Corporate Bitcoin Holdings: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sectoral Risk, Regulatory Influence, and Decentralized Governance
Abstract
The integration of Bitcoin into corporate treasuries constitutes a critical strategic choice, motivated by its capacity to bolster liquidity and serve as an inflation hedge, while simultaneously being encumbered by pronounced financial volatility and regulatory ambiguity. This investigation examines sectoral variations in Bitcoin adoption, with particular attention to the manner in which financial risks, regulatory structures, and decentralized governance mechanisms shape corporate conduct across the technology, cryptocurrency mining, retail, healthcare, and e-commerce sectors. Drawing on a cross-sectional dataset encompassing 102 publicly traded firms collectively holding 1,001,861 BTC, the analysis employs MAD-based volatility, Firth logistic regression incorporating a U.S. regulatory dummy to account for the BITCOIN Act of 2025, and heatmap visualization to evaluate risk profiles and adoption patterns. Results demonstrate marked sectoral disparities: the technology and mining sectors command predominant holdings yet confront heightened risk exposure, whereas retail and healthcare sectors proceed with greater caution, guided by considerations of cost-value efficiency and regulatory adherence. The U.S. regulatory dummy is significant, indicating the BITCOIN Act facilitates high Bitcoin adoption, while recent transactional activity is marginally significant. The heatmap accentuates the technology sector’s pre-eminence in aggregate Bitcoin reserves and illuminates the differential influence of regulatory frameworks in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Anchored in Institutional Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model, and Transaction Cost Economics, the study advances the field by quantifying sector-specific risks and visually representing regulatory impacts, thereby furnishing actionable insights for treasury risk management and regulatory policy formulation within a decentralized financial ecosystem.
Community
0 commentsNo discussion yet
Be the first to share a question or observation.