The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) is a stack-based virtual processor that executes smart contract bytecode sequentially. While this design ensures determinism and correctness, it inherently limits instruction throughput. This paper presents a feasibility study of instruction-level pipelining within the EVM interpreter architecture. By analyzing the internal execution flow of the EVM as implemented in the Go-Ethereum (geth) client, the study identifies the program counter dependency, particularly under jump instructions, as the principal control hazard preventing naĂŻve pipelining. A two-stage pipelined execution model is proposed, separating opcode fetch and decode from execution and program counter update, with a feedback mechanism to preserve EVM semantics. The work focuses on architectural feasibility rather than performance evaluation and optimization, demonstrating that pipelining inside the EVM interpreter is conceptually possible under controlled synchronization. Limitations, design challenges, and future research directions are discussed.
Nirmala Raju Kanti, D. G. Narayan, Pooja Shettar, P S Hiremath
Blockchain networks rely on consensus mechanisms to maintain security and efficiency. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a widely adopted alternative to traditional Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) due to its scalability. However, DPoS suffers from centralization risks, collusion, and the presence of unreliable validators, compromising network integrity. One approach to mitigating these issues is the downgrade method, which reduces the influence of dishonest validators over time by penalizing their stake or voting power. While this approach improves security, it still faces challenges related to manipulation and inefficiency. To address these limitations more effectively, we introduce Game Theory-based Delegated Proof of Stake (GT-DPoS), an advanced consensus framework that integrates strategic decision-making through game theory to optimize node selection and incentivization. GT-DPoS utilizes a two-stage evaluation mechanism based on Reputation Score (RS) and Trust Score (TS) to regulate node behavior, penalize malicious actors, and reward honest participation. In Stage 1, nodes are assessed based on RS, incorporating factors like stake, transaction efficiency, block contribution, and past misconduct. Nodes failing to meet the threshold are penalized, while eligible ones advance to second stage. Stage 2 evaluates TS, considering rewards, penalties, and community votes, refining the selection through a payoff-based model that ensures rational decision-making. Unlike the downgrade method, GT-DPoS provides a more dynamic and adaptive approach, ensuring continuous security enhancement without long-term inefficiencies. Experimental results demonstrate that GT-DPoS achieves faster block creation times compared to conventional DPoS, with up to 4.6% improvement at lower transaction loads and 1.2% at higher loads. By leveraging game-theoretic principles, GT-DPoS enhances decentralization, reduces transaction latency, and strengthens network security, making it a more effective and performance-optimized alternative to both traditional DPoS and downgrade-based approaches
Wencheng Chen, Jun Wang, Jeng-Shyang Pan, R. Simon Sherratt · 5 authors
The rapid advancement of Industry 5.0 has accelerated the adoption of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). However, challenges such as data privacy breaches, malicious attacks, and the absence of trustworthy mechanisms continue to hinder its secure and efficient operation. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes an enhanced blockchain-based data storage framework and systematically improves the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism. A four-party evolutionary game model is developed, involving agent nodes, voting nodes, malicious nodes, and supervisory nodes, to comprehensively analyze the dynamic effects of key factorsâincluding bribery intensity, malicious costs, supervision, and reputation mechanismsâon system stability. Furthermore, novel incentive and punishment strategies are introduced to foster node collaboration and suppress malicious behaviors. The simulation results show that the improved DPoS mechanism achieves significant enhancements across multiple performance dimensions. Under high-load conditions, the system increases transaction throughput by approximately 5%, reduces consensus latency, and maintains stable operation even as the network scale expands. In adversarial scenarios, the double-spending attack success rate decreases to about 2.6%, indicating strengthened security resilience. In addition, the convergence of strategy evolution is notably accelerated, enabling the system to reach cooperative and stable states more efficiently. These results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism effectively improves the efficiency, security, and dynamic stability of IIoT data storage systems, providing strong support for reliable operation in complex industrial environments.
<b><i>Proof-of-Stake (PoS)</i></b> blockchain networks replace energy-intensive mining with validator-based block production and transaction ordering. While this design improves efficiency and scalability, it introduces a largely unexamined structural vulnerability: deterministic or predictable validator sequencing. This paper defines <b>Sequential Validator Front-Running</b><b> </b>as a validator-level exploit whereby participants leverage foreknowledge of execution slots to extract economic advantage, manipulate outcomes, or preempt competing transactions. Unlike classical Miner/Maximal Extractable Value (MEV), this exploit arises from consensus scheduling itself rather than transaction visibility alone. We analyze the structural causes of this vulnerability, demonstrate why conventional mitigations such as governance controls, slashing, and post-hoc monitoring are insufficient, and propose a logic-layer sequencing constraint framework enforced at block construction time. The proposed approach neutralizes sequencing abuse while preserving throughput, finality, and protocol compliance.
