The purpose of the present article is to gain an understanding of the opportunities and difficulties created by the introduction and development of the practice of network (smart) contracts. Our research methodology is based on a holistic set of principles and methods of scholarly analysis employed by modern legal science. It uses a dialectical method involving both general approaches (structural system method, formal logical method, analysis and synthesis of individual elements, individual features of concepts, abstraction, generalization, etc.) and particular methods (legal technical, systematic, comparative, historical, and grammatical methods, method of the unity of theory and practice, etc.). We analyze the views of lawyers and other specialists from Russia and abroad, legislative innovations in the field of digital technologies, the practice of blockchain-based smart contracts, and the main risks (whether legal, technological, operational, or criminogenic) of smart contracts for economic activities with a study of their causes. In the present-day situation, it is necessary to move from the legal definition of the smart contract and its legal and technological characteristics, advantages and disadvantages to the implementation of startups in a wide range of areas, especially business, public regulation, and social relations. Scholarly and information support for such processes will contribute to the development of industry, public administration and digital technology applications to improve the life of individual citizens and society as a whole. The introduction of smart contracts does not require the adoption of new laws or regulations. Instead, one should adapt and, possibly, modify existing legal principles at the legislative and judicial levels to pave the way for the use of smart contracts and other new technologies. The system of contract law provides a sufficient framework for regulating transactions without the introduction of any new legal categories. We propose approaches to the legal definition of the smart contract and identify a set of problems that must be solved at the legislative and technical legal levels in order to implement smart contracts effectively in different spheres of life.
For several years, almost everyone has been talking about blockchain. The underlying distributed ledger technology has become (in)famous as the technology behind cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether. But what about blockchain and intellectual property like patents and copyright? Could this technology be used for the protection and enforcement of such rights? Which role can smart contracts play in this regard? This article focuses on questions concerning the requirements for provingthe protection of technical inventions as well as on the administration and exploitation of intellectual property rights. The latter could play an important rolefor intellectual property, which has not been registered or is not subject to registration, such as copyright. For trade secrets, a blockchain could be a useful tool for providing appropriate confidentiality measures. Last but not least, smart contracts in particular could be involved in connection with the transfer and, even more importantly, the licensing of intellectual property and mainly of software.
Evidence management is crucial in the field of forensic science. Evidences obtained from a crime scene are important in solving the case and delivering justice to the parties involved. Hence, protecting these evidences from any form of alteration is of utmost important. Chain of Custody is the process which maintains the integrity of evidence. Inability to maintain the chain of custody will make the evidence inadmissible in court, eventually leading to the case dismissal. Digitalization of forensic evidence management system is a need of time as it is an environment friendly model. Blockchains are digitally distributed ledgers of transactions signed cryptographically in chronological order that are sorted into blocks and is completely open to anyone in the blockchain network. Hyperledger Fabric is a consortium blockchain framework created by the Linux foundation and is mainly used for enterprise use. Based on the concept of Hyperledger Fabric, present study aimed to create a framework and further propose an algorithm to implement Blockchain Technology to digitalize forensic evidence management system and maintain Chain of Custody.
With the development of technology innovations it becomes possible to regulate relations between the parties through smart-contracts. Smart contracts are based on blockchain technology, which is a decentralized distributed ledger system consisting of a chain of computers connected to one server. This technology is so convenient for parties to the treaty, because it gives the participants of smart contract an opportunity to exchange property values without intermediaries such as notaries, guarantors, etc. It is to be noted that smart contracts are not resolved in most countries. Now in many countries, however, there is a formation of the legislative framework in the sphere of the smart contracts by considering a smart contract like an element of a legal transaction with the introduction of blockchain technology, which is explained by the desire to keep up with technical progress. There were some attempts in the International Private Law to conclude smart-contracts. As is well known the traditional question in the International Private Law is a conflict of law that is so popular now for smart contracts that using blockchain technology involve multiple jurisdictions. That’s why the choice-of-law issues in the regulation of relevant relations, including the projection concerning choice of law in those States where super-priority is adjusted for those innovations, requires further research. In this article the authors have analyzed the concept and essence of smart contracts (Smart Contracts), researched the problem of conflict of law, applicable to such contracts. In particular analysis focused specifically on the Rome I Regulation in the aspects of smart contract management. The paper also touches upon problematic aspects related to choice of law applicable to the smart contracts in Ukraine. In conclusion, the prospects for the use of smart contracts in International Private Law.
