From Code to Norm: A Legal Philosophy Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain in the Digital Legal System

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain technologies has fundamentally transformed the normative foundations, authority structures, and legitimacy of contemporary legal systems. While these technologies are commonly portrayed as instruments for enhancing efficiency and legal certainty, their increasing integration into legal decision-making raises profound philosophical questions concerning the nature of law, justice, and human agency. This article critically examines how AI and blockchain reshape legal normativity through the lens of legal philosophy. Employing a normative juridical methodology supported by conceptual and philosophical approaches, the study analyzes the implications of algorithmic decision-making and decentralized technological infrastructures for the evolution of legal authority. The findings demonstrate a paradigmatic shift from human-centered normative reasoning toward computational rationality grounded in algorithmic logic. AI replaces interpretative legal reasoning with probabilistic prediction, privileging statistical inference over moral deliberation. Simultaneously, blockchain institutionalizes automated legal enforcement through smart contracts, thereby minimizing interpretative discretion and limiting the contextual flexibility traditionally required to achieve substantive justice. These developments contribute to the emergence of what this article conceptualizes as post-human legal normativity, in which legal authority increasingly resides within technological systems rather than human reasoning and institutional judgment. The study argues that this transformation generates significant challenges to justice, transparency, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. The growing reliance on algorithmic authority risks reducing law to a technical mechanism detached from its ethical and normative foundations. Consequently, the philosophy of law must be reconstructed to reaffirm the centrality of human agency in legal governance and to ensure that emerging technologies function as instruments serving legal values rather than autonomous sources of legal authority.