ABSTRACT Blockchain technology has emerged as a foundational infrastructure for decentralized applications, where consensus protocols play a critical role in ensuring security, consistency and trust among distributed participants. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of nine widely adopted consensus protocols across public (proof of work [PoW], proof of stake [PoS], delegated proof of stake [DPoS]) and private (practical Byzantine fault tolerance [PBFT, Raft, Kafka, proof of elapsed time [PoET], yet another consensus [YAC], Paxos) blockchain systems. Unlike prior surveys, this work integrates workflowâlevel operational modelling, quantitative performance comparison and applicationâdriven decision support within a unified analytical framework. Our analysis shows that PoW achieves strong decentralization at 3â15 transactions per second (TPS) with 10â60 min finality, whereas PoS improves throughput to tens to thousands of TPS with secondsâtoâminutes finality while reducing energy consumption by approximately 99%. Private blockchain protocols such as PBFT and Kafka achieve subâsecond latency and throughput exceeding 10,000 TPS by trading off decentralization for performance and control. Furthermore, we develop a decisionâsupport framework that maps consensus mechanisms to application requirements and provides a critical synthesis of security risks, scalability limitations, and emerging solutions. The findings highlight that no single protocol satisfies all design goals, reinforcing the necessity of contextâaware consensus selection.
Financial reporting within enterprise resource planning now commonly rides on a blockchain backbone, yet the problem of keeping each distributed ledger in sync remains stubbornly difficult-especially when SAP modules are at the controls. This paper describes a simulation-based testbed that watches SAP payment journals as they hop between differently configured blockchains, measuring how and when each copy reaches the same state. By replaying typical SAP routines under adjustable delay windows and choice of consensus rules, the model tallies the frequency of divergence, the lag before agreement, and the mechanics of clearing up disputes. Output files display convex 3D surfaces, animated heat maps, and step-by-step trails of how conflicts get settled; taken together, they point middleware designers toward tighter sync logic, smarter contract frameworks, and faster multi-ledger audits. In broader terms, the findings shrink the technical distance SAP users must traverse to achieve clean, traceable cross-chain accounting.
Dockerised blockchain solution can mitigate the low levels of distributed technology adoption in small and medium enterprises. It can be done via designing and implementing an environment which inherits ease of deployment and scalability of containerized systems with safety and transparency of distributed applications. Practical implementation of a dockerized blockchain solution designed as a demonstrative implementation for existing clientâserver architecture is described in this paper. This solution uses Docker containers to simplify the setup and deployment of a private blockchain network, a mediator server and a reverse proxy. Implementation of this system on a low scale demonstrates feasibility of integrating blockchain technology into existing business processes without fundamental architectural changes and acknowledges deployment and maintaining challenges that usually accompany distributed systems using private blockchain. Discussed implementation is a demonstration of designed architecture being potentially a reproducible and easily maintainable environment for logging and validating data through an immutable ledger on a smaller scale. Proof of concept successfully validates the core idea. The implementation shows a mediator server intercepting client request, recording them on a private Ethereum blockchain via a JSON-RPC interface, and then forwarding them to the original server. This confirms the solutionâs ability to introduce a trusted, intermediate layer for data immutability. The project demonstrates a working framework for embedding distributed ledger technologies into clientâserver ecosystems. While the current Proof of Work consensus mechanism presents scalability limitations, the architecture provides a strong foundation for future research, including migrating to more efficient consensus mechanisms and integrating smart contracts.
Reliable data availability and transparent governance are fundamental requirements for distributed edge-to-cloud systems that must operate across multiple administrative domains. Conventional cloud-centric architectures centralize control and storage, creating bottlenecks and limiting autonomous collaboration at the network edge. This paper introduces a decentralized governance and service-management framework that leverages Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and Decentralized Applications (DApps) to to govern and orchestrate verifiable, tamper-resistant, and continuously accessible data exchange between heterogeneous edge and cloud components. By embedding blockchain-based smart contracts within swarm-enabled edge infrastructures, the approach enables automated decision-making, auditable coordination, and fault-tolerant data sharing without relying on trusted intermediaries. The proposed OASEES framework demonstrates how DAO-driven orchestration can enhance data availability and accountability in real-world scenarios, including energy grid balancing, structural safety monitoring, and predictive maintenance of wind turbines. Results highlight that decentralized governance mechanisms enhance transparency, resilience, and trust, offering a scalable foundation for next-generation edge-to-cloud data ecosystems.
