Xinwen Ni, Taojun Xie, Wolfgang Karl Härdle, Xiaorui Zuo
Abstract Cryptocurrency markets are highly sensitive to regulatory changes, often experiencing sharp price fluctuations in response to new policies and government interventions. Despite this, existing market indices fail to adequately capture the risks associated with regulatory uncertainty. In this paper, we introduce the Cryptocurrency Regulatory Risk Index (CRRIX), a machine learning-based index designed to quantify the impact of regulatory developments on cryptocurrency markets. Our methodology employs Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to classify policy-related news articles from major cryptocurrency news platforms, providing an objective measure of regulatory risk. We find that the CRRIX exhibits strong synchronicity with VCRIX, a cryptocurrency volatility index, suggesting that regulatory uncertainty plays a significant role in driving market fluctuations. Our results indicate that regulatory risk is a leading factor in market volatility, with major policy shifts triggering significant market movements. The proposed regulatory risk index provides a novel approach to quantifying policy uncertainty in the cryptocurrency sector, offering valuable insights for market participants navigating this rapidly changing environment.
Nektarios Aslanidis, Aurelio F. Bariviera, Alejandro Pérez-Laborda
This paper studies the dynamic market linkages among cryptocurrencies during August 2015 - July 2020 and finds a substantial increase in market linkages for both returns and volatilities. We use different methodologies to check the different aspects of market linkages. Financial and regulatory implications are discussed.
In this paper we take an empirical asset pricing perspective and investigate the dominant view (possibly, an instinctive reflection of the media hype surrounding the surge of Bitcoin valuations) that cryptocurrencies represent a new asset class, spanning risks and payoffs sufficiently different from the traditional ones. Methodologically, we rely on a flexible dynamic econometric model that allows not only time-varying coeficients, but also allow that the entire forecasting model be changing over time. We estimate such model by looking at the time variation in the exposures of major cryptocurrencies to stock market risk factors (namely, the six Fama French factors), to precious metal commodity returns, and to cryptocurrency-specific risk-factors (namely, crypto-momentum, a sentiment index based on Google searches, and supply factors, i.e., electricity and computer power). The main empirical results suggest that cryptocurrencies are not systematically exposed to stock market factors, precious metal commodities or supply factors with the exception of some occasional spikes of the coefficients during our sample. On the contrary, crypto assets are characterized by a time-varying but significant exposure to a sentiment index and to crypto-momentum. Despite the lack of predictability compared to traditional asset classes, cryptocurrencies display considerable diversification power in a portfolio perspective and as such they can lead to a moderate improvement in the realized Sharpe ratios and certainty equivalent returns within the context of a typical portfolio problem.
The application of machine learning algorithms in predicting cryptocurrency prices has gained significant attention in recent years. Researchers have explored various approaches such as recurrent neural networks, deep learning neural networks, Bayesian regression, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and other algorithms to forecast the prices of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin and Litecoin. This paper will draw on established literature on price prediction using machine learning, including studies on NFT sales predictability, NFT sale price fluctuations prediction, gold price prediction, and silver price forecasting. The research paper has focused on utilizing high-dimensional features, time-series analysis, as well as the comparison of different statistical models and machine learning algorithms. Additionally, the prediction models have incorporated factors such as market liquidity, exchange market dynamics. While the literature acknowledges the potential of machine learning in cryptocurrency price prediction, gold, silver and NFT’s there is a recognized gap in the application of these techniques across a broader range of cryptocurrencies. The proposed methodology will integrate various machine learning models and statistical methods to predict the prices of cryptocurrencies, gold, silver, and NFTs, taking into account factors such as market trends, trade networks and visual features. Furthermore, the studies emphasize the importance of feature engineering, sample dimension engineering, and the use of various machine learning techniques to enhance the accuracy and stability of cryptocurrency price predictions. As the cryptocurrency market continues to expand, there is a need for further research to develop robust machine learning models that can effectively forecast the prices of diverse cryptocurrencies, contributing to the advancement of this field.
We examine how liquidity affects cryptocurrency market efficiency and study commonalities in anomaly performance in cryptocurrency market. Based on the unique features of cryptocurrencies, we build a model with anonymous traders valuing cryptocurrencies as payments for goods and investment assets, and find that decreases in funding liquidity translate into lower asset liquidity in the cryptocurrency market. Empirically, we observe that many widely recognized stock market anomalies also exist in the cryptocurrency market, though some have opposite long/short legs. We also find supportive evidence that a decrease in cryptocurrency liquidity enhances anomaly returns while preventing the cryptocurrency market from achieving efficiency.
