Blockchain Papers

Kazunori Ohumi

Modern societies are simultaneously confronting demographic collapse and intensifying conflicts over gender equality, care, and labor. These tensions are often treated as policy trade-offs, yet they stem from a deeper ontological limitation: the reduction of human existence to functional structure (E≈S). This paper introduces Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT) as a foundational shift toward defining existence as generative resonance (E=ΦR). By reframing freedom, equality, and ethics as dynamic conditions of generative participation, the apparent conflict between demographic policy and gender equality dissolves. What emerges is not a compromise, but a civilizational transition from function-centered systems to generation-centered structures. This work provides a unified theoretical framework for rethinking equality, care, and sustainability in the 21st century. Highlights Reveals that conflicts between demographic policy and gender equality originate from a shared S-centric ontology (E≈S) Introduces UPCT (E = ΦR) as a unified framework for redefining existence, equality, and ethics Reconstructs equality as non-comparability of generative potential, beyond functional parity Demonstrates that demographic decline is a systemic failure of generative continuity (d(ΦR)/dt<0) Proposes a civilizational redesign based on generative resonance rather than labor-market optimization Summary & Main Arguments 1. Ontological Diagnosis of Modern CrisisThis paper begins by identifying a foundational contradiction in modern societies: the persistent conflict between demographic sustainability and gender equality. Rather than interpreting this as a policy failure, the paper argues that the root cause lies in an implicit ontological assumption—namely, that human existence is reducible to structural or functional representation (E≈S). Within this framework, individuals are treated as economic actors, legal units, or measurable entities, leading to systemic tensions when biological, relational, and generative dimensions cannot be fully captured. 2. Historical Saturation of Functional EqualityTracing the evolution of equality from formal legal equality to distributive and identity-based equality, the paper demonstrates that modern equality has progressively intensified its reliance on functional comparability. While these developments have been historically emancipatory, they culminate in a paradox: the more equality is pursued through structural comparison, the more differences (biological, genetic, relational) become sources of conflict. This results in a zero-sum system that ultimately fragments social cohesion. 3. UPCT as Ontological ReframingTo resolve this impasse, the paper introduces Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT), which redefines existence as generative resonance (E=ΦR). Here, Φ represents generative potential, and R relational resonance. Structure (S) is not the essence of existence but a temporary crystallization within a dynamic generative cycle (Φ→R→S→Φ′). This reframing shifts the analytical focus from static structure to dynamic process. 4. Redefinition of Core ValuesWithin the UPCT framework, the foundational concepts of modern philosophy are reinterpreted. Freedom becomes participation in generative processes rather than choice within structures. Equality is redefined as the non-comparability of generative potential rather than functional uniformity. Ethics is formalized as the sustainability condition (d(ΦR)/dt≥0), transforming it from normative prescription to systemic viability condition. 5. Policy Implications and Civilizational TransitionFinally, the paper applies this framework to the conflict between demographic policy and gender equality. It demonstrates that the conflict dissolves when both are reinterpreted through generative conditions rather than structural distribution. Policy interventions—such as reducing structural burdens, restoring relational infrastructure, elevating care, and redesigning time—are reframed as foundational requirements for sustaining generative resonance. This marks not a policy adjustment, but a civilizational transition. Contributions 1. Ontological Regrounding of Social TheoryThis paper provides a fundamental ontological critique of modern social theory by identifying the implicit equation E≈S as the root of contemporary contradictions. By introducing E=ΦR, it establishes a new foundation that integrates process, relation, and generation into the definition of existence. 2. Unified Framework Across DisciplinesThe study bridges philosophy, economics, gender studies, and systems theory by offering a single conceptual framework capable of explaining demographic decline, care crises, and equality conflicts. This integration moves beyond fragmented disciplinary approaches. 3. Redefinition of Equality and EthicsA major theoretical contribution is the redefinition of equality as non-comparability and ethics as a dynamic sustainability condition. This resolves long-standing tensions between fairness, difference, and viability, offering a new paradigm for justice theory. 4. Reinterpretation of Feminist and Critical ThoughtRather than rejecting feminist, Marxist, or care-based critiques, the paper demonstrates how these traditions can be sublated within UPCT. It preserves their insights while extending them beyond structural limitations, avoiding both reductionism and opposition. 5. Civilizational Design FrameworkThe paper advances a practical theoretical model for societal redesign. By translating UPCT into policy principles—structural reduction, relational recovery, generative elevation, and temporal redesign—it provides a concrete pathway for transitioning toward a generative society. Author’s Related Works UPCT Foundational Theoretical Works Ohumi, K. (2026). Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT): A Generative Relational Ontology of Existence, Stability, and Emergence.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19065461 Ohumi, K. (2026). Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT): A Unified Generative Theory of Time, Life, and Civilization.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18653237 Ohumi, K. (2026). Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT) Phase I: A Unified Resolution of Quantum Paradoxes via Temporal Sampling.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18230537 Ohumi, K. (2026). Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT) Phase II: A Phase Transition Law for Generative Systems under Measurement Optimization.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18408708 Ohumi, K. (2026). Universal Phase-Crystallization Theory (UPCT) I: Generative Time and Relational Space.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18979001 Ohumi, K. (2026). From Machine Civilization to Generative Civilization: Universal Phase-Crystallization Theory and the Generative Structure of Reality.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18935934 Ohumi, K. (2026). UPCT Existential Core: A Generative Ontology for Post-Functional Civilization. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19146516 Ohumi, K. (2026). A Generative-Relational Ontology of Sustained Existence: UPCT. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19469785 UPCT Ontology and Civilizational Philosophy Ohumi, K. (2026). Existence as Generativity: Desire, Structure, and the Dynamics of Civilizational Transition in Universal Phase Crystallization Theory. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19198157 Ohumi, K. (2026). From Having to Being: Toward a Generativity-Centered Ontology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18829129 Ohumi, K. (2026). The Declaration of Life-OS: An Ontological Turn Toward a Generative Civilizational Spiral.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18645582 Ohumi, K. (2026). From Proof to Resonance: A Φ-Ontology of Existence, Labor, Education, and Economic Life.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18515955 Ohumi, K. (2026). Returning to the Source of Philosophy: Affirmation of Life as the Life-OS and a Radical Point of Departure.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18529485 Ohumi, K. (2026). Dialectics as a Relational Logic of Life: From Linear Ascent to Spiral Circulation.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18522371 Ohumi, K. (2026). Does Color Exist? Overcoming the Ontological-Epistemological Confusion Through Generative Phase Transition: An Application of Universal Phase Crystallization Theory (UPCT). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105125 Ohumi, K. (2026). From Color to Sound: Human Cognitive Limits Between Ontology and epistemology and the Generative Resolution of UPCT. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19110346 Ohumi, K. (2026). Toward a Generative Theory of Human Motivation: Participation, Existence, and the Fundamental Drive. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286911 Ohumi, K. (2026). What is Desire? The Transition from the "Machine OS" to the "Life OS" in the History of Human Thought. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19327281 Ohumi, K. (2026). The Ontology of Resonance Beyond Generative Supremacy: The First Principle of "Existence = Generation = Resonance" and the Mandalic Hierarchy of the Life OS. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19334259 Ohumi, K. (2026). Life as Generative Resonance: An Ontological Essay on Happiness, Wealth, and the Recovery of Human Generativity. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19394468 Ohumi, K. (2026). Co-Generative Intelligence: A Relational Framework for Human–AI Collaboration Beyond Optimization. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19659573 Ohumi, K. (2026). The Equation of Knowledge Dynamics: A Generative–Relational–Structural Field Theory of Intelligence and Civilization. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19707187 Ohumi, K. (2026). The Meta-principle of Generation and the End of Ideology: Dismantling Structural Illusions and Redefining the Ontology of Value via the Equation E = ΦR. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19724468 UPCT Science and Physics Foundations Ohumi, K. (2025). A Sampling-Theoretic Reinterpretation of Quantum Uncertainty and Wave Function Collapse.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1800