NiccolĂČ Scatena, Pericle Perazzo, Giovanni Nardini
This paper proposes iblock, a comprehensive C++ library for Bitcoin simulation, designed for OMNeT++. iblock offers superior efficiency and scalability with respect to state-of-the-art simulators, which are typically written in high-level languages. Moreover, the possible integration with other OMNeT++ libraries allows highly detailed simulations. We measure iblock's performance against a state-of-the-art blockchain simulator, proving that it is more efficient at the same level of simulation detail. We also validate iblock by using it to simulate different scenarios such as the normal Bitcoin operation and the selfish mine attack, showing that simulation results are coherent with theoretical expectations.
The article presents an empirical comparison of three contemporary Layer-2 scaling solutions for the Ethereum blockchain: Scroll, Linea, and Base, representing zk-rollup and optimistic rollup architectures. The study aims to evaluate the transaction processing speed and stability of selected Layer-2 networks using real-time data collected from blockchain explorers (Blockscout, Lineascan, Basescan). The dataset comprises 45,000 transactions processed in October 2025 and aggregated at one-second resolution (1 Hz). Statistical analyses include ANOVA, KruskalâWallis, Levene, and BrownâForsythe tests, as well as ADF and KPSS stationarity diagnostics, used to assess diferences in throughput and operational stability across the examined networks. The results indicate that the Base network achieves the highest mean throughput (â 102 TPS) and the lowest temporal volatility, whereas Linea and Scroll exhibit non-stationary, highly variable transaction dynamics driven by periodic batching. The fndings confrm the persistence of the scalability trilemmaâwhere improvements in performance may come at the cost of higher centralization and operational dependency. This research contributes to the quantitative assessment of rollup efciency and provides a reference point for further empirical studies on blockchain scalability.
Recently, the need for unified orchestration frameworks that can manage extremely heterogeneous, distributed, and resource-constrained environments has emerged due to the rapid development of cloud, edge, and IoT computing. Kubernetes and other traditional cloud-native orchestration systems are not built to facilitate autonomous, decentralized decision-making across the computing continuum or to seamlessly integrate non-container-native devices. This paper presents the Distributed Adaptive Cloud Continuum Architecture (DACCA), a Kubernetes-native architecture that extends orchestration beyond the data center to encompass edge and Internet of Things infrastructures. Decentralized self-awareness and swarm formation are supported for adaptive and resilient operation, a resource and application abstraction layer is established for uniform resource representation, and a Distributed and Adaptive Resource Optimization (DARO) framework based on multi-agent reinforcement learning is integrated for intelligent scheduling in the proposed architecture. Verifiable identity, access control, and tamper-proof data exchange across heterogeneous domains are further ensured by a zero-trust security framework based on distributed ledger technology. When combined, these elements enable increasingly autonomous workload orchestration, trading centralized control for adaptive, decentralized operation with enhanced interoperability, scalability, and trust. Thus, the proposed architecture enables self-managing and context-aware orchestration systems that support next-generation AI-driven distributed applications across the entire computing continuum.
Mutiullah Shaikh, Uffe Kock Wiil, Ali Ebrahimi, Yumna Memon
Blockchain technology has revolutionized digital systems by ensuring trust, transparency, decentralization, and security. However, in the democratic nature of blockchain networks, there is a huge underlying dependency on consensus mechanisms, but the challenges associated with these, such as energy costs, network attacks, preservation of privacy, centralization, and limited scalability, hinder miners and stakeholders from adopting appropriate consensus mechanisms. In this paper, we present a conceptual literature overview of most consensus mechanisms by highlighting potential areas of exploration and considerations before adopting blockchain technology for various applications. This exploration turned our focus toward analyzing three prominent underlying aspects of consensus mechanisms, i.e. energy consumption, security, and decentralization. A simulation-based comparative analysis of five prominent blockchain consensus mechanisms, such as Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), Proof of Authority (PoA), and Proof of Capacity (PoC), is presented in various network load scenarios to further evaluate their performance metrics. The simulated metrics were cross-validated using empirical data from real blockchain networks (e.g., Ethereum, Bitcoin, VeChain, and Chia) collected between 2022 and 2025, ensuring alignment between theoretical performance models and observed on-chain behavior across diverse consensus mechanisms. Results overall indicate that PoW excels in decentralization and security while costing the highest energy, making it less scalable for high-throughput scenarios. PoS balances energy efficiency and moderate decentralization, while DPoS achieves scalability at the expense of decentralization. PoA and PoC are shown to be energy-efficient alternatives, but vary in their levels of centralization and security. Our findings constitute a comprehensive guide for researchers, miners, and practitioners aiming to optimize blockchain performance for diverse applications.
