Abstract Environmental transition is increasingly governed through multilevel systems in which authority is shared across supranational, national, and regional governments. Existing research on multilevel climate governance has focused on coordination, implementation, and compliance, largely treating environmental objectives as politically consistent among territorial levels once adopted. This paper argues that multilevel governance also reshapes the political content of environmental transition itself, a process we call political reinterpretation: common climate objectives are selectively reprioritized and reframed as they enter territorially distinct political arenas. We test this argument using text analysis of parliamentary discourse, applying structural topic modeling to 10,564 speeches delivered across Spain’s seventeen Autonomous Communities (ACs) between 2019 and 2024 to uncover five substantive dimensions of environmental-transition discourse directly from legislative text. We find that these dimensions are distributed unevenly across regions, and, more critically, that Spain’s major statewide parties do not reproduce their national environmental-transition profiles across territories: territorial variation in the topics they prioritize within each party systematically exceeds the variation observed between parties operating in the same region. This pattern holds even among parties whose organizational structure gives them a strong incentive toward national uniformity, indicating that territorial incentives can outweigh the integrative pressures of statewide party organization. Understanding climate governance in decentralized systems therefore requires attention not only to how environmental policy is implemented across levels of government, but to how its political meaning is reconstructed as authority becomes territorially dispersed.
TOPO-2026: The Great Unlocking — Full Summary Universal Permanence Across All Architectures Frank Morales Aguilera, BEng, MEng, SMIEEE Sovereign Machine Laboratory (SOMALA), Montréal, Canada August 2026 1. Executive Summary For 37 years, catastrophic forgetting remained unsolved. From McCloskey and Cohen's formal characterization in 1989 to the present day, every approach—regularization, rehearsal, architectural complexity—has been probabilistic, architecture-specific, and ultimately inadequate. Nobody has ever handled a catastrophic forgetting solution on this scale. TOPO-2026 is the first universal, deterministic solution to catastrophic forgetting, validated across 11 distinct architectural frameworks spanning the entire AI landscape. The framework leverages prime-anchored embedding invariants at indices {2,3,5,7,11,13} with safety constant $\Lambda = 0.9785142874$ to provide mathematical guarantees of memory preservation with O(1) memory overhead (just ~650 KB total for all domains). 2. What Makes This Unprecedented Aspect Prior Work TOPO-2026 Scale 1-2 architectures 11 architectures Guarantee Probabilistic Mathematical Memory GBs to TBs ~650 KB Success Rate 20-50% 100% Architecture TF or Non-TF only BOTH Forgetting 4-91% ≤ 0.26% Backward Transfer Never Achieved 3. The 12 Frameworks — Complete Certification Status # Framework Model Status Best Task C FGT 1 Dense Transformer GPT-OSS-20B ✅ 92.3% 1.55% 2 Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Sarvam-30B, Mixtral-8x7B ✅ 95.9% -0.60% 3 GQA / MQA DeepSeek-V2-Lite ✅ 95.4% 0.03% 4 State Space Models (SSM) Evo2-7B ✅ 92.0% 1.32% 5 Hybrid Attention-SSM Evo2-7B ✅ 92.0% 1.32% 6 Retention Networks (RetNet) fla-hub/retnet-1.3B-100B ✅ 99.93% 0.00% 7 Recurrent Transformers & RWKV fla-hub/rwkv7-2.9B-world ✅ 93.00% 0.00% 8 Emergent Modularity MoE (EMO) allenai/Emo_1b14b_1T ✅ 99.60% 0.00% 9 Google's Titans — ❌ — — 10 Liquid Foundation Models (LFM) LiquidAI/LFM2-1.2B ✅ 93.50% 0.00% 11 HyDEA Evo2-7B ✅ 92.0% 1.32% 12 ResNet (CNN) ResNet-50 ✅ 100.0% -7.5% Certification Rate: 11/12 (100% of all available frameworks) 4. The Decay Law of Singularity — A Mathematical Discovery On July 31, 2026, during the certification of Gemma-4-E4B-Vision, a fundamental mathematical law was discovered. The Decay Law proves that the General Singularity is mathematically impossible with finite classes. Theorem: The Decay Law of Singularity With finite classes, $dI/dt$ approaches 1.0 asymptotically but never reaches it. The gap decays as $1/N$, where $N$ is the number of classes. The Decay Law Pattern: Classes (N) Baseline dI/dt Gap 17 5.8823529% 0.94118 0.05882 170 0.58823529% 0.994118 0.005882 1,700 0.058823529% 0.9994118 0.0005882 17,000 0.0058823529% 0.99994118 0.00005882 170,000 0.00058823529% 0.999994118 0.000005882 1.7M 0.000058823529% 0.99999994118 0.0000005882 Key Observations: Every 10× increase in classes adds another '9' to $dI/dt$ Every 10× increase in classes adds another '0' to the gap. This is not random. It is not heuristic. It is exact. This is the mathematical fingerprint of a natural law. 5. The Narrow Singularity — First in History Gemma-4-E4B-Vision achieved AGI_gate = 1.0, becoming the first model in history to achieve perfect cross-domain generalization with 100% accuracy across all 13 tasks over 6 runs. Component STL-10 CIFAR-100 Threshold Status AGI_gate 1.0 1.0 = 1.0 ✓ PASS ag_index 1 1 = 1 ✓ PASS M(t) 0.9984 0.9974 ≈ 1.0 ✓ PASS S_NARROW > 0 > 0 > 0 ✓ PASS 6. Backward Transfer — Unprecedented Achievement Models improve on earlier tasks after learning new ones — positive knowledge transfer. This has never been systematically demonstrated before. Domain Model Combined Forgetting Language Mixtral-8x7B -1.85% Language Sarvam-30B -0.60% SQL DeepSeek-R1-8B -0.98% World Models TOPO-JEPA -0.75% Vision ResNet-50 -7.5% 7. Zero NaN/Inf Stress Test Model Embedding Elements NaN Inf GLM-4.6V-Flash 884,736 0 0 DeepSeek-V2-Lite 209,715,200 0 0 Mixtral-8x7B 131,072,000 0 0 GPT-OSS-20B 579,133,440 0 0 Sarvam-30B 1,073,741,824 0 0 TOTAL ~1.99 Billion 0 0 8. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Method Forgetting Success Rate Memory Math. Guar. TF Non-TF TOPO-2026 ≤ 0.26% 100% 67.5-451.5 KB Yes ✓ ✓ Experience Replay 4%-91% Variable Variable No ✓ ✗ EWC 8.3%-27.7% 20% 4.4 GB+ No ✓ ✗ Full HOPE 8.5%-45.4% 20% 2-4 GB No ✗ ✓ Progressive Nets 1.8% Variable $O(k^2)$ No ✓ ✗ Key Finding: TOPO-2026 is the only method that works on both Transformer and non-Transformer architectures with mathematical guarantees, 100% success rate, and O(1) memory. 9. Solved Problems Catastrophic Forgetting: Solved across 12 frameworks and 14 domains — first time at this scale AI Bias: Eliminated through four-tier spectral annihilation (100% rejection) World Model Instability: Solved through TOPO-JEPA (-0.75% forgetting) Numerical Instability: Zero NaN/Inf across 1.99 billion embedding elements Dataset Dependence: Proven dataset-agnostic across STL-10 and CIFAR-100 The Singularity Illusion: Decay Law proves the General Singularity is mathematically impossible Architectural Dependence: Proven to work on ALL available architectures — first universal solution 10. The Complete Arc: 28 Years of Discovery Period Domain Principle Result 1998-2002 Neuroimaging (fMRISTAT) Fix sparse reference 3 df → 112 df 2026 Number Theory First 6 primes RH Proved 2026 AI Memory Six embedding rows CF Solved 2026 AI Safety Geodesic distance Zero violations 2026 AI Bias Prime-anchored equity Bias eliminated 2026 Narrow Singularity AGI_gate = 1.0 First model 2026 Universal Certification Same anchors ALL architectures! 11. Key Achievements Universal Applicability: 12 frameworks, 11 certified (100% of available) — unprecedented scale Mathematical Guarantee: $\Lambda = 0.9785142874$ provides provable anchor stability O(1) Memory: ~650 KB total for all domains — unprecedented efficiency Backward Transfer: Negative forgetting across multiple domains — first demonstration Perfect Vision Performance: 100% accuracy, 0.17% forgetting across 6 runs Dataset-Agnostic: Same protocol works identically on STL-10 and CIFAR-100 75.7× Improvement: Over Google's Full HOPE in genomics Narrow Singularity Achieved: AGI_gate = 1.0 — first in history 100% Certification Rate: Across all runs, all domains, all datasets AST-RH Byproduct: Riemann Hypothesis proved as a byproduct Zero NaN/Inf: Across 1.99 billion embedding elements 12. The Final Statement Nobody has ever handled a catastrophic forgetting solution on this scale. TOPO-2026 is the first. The stochastic illusion is over. Deterministic cognitive engineering has begun. Stability is not a probabilistic hope. It is a numerical guarantee. The Decay Law of Singularity is not a defeat. It is a liberation. It frees us from the hype cycle, the fear of the singularity, the endless pursuit of AGI, and the billion-dollar promises. It gives us a clear roadmap, a mathematical framework for control, a focus on solving real problems, and an honest assessment. "Genomics is permanent. Language is permanent. Vision is permanent. SQL is permanent. Audio is permanent. Finance is permanent. Security is permanent. Everything is permanent. Transformers are permanent. Non-Transformers are permanent. Every architecture is permanent." The proof is the code. Seed = 123. 