The aim of a contract is to provide legal certainty to the parties and to define the toolkit of remedies available in the event of a dispute. In modern business practice, the ultimate goal of a contract is to eliminate or reduce the possibility of legal liability; the issue of efficiency and effectiveness of contract implementation is not the primary goal. The impact of technology in the concept of contract creation, implementation and control has redefined the traditional approach which implies that contracts are written by "lawyers for lawyers". The contemporary practice bears witness of the correlation and intertwining of law and technology in a way that exceeds the scope and goes beyond the relationship between the regulator and the regulated object; in effect, technology becomes an organic element of law, its origin, application, control and development. A smart contract, as an example of the influence of technology in the field of regulating contractual relations, automatically activates the obligation, in accordance with the terms and conditions that the parties agreed upon and entered in the program code. Based on the Blockchain technology, a smart contract profoundly changes the paradigm of trust in a person with the paradigm of trust in a program code. The basic limitation of smart contracts is their capacity to convert complex legal concepts into the computational form readable by a program code. Thus, they cannot function in a pure form (entirely defined by a program code). The code needs to be complemented by text. The legal form that should bridge the gap between the smart contract and the traditional contract is the Ricardian agreement. The Ricardian contract uses the best from both worlds. On the one hand, the key terms of the contract are in software-readable program code format; on the other hand, more complex provisions that are not suitable for conversion into an algorithm are contained in additional instructions that are part of the Ricardian agreement. In terms of legal obligation, the Ricardian contract reflects exclusively and only the intention of the parties, without implying a legal obligation that could be formally established only by concluding the intended future agreement. As such, the Ricardian contract can play the role of a guide for the interpretation of the prospective agreement, which gives it a certain value in case of a dispute.
Legal norms contained in text-driven contracts (as well as in statutes and bylaws), which are written in natural language, can be subject of algorithmic conversion in certain phases of the contract circle (implementation, monitoring, control, interpretation). The application of the blockchain concept as a structural pattern opens the possibility of creating a code-driven contract with automated execution: a "smart" contract. Algorithmization is understood as a process which enables the text of the contract to be translated into a format that is understandable to software developers. To this end, the use of the following methodologies is proposed: design of a pseudocode, application of formal logic symbols and the use of flowcharts. Successful conversion of legal prose into a code calls for cooperation between lawyers and programmers. The framework of that cooperation is the establishment of the so-called "Legal Expert System" (LES). Originally conceived by lawyers, LES is a program which allows the algorithm to solve the problem of contract execution. Contract algorithmization should convert contracts from prose to a code, while preserving contract validity and efficiency. For the time being, smart contracts cannot regulate commercially complex scenarios; thus, the de lege lata application of smart contracts as a complete replacement for traditional (analogous) contracts is excluded. A potential object of algorithmization are the primary instructions aimed at executing the characteristic performance of the contract. Contract algorithmization is an ongoing process, which is here to stay. The significance of this process is indisputable but its scope, dynamics and assumptions are still only partially defined and tested. The necessary condition (but hardly a sufficient one) is to legitimize the conception of a contract as an algorithm in the process of defining contractual provisions. Further development of this concept will depend on the functioning of other elements in the environment where code-driven contracts would be used and, above all, on the commercial response to the entire process of contract algorithmization. In effect, in order to be widely applied, contract algorithmization must become a commercially viable activity.
PSC Business against Corruption under the Commissioner for Rights, Elena V. Prudius
The rapid spread of digital technologies, namely – innovative technologies, has set the trajectories for the development of a new stage in the economy of the information society. Such growth is closely related to the emergence of new ways of doing business, new ways of concluding contracts and fulfilling contractual obligations, new forms of existence of contracts and new contractual structures. Thus, there is a need to form a new regulatory environment that provides a favorable legal regime for the emergence and development of modern technologies, as well as for the implementation of economic activities related to their use. Of particular importance in this case is the conclusion of transactions in electronic form. One of the varieties of such transactions can be called a smart contract, which has long been actively distributed in foreign countries, but is not used so often in the Russian Federation. The main reason for the low number of such «smart» contracts is that the legislator has practically not paid attention to the legal regulation of this category. The purpose of the work is to analyze smart contracts, identify problems in their application and propose solutions to the current situation. The following methods were used: historical, comparative law, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis. The author came to the conclusion that there is no legal definition of smart contracts and the specifics of its conclusion in the current legislation. Cryptocurrency is also closely related to smart contracts, which is also not fully regulated. In this regard, the author suggests ways to solve the identified problems.