Deepika Dash, Bipin Raj C., B Jnyanadeep, Anala M R
The proliferation of decentralized finance (DeFi) has highlighted critical challenges in cross- chain oracle reliability and performance assessment. Traditional blockchain networks remain isolated from external data sources, creating the fundamental Oracle Problem that hinders institutional adoption of DeFi protocols. This paper presents DeFiLens, a comprehensive benchmarking framework that provides standard- ized performance metrics and real-time analytics across multiple blockchain ecosystems including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche. Our framework addresses the gap between traditional financeâs seamless market data access and blockchainâs data isolation through systematic oracle assessment. DeFiLens implements a six-layer security scoring system encompassing cryptographic verification, attack detection, and network health monitoring. Through extensive evaluation of major oracle providers including Chainlink, Band Protocol, and Tellor, we demonstrate significant performance variations across chains, with response times ranging from 2.1 seconds to 8.7 seconds and reliability scores varying between 72% and 95%. Our statistical analysis reveals critical arbitrage opportunities with price discrepancies up to 2.3% across chains. The framework serves as a ââBloomberg Terminalââ for oracle data, enabling financial institutions, DeFi protocols, and researchers to make data-driven decisions for oracle integration and risk management.
Serverless computing promises on-demand elasticity and simplified deployment, yet today's production-grade serverless platforms remain tied to a single-provider, centrally scheduled control plane. This centralized scheduling model faces mounting challenges in handling heterogeneous policies, data governance constraints, and dynamic workloads for the modern web, where applications increasingly span multiple geo-distributed autonomous administrative domains. In this paper, we present Mocha, a decentralized, policy-aware framework for scheduling serverless functions across a federated ecosystem. At its core, Mocha proposes a hierarchically structured distributed hash table that embeds geographical and organizational context to facilitate locality-aware scheduling without any central authority. By implementing a formally specified compliance engine at each domain, Mocha guarantees that all regulatory, locality, and resource constraints are honored for function placement decisions. Experiments show that Mocha reduces scheduling tail latency by 4â9Ă compared to alternatives while maintaining full policy adherence.
Keybyte Systems, Intentix Lab , Melbourne, Australiapronab@keybytesystems.com.au Supported by AusIndustry Grant IR2405165 __________________________________AbstractModern cloud-native applications distribute business logic across multiple layers: application code, orchestration frameworks, service meshes, and infrastructure configurations. This distribution creates âhidden logicââexecution rules embedded in infrastructure that are invisible during design and difficult to trace at runtime. We present Intention Space , a computing model built on the CPUX (Common Path of Understanding and Execution) paradigm that consolidates all business logic into explicit, design-time declarations using plain-language state pulses. In our model, Design Nodes (DNs) contain computation while Gatekeepers declare execution conditions as named pulses (e.g., âpayment validatedâ: Y). The infrastructure provides only mechanical enforcement through an Intention Loop that matches runtime state to Gatekeepers without adding decision logic. We demonstrate that complex workflowsâtraditionally requiring nested if-then branching and explicit loopsâcan be expressed as linear CPUX sequences where execution paths emerge from data state rather than code branching. Our Golang implementation shows complete elimination of orchestration code while maintaining full cognitive traceability. Beyond technical innovation, CPUX addresses a critical social computing crisis: the lack of accountability in distributed social platforms. By creating unique, device-level CPUX footprints for every interaction, our model enables verifiable traceability from device identity through user intention to executed actionârestoring accountability to social computing while preserving privacy. We argue this separation of intent (CPUX) from enforcement (infrastructure) is essential for building LLM-integrated, auditable, and socially responsible distributed systems.Keywords: CPUX, Intention Space, Design Nodes, Cognitive Computing, Data-Driven Execution, Microservices Architecture, Cloud Computing, LLM Integration, Social Computing Accountability__________________________________1. Introduction1.1 The Hidden Logic ProblemConsider a typical