Bitcoin market's efficiency and liquidity questions are being comprehensively analyzed in scientific literature. This dataset serves academics for deeper analysis of these topics as well as it gives relevant information for spotting and evaluating risks in the market. Moreover, practitioners can benefit from the dataset and use it to identify patterns in the market, discover potential earning capabilities, and create effective arbitrage trading strategies. This is the first publicly available dataset that provides unique arbitrage data about pairs of cryptocurrency exchanges. The raw dataset was received by the Bitlocus LT, UAB. Using dplyr, reshape2, plyr packages in R we transformed dataset to show the amount of arbitrage which could be earned in 13 different cryptocurrency exchanges from 2019-01-01 to 2020-04-01. We used this dataset to create matrices for each day from 2019-01-01 to 2020-04-01 in order to perform network analysis on Bitcoin arbitrage opportunities (Bruzgė and Šapkauskienė [1]). However, this dataset is beneficial for other purposes such as the evaluation of market's seasonality and day of week effects. The dataset provides values in high-frequency intervals but it is possible to convert data to a suitable data format depending on the research question.
This study uses a fractional integration method to evaluate the efficiency of cryptocurrencies before and after the period COVID-19 had been announced as being a pandemic. Evidence of long memory is confirmed across all subsamples. Additionally, we find a greater degree of persistence during the COVID-19 pandemic period than in the pre-pandemic period.
We explore the impact of investor attention on idiosyncratic risk in the cryptocurrency markets. Taking the Google Trends Index as the measure of investor attention, we find that investor attention can significantly reduce cryptocurrencies’ idiosyncratic risks by increasing the liquidity. We further study possible cross-sectional variations of the effect of investor attention on idiosyncratic risk. Evidence shows that the investor attention effect is more pronounced for smaller-cap and younger cryptocurrencies. Moreover, a relatively stable external market environment and rising market state are conducive to the further play of the attention effect.
This paper examines information transmission between Bitcoin derivatives and spot exchanges using 15-minutes interval data over May 2016 - September 2020. We employ a novel econometric framework with Fourier approximation, taking structural shifts in causal linkages, on the prices, returns, and volatilities of BitMEX, the derivatives market, and five other major spot exchanges, Coinbase, Bitstamp, Kraken, CEX.io, and Poloniex. Overall, the results provide robust evidence of information flow between the derivatives and spot exchanges, implying the markets react to new information simultaneously. The results are of importance for investors conducting portfolio allocation exercises and risk management strategies.
In this paper, I examine how social media affects cryptocurrencies and more traditional stocks. I use data on Twitter posts in combination with daily stock prices to estimate the causal effect of a tweet on stock and coin prices. To do this, I use a difference-indifference regression with index funds as my control group, which allows me to capture general market trends that coins and stocks would follow if not for intervention. I find that tweets have a significant impact on cryptocurrencies that last up to three days after the post. The increase in coin prices is driven by tweets from Tyler Winklevoss and tweets about Tezos and Ethereum specifically. Meanwhile, Twitter posts have no impact on more traditional stocks. These results suggest that social media can provide the public with valuable information in real time for fast moving and volatile crypto assets, while their effects on more stable and institutionalized traditional stocks are more muted.
Bitcoin is firmly becoming a mainstream asset in our global society. Its highly volatile nature has traders and speculators flooding into the market to take advantage of its significant price swings in the hope of making money. This work brings an algorithmic trading approach to the Bitcoin market to exploit the variability in its price on a day-to-day basis through the classification of its direction. Building on previous work, in this paper, we utilise both features internal to the Bitcoin network and external features to inform the prediction of various machine learning models. As an empirical test of our models, we evaluate them using a real-world trading strategy on completely unseen data collected throughout the first quarter of 2021. Using only a binary predictor, at the end of our three-month trading period, our models showed an average profit of 86\%, matching the results of the more traditional buy-and-hold strategy. However, after incorporating a risk tolerance score into our trading strategy by utilising the model's prediction confidence scores, our models were 12.5\% more profitable than the simple buy-and-hold strategy. These results indicate the credible potential that machine learning models have in extracting profit from the Bitcoin market and act as a front-runner for further research into real-world Bitcoin trading.