The rapid development of the use of information and communication technologies, in particular smart contracts, necessitates legal regulation of the latter. The principle and mechanism of operation of smart contracts are of great legal interest, and although certain programmers the idea is expressed that a reasonable contract is software and is not a legal term, I do not agree with this possible, because a reasonable contract falls under the generally accepted definition of the contract, promotes monetary turnover and has real material consequences for the parties. The purpose of the smart contract is to transfer information and ensure that all participants fulfill the conditions set in the code. The potential of smart contract technology is capable of changing approaches to contract law no less than the advent of computers and the Internet has changed the way lawyers work. Taking into considerationthe diversity of scientific views on the legal nature of the smart contract, the lack of established scientific approaches, the considerable scientific interest of the topic requires its proper theoretical justification.
Despite the ubiquity of cryptocurrency, no international uniform regulatory system exists. State-by-state regulation of cryptocurrencies has problematic implications for cross-border investigations and predictability in application. Moreover, this regulatory framework leaves open opportunities for actors worldwide to violate international sanctions with impunity. This Note posits that an international regulatory framework is necessary to combat the evasion of financial sanctions on practical and theoretical grounds. It further argues that the best way to structure this new framework is through the enactment of a new multilateral treaty. A formal international regulatory mechanism for cryptocurrencies would have numerous benefits, foremost among them limiting the evasion of international sanctions. An international regulatory mechanism would also promote predictability in the regulation of cryptocurrencies. This would in turn entice institutional investors to build out the field of crypto users and encourage stability in an otherwise volatile marketplace. The proposal outlined within this Note goes beyond standard legal justifications for a multilateral mechanism. It drills down into the substantive mechanisms that an effective treaty must include, such as public key cryptography; an international public key directory; prosecution guidelines; and foreign fine credits. The levels of specificity to this end are perhaps uncommon in a typical legal proposal. However, this analysis is essential to explain why a new, multilateral treaty is required. The current structures in place cannot begin to grapple with the complex underlying issues which are so crucial to the regulation of cryptocurrency. The substantive components of the proposed treaty undergird the very reason why a new multilateral treaty is necessary.
Major cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and etherium rely on the computationally expensive and energy inefficient Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to validate transactions and secure their networks. In response to such concerns digital coins that implement more energy efficient algorithms, e.g. Proof of Stake (PoS), have started to grow in popularity and some PoW based coins are planning to switch to PoS. We investigate linkages and transmission of price shocks across fourteen PoW and PoS/Other powered digital assets. PoW cryptocurrencies appear to be more strongly connected within the network of digital coins than are PoS/Other digital currencies. On average PoW coins export more uncertainty to other cryptocurrencies, while assets in both groups import similar levels of risk. PoS/Other cryptocurrency stakeholders need to be aware of the impact that PoW cryptocurrencies can exert on the riskiness of their assets.
Are the technologies advanced enough to replace lawyers and the judiciary in the negotiation and enforcement process? Is it possible for a program code to be a contract that binds the parties named in it? What is a smart contract and what challenges does it pose to the law? The present study aims to clarify and show the advantages and disadvantages of using smart contracts in civil law.
The purpose of this article is to analyze methods, approaches, and tools of distributed ledger technology (DLT) for working with documents in education. The objectives of the article are to analyze problems with the authentication of educational documents, develop new structural solutions using block chain technology, consider two models, and evaluate their use for educational documents. Authentication of educational documents is carried out using state registers, which is a complex and resource-intensive process. There is an increase in the number of forged documents in the world, which calls into question the effectiveness of modern mechanisms. Distributed ledger technology (block chain) is a sustainable technological trend that affects the development and quality of the digital economy. The existence of a mechanism for verifying the authenticity of educational documents that is resistant to malicious manipulation is an urgent task that goes beyond the sphere of education, possible solutions to which are proposed to be considered in this paper. The article provides a brief description of DLT and considers the approach of using the technology to authenticate educational documents. It consists of two main stages: the issue of a digital educational document and its verification. The role of a trusted third party in the issue and validation process is considered. The paper presents the models for issuing and validating digital documents based on distributed ledger technology, which allows one to eliminate the limitations and shortcomings of existing approaches. The effectiveness of the approach based on the proposed models is revealed. The formulated approaches can be applied in various socio-economic areas and public administration to work with similar documents.
