Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

338 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

338 results · page 14 of 15

Clear filters
Jan 1, 2018·Annual Center Review
0 cites
Practical application and criminal aspects of cryptocurrencies

Ewelina Marcińczyk, Bartosz Borowik

The paper discusses cryptocurrencies both in terms of their applicability to everyday financial transactions as well as in terms of criminogenic factors. The Authors will present practical ways to settle in virtual currency, institutions in which bitcoin payments can be made and the possibility of converting them into traditional currencies. Also factors conducive to combine cryptocurrencies with the criminal world, such as the anonymity of both the Internet and cryptocurrencies will be analysed. In addition, the paper presents the real impact of cryptocurrencies on the increase in crime worldwide, both related to financing of terrorism and in connection with taxation of income. The data and conclusions contained in this study are a contribution to the discussion on the sense of investing in cryptocurrencies, and above all on the opportunities and threats that entail the widespread introduction of this method of payment.

Open access
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Digital Transformation in Law
Original source
Jan 1, 2018·SSRN Electronic Journal
0 cites
Smart Contracts – Not so Smart Legal Professionals?

Charlotta Kronblad, Helena Haapio

Smart contracts are becoming all smarter and increasingly available. Yet there seems to be a reluctance in mainstream industry to actually use them. It seems hard to convince general counsel, law firms, and purchasers of legal services to implement smart systems. This is a challenge for the providers of smart technology. The technology is not the problem - successful implementation is. The aim of this paper is to explore the resistance and gatekeepers within the legal industry, potentially resulting in a better understanding of how to overcome the barriers and use available smart technology. © 2018 Editions Weblaw. All rights reserved.

Open access
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Digital Transformation in Law
European and International Contract Law
Original source
Jan 1, 2018·Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of RAS
1 cites
Verifying functional properties of smart contracts using symbolic model-checking

Evgeniy Shishkin

We describe our efforts towards building a tool that automatically verify high-level functional properties of Ethereum smart contracts against its formal specification that can be given using four different methods: an invariant over contract state or three different types of trace properties. A model of runtime system, the source code of smart contract together with its specification is translated into SMT-solver formula and checked for counter example. We tested the method on simplified version of notorious TheDAO smart-contract, called MiniDAO. Our proof-of-concept tool was able to find a functional property violation of MiniDAO in just several seconds. We believe that the proposed method is indeed useful and deserves deeper investigation.

Open access
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
European and International Contract Law
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Jan 1, 2018·Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons (Case Western Reserve University)
18 cites
A Legal Perspective on the Trials and Tribulations of AI: How Artificial Intelligence, the Internet of Things, Smart Contracts, and Other Technologies Will Affect the Law

Iria Giuffrida, Fredric I. Lederer, Nicolas Vermeys

first met when we, along with Ed Imwinkelried and Fran Gilligan, were colleagues on the faculty of what today is The Judge Advocate General's School and Legal Center.We

Open access
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Digital Transformation in Law
Original source
Jan 1, 2018·Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University)
25 cites
Legal Recognition of Blockchain Registries and Smart Contracts

Robert Herian

The interrelatedness between computer systems, networks, code, and traditional law and legal frameworks continues to pose a number of important and vexed questions. This report will consider one area of the relationship: legal recognition of distributed ledger technology (DLT) or blockchain applications. Specifically, registers appended to blockchains (thereby creating “blockchain registries”), and “smart contracts” executed on blockchains

Open access
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Oct 10, 2017·The Computer Journal
126 cites
Algorithmic Dispute Resolution—The Automation of Professional Dispute Resolution Using AI and Blockchain Technologies

Jeremy Barnett, Philip Treleaven

Legal Services industries are entering a period of major disruption caused by new legal technologies (LawTech), such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT) and Blockchain. An area already undergoing major innovation is alternative dispute resolution (Alternative Dispute Resolution (2017) Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolution), especially automated online dispute resolution (Online Dispute Resolution (2017) Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_dispute_resolution; Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. (2001) Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Wiley, New Jersey). In terms of LawTech, we broadly divide online dispute resolution into (a) Consumer ODR—uses technology to facilitate the resolution of disputes between ecommerce parties, typically online suppliers and consumers; (b) Judicial ODR—covers any means of settling ‘ordinary’ disputes where there is a hearing (using technology) but outside of the courtroom, such as divorce or personal injury cases; and what we refer to as (c) Corporate ODR—the use of technology to manage the resolution of any contractual disputes that may emerge from major multi-partner projects or financial transactions. This paper focuses on ODR and specifically the future use of automating anticipatory Corporate dispute resolution using AI and blockchain technologies. The paper describes the legal sector, and how it is being radically transformed by computer science.