Abstract This study examines intraday time series momentum in Bitcoin. Unlike stock markets, Bitcoin trades 24 h a day and therefore has not got a clear opening and closing period. Therefore, we use trading volume as a proxy for the market trading time and show that the first half‐hour positively predicts the last half‐hour return. We find that the first trading sessions with the highest volume or volatility are associated with the greatest predictability for intraday time series momentum. We also show that intraday momentum‐based trading yields substantial economic gains in terms of market timing and asset allocation, especially in periods of a market downturn in Bitcoin. Consistent with the finding in foreign exchange markets, our results also show that the Bitcoin intraday momentum is driven by liquidity provision rather than late‐informed trading.
The cryptocurrency market has experienced stunning growth, with market value exceeding USD 1.5 trillion. We use a DCC-MGARCH model to examine the return and volatility spillovers across three distinct classes of cryptocurrencies: coins, tokens, and stablecoins. Our results demonstrate that conditional correlations are time-varying, peaking during the COVID-19 pandemic sell-off of March 2020, and that both ARCH and GARCH effects play an important role in determining conditional volatility among cryptocurrencies. We find a bi-directional relationship for returns and long-term (GARCH) spillovers between BTC and ETH, but only a unidirectional short-term (ARCH) spillover effect from BTC to ETH. We also find spillovers from BTC and ETH to USDT, but no influence running in the other direction. Our results suggest that USDT does not currently play an important role in volatility transmission across cryptocurrency markets. We also demonstrate applications of our results to hedging and optimal portfolio construction.
The price of a stock rises or falls in relation to a number of different factors, including changes to the economy brought about by pandemics. A few studies have already identified the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the stock market. However, empirical evidence is lacking on changes in stock price performance of blockchain-based companies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use the event study approach to estimate stock expected returns by applying an asset pricing model over a thirty-day event window around the announcement on March 11, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) as a global pandemic, using a sample of S&P Global 1200 companies. Overall, our results indicate more sensitivity in blockchain-based companies’ stock prices to the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those of non-blockchain-based companies. Cumulative abnormal returns show that the stock price of blockchain-based companies recover losses slower than non-blockchain companies. Our findings are important for investors and shareholders for future pandemics and events.
In this study, we predicted the log returns of the top 10 cryptocurrencies based on market cap, using univariate and multivariate machine learning methods such as recurrent neural networks, deep learning neural networks, Holt’s exponential smoothing, autoregressive integrated moving average, ForecastX, and long short-term memory networks. The multivariate long short-term memory networks performed better than the univariate machine learning methods in terms of the prediction error measures.
In this paper, I examine the effect of the May 18th, 2021 Chinese ban of cryptocurrency transactions on the overall volatility of the cryptocurrency market. To do this, I analyze, in both univariate and multivariate settings, range-based volatility in various event windows surrounding the event. I find clear economic and statistical change in volatility in the five days after the ban. In the ten-day period after the ban, there is a moderate economic change in volatility. In the forty-day period after the ban, there is little economic change in volatility. I conclude that the Chinese ban had a clear short-term impact on the volatility of the cryptocurrency marketplace, but the effects wore off shortly thereafter.
Sep 30, 2021·Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Ser Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University Series Economics and Management
Dmitry А. Endovitsky, Вячеслав Владимирович Коротких
Introduction. Digital financial assets are a relatively new phenomenon. More and more, they include virtual currencies, and in particular cryptocurrencies. Both regulators and financial market players are becoming increasingly interested in such assets. Cryptocurrencies have no intrinsic value, and this encourages scientific studies on the problem of price formation and risk management associated with cryptocurrency operations. Most papers on the problem lack a systematic ap-proach and do not provide solutions to a large number of fundamental issues. Purpose. The purpose of our study was to develop a method for the risk analysis of operations with digital financial assets, namely cryptocurrencies. Methodology. In our study, we used parametric methods of data analysis and ma-chine learning methods, description, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, and grouping method. The sample was accumulated between April 2013 and April 2021 and included cryptocurrencies with the market capitalization of over 1 million USD. Results. The study determined the common risk factors for the cryptocurrency market. The risk factors are presented as linear combinations of returns of subsets of cryptocurrencies with dynamically changing weight coefficients. The risk factors were formed based on the market information, which included the price of the cryptocurrency, the trading volume, and its market capitalization. Conclusions. The study demonstrated that the cryptocurrency market is suscepti-ble to market anomalies common to traditional financial asset markets. In addition to the risk factors based on the market capitalization of cryptocurrencies (the size) and their aggregate profitability (the momentum), the article presents statistically relevant risk factors which reflect the growth rate of the market capitalization and the level of illiquidity of cryptocurrencies. In order to explain the market anomalies and the arbitrary strategies based on them, the article presents several factor models of cryptocurrency price formation. These models can be used to develop an in-tegrated approach to the risks associated with operations with digital financial assets.