Catherine Carpentier-Desjardins, Masarah Paquet-Clouston

Abstract Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have gained in popularity over the last few years, as they offer a wide range of accessible, innovative, and complex financial services. Because they evolve quickly under limited regulation, it is easy for malicious parties to target them for profit when they notice a vulnerability in these emergent protocols. Existing work has focused on understanding typical attack flows and securing the technology to alleviate crime. However, little is known about what other attributes, beyond technical vulnerabilities, may put DeFi actors at risk. Drawing on Cook’s (Crime Justice 7:1–27, 1986) crime opportunity framework of target attractiveness, this study investigates which attributes are associated with an increase or a decrease in the likelihood of DeFi victimization. We compare actors victimized in 2022 with those that were not across several target dimensions: propinquity, vulnerability, potential payoff, main area of operation, and self-protection activities. Results show that being listed on a popular centralized exchange, operating on a layer-2 blockchain, offering lending services, and having high trading volumes are associated with an increased likelihood of victimization, while operating a dApp and having experienced past victimization are associated with a decrease. By contrast, self-protection measures such as publicly disclosed audits, and bug bounty programs show no measurable effect, likely reflecting variation in their quality and implementation or the fact that undisclosed audits could not be observed. By integrating criminological theory into DeFi security research, this study provides a holistic framework for understanding crime opportunities in this novel ecosystem, while informing potential prevention strategies to reduce associated harms.

Eunyoung Sung, Ohbyung Kwon, Kwonsang Sohn

Abstract Industry 4.0 technology enables luxury fashion brands in the virtual market to quantify the value of digital items in the metaverse; thus, brands can maintain their reputations, ensure consistent and integrated luxury brand marketing, and attract new consumers in the virtual market. Understanding consumer behavior toward buying digital assets (i.e., nonfungible tokens [NFTs]) is important. By using blockchain‐based NFTs as a way to verify the authenticity of digital assets in the virtual market, luxury brands can maintain their reputations and help consumers protect their digital assets. Thus, developing global marketing strategies supported by this technology is important for the success of luxury fashion brands in the metaverse. We conducted analyses to explore consumer behavior in the metaverse with regard to blockchain‐based luxury NFTs. The findings reveal the psychological evaluation process as a mechanism that drives consumer behavior toward NFT luxury brand fashion items in global virtual markets. The empirical findings also extend the application of game theory and prospect theory by revealing the psychological evaluation of risks associated with (not) buying luxury fashion NFTs as another mechanism driving consumer behavior in the metaverse.