The present study conducts a dynamic conditional cross-correlation and time–frequency correlation analyses between cryptocurrency and equity markets in both advanced and emerging economies. The purpose of the study is twofold. First, the study investigates the presence of the pure (narrow) form of financial contagion between cryptocurrency and stock markets in both advanced and emerging economies, during the black swan event of the COVID-19 crisis. Second, the study examines the hedging and safe-haven properties of cryptocurrencies against equity markets, before and during periods of financial upheaval triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Two econometric models are used: (1) the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) GARCH and (2) the wavelet analysis models. Using the DCC GARCH model, the study found the evidence of high conditional correlations between cryptocurrency and equity markets. The high conditional correlation was mostly detected in periods of financial turmoil corresponding to the first quarter and the second quarter of 2020. The increase in conditional correlation during periods of financial upheaval (compared to a tranquil period) indicates the presence of the pure form of financial contagion. The wavelet cross-correlation analysis showed the evidence of positive cross-correlation between the Bitcoin and the equity markets during period of financial turmoil. The cross-correlation was identified in both short and long (coarse) scales. In short scales, the equity markets lead the cryptocurrency market, while the cryptocurrency market leads equity markets in coarse scales. The findings of the present study revealed that the degree of interdependence between cryptocurrency and equity markets has substantially increased during the COVID-19 period, and this has negated the safe-haven and hedging benefits of cryptocurrencies over equity markets.
This article explores the complexities of cryptocurrency price volatility during times of crisis. We analyze time series data with long-term memory or long-range dependence to understand the impacts of crises on cryptocurrency prices. Specifically, we examine the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian war on cryptocurrency markets, as well as the role of investor sentiment in price fluctuations during periods of uncertainty. To do so, we use fractionally integrated models to analyze the short- and long-term effects of these external factors on cryptocurrency prices. Our study mainly focuses on Bitcoin returns volatility using specific fractionally integrated models during four sub-period of historical crises from 2014. It assesses and compares the fractionally integrated models of the GARCH, the FIGARCH-BBM, the FIGARCH-CHUNG, FIEGARCH, and the FIAPARCH-BBM during the sub-periods of the pre-Covid-19, of the Covid-19 situation, between the Covid-19 and the Russo-Ukrainian War, and of the Russo-Ukrainian War. Conditional volatility models' parameters are first estimated from the four sub-sample data series BTC/USD exchange rate returns and it is calculated. Estimated conditional volatilities are then compared to specific volatilities relying on information criteria, after which the models are ranked. Finally, we test the specifics fractionally integrated volatility models with the normality test, the Q-Statistics on Standardized Residuals Test, the ARCH Test, and the graphic analysis. The specific volatility model of the first sub-period pre-Covid-19 is FIAPARCH-BBM (2,1). BTC/USD returns evolution during the Covid-19 crisis indicates that the FIEGARCH (2,2) is the appropriate volatility model. In addition, our results find that the FIEGARCH (2,1) is the appropriate model of volatility over the third sub-period and during the Russo-Ukrainian War period. By extrapolating the results of the four events, the study showed that the series of BTC/USD returns sampled over the four sub-periods were not immune to risk leading to historical crisis situations. The fluctuations of Bitcoin data during a political or economic event influence the choice of volatility models and their coefficients. More specifically, the parameters of the determined models of conditional volatility show that a war will make cryptocurrency more important on the exchange market even than an epidemic in the example of Covid-19. Our results suggest that the pandemic and geopolitical tensions have had a significant impact on cryptocurrency prices, but investor sentiment has played a crucial role in exacerbating price volatility. Additionally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of fractionally integrated models in predicting cryptocurrency prices during times of crisis. In summary, this study provides important insights into the dynamics of cryptocurrency markets during global crises, highlighting the need for sophisticated modeling techniques to effectively capture the complexities of these markets.