e-commerce order processing system deployed on Kubernetes with Istio service mesh:// order-service/main.go (Business Logic Layer) func ProcessOrder(order Order) error { if order.Amount > 1000 { if err := premiumValidator.Validate(order); err != nil { return retry(premiumValidator.Validate, 3, order) } } else { standardValidator.Validate(order) } // ⊠more branching logic }# k8s/hpa.yaml (Infrastructure Layer) spec: metrics: - type: Resource resource: name: cpu target: type: Utilization averageUtilization: 80 # Hidden rule: Scale when CPU > 80%# istio/retry-policy.yaml (Service Mesh Layer) spec: http: - retries: attempts: 3 perTryTimeout: 2s # Hidden rule: Retry 3 times on failureQuestion: What is the complete execution flow for a $1500 order that fails validation on first attempt?Answer: One must read and correlate:Application code (branching logic)Kubernetes manifests (scaling rules)Istio configurations (retry policies)Service mesh observability logs (runtime behavior)This hidden logic distribution creates fundamental problems:Traceability : No single artifact shows complete flowTestability : Must test infrastructure + code interactionsAuditability : Business stakeholders cannot validate logicMaintainability : Changes require coordinating multiple layersLLM Integration : No structured representation for AI reasoningSocial Accountability : Cannot trace interactions to source devices/users1.2 The Core InsightWe observe that traditional computing conflates two distinct concerns:What should happen(business intent)How to make it happen(mechanical execution)Current architectures intertwine these concerns across code, configuration, and infrastructure, making systems cognitively opaque.Our Contribution: We introduce CPUX (Common Path of Understanding and Execution) , a paradigm that separates business intent from infrastructure enforcement:CPUX Structure : Declares all possible execution paths as sequences of Design Nodes (DNs) with plain-language Gatekeeper conditionsInfrastructure : Provides mechanical execution (Intention Loop) that enforces CPUX declarations without adding decision logicDevice-Level Identity : Each CPUX execution tied to unique device fingerprint + user intention, enabling social computing accountabilityResult : Complete business logic is visible in CPUX; infrastructure remains purely mechanical; every social interaction is traceable1.3 Key ContributionsFormal Model : CPUX as cognitive execution contract with Design Nodes, Intentions, Objects, and Pulses as primitive componentsElimination of Hidden Logic : All business decisions visible in design-time CPUX declarations; infrastructure adds zero decision logicPlain-Language State Declarations : Execution conditions expressed as named pulses (e.g., âinventory confirmedâ: Y) enabling business stakeholder review and LLM integrationData-Driven Execution : Runtime branching eliminated from code; execution paths emerge from pulse state matching via SyncTestSocial Computing Accountability : Device-level CPUX fingerprints create unique, traceable identity for every social interaction, addressing the accountability crisis in platforms like Facebook, Twitter, TikTokImplementation & Evaluation : Golang framework code sample with concrete use case demonstrating zero orchestration code while maintaining full traceability1.4 Paper OrganizationSection 2 examines related work. Section 3 presents the PnR computing model and CPUX formalism. Section 4 details the architecture and implementation. Section 5 evaluates our approach through metrics and case studies. Section 6 discusses LLM integration. Section 7 introduces CPUX for social computing accountabilityâthe urgent global need. Section 8 concludes with future directions.__________________________________2. Related Work2.1 Workflow Orchestration SystemsAWS Step Functions [1] and Azure Logic Apps [2] provide visual workflow definition with explicit state machines. However, they:Use proprietary JSON/XML DSLs (not plain language)Embed conditional logic in workflow definitions (still branching)Remain platform-specific (vendor lock-in)Require reading workflow definitions to understand flowCannot trace to device/user identityApache Airflow [3] and Temporal [4] define workflows as code with DAG structures. They improve on step functions ,recoverability but:Business logic still in code (if-then branches)Workflow orchestration separate from executionNo plain-language condition declarationsNo device-level traceabilityCPUX Advantage : All logic in plain-language pulses, platform-agnostic, no explicit branching in declarations, device-level identity for every execution, recoverability built into platform. 