Its novelty lies in: (a) formalizing seven explicit propositions (P1–P7) with explicit why-how-formal statement structure for each construct-to-construct relationship; (b) theorizing a differentiated serial mediation structure—full mediation in the upstream technical-structural segment (P1–P3) and partial mediation in the downstream relational-governance segment (P4–P7); (c) reversing the P6 direction to Sharia Compliance → Stakeholder Trust on Signaling Theory grounds; (d) defining Institutional Performance as a four-dimensional construct (financial, Sharia legitimacy, stakeholder value, and governance quality); and (e) specifying boundary conditions delimiting the framework’s scope to permissioned blockchain environments and high-religiosity market contexts.
The digital transformation of Islamic finance encourages the evolution of musharakah contracts into a technology-based crowdfunding ecosystem. However, this change also presents a more complex moral hazard risk due to the limitations of direct supervision. This research aims to synthesize the scientific literature for the period 2015-2025 in order to map the digital evolution of musharakah contracts and formulate a moral hazard risk mitigation framework that is adaptive to the characteristics of sharia crowdfunding platforms. The study uses a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with a descriptive-analytical approach across 15 reputable scientific articles. The findings show that the moral hazard in sharia crowdfunding stems from information asymmetry, weaknesses in digital financial reporting, and limited platform oversight capacity, which collectively weakens the integrity of profit-sharing-based contracts. Effective mitigation requires the integration of four dimensions, namely algorithmic technology such as blockchain and smart contracts, strengthening digital sharia supervisory institutions, updating specific OJK regulations, and increasing the capacity of Islamic financial literacy, which together form the concept of Algorithmic Sharia Governance as a novelty in this study.
This paper presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first formal mechanism design treatment of Quran 2:282 as a low-cost verification mechanism. It proves that the Quranic debt documentation mechanism drives the creditor's expected verification cost to zero in the costly state verification framework. It achieves this by creating ex ante evidence through writing and witnessing, and by introducing a dual deterrence system: a fixed internal moral cost and a detection-contingent legal penalty. The paper also offers two interpretative contributions. First, it shows that the Quranic witness rule is an early redundancy mechanism for error correction, anticipating the logic later formalized by Hamming (1950). Second, it proposes an economic reading of the terms safih, da'if, and the inability to dictate, arguing that the guardian who dictates with justice may be a qualified third-party verifier, not merely a relative.
Cahya Kamila Maharani, Relit Nur Edi, Ismail Septayanto Utama
The 4.0 Industrial Revolution has transformed the global economic landscape through the digitalization of financial services, trade, and industrial activities. This transformation has accelerated the growth of the Halal Market, making it one of the fastest-growing economic sectors, driven by the expanding Muslim population, increasing awareness of halal consumption, and rising demand for ethical and sustainable products. In this context, Islamic Fintech has emerged as a strategic innovation that integrates digital financial technologies with the principles of Islamic law and economics. Although studies on Sharia Fintech and the halal industry have grown substantially, research integrating these two domains from the perspectives of Islamic law and Islamic economics remains limited. This study aims to examine the strategic role of Islamic Fintech in strengthening the global Halal Market through an interconnective analytical framework. Employing a qualitative library research approach, the study critically analyzes scholarly literature, regulatory documents, international reports, and previous empirical studies. The findings indicate that Sharia Fintech enhances financial inclusion, transparency, halal traceability, value chain efficiency, and digital governance through the adoption of blockchain, artificial intelligence, smart contracts, and digital payment systems. These innovations contribute to the realization of Maqashid al-Shariah, particularly the protection of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl) and the promotion of public welfare (maṣlaḥah). The novelty of this study lies in the development of a comprehensive conceptual framework that integrates Islamic law, Islamic economics, digital financial innovation, and Halal Market governance into a unified analytical model.
Abdul Adlim, Babun Suharto, Wildan Khisbullah Suhma, Kholida Ulfi Mubaroka
The rapid development of crypto assets has challenged the classical concept of mal (property) in Islamic jurisprudence because digital assets do not possess tangible physical characteristics traditionally associated with lawful ownership. This study aims to reconstruct the paradigm of mal within contemporary fiqh by examining the legal status of crypto assets through the framework of maqasid al-shari'ah, particularly hifz al-mal, while evaluating the role of smart contracts in reducing contractual uncertainty (gharar). This study employed a qualitative normative legal approach based on literature analysis of classical fiqh, usul al-fiqh, contemporary Islamic legal scholarship, institutional fatwas, and financial regulations. The findings demonstrate that the concept of mal has evolved from a material-based understanding toward a value-oriented paradigm that emphasizes recognized benefit, scarcity, and lawful ownership. Under these criteria, crypto assets may be recognized as mal when supported by legitimate ownership, transparent governance, and productive economic purposes. Smart contracts contribute to minimizing contractual and operational gharar through automated execution and transaction transparency, although they cannot eliminate risks arising from market volatility. This study proposes a reconstructed paradigm of mal that provides a more contextual analytical framework for assessing the legality of digital assets within contemporary Islamic law.
This study maps the development, collaboration patterns, citation structure, and thematic evolution of research on blockchain technology in the waqf sector. A bibliometric analysis of 417 Scopus-indexed publications published from 2006 to 12 July 2024 was performed using Bibliometrix in RStudio and VOSviewer. The analysis covered publication trends, influential sources and contributors, country productivity, citation impact, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence. The results show increasing scholarly attention to the intersection of blockchain, Islamic finance, fintech, and waqf management. Malaysia and Indonesia emerged as the most productive and most cited countries, while an international co-authorship rate of 29.74% indicated moderate cross-border collaboration. Keyword analysis revealed that the field is anchored in Islamic finance, fintech, blockchain, and waqf, with growing attention to cash waqf, crowdfunding, financial inclusion, digital transformation, smart contracts, cybersecurity, and technology adoption. However, these patterns demonstrate scholarly attention and thematic associations rather than empirical proof of blockchain’s operational benefits in waqf institutions. This study identifies priority gaps in empirical implementation, Shariah governance, stakeholder adoption, technical feasibility, and socioeconomic impact evaluation of blockchain-enabled waqf systems.