Federico Cernera, Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Alberto Maria Mongardini · 5 authors
In the world of cryptocurrencies, public listing of a new token often generates significant hype, in many cases causing its price to skyrocket in a few seconds. In this scenario, timing is crucial to determine the success or failure of an investment opportunity. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of sniper bots, automated tools designed to buy tokens as soon as they are listed on the market. We leverage GitHub open-source repositories of sniper bots to analyze their features and how they are implemented. Then, we build a dataset of Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain (BSC) liquidity pools to identify addresses that serially take advantage of sniper bots. Our findings reveal 14,029 sniping operations on Ethereum and 1,395,042 in BSC that bought tokens for a total of $10,144,808 dollars and $18,720,447, respectively. We find that Ethereum operations have a higher success rate but require a larger investment. Finally, we analyze token smart contracts to identify mechanisms that can hinder sniper bots.
We investigate the connectedness of automated market makers (AMM) that play a pivotal role in liquidity and ease of operations in the decentralized exchange (DEX). By applying the TVP-VAR model, our findings show higher level of connectivity during periods of turmoil (such as Delta, Omicron variants of SARS-Covid, and the Russia Ukraine conflict). Furthermore, risk transmission/reception is found to be independent of the platform on which they typically run (Ethereum based AMMs were both emitters as well as receivers). Pancake (a Binance based AMM) and Perpetual Protocol (Ethereum based AMM) emerged as moderate to high receivers of risk transmission, whereas all of the other AMMs, including Ethereum, were found to be risk emitters at varying degrees. We argue that AMMs typically depend on the underlying smart contracts. If the contract is flexible, AMMs can vary (either receiver or emitter), otherwise AMMs behave in tandem.
Purpose This study aims to identify the ability of gold and cryptocurrency (Cryptocurrency Uncertainty Index (UCRY) Price) as safe haven assets (SHA) for stocks and bonds in both conventional (i.e. stock indices and government bonds) and Islamic markets (i.e. Islamic stock indices and Islamic bonds (IB)). Design/methodology/approach The authors employed the nonadditive panel quantile regression model by Powell (2016). It measured the safe haven characteristics of gold and UCRY Price for stock indices, government bonds, Islamic stocks, and IB under gold circumstances and level of cryptocurrency uncertainty, respectively. The period spanned from 11 March 2020 to 31 December 2021. Findings This study discovered three findings, including: (1) gold is a strong safe haven for stocks and bonds in conventional and Islamic markets under bearish conditions; (2) UCRY Price is a strong safe haven for conventional stocks and bonds but only a weak safe haven for Islamic stocks under high crypto uncertainty; and (3) gold offers a safe haven in both emerging and developed countries, while UCRY Price provides a better safe haven in developed than in emerging countries. Practical implications Gold always wins big for safe haven properties during unstable economy. It can also win over investors who consider shariah compliant products. Therefore, it should be included in an investor's portfolio. Meanwhile, cryptocurrencies are more common for developed countries. Thus, the governments and regulators of emerging countries need to provide more guidance around cryptocurrency so that the societies have better literacy. On top of that, the investors can consider crypto to mitigate risks but with limited safe haven functions. Originality/value The originality aspects of this study include: (1) four chosen assets from conventional and Islamic markets altogether (i.e. stock indices, government bonds, Islamic stock indices and IB); (2) indicator countries selected based on the most used and owned cryptocurrencies for the SHA study; and (3) the utilization of UCRY Price as a crypto indicator and a further examination of the SHA study toward four financial assets.
The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of a novel method called linear law-based feature space transformation (LLT) on the accuracy of intraday price movement prediction of cryptocurrencies. To do this, the 1-minute interval price data of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin, and Ripple between 1 January 2019 and 22 October 2022 were collected from the Binance cryptocurrency exchange. Then, 14-hour nonoverlapping time windows were applied to sample the price data. The classification was based on the first 12 hours, and the two classes were determined based on whether the closing price rose or fell after the next 2 hours. These price data were first transformed with the LLT, then they were classified by traditional machine learning algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation. Based on the results, LLT greatly increased the accuracy for all cryptocurrencies, which emphasizes the potential of the LLT algorithm in predicting price movements.
