Operator-Theoretic Collapse of Cryptographic Hardness: Birman-Schwinger Instability and Zero-Knowledge Witnesses

Abstract

Recent advancements, specifically the 2026 whitepaper by Google Quantum AI, Stanford University, and the Ethereum Foundation (arXiv:2603.28846), have demonstrated the resource feasibility of breaking secp256k1 elliptic curve cryptography using fault-tolerant quantum computation (≤ 1200 logical qubits and ≤ 90 million Toffoli gates). While their work validates this capability via zero-knowledge STARK proofs without disclosing explicit circuits, we provide the continuous operator-theoretic framework that explains the exact physical collapse mechanism underlying their discrete resource results. By modeling cryptographic hardness as a stable, invariant computational manifold, we show that quantum vulnerability is a manifestation of a Birman-Schwinger instability. We prove that, within this model, the introduction of a transverse quantum operator (e.g., Shor's algorithm implemented via Quantum Phase Estimation) forces a resolvent singularity in the classical generator when the resource perturbation parameter crosses a critical threshold (μ_c). We establish a strict Hardness Phase Transition, demonstrating that cryptographic security is equivalent to the point 1 remaining outside the spectrum of the Birman-Schwinger kernel. Furthermore, we formalize zero-knowledge proofs (such as the Groth16-wrapped STARK artifacts published by Babbush et al.) as highly constrained Boolean projectors. We show that these proofs trigger an epistemic spectral collapse via Zeno stabilization, certifying the non-invertible regime without decohering the raw computational state into the public domain. The manuscript includes an exact analytic toy model demonstrating bound-state collapse into the continuum, explicitly mapping the destruction of exponential cryptographic isolation to a polynomial scattering state. This formalization transitions cryptographic failure from a domain of discrete computational estimates to a continuous framework of operator-theoretic necessity.