Verifiable Consent in Distributed Systems via AI-Governed Identity and Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Abstract

Distributed systems can verify whether a transaction or state transition is valid, yet they often cannot establish whether the underlying action was authorized under a meaningful, current, and context-specific expression of consent. This limitation becomes increasingly significant as autonomous software agents, artificial intelligence systems, decentralized applications, and connected devices act across organizational and technical boundaries. This article presents a nonproprietary framework for verifiable consent in distributed systems through AI-assisted identity governance and recursive zero-knowledge proofs. The framework represents consent as a structured, machine-verifiable authorization object containing the consenting subject, requesting actor, permitted action, contextual constraints, validity period, policy version, and revocation state. A bounded AI-governance layer evaluates requests against explicit policies and contextual evidence while remaining subordinate to deterministic rules, human-defined constraints, and auditable decision procedures. Approved authorization statements are transformed into privacy-preserving cryptographic proofs, allowing a verifier to confirm that relevant consent and policy conditions were satisfied without requiring disclosure of the underlying identity attributes, private data, or complete policy record. To support high-volume environments, individual proofs may be recursively composed into succinct aggregate proofs. This construction separates expensive proof generation from efficient downstream verification and provides a basis for scalable authorization auditing across distributed infrastructure. The article defines the system model, consent lifecycle, trust assumptions, proof relationships, revocation requirements, and principal security properties, including authorization soundness, privacy preservation, replay resistance, policy-version integrity, and revocation safety. It also analyzes the architectural tradeoffs associated with AI reasoning, cryptographic proving costs, governance design, key management, and interoperability. The proposed framework does not disclose implementation-specific circuits, source code, model configurations, deployment topology, or proprietary protocol parameters. Instead, it establishes a general research foundation for treating consent as a verifiable computational primitive. Potential applications include decentralized identity, autonomous agents, regulated data exchange, financial services, healthcare information systems, Internet of Things networks, and cross-platform digital authorization.