The growing potential and high volatility of the cryptocurrency market attract a lot of interest from both businesses and investors. Even though the prices fluctuate, predicting with time serious models such as ARMA and ARIMA would still provide a useful reference for analyzing the market. Recent studies on machine learning methods including RNNs have made new progress in forecasting digital currencies. This study focuses on one of the traditional models ARMA to predict the time serious dataset from 2021-2022 of cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple. To be specific, AIC and ADF tests are used to choose the optimal model and suitable dataset. According to the analysis, the ARMA model would be affected by the volatility of Bitcoin. However, the predictions are not precise enough but still a valuable reference for certain businesses and individual investors. More state-of-art machine learning models can be utilized in future study to enhance the performance. Overall, these results shed light on guiding further exploration of crypto currency price prediction.
This study examines the tendency of short-term return spillover across Bahrain stocks, bitcoin, and other commodity assets factoring in the dynamic effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study employed vector autoregression (VAR) model using the daily returns of Bahrain All Shares Index, bitcoin, crude oil, and gold futures from January 2018 to March 2022. The results showed a persistent unidirectional short-term spillover of return from the Bahrain stock market to the futures gold market for both the period before and during the pandemic. Moreover, the results also showed that the significant positive shock in the bitcoin returns as granger-caused by the returns of the Bahrain stock market is only during the period before the pandemic. Finally, a significant negative contemporaneous short-term effect on the crude oil market returns can be statistically explained by the shocks in the Bahrain stock market only during the COVID-19 period.
Daniel Pereira Alves de Abreu, Robert Aldo Iquiapaza
Purpose The aim of the study was to analyze the performance of Black-Litterman (BL) portfolios using a views estimation procedure that simulates investor forecasts based on technical analysis. Design/methodology/approach Ibovespa, S&P500, Bitcoin and interbank deposit rate (IDR) indexes were respectively considered proxies for the national, international, cryptocurrency and fixed income stock markets. Forecasts were made out of the sample aiming at incorporating them in the BL model, using several portfolio weighting methods from June 13, 2013 to August 30, 2022. Findings The Sharpe, Treynor and Omega ratios point out that the proposed model, considering only variable return assets, generates portfolios with performances superior to their traditionally calculated counterparts, with emphasis on the risk parity portfolio. Nonetheless, the inclusion of the IDR leads to performance losses, especially in scenarios with lower risk tolerance. And finally, given the impact of turnover, the naive portfolio was also detected as a viable alternative. Practical implications The results obtained can contribute to improve investors practices, specifically by validating both the performance improvement – when including foreign assets and cryptocurrencies –, and the application of the BL model for asset pricing. Originality/value The main contributions of the study are: performance analysis incorporating cryptocurrencies and international assets in an uncertain recent period; the use of a methodology to compute the views simulating the behavior of managers using technical analysis; and comparing the performance of portfolio management strategies based on the BL model, taking into account different levels of risk and uncertainty.
Yapılan bu çalışmanın amacı, 1.1.2016-4.12.2022 dönemini kapsayan günlük veriler yardımıyla Bitcoin ile alakalı çıkan haberler ile hem Bitcoin fiyatı hem de getirisi arasındaki ilişkiyi zamanla değişen nedensellik analizi kapsamında incelemektir. Söz konusu ilişkinin varlığı, Hacker ve Hatemi-J (2006)’nin Boostrapt Temelli Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi ve zamanla değişen nedensellik analizi kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen nedensellik testi bulguları, Bitcoin ile ilgili çıkan haberler ile Bitcoin fiyatı arasında karşılıklı bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu yönündedir. Diğer taraftan, Bitcoin getirisi ile Bitcoin ile ilgili çıkan haberler arasındaki nedensellik bulguları incelendiğinde, Bitcoin ile alakalı çıkan haberlerden Bitcoin getirisine doğru nedensellik ilişkisinin söz konusu olmadığı, buna karşın Bitcoin getirilerinden Bitcoin ile alakalı çıkan haberlere doğru bir nedensellik olduğu söylenebilir. Ayrıca, söz konusu nedensellik ilişkilerinin zamanla nasıl bir seyir izlediğine bakıldığında özellikle Bitcoin fiyatlarının arttığı dönemlerde Bitcoin ile ilgili haber sayılarının arttığı görülmüştür. Bu çerçevede hem Bitcoin hem de altcoin piyasasına yatırım yapacak bireylerin, Bitcoin ve altcoin ile alakalı çıkmış olan haberleri dikkate alarak işlem yapmaları yatırımın sağlıklı olması adına önem teşkil etmektedir.