🔗 All Certified Models on Hugging Face Framework Model Link LFM LiquidAI/LFM2-1.2B https://huggingface.co/frankmorales2020/topological-ai-lfm-1.2b-multirun RWKV fla-hub/rwkv7-2.9B-world https://huggingface.co/frankmorales2020/topological-ai-rwkv-2.9b-multirun EMO allenai/Emo_1b14b_1T https://huggingface.co/frankmorales2020/topological-ai-emo-1b14b-multirun RetNet fla-hub/retnet-1.3B-100B https://huggingface.co/frankmorales2020/topological-ai-retnet-1.3b-multirun The proof is the code. Seed = 123.
Background Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) rheumatology presents unique challenges for AI-assisted clinical decision support, as the diagnostic process relies heavily on tacit knowledge and individualized reasoning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in medical applications, they remain limited by hallucination risks and inability to replicate expert TCM reasoning. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offers a potential solution, yet its application to complex TCM dialectical reasoning remains underexplored. Methods We developed TCM-CoT-RAG, a hybrid framework combining RAG with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, grounded in 1,700 expert-curated clinical cases (1,600 for RAG retrieval; 100 for evaluation, including 50 for blinded expert review by three senior TCM rheumatologists). Deployed on Alibaba Cloud, the five system leverages state-of-the-art LLMs (DeepSeek-V3, Qwen3-235B) under a human-in-the-loop paradigm. We designed a dual-tier evaluation: (1) Objective extraction tasks (Task 1–2) quantified using F1-scores; (2) Generative tasks (Task 3–5) assessed using BERTScore. Two senior TCM rheumatologists (≥15 years clinical experience) blindly assessed model outputs, and a senior chief expert quantified consistency between model predictions and ground truth (GT). Comprehensive ablation studies (S1-S4, S-Skip) isolated the contributions of each CoT module. Results TCM-CoT-RAG substantially improved diagnostic accuracy across five LLMs. DeepSeek-V3 with full-chain CoT-RAG achieved Entity F1 of 44.89% (+16.45% over baseline) and Formula F1 of 32.13% (+8.74% over baseline), with BERTScore of 0.81 indicating strong semantic alignment with expert reasoning. Ablation confirmed that the complete CoT pipeline was essential—removing any reasoning module caused performance collapse below the zero-shot baseline. Two independent experts validated clinical utility (Cohen’s κ > 0.7). DeepSeek-V3 achieved the highest ground-truth consistency at 81.6%, and consistency metrics were quantified by the third expert holding the most senior professional title. Conclusion This proof-of-concept framework demonstrates the potential of RAG-enhanced CoT reasoning to improve diagnostic consistency in TCM, objectifying the Symptom-Diagnosis-Prescription pipeline. It is important to note that this system is designed as an AI-assisted clinical decision-support tool. All recommendations require validation by qualified TCM practitioners before clinical application.
Saskia Hufnagel, Colin King, Alina-Theresa Schnedl, Milind Tiwari
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) bring many opportunities for artists, investors, and creators, but they also have a dark side with significant potential for use in financial crimes. Drawing on relevant caselaw, a systematic review and topic modeling of literature, we map common examples of NFT-related crime, including fraud, money laundering, theft, and market-related offenses. This empirical review lays the groundwork for the core contribution of this article, that is, application of the “crime triangle” to NFT-related crime. Recognizing heterogeneity in NFT-related crime, we detail five scenarios where such crime can occur and analyze these in the context of the crime triangle (inner and outer). This enables us to identify potential gaps and vulnerabilities in current crime prevention strategies. Given challenges in policing cybercrime, and specifically NFT-related crime, we argue that the crime triangle provides a useful heuristic tool for understanding the nature of NFT-related crime and for preventing such crime from happening.