Blockchain Papers

Follow blockchain research across journals, conferences, and preprint repositories.

2,964 papersLast indexed Aug 31, 2026
Search papers

Paper index

2,964 results · page 102 of 124

Clear filters
Jan 1, 2020·Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
26 cites
Information flow between bitcoin and other financial assets

Sangjin Park, Kwahngsoo Jang, Jae‐Suk Yang

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
2 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Cogent Economics & Finance
40 cites
Adaptive market hypothesis: An empirical analysis of time –varying market efficiency of cryptocurrencies

Ambreen Khursheed, Muhammad Abubakr Naeem, Sheraz Ahmed, Faisal Mustafa

This study examines the adaptive market hypothesis (AMH) in relation to time-varying market efficiency by using three tests, namely Generalized Spectral (GS), Dominguez-Lobato (DL) and the automatic portmanteau test (AP) test on four-digital currencies; Bitcoin, Monaro, Litecoin, and Steller over the sample period of 2014–2018. The study applies Jarque-Bera test, ADF test, Ljung-Box statistics and ARCH-LM test for testing normality of returns, stationarity of series, serial correlation and volatility clustering in returns and squared returns of selected cryptocurrencies. Further, the study adopts an extremely important category of martingale difference hypothesis (MDH), which uses non-linear methods of dependencies for identifying changing linear and non-linear dependence in the price movement of currencies. The results indicate that price movements with linear and nonlinear dependences varies over time. Our tests also reveal that Bitcoin, Monaro and Litecoin have the longest efficiency periods. While Steller shows the longest inefficient market period. In view of varying market conditions, the results indicate that different market periods have significant impact on prices fluctuations of cryptocurrencies. Therefore, our findings suggest implementing the adaptive market hypothesis (AMH) as predicting changes in cryptocurrency prices over time must consider the time-varying market conditions for efficient forecasting.

Open access
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Research in International Business and Finance
23 cites
Benefits of sectoral cryptocurrency portfolio optimization

Maria Čuljak, Bojan Tomić, SaĆĄa Ćœiković

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
2 source records
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Frontiers in Blockchain
27 cites
The Cost of Bitcoin Mining Has Never Really Increased

Yo-Der Song, Tomaso Aste

The Bitcoin network is burning a large amount of energy for mining. In this paper, we estimate the lower bound for the global mining energy cost for a period of ten years from 2010 to 2020, taking into account changes in energy costs, improvements in hashing technologies and hashing activity. We estimate energy cost for Bitcoin mining using two methods: Brent Crude oil prices as a global standard and regional industrial electricity prices weighted by the share of hashing activity. Despite a ten-billion-fold increase in hashing activity and a ten-million-fold increase in total energy consumption, we find the cost relative to the volume of transactions has not increased nor decreased since 2010. This is consistent with the perspective that, in order to keep the Blockchain system secure from double spending attacks, the proof or work must cost a sizable fraction of the value that can be transferred through the network. We estimate that in the Bitcoin network this fraction is of the order of 1%.

Open access
5 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Caching and Content Delivery
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Journal of Futures Markets
35 cites
Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Evidence from the options market

Lai T. Hoang, Dirk G. Baur

Abstract This paper studies a large number of bitcoin (BTC) options traded on the options exchange Deribit. We use the trades to calculate implied volatility (IV) and analyze if volatility forecasts can be improved using such information. IV is less accurate than AutoRegressive–Moving‐Average or Heterogeneous Auto‐Regressive model forecasts in predicting short‐term BTC volatility (1 day ahead), but superior in predicting long‐term volatility (7, 10, 15 days ahead). Furthermore, a combination of IV and model‐based forecasts provides the highest accuracy for all forecasting horizons revealing that the BTC options market contains unique information.

Open access
3 source records
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Management Science
35 cites
Why Fixed Costs Matter for Proof-of-Work–Based Cryptocurrencies

Rodney Garratt, Maarten R.C. van Oordt

We assess how the cost structure of cryptocurrency mining affects the response of miners to exchange rate fluctuations and the immutability of cryptocurrency ledgers that rely on proof-of-work. We show that the amount of mining power supplied to currencies that rely on specialized hardware, such as Bitcoin, responds less to adverse exchange rate shocks than other currencies respond to such shocks, a fact that is instrumental to avoiding double-spending attacks. The results may change if mining equipment used for one cryptocurrency can be transferred to another. For smaller currencies with low exchange rate correlation, transferability eliminates the protection that fixed costs provide. Our results weaken doomsday predictions for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with declining block rewards. This paper was accepted by Bruno Biais, Special Section of Management Science: Blockchains and Crypto Economics. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4901 .