Open access
2 source records
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
European and International Contract Law
Original source
Sep 1, 2017·Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika
352 cites
Blockchain Technology

Purwono Purwono, Alfian Ma’arif, Wahyu Rahmaniar, Qazi Mazhar ul Haq · 6 authors

Blockchain technology has a promising future in a number of industries and enterprises. Formerly connected to virtual currency like Bitcoin, blockchain has evolved into a versatile technology with many applications. In the upcoming years, it is predicted that blockchain will revolutionize a variety of industries, including banking, supply chain management, healthcare, voting systems, and more. The future of blockchain technology depends critically on its ability to increase security and transparency. By providing a decentralized and unchangeable record, eliminating the need for middlemen, and boosting participant confidence, blockchain promotes secure and traceable transactions. This transparency has the potential to transform whole industries by reducing fraud, streamlining processes, and increasing output. Blockchain also has the power to change financial systems. Blockchain-based smart contracts facilitate faster, more efficient transactions by automating and enforcing contractual agreements without the need for middlemen. By enabling speedier cross-border transactions, reducing costs, and boosting financial inclusion, tokenization and blockchain-based digital currencies have the potential to overturn conventional banking institutions. Blockchain’s key attributes, including decentralization, transparency, immutability, and security, make it a desirable choice for a range of organizations. Cross-border payments, trade finance, and smart contracts are just a few of the financial sector processes that blockchain technology has the potential to enhance and automate, lowering costs and increasing productivity. Additionally, the tamper-resistance of blockchain technology can boost transaction security and reliability, allowing for a wider use in traditional financial institutions. Outside of the financial industry, blockchain technology has a lot of promise, particularly in industries like supply chain management, healthcare, energy, intellectual property, and governance. By enabling transparent and traceable transactions, blockchain may improve supply chain efficiency, ensure product authenticity, and boost customer trust. By facilitating the secure exchange of patient data and research data, the decentralized nature of blockchain technology can enhance data security, interoperability, and privacy in the healthcare sector. A more decentralized and sustainable energy ecosystem may be supported by blockchain technology through peer-to-peer energy exchange, grid management, and monitoring of renewable energy certificates in the energy sector. Additionally, blockchain technology has the potential to transform decentralized governance structures, voting procedures, intellectual property rights, and digital identity management. By allowing people to own and manage their digital identities, blockchain can enhance privacy and reduce identity theft. Blockchain-based voting systems can offer transparency, security, and verifiability, thereby increasing voter turnout and public trust in democratic institutions. Blockchain can also enable the secure and transparent management of intellectual property rights, fostering author credit and just compensation.

Open access
38 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Intellectual Property and Patents
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Jun 15, 2017·Informatik-Spektrum
17 cites
Smart Contracts

Daniel Hellwig, Goran Karlic, Arnd Huchzermeier

This chapter looks beyond the novelty of self-executing ‘smart contracts’ in blockchain networks and explores developments against the background fact that commercial parties have, for centuries, used documentary credit to simulate autonomous performance. Blockchain-based smart contracts and documentary credit share three core functionalities which are essential to any effective autonomous performance, analogue or digital—they both (i) act through internalized media of exchange; (ii) operate as closed systems; and (iii) provide means of securing sufficient resources to guarantee contractual performance. Using these three functionalities as a framework, this chapter conducts a comparative analysis of mechanisms for effecting autonomous contractual performance in a commercial setting. From this comparison, a few hypotheses are drawn regarding the potential areas where smart contract technology is more likely to find fruitful application. In particular, the chapter considers potential limitations to applying smart contracts to scenarios beyond digital asset transfers, how dispute resolution mechanisms should be designed to complement (rather impair) the autonomous nature of contractual performance under smart contracts, and potential capital cost implications which might arise in some cases when parties seek to replace human intermediaries with smart contracts.