In this paper, the generalised extreme value distribution (GEVD) model is employed to estimate financial risk in the form of return levels and the value at risk (VaR) for the two exchange rates, BitCoin/US dollar (BTC/USD) and the South African rand/US dollar (ZAR/USD). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) responsible for developing supervisory guidelines for banks and financial trading desks recommended that VaR be computed and reported. The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method is used to estimate the parameters of the GEVD. The estimated risk values are used to compare the riskiness of the two exchange rates and help both traders and investors to define their position in forex trading. This is to helping understanding the risk they are taking when they convert their savings/investments to BitCoin instead of the South African currency, the rand. The high extreme value index associated with the BTC/USD compared to the ZAR/USD implies that BitCoin is riskier than the rand. The BTC/USD has higher values of expected extreme/tail losses of 13.44%, 18.02%, and 23.41% at short (6 months), medium (12 months), and long (24 months) terms, compared to the ZAR/USD expected extreme/tail losses of 2.40%, 2.84%, and 3.28%, respectively. The computed VaR estimates for losses of USD 0.17, USD 0.22, and USD 0.38 per dollar invested in BTC/USD at 90%, 95%, and 99%, compared to ZAR/USD’s USD 0.03, USD 0.03, and USD 0.04 at the respective confidence levels, confirm the high risk associated with BitCoin. The conclusion drawn from this study is that BTC/USD is riskier than ZAR/USD, despite the rand being a developing country’s currency, hence perceived as being risky. The perception is that the rand is riskier than BitCoin and perceptions do influence exchange rates. Kupiec’s backtest results confirmed the model’s adequacy. These findings are helpful to investors, traders, and risk managers when deciding on trading positions for the two currencies.
This paper assesses the effectiveness of a broad set of 1066 active and continuously traded cryptocurrencies as a safe haven instrument against extreme oil price movements, in comparison to the corresponding roles of gold. The uncertainty for the oil market during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent Russia–Ukraine conflict set the tone for natural experiments for our study. We use a trail-blazing dynamic generalized autoregressive score model to estimate the tail riskiness of the potential safe haven assets from January 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022. By estimating the risk exposure of all cryptocurrency assets, we determine top ten safest assets for investment. Our results show the emergence of new safe haven cryptocurrencies, which have previously been ignored by the academic literature and policy makers alike. Intriguingly, our findings reveal that gold has been replaced by altcoins as the safest assets during both the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. At this instance, our findings suggest that Bitcoin provides lengthier safe haven properties than gold for oil returns in both periods. However, the safe haven properties of gold and cryptocurrencies are time varying. Last but not least, we introduce a new Cryptocurrency Tail Risk Index (CTRI) that captures the risk exposure of cryptocurrency market, as a whole. Our results suggest that investment in numerous cryptocurrencies provides lengthier safe haven properties than investing in gold alone.