Adam Zaremba, Mehmet Hüseyin Bilgin, Huaigang Long, Aleksander Mercik · 5 authors
We demonstrate a new powerful predictive signal for cryptocurrency returns: the last day's return. Based on daily prices of more than 3600 coins, we document that the cryptocurrencies with low last day's return significantly outperform their counterparts with high last day's return. The effect is confirmed by a battery of cross-sectional tests and portfolio sorts, and is not subsumed by a broad range of other return predictors. We argue that the daily reversals result from the illiquidity of the vast majority of traded cryptocurrencies. In consequence, the pattern is cross-sectionally dependent on liquidity, and the handful of largest and most tradeable coins exhibit daily momentum rather than a reversal. Our findings help to reconcile earlier conflicting evidence on return persistence in cryptocurrency markets.
In this paper we extend the analysis of an agent-based model for adaptive trading, called asynchronous stochastic price pump (ASPP) introduced by Perepelitsa and Timofeyev (2019), to the model with heterogeneous distribution of psychological parameters of speculative optimism and pessimism across the population of traders. We show that the new model has a range of qualitatively different dynamics when the correlation between those factors ranges from low negative to large positive values. A statistical parameter estimation suggests a heterogeneous ASPP with negative correlation as a model of price variations of Bitcoin.
In December 2017, two leading derivative exchanges, CBOE and CME, introduced the first regulated Bitcoin futures. Our aim is estimating their causal impact on Bitcoin volatility and trading volume. Employing a new causal approach, C-ARIMA, we find that the CME future triggered an increase in both outcomes. There is also evidence of a positive volume-volatility relationship and that the effect on volatility was partially due to the higher trading volumes induced by the launch of the contract. After controlling for the effect on volumes, we find that the CME instrument caused Bitcoin volatility to increase by more than double.
We study recurrent patterns in volatility and volume for major cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ether, using data from two centralized exchanges (Coinbase Pro and Binance) and a decentralized exchange (Uniswap V2). We find systematic patterns in both volatility and volume across day-of-the-week, hour-of-the-day, and within the hour. These patterns have grown stronger over the years and can be related to algorithmic trading and funding times in futures markets. We also document that price formation mainly takes place on the centralized exchanges while price adjustments on the decentralized exchanges can be sluggish.
Non-linear interactions between cryptocurrency price movements can elicit cross-frequency coupling (CFC) wherein one set of frequencies in the 1st timeseries is coupled to another set of frequencies in the 2nd timeseries. To investigate this, we use a generalized coherence approach to detect and quantify both linear (i.e., iso-frequency coupling, IFC) and non-linear coherence (CFC) and the associated phase relationships between the intra-day price changes of various pairs of cryptocurrencies for the year 2020. Using this information, we further assess the risk reduction associated with diversification of portfolios between each pair of a small market capital and a large market capital cryptocurrency, for both synchronous and asynchronous trading conditions. While mean pairwise IFC values were lower for smaller cryptocurrencies, pairwise CFC values were more heterogeneous and had no correlation with the market capital size. Diversification of portfolios resulted in reduced risk for synchronously-traded pairs of those cryptocurrencies which had low IFC. For asynchronous trading conditions, if the larger market capital cryptocurrency was traded at a higher frequency, diversification almost always reduced risk. Thus, the novel approach used in this study reveals important insights into the complex dynamics that govern the price trends of cryptocurrencies.