Johannes Jakubik, Abdolreza Nazemi, Andreas Geyer-Schulz, Frank J. Fabozzi
In this paper, we investigate how a deep learning machine learning model can be applied to improve Bitcoin price forecasting and trading by incorporating unstructured information from financial news. The two-stage model we propose that includes financial news significantly outperforms machine learning models without financial news. In the first stage, we leverage long short-term memory (LSTM) networks to extract structured information from financial news. In the second stage, we apply machine learning models with structured input from financial news to the prediction of Bitcoin prices. In addition to the superior performance relative to machine learning models without input from financial news, we find that the out-of-time rate of return attained with the proposed forecasting system is substantially higher than for a buy-and-hold strategy. Our study highlights how combining deep learning and financial news offers investors and traders support for the monetization of unstructured data in finance.
This paper investigates the risk and return properties of a trading strategy for the cryptocurrency market. The main predictive power for portfolio formation comes from a simple prospect theory model that only uses price information readily available. The dataset consists of a large body of cryptocurrencies from 2014 to 2020. I find a strong outperformance over the market, even after controlling for known predictors. Factor regressions with a cryptocurrency three-factor model further reveal significant alphas. Robustness test emphasize the legitimacy of the strategy. On average, cryptocurrencies with a high (low) prospect theory value earn low (high) subsequent returns. Interestingly, traders in the cryptocurrency market seem to assess the attractiveness of cryptocurrency in a way described by prospect theory. Mechanical tests of the model show that probability weighting is a main driver behind this assessment. Cryptocurrencies with a high prospect theory value tend to be highly positively skewed. This skewness could be the reason why the cryptocurrency seems attractive to traders, similar to lottery-like gambles.
We study the cross-sectional interdependence between returns on cryptocurrency pairs and deviations of Tether USD from its parity to the U.S. dollar. Methodologically, we propose a large-scale Bayesian Vector Autoregressive (BVAR) model which features a global-local shrinkage prior for cross-pairs return correlations. Empirically, we show that deviations from the USDT/USD parity significantly and positively correlate with future returns on cryptocurrency pairs, conditional on both aggregate and asset-specific trading activity. A simple long-only rotational investment strategy which exploits the exposure to the lagged USDT/USD deviations outperforms out-of-sample passive benchmark investments in Bitcoin and a value-weighted market index.
This paper sets out to explore whether the investor herding in the cryptocurrency market induces correlations in cryptocurrency returns using the methodology of Chang et al. (2000) and Galariotis et al. (2015) from a daily data sampling period of 3/30/2015 to 5/24/2019. The initial regression results show that the cross-sectional absolute deviation of return can only be explained by GSCI oil and gold index return, but no relationship exists between cross-sectional absolute deviation of return and other regression variables, such as return on CCi30, US equity risk premium and US/Euro exchange rate return. The herding regression results under normal market condition show that a strong tendency exists to herd on non-fundamental information that explains cross-sectional absolute deviation of returns. As such, cryptocurrency returns cannot be predicted on the basis of fundamental economic information (e.g., major macroeconomic announcements). Herding on non-fundamental information is found to be more pronounced during an upward-trending period of the market and other than upward-trending period. No signs of herding on fundamental information could be observed under other market conditions. Although the theory suggests that herding on non-fundamental information results in more efficient outcomes, the above findings do not encourage the diversification of traditional assets with cryptocurrency on the basis of low correlation. Since cryptocurrency lacks intrinsic value, the exchange is shown to provide a pseudo-efficient trading platform for speculative investors. Implications for future research are discussed.
Abstract In this paper, we use a bivariate structural VAR to investigate risk spillovers from the cryptocurrency market to standard financial markets. We investigate the effects of cryptocurrency shocks on key financial markets, including the stock, bond, gold and foreign exchange markets. The results show that cryptocurrency shocks do not have statistically significant effects on standard financial markets except for the bond market. This is consistent with most of the existing literature that argues that cryptocurrencies are mostly a new and different asset class, not related to standard factors.