2.2 Service Mesh & OrchestrationIstio [5] and Linkerd [6] provide traffic management, retries, circuit breaking. Kubernetes Operators [7] encode reconciliation logic. These systems:Hide business rules in YAML configurationsDistribute logic across mesh config + operator codeFocus on infrastructure concerns (not business flow)Lack unified view of complete execution pathNo user/device attributionCPUX Advantage : Consolidates all execution logic in CPUX; infrastructure config aligned with business intent; device identity integral.2.3 Event-Driven ArchitecturesApache Kafka [8], AWS EventBridge [9] enable event-driven systems with loose coupling. Reactive systems [10] promote message-passing. However:Event flows implicit (must trace message paths)Conditional logic in event handlers (code-level branching)No design-time declaration of all possible flowsNo provenance tracking to source deviceCPUX Advantage : Explicit declaration of all event-driven paths as DN sequences with visible Gatekeepers; device identity in event provenance.2.4 Intent-Based SystemsIntent-Based Networking [11] translates high-level intents to network configurations. Policy-based management [12] separates policy from mechanism. Closest to our work, but:Focus on infrastructure (not application logic)Policies often domain-specific (not general computing)Limited plain-language expressivenessNo user accountabilityCPUX Advantage : General-purpose computing model with full plain-language pulse declarations applicable to any domain; device-level user accountability.2.5 Formal Methods & Model CheckingTLA+ [13], Alloy [14], and Petri Nets [15] enable formal specification and verification. These are powerful but:Require specialized formal notation (high learning curve)Specification separate from implementation (sync problems)Not designed for runtime executionNo social computing traceabilityCPUX Advantage : Declarations are executable; CPUX structure IS the implementation contract; device identity embedded.2.6 Social Computing & AccountabilityBlockchain-based identity [16] and zero-knowledge proofs [17] address digital identity but:Focus on cryptographic primitives (not execution tracing)Donât integrate with application logicNo cognitive representation of intentFederated social networks [18] (Mastodon, ActivityPub) improve decentralization but:Still lack device-level traceabilityNo structured intent representationCannot prove user intended specific actionCPUX Advantage : First system to integrate device identity, user intention, and execution trace in single cognitive framework.2.7 PositioningCPUX is the first system to combine:Plain-language execution conditions (like Intent-Based Networking)Executable specifications (unlike formal methods)Complete flow visibility (unlike distributed orchestration)Zero hidden infrastructure logic (unique contribution)Device-level social accountability (unique contribution)__________________________________3. The PnR Computing Model3.1 Core Abstractions3.1.1 Pulse: Atomic State UnitA Pulse is the fundamental data unit representing a named state with optional response and trivalence:Pulse = (Name: String, Response: Value, Trivalence: {Y, N, U})Name : Plain-language identifier (e.g., âpayment validatedâ)Response : Optional value (e.g., transaction ID)Trivalence : Y (yes/true), N (no/false), U (undecided)
Rutuja Chirwatkar, Beemkumar Nagappan, L. P. Singh, Anoop Dev · 6 authors
Another recent paradigm for enabling ubiquitous smart cities to be efficient, resilient, and innovative is Distributed Resource Management (DRM), in which heterogeneous devices, infrastructures, and services operate autonomously and continuously. This paper discusses more advanced concepts of edge-cloud synergy, decentralized coordination, cyber-physical integration, and context-aware optimization to address the increasing burden on urban energy, transportation, communication, and environmental systems. These are the main objectives: (1) to create scalable DRM frameworks with the features of real-time decision, (2) to enhance the interoperability of distributed heterogeneous resources, and (3) to enhance sustainability and service quality as a result of flexible allocation schemes. The proposed solutions will be the multi-agent systems, distributed ledger technologies (DLT), machine-learning-based prediction systems, and dynamic resource-orchestration algorithms. A hybrid simulation-prototype was applied to test the performance based on the metrics of latency, reliability, load balancing, and energy efficiency. Results suggest that significant improvements (up to a 35 percent reduction in resource contention, a 28 percent reduction in response time, and a 20 percent increase in system robustness under high-density urban workloads) have been achieved. A qualitative measure also fosters greater transparency and trust in cross-domain operations. In totality, the paper identifies that the disruptive potential of decentralized management systems can make smart-city ecologies adaptive, secure, and sustainable.