Open access
3 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
44 cites
Covid-19 impact on cryptocurrencies: Evidence from a wavelet-based Hurst exponent

María Belén Arouxét, Aurelio F. Bariviera, Verónica Pastor, Victoria Vampa

Cryptocurrency history begins in 2008 as a means of payment proposal. However, cryptocurrencies evolved into a complex ecosystem of high yield speculative assets. Contrary to traditional financial instruments, they are not (mostly) traded in organized, law-abiding venues, but on online platforms, where anonymity reigns. This paper examines the long term memory in return and volatility, using high frequency time series of seven important coins. Our study covers the pre-Covid-19 and the subsequent pandemic period. We use a recently developed method, based on the wavelet transform, which provides more robust estimators of the Hurst exponent. We detect that, during the peak of Covid-19 pandemic (around March 2020), the long memory of returns was only mildly affected. However, volatility suffered a temporary impact in its long range correlation structure. Our results could be of interest for both academics and practitioners.

Open access
4 source records
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Financial Innovation
45 cites
Hybrid data decomposition-based deep learning for Bitcoin prediction and algorithm trading

Yuze Li, Shangrong Jiang, Xuerong Li, Shouyang Wang

Abstract In recent years, Bitcoin has received substantial attention as potentially high-earning investment. However, its volatile price movement exhibits great financial risks. Therefore, how to accurately predict and capture changing trends in the Bitcoin market is of substantial importance to investors and policy makers. However, empirical works in the Bitcoin forecasting and trading support systems are at an early stage. To fill this void, this study proposes a novel data decomposition-based hybrid bidirectional deep-learning model in forecasting the daily price change in the Bitcoin market and conducting algorithmic trading on the market. Two primary steps are involved in our methodology framework, namely, data decomposition for inner factors extraction and bidirectional deep learning for forecasting the Bitcoin price. Results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms other benchmark models, including econometric models, machine-learning models, and deep-learning models. Furthermore, the proposed model achieved higher investment returns than all benchmark models and the buy-and-hold strategy in a trading simulation. The robustness of the model is verified through multiple forecasting periods and testing intervals.

Open access
3 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·E3S Web of Conferences
36 cites
Bitcoin price prediction using ARIMA and LSTM

Yiqing Hua

The goal of this paper is to compare the accuracy of bitcoin price in USD prediction based on two different model, Long Short term Memory (LSTM) network and ARIMA model. Real-time price data is collected by Pycurl from Bitfine. LSTM model is implemented by Keras and TensorFlow. ARIMA model used in this paper is mainly to present a classical comparison of time series forecasting, as expected, it could make efficient prediction limited in short-time interval, and the outcome depends on the time period. The LSTM could reach a better performance, with extra, indispensable time for model training, especially via CPU.

Open access
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
40 cites
Does blockchain patent-development influence Bitcoin risk?

Yang Hu, Yang Hou, Les Oxley, Shaen Corbet

The paper presents a novel analysis specifically investigating as to whether stocks associated with leading blockchain patent-developments influence the price volatility of Bitcoin across multiple time frequencies. It is important to further develop our understanding of the inter-dynamics between this relatively youthful financial product and pricing sensitivities associated with corporate technological advancement. Several interesting results are presented. First, Bitcoin is identified as a volatility receiver instead of a transmitter across all of the time frequencies considered during periods of patent development. Secondly, Microsoft, Mastercard, Intel and Visa contribute the largest volatility spillovers to the Bitcoin market due to patent development. Finally, for most of the companies considered, the calculated spillover effects towards Bitcoin markets are found to increase from the short-term to the long-term. These results suggest the existence of an avenue through which large corporations can influence cryptocurrency prices through their announcements of future technological intentions. The inherent risks incorporated with blockchain and cryptocurrency patent-development should be studied in detail, with particular warnings presented to those companies with no evidence of prior exposure and market knowledge.