Multifractal analysis is a forecasting technique used to study the scaling regularity properties of financial returns, to analyze the long-term memory and predictability of financial markets. In this paper, we propose a novel structural detrended multifractal fluctuation analysis (S-MF-DFA) to investigate the efficiency of the main cryptocurrencies. The new methodology generalizes the conventional approach by allowing it to proceed on the different fluctuation regimes previously determined using a change-points detection test. In this framework, the characterization of the various exogenous factors influencing the scaling behavior is performed on the basis of a single-factor model, thus creating a kind of self-explainable machine learning for price forecasting. The proposal is tested on the daily data of the three among the main cryptocurrencies in order to examine whether the digital market has experienced upheavals in recent years and whether this has in some ways led to a structured multifractal behavior. The sampled period ranges from April 2017 to December 2022. We especially detect common periods of local scaling for the three prices with a decreasing multifractality after 2018. Complementary tests on shuffled and surrogate data prove that the distribution, linear correlation, and nonlinear structure also explain at some level the structural multifractality. Finally, prediction experiments based on neural networks fed with multi-fractionally differentiated data show the interest of this new self-explained algorithm, thus giving decision-makers and investors the ability to use it for more accurate and interpretable forecasts.
Günümüzde ekonomilerin, işletmelerin başarılı ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde büyümesi için sermaye piyasaları önem arz etmektedir. Varlık fiyatları alternatif yatırım araçları olmaları yönüyle hisse senedi piyasaları ile etkileşim içindedir. Dolayısıyla varlık fiyatlarında oluşan balonların hisse senedi piyasaları ile ilişki içinde olması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışmada 08:2010 ile 10:2022 arası aylık verilerle Dolar, Euro, Bitcoin, CDS ve mevduat faizi değişkenlerinde balon varlığı incelenmiştir. Ele alınan değişkenlerde balon oluşumunun varlığı durumunda bu balonların BIST 100 endeksi oynaklığına etkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Balonların varlığı SADF ve GSADF testleri ile analiz edilirken, TARCH ve ARCH-GARCH modelleri yardımıyla oynaklık belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. USD, Euro, Bitcoin değişkeni için ele alınan dönem boyunca istatistiksel olarak önemli balon oluşumları söz konusu iken, CDS ve mevduat değişkeni için söz konusu dönemde istatistiksel olarak önemli bir balon oluşumu gözlemlenmemiştir. USD ve Euro değişkenlerinde meydana gelen balonların BIST 100 endeks getirisinde oynaklığı artırdığı söylenebilir. Ancak BITCOIN de yaşanan balonların istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür.
Men Qin, Chi‐Wei Su, Yunxu Wang, Nicoleta Mihaela Doran
Exploring the safe-haven characteristics of bitcoin from novel perspectives is crucial to diversify the investment and reap the benefits. This investigation employs bootstrap full-and sub-sample techniques to probe time-varying interrelation between global supply chain pressure (GSCP) and bitcoin price (BP), and further answer if “digital gold” could resist the strains of global supply chain. The empirical outcomes suggest that GSCP positively and negatively affects BP. The positive influence points out that high GSCP might boost the international bitcoin market, driving BP to rise, which indicates that “digital gold” could resist the pressures of global supply chain. But the negative effect of GSCP on BP could not support the above view, mainly affected by the weak purchasing power and more valuable assets, which is not consistent with the assumption of the inter-temporal capital asset pricing model (ICAPM). In turn, GSCP is adversely affected by BP, highlighting that the international bitcoin market may be viewed as a stress reliever for the global supply chain. Against a backdrop of the deteriorative Russia-Ukraine war and the intensifying global supply chain crisis, the above conclusions could bring significative lessons to the public, enterprises and related economies.