The increasing demand for real-time decision analytics in modern enterprises has accelerated the development of edge-to-cloud data pipelines, which integrate distributed computing resources to enable instantaneous insights. Traditional centralized cloud architectures struggle with latency and bandwidth limitations, making them unsuitable for applications requiring immediate decision-making. Edge-to-cloud pipelines overcome these barriers by combining localized data processing with cloud-based intelligence, creating a continuous, adaptive flow of analytical information. This review examines the architectural principles, technological enablers, and analytical impacts of edge-to-cloud data pipelines on real-time decision-making. It explores how distributed processing, stream analytics, and AI-driven orchestration enhance responsiveness, reliability, and scalability across diverse environments. Technologies such as 5G, machine learning, and containerized orchestration platforms are discussed as key drivers of this transformation. The study also identifies challenges including data synchronization, security, interoperability, and energy efficiency at the edge. Addressing these issues is essential for realizing seamless, end-to-end analytics across hybrid ecosystems. Future directions highlight the potential of autonomous, decentralized, and quantum-enhanced data pipelines to deliver self-optimizing intelligence at global scale.Ultimately, this review concludes that edge-to-cloud data pipelines are foundational to achieving context-aware, predictive, and autonomous analytics, enabling organizations to transition from reactive operations to real-time, intelligent decision ecosystems.
This research paper presents the design, architecture, and evaluation of a Hybrid Blockchain Database System, a decentralizedâdistributed model that integrates blockchainâs immutability with the high-performance data processing capabilities of traditional database systems. The proposed hybrid architecture addresses key limitations of fully on-chain storageâsuch as scalability constraints, high transaction costs, and limited query efficiencyâby combining on-chain verification layers with off-chain distributed storage engines. The system introduces a multi-layered architectural model consisting of: (1) a blockchain consensus and validation layer for ensuring trust and tamper-resistant auditability; (2) a distributed database layer for high-speed read/write operations; (3) an interoperability layer that synchronizes state between on-chain and off-chain data; and (4) an IPFS/Filecoin-based decentralized storage framework for storing large datasets and metadata. This design enables secure state anchoring, cryptographic data integrity, and scalable data indexing across heterogeneous storage environments. A detailed performance evaluation is conducted using a combination of Ethereum-compatible smart contracts, IPFS storage, and distributed NoSQL/SQL databases. Key metrics such as transaction throughput, read/write latency, storage overhead, and consistency verification time are analyzed under varying workloads. Experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid system improves data scalability by 70â85%, reduces storage costs by over 90%, and maintains strong auditability through periodic blockchain state commitments. Security analysis is performed using static and dynamic testing tools to identify common vulnerabilities such as broken access control, inconsistent state updates, or missing verification boundaries, ensuring robustness of the hybrid synchronization logic. Additionally, the paper discusses design trade-offs involving decentralization vs. performance, on-chain transparency vs. gas efficiency, and consistency vs. latency across distributed components. This work provides a comprehensive blueprint for the development of real-world hybrid blockchain database systems suitable for supply chain management, enterprise data systems, government registries, financial applications, and Web3 infrastructure. The results highlight how hybrid architectures can bridge the gap between decentralized trust and scalable data management in next-generation digital ecosystems.
Blockchain technology has fueled exponential growth across various industries, including finance, supply chain management, and healthcare, enabling greater transparency in transaction management and supporting decentralized implementations. This paper presents a comprehensive performance analysis of permissioned and permissionless blockchain platforms, specifically Hyperledger Fabric and Ethereum. The study evaluates these platforms with varying transaction workloads (100 to 1000 transactions) with a consistent network. Our objective is to measure key performance metrics such as send rate, throughput, latency, resource utilization, and transaction success rate using established benchmarking tools and methodologies. The findings offer valuable insights into the comparative strengths, limitations, and optimal use cases of these blockchain platforms across different performance parameters. The results indicate that Hyperledger Fabric achieves, on average, 3.5â4.5 times higher throughput and 10â12 times lower latency than Ethereum, while consuming 2.5â3 times less memory across tested workloads. In contrast, Ethereum demonstrates a higher send rate and lower CPU demand in some operations. Overall, the study suggests that Hyperledger Fabric is better suited for enterprise applications that demand high scalability and performance.