Open access
3 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·International Review of Economics & Finance
27 cites
Comovement and instability in cryptocurrency markets

Pierangelo De Pace, Jayant Rao

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
2 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Finance research letters
28 cites
Cryptocurrencies and the low volatility anomaly

Tobias Burggraf, Markus Rudolf

No abstract is available for this record.

Open access
2 source records
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Cogent Economics & Finance
55 cites
Connectedness of cryptocurrencies and gold returns: Evidence from frequency-dependent quantile regressions

Peterson Owusu, Anokye M. Adam, George Tweneboah

This paper explores the symmetric and asymmetric dependency structure of decomposed return series of Gold and eight cryptocurrencies to establish the hedging and diversification potentials of these asset classes. Daily data spanning 30 April 2013 to 18 April 2019 are employed within the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Quantile-in-Quantile regression techniques. Our empirical results provide evidence that cryptocurrencies and Gold can both hedge and diversify for each other at different conditional distributions of their returns. We also find that cryptocurrencies are not purely speculative but can be driven by medium- and long-term fundamentals. In addition, both Gold and cryptocurrencies can be hedge and diversifiers for other traditional asset classes such as crude oil, fiat currencies, and other commodities.

Open access
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·World Economy
44 cites
Analysis of Bitcoin prices using market and sentiment variables

Burcu Kapar, José Olmo

Abstract This paper proposes an empirical model for analysing the dynamics of Bitcoin prices. To do this, we consider a vector error correction model over two overlapping periods: 2010–17 and 2010–19. Price discovery is achieved through the Gonzalo–Granger permanent‐transitory decomposition. The pricing factors are endogenous linear combinations of the S&P 500 index, gold price, a Google search variable associated to Bitcoin and a fear index proxied by the FED Financial Stress Index. Our empirical analysis shows that during the first period, a linear combination of four pricing factors describes the efficient Bitcoin price. The S&P 500 index and Google searches have a positive effect whereas gold prices and the fear index have a negative effect. In contrast, during the second period, the efficient price behaves idiosyncratically and can be only rationalised by individuals' search for information on the cryptocurrency. These findings provide empirical evidence on the presence of a correction in Bitcoin prices during the period 2018–19 uncorrelated to market fundamentals. We also show that standard empirical asset pricing models perform poorly for explaining Bitcoin prices.

Open access
3 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Journal of risk and financial management
41 cites
Does the Hashrate Affect the Bitcoin Price?

Dean Fantazzini, Nikita Kolodin

This paper investigates the relationship between the bitcoin price and the hashrate by disentangling the effects of the energy efficiency of the bitcoin mining equipment, bitcoin halving, and of structural breaks on the price dynamics. For this purpose, we propose a methodology based on exponential smoothing to model the dynamics of the Bitcoin network energy efficiency. We consider either directly the hashrate or the bitcoin cost-of-production model (CPM) as a proxy for the hashrate, to take any nonlinearity into account. In the first examined subsample (01/08/2016–04/12/2017), the hashrate and the CPMs were never significant, while a significant cointegration relationship was found in the second subsample (11/12/2017–24/02/2020). The empirical evidence shows that it is better to consider the hashrate directly rather than its proxy represented by the CPM when modeling its relationship with the bitcoin price. Moreover, the causality is always unidirectional going from the bitcoin price to the hashrate (or its proxies), with lags ranging from one week up to six weeks later. These findings are consistent with a large literature in energy economics, which showed that oil and gas returns affect the purchase of the drilling rigs with a delay of up to three months, whereas the impact of changes in the rig count on oil and gas returns is limited or not significant.

Open access
2 source records
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Digital Finance
30 cites
Cryptocurrency volatility markets

Fabian Woebbeking

Abstract By computing a volatility index (CVX) from cryptocurrency option prices, we analyze this market’s expectation of future volatility. Our method addresses the challenging liquidity environment of this young asset class and allows us to extract stable market implied volatilities. Two alternative methods are considered to compute volatilities from granular intra-day cryptocurrency options data, which spans over the COVID-19 pandemic period. CVX data therefore capture ‘normal’ market dynamics as well as distress and recovery periods. The methods yield two cointegrated index series, where the corresponding error correction model can be used as an indicator for market implied tail-risk. Comparing our CVX to existing volatility benchmarks for traditional asset classes, such as VIX (equity) or GVX (gold), confirms that cryptocurrency volatility dynamics are often disconnected from traditional markets, yet, share common shocks.