This research paper provides an in-depth analysis of cryptocurrency exchanges by examining their types, regulatory environment, challenges, and user behavior. We conducted a comparative study of ten popular cryptocurrency exchanges and collected data on user behavior and preferences through surveys, interviews, and website analysis. Our findings reveal that crypto exchanges face numerous challenges such as security, liquidity, and regulatory compliance. We also found that users prefer exchanges that offer a wide range of cryptocurrencies, high liquidity, low fees, and strong security measures. This research contributes to the understanding of the cryptocurrency industry and provides insights for policymakers, investors, and users. Keywords : Cryptocurrency Exchanges, Bitcoin, Trading, Portability and Vulnerability
Cryptocurrencies have become a world-class phenomenon, with governments, companies and investors facing huge challenges and opportunities. Bitcoin is the one of most widely known cryptocurrencies. People prefer to use Bitcoin as an asset to invest for profit and hedge risk than for its payment function. This is the reason for the study of bitcoin market is so important. Many scholars had used daily data on bitcoin to construct different GARCH models to analyse the volatility of its returns. This research builds a GARCH model for the logarithmic return series of the bitcoin price to understand the volatility of the bitcoin price over the experimental time horizon. The experimental results show that the price of bitcoin is more volatile and vulnerable to external shocks. The analysis suggests that Bitcoin is more clearly a speculative financial instrument and that the price of Bitcoin is highly frothy.
The response of the Bitcoin market to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is an example of how a global public health crisis can cause drastic market adjustments or even a market crash. Investor attention on the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to play an important role in this response. Focusing on the Bitcoin futures market, this paper aims to investigate whether pandemic attention can explain and forecast the returns and volatility of Bitcoin futures. Using the daily Google search volume index for the "coronavirus" keyword from January 2020 to February 2022 to represent pandemic attention, this paper implements the Granger causality test, Vector Autoregression (VAR) analysis, and several linear effects analyses. The findings suggest that pandemic attention is a granger cause of Bitcoin returns and volatility. It appears that an increase in pandemic attention results in lower returns and excessive volatility in the Bitcoin futures market, even after taking into account the interactive effects and the influence of controlling other financial markets. In addition, this paper carries out the out-of-sample forecasts and finds that the predictive models with pandemic attention do improve the out-of-sample forecast performance, which is enhanced in the prediction of Bitcoin returns while diminished in the prediction of Bitcoin volatility as the forecast horizon is extended. Finally, the predictive models including pandemic attention can generate significant economic benefits by constructing portfolios among Bitcoin futures and risk-free assets. All the results demonstrate that pandemic attention plays an important and non-negligible role in the Bitcoin futures market. This paper can provide enlightens for subsequent research on Bitcoin based on investor attention sparked by public emergencies.
As the price of virtual currency fluctuates greatly, precise prediction and appropriate trading strategies can bring investors best returns. This paper predicted the price of Ethereum and Bitcoin in the light of autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) and get a R2 of 0.995 and 0.993 respectively, which indicates the model can yield reasonable predictions. Then their investment ratios are set to 0.88 and 1.12 respectively by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to solve the daily revenue function formed by the predicted price and the current price. Finally, the paper compared the returns yielded by the PSO trading strategy optimized by AHP and the strategy without optimization. It can be concluded that the AHP has a possibility of 64.66 per cent to yield more returns when used.
Chekwube V. Madichie, Franklin N. Ngwu, Eze A. Eze, Olisaemeka D. Maduka
Cryptocurrencies have, over the years, gained an unprecedented prominence in financial discourse, with the market fielding over 5,300 digital currencies and reaching over $2 trillion in market capitalisation in 2022. The surge in market values of digital currencies and their popularity in the world of e-commerce have remained unabated and equally received special attention from researchers focusing on identifying the underlying factors that drive changes in their market values. Thus, this study models the dynamics of the prices of cryptocurrencies alongside their interconnectedness, focusing on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin along the time and frequency dimensions of monthly data from 1 March 2016 to 05/31/2022. Based on the ARDL model, results show that the volume of transactions of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin, oil prices, and gold prices exert a more significant positive influence on their prices in the longrun than in the shortrun. However, the publicity of the selected cryptocurrencies (google search rates) does not significantly influence their prices. Interestingly, results from the Wavelet Granger causality tests show no causality between the raw series of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin prices. However, a bi-directional causality exists between Bitcoin and Ethereum prices during the longrun in their low frequencies, a unidirectional causality running from Bitcoin to Litecoin prices during the longrun in their low frequencies, and a unidirectional causality running from Litecoin to Ethereum prices during the shortrun, medium run and longrun in their high, medium, and low frequencies. These findings have profound implications for the global financial market and investor decisions.