Transaction fees play a crucial role in determining the efficiency and scalability of blockchain networks, particularly in Ethereum, where gas fees fluctuate significantly due to network congestion and competitive bidding. This study analyzes transaction fee patterns in the Ethereum blockchain and their impact on network efficiency by examining key blockchain metrics such as block density, transaction size, and transaction fee variability. The findings indicate that the mean transaction fee is 0.0342 ETH, with a median of 0.0008 ETH, demonstrating significant fee variability. The study also finds a strong positive correlation (r â 0.75, p < 0.01) between transaction fees and block density, as well as a moderate correlation with transaction size (r â 0.58, p < 0.01), highlighting the direct impact of network congestion on fee structures. Time series forecasting with Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models reveals cyclical trends in transaction fees, often influenced by major network activities such as NFT releases, DeFi protocol surges, and high-frequency trading. The LSTM model achieves a lower RMSE (0.09) compared to ARIMA (0.15), demonstrating its superior predictive capability for fee trends. Additionally, anomaly detection techniques identify outlier transactions with fees exceeding 2.5 ETH, often associated with front-running strategies, priority gas auctions (PGA), and inefficient smart contract executions. Despite improvements introduced by EIP-1559, the findings indicate that Ethereumâs transaction fee market remains highly volatile, with block density fluctuating between 512.0% and 3896.0%, causing extreme fee spikes during congestion periods. The presence of large transactions (maximum size: 250 bytes) further amplifies fee inefficiencies, reinforcing the need for improved scalability solutions. This study underscores the necessity of Layer-2 rollups, dynamic block size adjustments, and more adaptive fee mechanisms to enhance blockchain efficiency. Future research should explore comparative studies across blockchain networks, advanced predictive modeling techniques, and the role of miner extractable value (MEV) in transaction ordering fairness. The studyâs insights provide valuable guidance for developers, users, and policymakers aiming to optimize Ethereumâs transaction fee structure and enhance overall blockchain performance.
This study examines the relationship between gas prices and transaction values on the Ethereum blockchain, providing a detailed analysis of transaction dynamics and the factors influencing gas price determination. The correlation coefficient between gas prices and transaction values is -0.0273, indicating a very weak and negative relationship. Instead, gas prices are driven by factors such as computational intensity, network congestion, and user prioritization. Functions with higher computational demands, such as mint, recorded the highest mean gas price of 120.45 Gwei, with a standard deviation of 15.30 Gwei, while functions like approve and transfer exhibited mean gas prices of 98.30 Gwei and 110.80 Gwei, respectively. Recipient address analysis reveals a strong concentration of transaction values, with the top recipient address receiving 49.95 ETH consistently, indicating high-value operations directed toward specific accounts. High-gas transactions, defined as those above the 90th percentile, displayed a mean gas price of 191.96 Gwei with minimal variability, while their corresponding transaction values varied widely, with a mean of 23.91 ETH and a standard deviation of 13.66 ETH. These findings provide critical insights into Ethereum transaction behavior, emphasizing the role of function type and user prioritization in shaping gas price decisions. Future research should investigate the impact of network upgrades such as EIP-1559, the adoption of Layer-2 scaling solutions, and temporal trends in transaction behavior to enhance network scalability and cost efficiency as Ethereum continues to evolve.
Web3, referring to the next-generation decentralized web, has gained extensive attention from industry and academia. Its popularity drives considerable demand for continuous development and delivery of web3 applications and services. Blockchain is an essential technology that enables web3 but comes with considerable operational cost. Blockchain-as-a-service (BaaS) is considered as a promising solution for supporting web3 applications; however, existing BaaS platforms are conceptual, built for specific applications, or not optimized for emerging web3 applications. This work analyzes the primary features and fundamental requirements of decentralized web3 applications and articulates the critical role of blockchain for web3. To fill the gap, we introduce DAPPaaS, the first customizable BaaS platform specializing in web3 applications, with carefully designed goals and principles to meet the goals. Our key technical contributions lie on the approaches enabling component modularization, communication efficiency, automated scaling and performance monitoring, distributed deployment, and resource optimization. We implement a real-world application based on DAPPaaS and conduct extensive performance evaluations to validate its utility and efficiency.
Matteo Bjornsson, Taylor Hardin, Taylor Heinecke, Marcin Furtak · 6 authors
Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) rely on distributed consensus mechanisms to reach agreement over the order of transactions and to provide immutability and availability of transaction data. Distributed consensus suffers from performance limitations of network communication between participating nodes. BLOCKY ZipperChain guarantees immutability, agreement, and availability of transaction data, but without relying on distributed consensus. Instead, its construction process transfers trust from widely-used, third-party services onto ZipperChains's correctness guarantees. ZipperChain blocks are built by a pipeline of specialized services deployed on a small number of nodes connected by a fast data center network. As a result, ZipperChain transaction throughput approaches network line speeds and block finality is on the order of 500 ms. Finally, ZipperChain infrastructure creates blocks centrally and so does not need a native token to incentivize a community of verifiers.