Ceren Kocaoğullar, Arthur Gervais, Benjamin Livshits
While quantitative automation related to trading crypto-assets such as ERC-20 tokens has become relatively commonplace, with services such as 3Commas and Shrimpy offering user-friendly web-driven services for even the average crypto trader, we have not yet seen the emergence of on-chain trading as a phenomenon. We hypothesize that just like decentralized exchanges (DEXes) that by now are by some measures more popular than traditional exchanges, process in the space of decentralized finance (DeFi) may enable attractive online trading automation options. In this paper we present ChainBot, an approach for creating algorithmic trading bots with the help of blockchain technology. We show how to partition the computation into on- and off-chain components in a way that provides a measure of end-to-end integrity, while preserving the algorithmic "secret sauce". Our system is enabled with a careful use of algorithm partitioning, zero-knowledge proofs and smart contracts. We also show that with layer-2 (L2) technologies, trades can be kept private, which means that algorithmic parameters are difficult to recover by a chain observer. Our approach offers more transparent access to liquidity and better censorship-resistance compared to traditional off-chain trading approaches. We develop a sample ChainBot and train it on historical data, resulting in returns that are up to 2.4x the buy-and-hold strategy, which we use as our baseline. Our measurements show that across 1000 runs, the end-to-end average execution time for our system is 48.4 seconds. We demonstrate that the frequency of trading does not significantly affect the rate of return and Sharpe ratio, which indicates that we do not have to trade at every block, thereby significantly saving in terms of gas fees. In our implementation, a user who invests \$1,000 would earn \$105, and spend \$3 on gas; assuming a user pool of 1,000 subscribers.
Do behavioral factors mediate the relationship between industry returns and Bitcoin returns? We use four industry indices in technology, energy, clean energy, and banking, and the Sentiment index from Thomson Reuters Marketpsych Indices as a behavioral factor to investigate this question. We show that the sensitivities of technology and clean energy industry indices to Sentiment, positively and significantly, strengthen the relationship between sentiment and Bitcoin returns. By showing that behavioral factors mediate the association between the returns of industry indices and Bitcoin returns, we provide evidence that investors’ Sentiment captures the association between Bitcoin and sectors related to cryptocurrencies. Our results, however, do not support prior studies’ findings of a direct relationship between the industry indices and Bitcoin returns.
Dimitrios Koutmos, Timothy King, Constantin Zopounidis
Abstract Are cryptocurrencies useful minimum‐variance hedging instruments? This paper develops a two‐step analytical framework to explore this question across time. First, it estimates dynamic optimal weights, calibrated when investing between the aggregate market and a respective sampled cryptocurrency. This is performed separately for 11 major cryptocurrencies using the dynamic conditional correlation approach of Engle. Second, using a fractional regression approach, it uncovers linkages between optimal weights in cryptocurrencies and sources of economic uncertainty. Overall, this paper makes the following important findings. First, optimal weights in cryptocurrencies all rose rapidly during the COVID‐19 pandemic. In all, bitcoin showed to be the leading cryptocurrency in terms of hedging effectiveness during this recent time period. Second, most cryptocurrencies exhibit zero or negative betas consistently across time, thus making them natural hedging instruments for investors seeking to reduce their portfolio's comovement with the market. Finally, cryptocurrencies serve as better hedges for economic uncertainties arising from equity and commodity markets. They are relatively less effective for uncertainties arising from risks in the banking industry and firm default risk. This paper contributes broadly to the asset pricing literature since our two‐step approach herein can tractably be extended to other asset classes or other econometric measures of systematic risk.
Abstract We investigate the significance of extreme positive returns in the cross-sectional pricing of cryptocurrencies. Through portfolio-level analyses and weekly cross-sectional regressions on all cryptocurrencies in our sample period, we provide evidence for a positive and statistically significant relationship between the maximum daily return within the previous month (MAX) and the expected returns on cryptocurrencies. In particular, the univariate portfolio analysis shows that weekly average raw and risk-adjusted return differences between portfolios of cryptocurrencies with the highest and lowest MAX deciles are 3.03% and 1.99%, respectively. The results are robust with respect to the differences in size, price, momentum, short-term reversal, liquidity, volatility, skewness, and investor sentiment.
Managing extreme price fluctuations in cryptocurrency markets are of central importance for investors in this market segment. Using a sample of highly liquid cryptocurrencies from January 2017 to June 2021, this paper proposes a dynamic investment strategy that selects cryptocurrencies based on their historical volatility and is complemented by a simple stop-loss rule. Our results reveal that investing in highly concentrated low volatility cryptocurrency portfolios with six to twelve months volatility look-back and holding period generate statistically significant excess returns. By including a simple stop-loss rule, the downside risk of cryptocurrency portfolios is reduced markedly, and the Sharpe ratios are improved significantly.