the first wave of health sector reform, through the introduction of the Local Government Code of 1991. The Code devolved basic services for agriculture extension, forest management, health services, barangay (township) roads and social welfare to Local Government Units. In 1992, the Philippines Government devolved the management and delivery of health services from the National Department of Health to locally elected provincial, city and municipal governments. AIM: The aim of this review is to (i) Provide a background to the introduction of devolution to the health system in the Philippines and to (ii) describe the impact of devolution on the structure and functioning of the health system in defined locations. METHOD: International literature was reviewed on the subjects of decentralization. Rapid appraisals of health management systems were conducted in both provinces. Additional data were accessed from the rural health information system and previous consultant reports. RESULTS: Subsequent to the introduction of devolution, quality and coverage of health services declined in some locations, particularly in rural and remote areas. It was found that in 1992-1997, system effects included a breakdown in management systems between levels of government, declining utilization particularly in the hospital sector, poor staff morale, a decline in maintenance of infrastructure and under financing of operational costs of services. CONCLUSION: The aim of decentralization is to widen decision-making space of middle level managers, enhance resource allocations from central to peripheral areas and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health services management. The findings of the historical review of devolution in the Philippines reveals some consistencies with the international literature, which describe some negative effects of decentralization, and provide a rationale for the Philippines in undertaking a second wave of reform in order to 'make devolution work'.