The combination of Deep Learning and GARCH-type models has been proved to be superior to the single models in forecasting of volatility in various markets such as energy, main metals, and especially stock markets. To verify this hypothesis for cryptocurrencies market, we constructed various Deep Learning models based on Feed Forward Neural Networks (DFFNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and evaluated their performance in forecasting the volatility of 27 cryptocurrencies. Then, different hybrid models were built in which the outputs of three GARCH-type models, namely GARCH, EGARCH, and APGARCH, with three different assumptions for the residuals’ distribution were fed into the DFFNN and LSTM networks. In other words, GARCH-type models were utilized as feature extractors and the deep learning models leveraged a sequence of extracted features as their inputs to produce the volatility of the next day. Our findings revealed that not only the deep learning models improve the forecasts of GARCH-type models with any distribution assumption, the forecasts of GARCH-type models as informative features can significantly increase the predictive power of the studied deep learning models; namely, the DFFNN and LSTM models.
Maria Chiara Pocelli, Manuel L. Esquível, Nadezhda P. Krasii
We present an analysis on variability Bitcoin characteristics that help to quantitatively differentiate Bitcoin from the state-owned traditional currencies and the asset Gold. We provide a detailed study on returns of exchange rates—against the Swiss Franc—of several traditional currencies together with Bitcoin and Gold; for that purpose, we define a distance between currencies by means of the spectral densities of the ARMA models of the returns of the exchange rates, and we present the computed matrix of the distances between the chosen currencies. A statistical analysis of these matrix distances is further proposed, which shows that the distance between Bitcoin and any other currency or Gold is not comparable to any of the distances between currencies or between currencies and Gold and not involving Bitcoin. This result shows that Bitcoin is essentially different from the traditional currencies and from Gold, at least in what concerns the structure of its variance and auto-covariances.
Bogdan Andrei Dumitrescu, Carmen Obreja, Ionel Leonida, Dănuț Georgian Mihai · 5 authors
This paper contributes to the literature dedicated to the interlinkages between cryptocurrencies and currencies by investigating whether Bitcoin price movements affect the exchange rates of a sample of nine European countries with non-euro currencies. By resorting to the novel unconditional quantile regression, we show that there is a statistically significant link between Bitcoin price movements and changes in nominal exchange rates. In normal market conditions, an increase in the price of Bitcoin can be associated with an appreciation of the currencies from our sample, while during the COVID-19 pandemic, the relationship inversed. In addition, we find heterogeneities in this relationship, depending on the level of change in the nominal exchange rate. The results emphasize the relevance of Bitcoin price movements to the conduct of monetary policy through the exchange rate channel and that investors in cryptocurrencies and various financial assets denominated in the currencies from our sample can benefit from diversification by including both types of assets in their portfolios.
Bitcoin, as a virtual cryptocurrency with both property of investment and currency, is widely investigated for its potential as a safe haven in world volatility. This paper, using classic time series model VAR and ARMA-GARCH, aims to study whether Bitcoin has safe-haven value in geopolitical events, which is based on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. By quantifying the impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict with crude oil prices and considered logarithmic yield, this study finds out both the positive and negative effects to Bitcoin yield from temporary shocks and long-term fluctuations of geopolitical. The VAR accumulation shows that geopolitics will have cumulative net positive impacts on Bitcoin's yield in the short term, that is, Bitcoin can be seen as a short-term safe haven for investors with brief profit needs. However, more results show that the impact of geopolitics on Bitcoin is difficult to determine, and the long-term impact is close to zero. The inadequate evidence of safe-haven value means that long-term investors need to consider Bitcoin cautiously. Based on the current background of Russia-Ukraine conflict, the study can both promote the academic understanding of Bitcoin’s value in geopolitical conflict, and help the investors make the right choice in world volatility.