In this work author compares smart-contract to letter of credit. Discovering technological and law aspects of smart-contract. The author underlines indivisibility of these aspects, which consolidate in unique symbiosis of digital solutions and law constructions. Moreover, technical and law nature are to be discovered in this paper, particularly, program and law mechanism of smart-contract. Comparing smart-contract to letter of credit, author concludes that smart-contract is one of types of letter of credit as a payment instrument.
The paper carries out a legal analysis of three models of settlements by letters of credit with the use of distributed ledger technology. First, this refers to the model of settlements that uses blockchain as a way of transferring documents under the letter of credit. Second, the author investigates the model of settlements where two smart contracts are used. In the author’s view, such smart contracts should be seen as a way of executing the contracts that, in practice, form the settlement procedure with the use of letters of credit. Third, the most interesting is the settlement model where the payer and the recipient of funds (payee) enter into one smart contract that provides non-cash settlements between them with the use of the P2P service. There is no financial intermediary that organizes non-cash settlements in this settlement model. This difference makes it possible to conclude that settlements similar to settlements with the use of letters by credit via blockchain technology and carried out on the principle of P2P, should be considered as a new form of non-cash settlements. The peculiarity of this form of non-cash settlements is the opportunity given to direct participants of the settlement to fulfil their monetary obligations without using cash and without any assistance of financial intermediaries.
The growing use of smart contracts in a wide range of transactions has raised a deluge of legal issues, including allocation of liability in such transactions. In many circumstances, using smart contracts involves a range of legal risks that might be distributed beyond the contractual parties to other parties, such as the developers of the smart contract code. While smart contracts have the potential to disrupt the current legal and transactional status quo, notorious occurrences such as attacks on Ethereum or Bitcoin platforms highlight the need to properly dissect the issue of liability and rightly apportion liability where it falls. This also includes working on any lapses in the existing legal and transactional framework to cater for these issues. This article sets out to examine the validity of smart contracts in the light of existing contract law principles. It examined the legal regime and development of smart contracts in Nigeria. It further discussed the problem of allocation of liability associated with smart contracts. It made certain propositions on how these issues could be tackled including the amendment of existing legal framework to aptly provide for and regulate the smart contracts era particularly in Nigeria. The doctrinal method of research was employed to dissect the issues raised and discussed in the article. Relevant texts were scrutinized and analyzed to arrive at the findings and recommendations contained in the article.
Summary We provide a high‐level view on topics addressed in scientific articles about regulatory technology (RegTech), with a particular focus on technologies used. For this purpose, we first explore different denominations for RegTech and derive search queries to search relevant literature portals. From the hits of that information retrieval process, we select 55 articles outlining the application of information technology in regulatory affairs with an emphasis on the financial sector. In comparison, we examine the technological scope of 347 RegTech companies and compare our findings with the scientific literature. Our research reveals that ‘compliance management’ is the most relevant topic in practice, and ‘risk management’ is the primary subject in research. The most significant technologies as of today are ‘artificial intelligence’ and distributed ledger technologies such as ‘blockchain’.
The present chapter will look at the possible application of smart contracts in the intellectual property arena in general, but it will specifically discuss mostly copyright solutions, although a few uses apply to different areas of protection. This presents a few challenges, at the time of writing many of the proposals that will be discussed have not yet been implemented, or are in a prototype level, and as such we may have to assume their viability based on nothing other than a few examples that have not been fully tested. Similarly, legal discussions about the blockchain and smart contracts tend to be surrounded by considerable hype, often fuelled by commercial interests, and it is often difficult to separate facts from sales pitches. This is why this work will try to take a more sceptical approach to the phenomenon.