Purpose Cryptocurrency markets are notoriously noisy, but not all markets might behave in the exact same way. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate which one of the cryptocurrency markets contributes the most to the common volatility component inherent in the market. Design/methodology/approach The paper extracts each of the cryptocurrency's markets' latent volatility using a stochastic volatility model and, subsequently, models their dynamics in a fractionally cointegrated vector autoregressive model. The authors use the refinement of Lien and Shrestha (2009, J. Futures Mark) to come up with unique Hasbrouck (1995, J. Finance) information shares. Findings The authors’ findings indicate that Bitfinex is the leading market for Bitcoin and Ripple, while Bitstamp dominates for Ethereum and Litecoin. Based on the dominant market for each cryptocurrency, the authors find that the volatility of Bitcoin explains most of the volatility among the different cryptocurrencies. Research limitations/implications The authors’ findings are limited by the availability of the cryptocurrency data. Apart from Bitcoin, the data series for the other cryptocurrencies are not long enough to ensure the precision of the authors’ estimates. Originality/value To date, only price discovery in cryptocurrencies has been studied and identified. This paper extends the current literature into the realm of volatility discovery. In addition, the authors propose a discrete version for the evolution of a markets fundamental volatility, extending the work of Dias et al. (2018).
Jan 1, 2020·Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
With the increase in the attention to cryptocurrency, studies on the factors affecting the price fluctuation of cryptocurrency have been actively conducted. Prior researches suggested that policy announcements (i.e., public information) related to cryptocurrency have been found to affect the price volatility in the market in particular. Privileged information, which is hard to be observable unlike public information published by the government or corporations, is hardly homogenously distributed to individual investors. However, it inevitably affects the price in any market. Therefore, this study aims to identify the information asymmetry, which is mainly formed by privileged information, in the cryptocurrency market. Moreover, this study examines whether investment sentiment, which mainly influences transaction behaviors of uninformed traders, has a significant effect on the cryptocurrency market as well. The results contribute to the understanding of the cryptocurrency market in a basis of the existing market theories.
Benjamin M. Blau, Todd G. Griffith, Ryan J. Whitby
This study examines the comovement between 17 of the most active cryptocurrencies. We are unable to statistically reject the presence of perfect comovement between Bitcoin and six of the 16 non-Bitcoin cryptocurrencies. Consistent with the friction-based explanation for the presence of comovement, once the CBOE introduced futures contracts on Bitcoin, we find that all 16 cryptocurrencies comove with Bitcoin. These results suggest that introducing futures contracts improves the informational environment of the entire cryptocurrency market, which helps explain the unusual comovement in the cryptocurrency market.
We formulate an optimal hedging problem of Bitcoin inverse futures under the minimum-variance framework. We obtain the optimal hedging strategy in closed forms for both short and long hedges and compute hedging effectiveness under the optimal strategy. Our empirical analyses show that the optimal hedging strategy achieves superior effectiveness in reducing risk and outperforms the naïve hedge in all scenarios.
Currently, there are no convincing proxies for the fundamentals of cryptocurrency assets. We propose a new market-to-fundamental ratio, the price-to-utility (PU) ratio, utilizing unique blockchain accounting methods. We then proxy various existing fundamental-to-market ratios by Bitcoin historical data and find they have little predictive power for short-term bitcoin returns. However, PU ratio effectively predicts long-term bitcoin returns than alternative methods. Furthermore, we verify the explainability of PU ratio using machine learning. Finally, we present an automated trading strategy advised by the PU ratio that outperforms the conventional buy-and-hold and market-timing strategies. Our research contributes to explainable AI in finance from three facets: First, our market-to-fundamental ratio is based on classic monetary theory and the unique UTXO model of Bitcoin accounting rather than ad hoc; Second, the empirical evidence testifies the buy-low and sell-high implications of the ratio; Finally, we distribute the trading algorithms as open-source software via Python Package Index for future research, which is exceptional in finance research.
This paper analyses the volume-return relationships across the top 30 most traded cryptocurrencies from April 2013 to June 2019 using high-frequency intraday data. We use a novel approach for the classification of cryptocurrencies with respect to multiple qualitative factors, such as geographical location of headquarters, founder and founder’s origin, platform on which the cryptocurrency is built, and consensus algorithm, among others. We identify significant bidirectional causalities between trading volume and returns at different high-frequency intervals; however, those linkages are weakening with decreasing data frequencies. The findings confirm the leading position of the Bitcoin trading volume in the cryptocurrency price formation. This evidence will help investors to design effective trading strategies in cryptocurrency markets providing useful insights from cryptocurrency categorisation.