Melanie L. Fein
No abstract is available for this record.
Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.
80 results · page 4 of 4
Melanie L. Fein
No abstract is available for this record.
M. Todd Henderson, Max Raskin
No abstract is available for this record.
Tiffany L. Minks
No abstract is available for this record.
Jonas Hedin
Trading securities is a process that requires multiple trusted intermediaries to ensure that the trade is done correctly. The securities industry is therefore very slow and expensive; the central securities depository (CSD) being one of the main contributors to the disruption. In an effort to fix this, financial institutions has recently started looking into the blockchain technology; the innovation behind the cryptocurrency Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a digital currency that can be traded peer-to-peer without the need for a trusted intermediary. If this concept could be used when trading securities it would simplify the process, making the settlement-time near instant. In addition to the speedup, it would also save the industry a lot of money since many processes could be automated. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the blockchain technology and its applications in the finance industry. The focus is on how a blockchain could be used to reduce the responsibility of the central securities depository as much as possible, and especially on how corporate actions could be automated. The goal is to answer these questions: Is blockchain a suitable platform for a decentralized corporate actions solution? Whatare the benefits and drawbacks of using a blockchain versus a traditional centralized solution? The aim is to provide an evaluation of the usage of blockchains in finance, with extra focus on the CSD and corporate actions
Folake Alabi
No abstract is available for this record.
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen
No abstract is available for this record.
Kinga Kądziołka
No abstract is available for this record.
Sarah Jane Hughes, Stephen T. Middlebrook
This Article looks at competing models for regulating providers of services to individuals and businesses that take cryptocurrencies in payment for goods and services, including operators of online wallets and exchanges, and other cryptocurrency market intermediaries whose functions resemble "money service businesses" or "money transmission." We conclude that, in addition to whatever "money services" or "money transmission "prudential regulation the States or federal government may adopt, the operation of wallets and exchanges requires a new commercial law that lays out rights and liabilities of cryptocurrency users in a robust and transparent fashion. We use Article 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code as a model for regulating cryptocurrency transactions in which intermediaries play a role.