WHAT THIS PAPER ARGUES. Every Popperian tool this corpus has built — falsifiability criteria, self-vaccination, the act-level test, the Personal System Reminder, and the four falsification conditions just added to the Entropy-Resistant Institution (ERI) index — operates inside a discursive formation without ever asking how that formation became possible to inhabit in the first place. This is not a gap Popperian rigor can close by adding a fifth falsification condition or a fifth comparator case, because the question is not whether a claim within the formation is true or false; it is what made this particular kind of claim — a weighted numerical composite, cross-culturally applied, extracted from historical institutions and repurposed as a design template for future governance — a thinkable, legitimate object of knowledge at all. This is the question Michel Foucault's archaeological method exists to ask. This paper argues the corpus needs it, using the just-revised ERI paper as evidence rather than illustration. Four archaeological blind spots are documented directly in ERI's own text. First, its newly added Jiangnan-regeneration section treats "Jiankang, 220–589" as a bounded unit that a fourth comparator case can be added alongside — the unexamined assumption that a historical institution is a natural object rather than one constituted by the apparatus built to measure it, Foucault's critique of "the unity of the book" applied for the first time to a unity of the case. Second, the six attributes assume, without argument, that "legitimacy transfer" and "resource flexibility" name the same kind of variable in a Six Dynasties Chinese, a Shinto-imperial Japanese, and a Catholic canon-law context — a commensurability claim no additional comparator case can test, because the problem is not sample size but an a priori equivalence the index requires in order to function as an index at all. Third, ERI names its own methodological ancestors — Polity5, the Fragile States Index, V-Dem — as if borrowing a value-neutral toolkit, when each is inherited along with the specific historical formation that produced it. Fourth, ERI states plainly that the exercise exists to extract portable institutional design lessons for F2-era governance actors — read here not as incidental motivation but as the archive-producing act itself, the textbook operation of what Foucault calls biopower. The paper's constructive contribution is the Archaeological Symmetry Principle, extending this corpus's existing Principle of Epistemic Symmetry into a register falsifiability cannot reach alone: a researcher who subjects a target argument to falsifiability must, symmetrically, subject their own measuring instrument to historicization. Read this way, the Longevity Asymmetry Corpus is reread as an analysis of biopolitics that has operated, until now, without the name — the Mortality Symmetry Axiom as the statistical anonymity that historically made biopower's tolerance of differential death invisible, the Biological Zero-Day Mechanism as the process that collapses that anonymity back into sovereign-style visibility. The paper closes by naming, honestly, the tension this creates with the corpus's own Popperian commitments, and states plainly what an archaeological stance does not solve.
Open access
2 source records
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
This paper investigates the profound influence of Tang Dynasty legacies on the subsequent Song Dynasty's distinct financial-military transformation. While the Tang era was characterized by an expansive cosmopolitanism, a decentralized military, and a complex interplay of central and regional powers, its eventual decline underscored critical vulnerabilities in state governance and defense. The Song founders, keenly aware of these historical precedents, embarked on a deliberate path of institutional re-engineering. This study argues that the Tang's "cosmopolitan crucible"—its blend of cultural openness, economic dynamism, and ultimately, military decentralization—served as a crucial historical backdrop, compelling the Song to forge a highly centralized, civilian-controlled financial-military complex. We explore how Tang's sophisticated, yet often unstable, fiscal mechanisms and its frontier-focused military organization contrasting with the rise of autonomous regional commanders, directly informed Song's innovations in state monopolies, paper currency, and a robust professional army under strict imperial command. By examining both continuity and rupture, this research illuminates the adaptive strategies employed by the Song to consolidate power, ensure stability, and sustain an unprecedented level of economic and military capability, fundamentally reshaping the trajectory of imperial Chinese statecraft.
Sofia Cossar, Tara Merk, Jamilya Kamalova, Primavera De Filippi
In 2021, the Proof of Humanity (PoH) project debuted as the first Sybil-resistant registry of“unique and singular” individuals on the Ethereum network. The project offers an economic incentivethrough collaboration with the Universal Basic Income (UBI) smart contract, which distributes $UBIcryptocurrency tokens to registered humans. The PoH registry, equipped with measures to combatfraudulent registrations or bot impersonations, allows users to challenge suspicious profiles. Thesechallenges are adjudicated by Kleros' Humanity Court. Within two years, over 17,000 registrants joinedthe registry. The founding organization, Kleros Cooperative, announced the registry would be gov-erned by a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). The launch of the PoH DAO, the first in theEthereum ecosystem to implement a 1-person-1-vote liquid democracy system, challenged traditionaltoken-weighted voting mechanisms in DAO governance. Despite gaining recognition and endorsementfrom influential figures like Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, the community grappled with irrecon-cilable long-term visions, leading to the adoption of a binding proposal to "fork" by the end of 2022,highlighting underlying challenges within the PoH DAO. In 2022, our team at BlockchainGov conducteda research study to explore the governance dynamics that led to the PoH DAO’s governance crisis andsubsequent decision to “fork.”
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have seen exponential growth and interest due to their potential to redefine organizational structure and governance. Despite this, there is a discrepancy between the ideals of autonomy and decentralization and the actual experiences of DAO stakeholders. The Information Systems (IS) literature has yet to fully explore whether DAOs are the optimal organizational choice. Addressing this gap, our research asks, "Is a DAO suitable for your organizational needs?" We derive a gated decision-making framework through a thematic review of the academic and grey literature on DAOs. Through five scenarios, the framework critically emphasizes the gaps between DAOs' theoretical capabilities and practical challenges. Our findings contribute to the IS discourse on blockchain technologies, with some ancillary contributions to the IS literature on organizational management and practitioner literature.
Abstract This article examines how and why renowned Republican-era Chinese firms raised debt capital to finance their businesses by accepting savings deposits from ordinary people instead of borrowing from financial institutions. The article argues that in the absence of a powerful unitary state and centralized financial institutions, Chinese firms innovated sophisticated, decentralized financial instruments capable of amassing large quantities of capital from a broad host of depositors without the involvement of financial intermediaries. Savings deposits not only provided these firms with a cheaper and more flexible source of debt capital than that on offer from banks but also they fueled the Chinese economy by creating a sizable credit supply, a phenomenon that Chinese business and financial history scholarship focusing on the role of indigenous and modern banks has hitherto largely neglected.