This article analyses the main legal requirements in the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), general data protection regulation (GDPR) and the intersections between privacy laws, genomic data and smart contracts (such as fungible and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The CCPA and GDPR laws impose several restrictions on the storing, accessing, processing and transferring of personal data. This has generated some challenges for lawyers, data processors and business enterprises engaged in blockchain offerings, especially as they pertain to high-risk data sets such as genomic data. The technical features of NFT, distributed storage and wallets to trace and govern genomic (DNA) data sets will allow data donors to establish digital ownership and control in line with privacy laws using ‘programmable privacy smart contracts’. To be legally compliant, the design of blockchain value propositions should include privacy-by-design capabilities in the smart contract coding language itself. This article describes three domains (privacy laws, genomics and NFTs) and begins to explore how data engineers can address the challenges of coding privacy laws, the legal requirements into smart contracts. This current approach focuses on NFTs and genomic data requirements which include the selection of genetic metadata borrowing from developing ERC specifications and their programming logic. Programmable privacy is a unique way to write and design computer code, which can automatically check the legal compliance of the smart contract in a trust-less and decentralised way. We exemplify the approach by describing the conceptual value proposition of Genobank.io, a privacy-preserving genomic data platform.
Abstract This chapter focuses on how machine learning (ML) and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) change the environment of the law, the substance of legal goods, and on the extent to which these changes affect legal protection. ML applications, for example, can decide a person's credit worthiness or employability. Moreover, DLTs can, for instance, self-execute transactions and policies without and beyond the law. One of the main challenges here thus concerns the regulatory effects of these novel technologies and the potential incompatibility of legal protection with techno-regulation (defined as the regulatory effects of a technology, whether or not intended). This challenge will be discussed in terms of automated compliance (‘legal by design’) and technological articulation of fundamental rights (‘legal protection by design’).
With the rapid development of new technologies taking place during the 4th Industrial Revolution, new types of disputes of significant specificity have gradually begun to emerge. Among such cases a special category of cases has been formed by disputes arising from smart contracts based on block chain technology. There are two possible ways to resolve such disputes. Under the first approach, they are subject to consideration by traditional arbitration institutions, guided by the usual rules and guidelines (blockchain arbitration). The second approach involves the need to create innovative applications based on blockchain technology and designed to resolve disputes arising in a digital decentralized environment ( blockchain arbitration). Such applications, in turn, are divided into two groups. The first group consists of projects involving the creation of a special arbitration combining the advantages of international commercial arbitration and blockchain technology; the second group includes projects involving the establishment of a decentralized quasi-judicial system for dispute resolution. The paper attempts to analyze the most interesting projects related to each of the listed groups and assess the prospects of their development. Based on the results of the analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that the implementation of such projects will lead to the emergence of many issues (among which the problem of choice of applicable law, determination of place of arbitration, arbitrability, as well as the possibility of recognition and enforcement of awards made by such arbitral tribunal). Under the influence of new technologies, international commercial arbitration is gaining a new direction of its development. In the future, the development of new technologies will require not only rationalization of existing dispute resolution mechanisms, but also a fundamental rethinking.
Purpose: A burgeoning body of research has described how the blockchain technology may affect the way firms operate within the recording industry which has undergone profound changes due to the dematerialisation of music and the emergence of now consumption habits. The purpose of the paper is to explore both the challenges and the opportunities related to the application of smart contracts and blockchain mechanisms to the recording industry. Approach/Methodology/Design: Based on a review of contributions made to the literature in various fields, we discuss recent developments, relying on several examples and use cases which bring an updated perspective to a topical question. While the blockchain brings interesting solutions in favour of an improved management of copyright data and fees collection, several barriers impede their uptake and large-scale adoption. Findings: We argue that the absence of both technological and regulatory standards, the resistance to change, and the necessary use of cryptocurrency, are all obstacles to a profound transformation of the sector. Practical Implications: To overcome these limitations, we suggest three recommendations that deal with technological standards, cooperative agreements, and international regulation around blockchain. Originality/Value: So far, the literature tends to focus either on blockchain technology or on smart contracts when discussing technological evolution within the recording industry. In this paper, we bring together these two elements which are definitely complementory to each other. Further research efforts are required to investigate in more details the feasibility and relevance of the recommendations we make.