Open access
34 source records
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
European and International Contract Law
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Original source
Apr 20, 2017·Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
126 cites
Intelligent Contracts and the Construction Industry

Jim Mason

Advances in technology have resulted in a fast changing landscape for construction contracts. Lawyers struggle to keep up with the pace of innovation and the need to provide legal solutions and accommodate new approaches. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has become part of the common parlance in construction notwithstanding limited evidence of its impact on the ground... Intelligent contracts appear as a logical extension to BIM whereby the contractual performance itself becomes automated. However, intelligent contracts work best where they are short term or are of instantaneous effect. This is at odds with the complicated and long-running nature of construction projects. Further, storage constraints, compatibility and reliability issues together with confidentiality and the long term nature of distributed ledgers pose additional problems. The aim of this paper is to present the debate about what could be achieved in the construction industry by the adoption of intelligent contracts. An on-line forum provided the secondary data on which the discussion is based. The objectives are to introduce aspects of technological advancement within commerce generally and to discuss their application in construction. The hypothesis advanced is that certain aspects of the construction contract cannot be fully intelligent and the best that can be achieved in the short to medium term is a semi-automated position. Further, intelligent contracts should be viewed as part of the BIM-led revolution in construction and not separate from it. The recommendation is that incremental advances such as the coding of project management and contract administration data be targeted to provide improved operational efficiency and value savings.

Open access
2 source records
BIM and Construction Integration
Law, logistics, and international trade
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Mar 20, 2017·Business & Information Systems Engineering
1,182 cites
Blockchain

Navneet Kaur, Nidhi Chahal, Ritu Dewan, Shikha Singh · 7 authors

Distributed ledger technology, a method of storing and maintaining the integrity of multiple copies of critical data using a massively redundant network of participating machines, has found a “killer application” in blockchain, a type of distributed ledger. A blockchain consists of sequential blocks that may never be modified or reordered, leaving a public, auditable record that is consistent and highly resistant to tampering and deletion. These qualities make blockchain eminently suitable for its most common use, cryptocurrency, and its occasional variants in the form of cryptocurrency tokens, used to represent ownership or some other right to virtual or physical goods and capabilities. Blockchain also enables smart contracts, discrete bodies of software written to serve both as the memorial and the means of execution of an agreement between parties. Smart contracts can have all the elements of a traditional contract, and as jurisdictions legislate or jurists rule on the fine points of enforceability and the acceptability of smart contracts as traditional contracts, applications in nearly every area of commerce have emerged. Digital lawyers may not need to become software developers, but deepening their understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the technology, developing a keen awareness of the issues at the intersection between code and the law, as well as the law’s readiness in this area, will be of great advantage to them and their clients in this rapidly evolving area at the intersection of technology, commerce and law.

Open access
33 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Big Data and Digital Economy
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Original source
Jan 1, 2017·SSRN Electronic Journal
41 cites
Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Jan 1, 2017·SSRN Electronic Journal
42 cites
Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Original source
Dec 14, 2016·arXiv (Cornell University)
69 cites
Smart Contract Templates: essential requirements and design options

Christopher D. Clack, Vikram A. Bakshi, Lee Braine

Smart Contract Templates support legally-enforceable smart contracts, using operational parameters to connect legal agreements to standardised code. In this paper, we explore the design landscape of potential formats for storage and transmission of smart legal agreements. We identify essential requirements and describe a number of key design options, from which we envisage future development of standardised formats for defining and manipulating smart legal agreements. This provides a preliminary step towards supporting industry adoption of legally-enforceable smart contracts.

Open access
2 source records
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Original source
Aug 2, 2016·arXiv (Cornell University)
179 cites
Smart Contract Templates: foundations, design landscape and research\n directions

Christopher D. Clack, Vikram A. Bakshi, Lee Braine

In this position paper, we consider some foundational topics regarding smart\ncontracts (such as terminology, automation, enforceability, and semantics) and\ndefine a smart contract as an automatable and enforceable agreement. We explore\na simple semantic framework for smart contracts, covering both operational and\nnon-operational aspects, and describe templates and agreements for\nlegally-enforceable smart contracts, based on legal documents. Building upon\nthe Ricardian Contract, we identify operational parameters in the legal\ndocuments and use these to connect legal agreements to standardised code. We\nalso explore the design landscape, including increasing sophistication of\nparameters, increasing use of common standardised code, and long-term research.\n

Open access
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Original source
May 1, 2016·SCRIPTed A Journal of Law Technology & Society
114 cites
Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement

Riikka Koulu

By Riikka Koulu. As cross-border online transactions increase the issue of cross-border dispute resolution and enforcement becomes more and more topical. Disputes arising from e-commerce are seldom taken into the public courts and therefore online dispute resolution (ODR) is becoming a mainstream solution for resolving them. Simultaneously, different applications and possibilities of blockchain technologies such as cryptocurrencies have caught the attention of both computer scientists and legal scholars, increasingly gaining momentum. However, the potential of blockchains reach further than their use as a currency: they can be used for the decentralised execution of programmable contracts known as smart contracts, completely without the need for intermediaries like e-commerce sites, credit card companies or courts. These possibilities have not previously been discussed in relation to dispute resolution. This article provides an introduction to this new technological possibility by examining self-executing smart contracts that utilise novel blockchain technologies. To demonstrate the logic behind smart contracts more concretely, a weather bet (i.e. a bet on what the weather is going to be in a given location) is translated into a programmable smart contract and then discussed in lines of code with further explanations. In addition to this, the author suggests that smart contracts could also be employed for the purposes of dispute resolution, which might provide a solution for the problem of enforcing ODR decisions. Instead of normative analysis, the article provides an introductory analysis of the legal implications that the blockchain technology has outside its application as virtual currency.

Open access
2 source records
Digital Transformation in Law
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Original source
Jan 1, 2016·International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change
39 cites
Cryptocurrency

Siddharth Misra, Vishal Kashyap, Poonacha K.B., Arjun Mukund · 5 authors

Tema ovog rada su kriptovalute. Budući da većina ljudi nije pravodobno upoznata s ovom temom, ovaj rad prikazuje i opisuje kriptovalute te način na koji se upotrjebljuju u svakodnevnom životu. Kriptovalute (eng. cryptocurrency) digitalne su valute dizajnirane kao sredstvo razmjene. Poznate su po tome što su državne agencije i banke isključene iz procesa razmjene. Kriptovalute omogućuju jednostavnu, jeftinu i brzu transakciju na području cijeloga svijeta. Trenutno najisplativije kriptovalute su Bitcoin i Ethereum, a u radu je opisana njihova korisnost, prednosti i mane. Budući da se Bitcoinu predviđa uspješna budućnost i sve je prisutniji i prihvatljiviji na tržištu, u radu su navedeni primjeri iz Hrvatske koji to potvrđuju. Sve veći broj poduzetnika odlučuje se za uvođenje kriptovaluta. U primjerima je obuhvaćen širok spektar djelatnosti, od frizerskih usluga, preko raznih tvrtki koji se bave prodajom računalne opreme, ugostiteljskih usluga preko mogućnosti brzog i lakog podizana gotovine na kripto bankomatima pa sve do plaćanja komunalnih usluga, pa čak i humanitarno djelovanje. Mnogi smatraju da su kriptovalute samo sinonim za prijevare i pranje novca, no programeri tvrde da su kriptovalute samo jedna vrsta tehnologije, alat koji sam po sebi ne može biti ni dobar ni loš, ovisno o tome za što se koristi. Autor ovoga rada proveo je istraživanje o tome kako se može besplatno započeti trgovanje kriptovalutama te je anketom ispitao stavove ispitanika o implementaciji kriptovaluta u društvu.

Open access
23 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Cryptography and Data Security
Original source
Jan 1, 2016·SSRN Electronic Journal
121 cites
The Law of Smart Contracts

Max Raskin

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Digital Transformation in Law
European and International Contract Law
Original source
Dec 8, 2015·Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
44 cites
Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin

Pietro Ortolani

The enforcement of outcomes in online dispute resolution (ODR) is a delicate problem. Since disputes arising out of e-commerce transactions are typically low in value, the traditional channels of coercive enforcement are often not a viable option. The article argues that the Bitcoin system can be used as a source of inspiration to devise new models of self-enforcement. The article describes the legal framework of ODR and argues that the goal of self-enforcement can be attained through the use of technology. It then describes the relevant features of the Bitcoin system, underlining its potential as a new forum for the expression of private autonomy. It then investigates the features of Bitcoin adjudication, before arguing that Bitcoin must be regarded as an original and self-contained system of dispute resolution, whose characteristics can be used to theorise new models of self-enforcement. Next, it compares four alternative models of self-enforcement, two of which take Bitcoin adjudication as an example. Finally, it puts forth recommendations for all actors involved in the implementation of self-enforcing ODR mechanisms and argues that different models should be left free to compete.

Open access
3 source records
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Original source