Open access
3 source records
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari)
89 cites
Forecasting Bitcoin closing price series using linear regression and neural networks models

Nicola Uras, Lodovica Marchesi, Michele Marchesi, Roberto Tonelli

In this article we forecast daily closing price series of Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum cryptocurrencies, using data on prices and volumes of prior days. Cryptocurrencies price behaviour is still largely unexplored, presenting new opportunities for researchers and economists to highlight similarities and differences with standard financial prices. We compared our results with various benchmarks: one recent work on Bitcoin prices forecasting that follows different approaches, a well-known paper that uses Intel, National Bank shares and Microsoft daily NASDAQ closing prices spanning a 3-year interval and another, more recent paper which gives quantitative results on stock market index predictions. We followed different approaches in parallel, implementing both statistical techniques and machine learning algorithms: the Simple Linear Regression (SLR) model for uni-variate series forecast using only closing prices, and the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model for multivariate series using both price and volume data. We used two artificial neural networks as well: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Long short-term memory (LSTM). While the entire time series resulted to be indistinguishable from a random walk, the partitioning of datasets into shorter sequences, representing different price "regimes", allows to obtain precise forecast as evaluated in terms of Mean Absolute Percentage Error(MAPE) and relative Root Mean Square Error (relativeRMSE). In this case the best results are obtained using more than one previous price, thus confirming the existence of time regimes different from random walks. Our models perform well also in terms of time complexity, and provide overall results better than those obtained in the benchmark studies, improving the state-of-the-art.

Open access
3 source records
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Quantitative Finance and Economics
65 cites
Forecasting the movements of Bitcoin prices: an application of machine learning algorithms

Hakan Pabuçcu, Serdar Ongan, AyƟe Ongan

Cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, are one of the most controversial and complex technological innovations in today's financial system. This study aims to forecast the movements of Bitcoin prices at a high degree of accuracy. To this aim, four different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are applied, namely, the Support Vector Machines (<i>SVM</i>), the Artificial Neural Network (<i>ANN</i>), the NaĂŻ ve Bayes (<i>NB)</i> and the Random Forest (<i>RF</i>) besides the logistic regression (LR) as a benchmark model. In order to test these algorithms, besides existing continuous dataset, discrete dataset was also created and used. For the evaluations of algorithm performances, the <i>F</i> statistic, accuracy statistic, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Root Absolute Error (RAE) metrics were used. The <i>t</i> test was used to compare the performances of the SVM, ANN, NB and RF with the performance of the LR. Empirical findings reveal that, while the <i>RF</i> has the highest forecasting performance in the continuous dataset, the <i>NB</i> has the lowest. On the other hand, while the <i>ANN</i> has the highest and the <i>NB</i> the lowest performance in the discrete dataset. Furthermore, the discrete dataset improves the overall forecasting performance in all algorithms (models) estimated.

Open access
2 source records
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Original source
Jan 1, 2020·Defence and Peace Economics
71 cites
Jumps in Geopolitical Risk and the Cryptocurrency Market: The Singularity of Bitcoin

Elie Bouri, Rangan Gupta, Xuan Vinh Vo

Are price discontinuities in cryptocurrencies jointly related to large swings in geopolitical risk? This is a relevant question to answer given recent news from the press that Bitcoin’s price jumps are driven by jumps in the level of geopolitical risk index. To answer this question, we examine first the jump incidence of daily returns for Bitcoin and other leading cryptocurrencies and then study the co-jumps between cryptocurrencies and the geopolitical risk index using logistic regressions. Our dataset is at the daily frequency and covers the period 30 April 2013 to 31 October 2019. The results show that the price behaviour of all cryptocurrencies under study is jumpy but only Bitcoin jumps are dependent on jumps in the geopolitical risk index. This revealed evidence of significant co-jumps for the case of Bitcoin only nicely complements previous studies arguing that Bitcoin is a hedge against geopolitical risk.

Open access
3 source records
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Original source